Drivetrain M62 SC on the MINI is reality
Originally Posted by spillman
Also if you go with an oversize pulley you are going to lose boost. Less boost less horsepower. I am sure the "overboost" they are talking about is maxing out the factory TMAP sensor.
And as far as 250whp... Well that's the limit of a stock twincharge motor. Reaching that on boost only which just a supercharger... Well I think you proabably will need a set forged pistons to keep up. Just my 2 cents.
And as far as 250whp... Well that's the limit of a stock twincharge motor. Reaching that on boost only which just a supercharger... Well I think you proabably will need a set forged pistons to keep up. Just my 2 cents.
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
You mentioned overboost, what boost levels are you seeing and at what RPMs are you seeing them?
p.s. FWIW, it's 4:30AM and it's 99F outside. Yes, the suns not even up and it's 99F!!! Just gotta love Phoenix.
p.s. FWIW, it's 4:30AM and it's 99F outside. Yes, the suns not even up and it's 99F!!! Just gotta love Phoenix.
The car made 180whp on the dyno Friday, and Brant told me they even stopped at 5k rpms because the numbers just weren't looking stable. They've been tuning M62's on Miatas for over 6 years. Keep in mind, this system is being applied to completely stock Mini. They usually dyno around 150whp and this M62 kit is already showing a 30whp increase untuned. My next plan for this car is a catless header with a larger exhaust. That will open it up to flow even better.
Spider...sorry I missed y'all, ended up having to work yesterday. We'll get up soon, maybe after your car is finished, and have some fun!
Does anybody here think the Gintani Water to Air intercooler/intake manifold would work with this setup and/or be beneficial?
Originally Posted by SpiderX
see the M7 DFIC.....it works very well wo all the extra plumbing..... the DFIC is the best thing to come along in a long time...... the 62 will be another break through....
All due respect my friend. But 22psi is the limit of the factory pistons. Go above that and you have broken ringlands.
I am certain that the "62" is no where even close to as efficient as a twincharge setup with a gt2871r. So 250whp is the max for twincharge stock internals. Which would mean you need to subtract a percent of that due to increased drag on the motor from having to spin a larger supercharger.
Also if the DFIC works so well then why do the subaru people not making something like that. Because they realize how much more efficient a front mounted intercooler works. The MINI is no different.
I am certain that the "62" is no where even close to as efficient as a twincharge setup with a gt2871r. So 250whp is the max for twincharge stock internals. Which would mean you need to subtract a percent of that due to increased drag on the motor from having to spin a larger supercharger.
Also if the DFIC works so well then why do the subaru people not making something like that. Because they realize how much more efficient a front mounted intercooler works. The MINI is no different.
Originally Posted by Mini Fireman
Does anybody here think the Gintani Water to Air intercooler/intake manifold would work with this setup and/or be beneficial?
Originally Posted by Major Mini
I spoke with Brant at BR Performance Friday and he told me about the dyno results. With the M62 and a stock pulley for that blower, the car made 23psi of boost. Way too much for the stock engine. Brant is calculating the correct size for a larger pulley and Dave will make it tomorrow. Supposed to go to the dyno on Tuesday now. Yes the larger pulley will drop boost therefore decreasing heat while also reducing some drag on the engine to drive the blower. The cooler/denser air charge should add some hp as well. They are still looking for it to make around 210whp with everything properly tuned.
The car made 180whp on the dyno Friday, and Brant told me they even stopped at 5k rpms because the numbers just weren't looking stable. They've been tuning M62's on Miatas for over 6 years. Keep in mind, this system is being applied to completely stock Mini. They usually dyno around 150whp and this M62 kit is already showing a 30whp increase untuned. My next plan for this car is a catless header with a larger exhaust. That will open it up to flow even better.
Spider...sorry I missed y'all, ended up having to work yesterday. We'll get up soon, maybe after your car is finished, and have some fun!
The car made 180whp on the dyno Friday, and Brant told me they even stopped at 5k rpms because the numbers just weren't looking stable. They've been tuning M62's on Miatas for over 6 years. Keep in mind, this system is being applied to completely stock Mini. They usually dyno around 150whp and this M62 kit is already showing a 30whp increase untuned. My next plan for this car is a catless header with a larger exhaust. That will open it up to flow even better.
Spider...sorry I missed y'all, ended up having to work yesterday. We'll get up soon, maybe after your car is finished, and have some fun!
They were considering using a water to air intercooler for this application, but decided to use the stock TMIC for simplicity and cost effectiveness. When properly tuned the M62 shouldn't create as much heat as the 45. I've heard water to air intercoolers aren't as effecient for track use and extended periods of hard driving.
Originally Posted by spillman
HUH??? I'm a little confused here. If you can pick up horsepower from a larger pulley then why do so many vendors sell the reduction pulley? 

