Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain M62 SC on the MINI is reality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #201  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by spillman
Also if you go with an oversize pulley you are going to lose boost. Less boost less horsepower. I am sure the "overboost" they are talking about is maxing out the factory TMAP sensor.

And as far as 250whp... Well that's the limit of a stock twincharge motor. Reaching that on boost only which just a supercharger... Well I think you proabably will need a set forged pistons to keep up. Just my 2 cents.
All due respect.... your not reading..... my car is hardly with "just a SC" it has what I think is the whole menu of available mods....
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #202  
Major Mini's Avatar
Major Mini
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
You mentioned overboost, what boost levels are you seeing and at what RPMs are you seeing them?

p.s. FWIW, it's 4:30AM and it's 99F outside. Yes, the suns not even up and it's 99F!!! Just gotta love Phoenix.
I spoke with Brant at BR Performance Friday and he told me about the dyno results. With the M62 and a stock pulley for that blower, the car made 23psi of boost. Way too much for the stock engine. Brant is calculating the correct size for a larger pulley and Dave will make it tomorrow. Supposed to go to the dyno on Tuesday now. Yes the larger pulley will drop boost therefore decreasing heat while also reducing some drag on the engine to drive the blower. The cooler/denser air charge should add some hp as well. They are still looking for it to make around 210whp with everything properly tuned.

The car made 180whp on the dyno Friday, and Brant told me they even stopped at 5k rpms because the numbers just weren't looking stable. They've been tuning M62's on Miatas for over 6 years. Keep in mind, this system is being applied to completely stock Mini. They usually dyno around 150whp and this M62 kit is already showing a 30whp increase untuned. My next plan for this car is a catless header with a larger exhaust. That will open it up to flow even better.

Spider...sorry I missed y'all, ended up having to work yesterday. We'll get up soon, maybe after your car is finished, and have some fun!
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #203  
Mini Fireman's Avatar
Mini Fireman
5th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Locked away
Does anybody here think the Gintani Water to Air intercooler/intake manifold would work with this setup and/or be beneficial?

Originally Posted by SpiderX
see the M7 DFIC.....it works very well wo all the extra plumbing..... the DFIC is the best thing to come along in a long time...... the 62 will be another break through....
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:52 PM
  #204  
spillman's Avatar
spillman
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfordton, NC
All due respect my friend. But 22psi is the limit of the factory pistons. Go above that and you have broken ringlands.

I am certain that the "62" is no where even close to as efficient as a twincharge setup with a gt2871r. So 250whp is the max for twincharge stock internals. Which would mean you need to subtract a percent of that due to increased drag on the motor from having to spin a larger supercharger.

Also if the DFIC works so well then why do the subaru people not making something like that. Because they realize how much more efficient a front mounted intercooler works. The MINI is no different.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:53 PM
  #205  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mini Fireman
Does anybody here think the Gintani Water to Air intercooler/intake manifold would work with this setup and/or be beneficial?
That would be a question for Brant and Dave as they are the co-developers..... as long as it will fit why not..... I am not personally a big fan because of heatsoak issues as well as extra plumbing etc.....
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #206  
spillman's Avatar
spillman
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfordton, NC
Originally Posted by Major Mini
I spoke with Brant at BR Performance Friday and he told me about the dyno results. With the M62 and a stock pulley for that blower, the car made 23psi of boost. Way too much for the stock engine. Brant is calculating the correct size for a larger pulley and Dave will make it tomorrow. Supposed to go to the dyno on Tuesday now. Yes the larger pulley will drop boost therefore decreasing heat while also reducing some drag on the engine to drive the blower. The cooler/denser air charge should add some hp as well. They are still looking for it to make around 210whp with everything properly tuned.

The car made 180whp on the dyno Friday, and Brant told me they even stopped at 5k rpms because the numbers just weren't looking stable. They've been tuning M62's on Miatas for over 6 years. Keep in mind, this system is being applied to completely stock Mini. They usually dyno around 150whp and this M62 kit is already showing a 30whp increase untuned. My next plan for this car is a catless header with a larger exhaust. That will open it up to flow even better.

Spider...sorry I missed y'all, ended up having to work yesterday. We'll get up soon, maybe after your car is finished, and have some fun!
HUH??? I'm a little confused here. If you can pick up horsepower from a larger pulley then why do so many vendors sell the reduction pulley?
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #207  
Major Mini's Avatar
Major Mini
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
They were considering using a water to air intercooler for this application, but decided to use the stock TMIC for simplicity and cost effectiveness. When properly tuned the M62 shouldn't create as much heat as the 45. I've heard water to air intercoolers aren't as effecient for track use and extended periods of hard driving.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #208  
Major Mini's Avatar
Major Mini
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
Originally Posted by spillman
HUH??? I'm a little confused here. If you can pick up horsepower from a larger pulley then why do so many vendors sell the reduction pulley?
Because we're talking about a completely different supercharger that moves more air with each revolution.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #209  
spillman's Avatar
spillman
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfordton, NC
Hmmm... Are they not both Eaton roots type blowers?
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:03 PM
  #210  
Major Mini's Avatar
Major Mini
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
yes indeedy...check this out http://www.automotive.eaton.com/prod...argers/M45.asp
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:04 PM
  #211  
spillman's Avatar
spillman
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfordton, NC
The only way that you would pick up horsepower from less boost would be if the supercharger was pushed over it's limit or the intercooler couldn't keep up.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #212  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
Soul Coughing
5th Gear
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 157
From: Northern Jersey
Originally Posted by spillman
All due respect my friend. But 22psi is the limit of the factory pistons. Go above that and you have broken ringlands.

I am certain that the "62" is no where even close to as efficient as a twincharge setup with a gt2871r. So 250whp is the max for twincharge stock internals. Which would mean you need to subtract a percent of that due to increased drag on the motor from having to spin a larger supercharger.

Also if the DFIC works so well then why do the subaru people not making something like that. Because they realize how much more efficient a front mounted intercooler works. The MINI is no different.
spider's car would be able to make more horsepower with less psi because of the more mods, at least in theory. It will be interesting to see what numbers his car makes!
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:07 PM
  #213  
spillman's Avatar
spillman
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfordton, NC
I could see 10-15 whp higher. But not 40whp higher.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #214  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Major Mini
sorry I missed you as well...got to ride in the car and it is very nice.....

re the 45 vs 62....the reduction pulley even the stock pulley is too much for the stock engine..... on my car they will recompute and figure best size.... the great news is that you should be able to get nice gains with easy integration..... my car was nightmare to get that kind of power....search through alll the posts and miscues in the non synergistic parts....subtraction by addition...... those who have done a lot know exactly what i am talking about
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:20 PM
  #215  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Major Mini
With the M62 and a stock pulley for that blower, the car made 23psi of boost.
That's awesome! I wouldn't have thought it was so much, but it's an impressive amount of boost!


Originally Posted by SpiderX
I was just thinking "your up early" or "still up".
Up early for a training class and just got back. Yesterday it hit 118 and today is supposed to get 115 or so. So we tried to stay outta the heat the best we can.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #216  
Johan's Avatar
Johan
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
From: The Swamp
Originally Posted by spillman
HUH??? I'm a little