Originally Posted by spillman
All due respect my friend. But 22psi is the limit of the factory pistons. Go above that and you have broken ringlands.
I am certain that the "62" is no where even close to as efficient as a twincharge setup with a gt2871r. So 250whp is the max for twincharge stock internals. Which would mean you need to subtract a percent of that due to increased drag on the motor from having to spin a larger supercharger.
Also if the DFIC works so well then why do the subaru people not making something like that. Because they realize how much more efficient a front mounted intercooler works. The MINI is no different.
I am certain that the "62" is no where even close to as efficient as a twincharge setup with a gt2871r. So 250whp is the max for twincharge stock internals. Which would mean you need to subtract a percent of that due to increased drag on the motor from having to spin a larger supercharger.
Also if the DFIC works so well then why do the subaru people not making something like that. Because they realize how much more efficient a front mounted intercooler works. The MINI is no different.
Originally Posted by Major Mini
yes indeedy...check this out http://www.automotive.eaton.com/prod...argers/M45.asp
re the 45 vs 62....the reduction pulley even the stock pulley is too much for the stock engine..... on my car they will recompute and figure best size.... the great news is that you should be able to get nice gains with easy integration..... my car was nightmare to get that kind of power....search through alll the posts and miscues in the non synergistic parts....subtraction by addition...... those who have done a lot know exactly what i am talking about
Originally Posted by Major Mini
With the M62 and a stock pulley for that blower, the car made 23psi of boost.
Originally Posted by SpiderX
I was just thinking "your up early" or "still up".
Originally Posted by spillman
HUH??? I'm a little confused here. If you can pick up horsepower from a larger pulley then why do so many vendors sell the reduction pulley? 

-- Johan
Half of the equation is being forgotten....
IAT, along with boost, determin available power (all else being the same).....
Some one posted the 62 moves 30% more air, so about at 30% oversize pulley will give same volume rates as stock, with less heating, so it would generate a bit more power than the stock set up.... Anyway, you can use that as a limit for the oversize pulley..... a 15%-20% oversize might be a good place to start.....
Have fun!
Matt
Some one posted the 62 moves 30% more air, so about at 30% oversize pulley will give same volume rates as stock, with less heating, so it would generate a bit more power than the stock set up.... Anyway, you can use that as a limit for the oversize pulley..... a 15%-20% oversize might be a good place to start.....
Have fun!
Matt
Originally Posted by SpiderX
sorry I missed you as well...got to ride in the car and it is very nice.....
re the 45 vs 62....the reduction pulley even the stock pulley is too much for the stock engine..... on my car they will recompute and figure best size.... the great news is that you should be able to get nice gains with easy integration..... my car was nightmare to get that kind of power....search through alll the posts and miscues in the non synergistic parts....subtraction by addition...... those who have done a lot know exactly what i am talking about
re the 45 vs 62....the reduction pulley even the stock pulley is too much for the stock engine..... on my car they will recompute and figure best size.... the great news is that you should be able to get nice gains with easy integration..... my car was nightmare to get that kind of power....search through alll the posts and miscues in the non synergistic parts....subtraction by addition...... those who have done a lot know exactly what i am talking about

Mikey
Originally Posted by Johan
Are you serious?? I'm pretty sure a m62 maybe move more air than a m45. So the same size pulley would move more air on the m62...perhaps? Therefor a larger pulley on a m62 can theoretically produce more boost or equal to a smaller pulley on m45...I thought that you twin charged guys had all this figured out???
-- Johan
-- JohanAnd yes I do have this figured out.
DIY Kit
[I asked Dave if he considered his design to be a DIY and he said absolutely that is the goal once the front is off he can put it on in about 1 1/2 hr. [/quote]
I stumbled on to this thread and have been reading evey page for the past 1.75 hrs when I got to the above statement oh my Gawd!!! My compuscreen was covered w/sticky stuff.
I am SOLD!!!! The beauty of this kit is that you can later twin charge it if you want to get crazy.
Shoot! I can't find any towels to clean my screen off.
P.S. the sticky stuff is soda
I stumbled on to this thread and have been reading evey page for the past 1.75 hrs when I got to the above statement oh my Gawd!!! My compuscreen was covered w/sticky stuff.
I am SOLD!!!! The beauty of this kit is that you can later twin charge it if you want to get crazy.
Shoot! I can't find any towels to clean my screen off.
P.S. the sticky stuff is soda
Originally Posted by spillman
Yes you will make more boost than on a M45. But you will not make more horserpower by going from stock size to oversize.
And yes I do have this figured out.
And yes I do have this figured out.
Originally Posted by ChiliCooperS
So were talking about an oversize pulley here... So I'll have to sell the M7 pullies I'll recieve here in... 4 days?
Mikey

Mikey
Originally Posted by Johan
Ok so if a oversize pulley on a m62 is making (for example) 18 lbs of boost, that's not more HP than a stock pulley m45???


A larger pulley spins the supercharger slower producing less boost. A smaller pulley (the reduction pulley that everyone sells) generates more boost.






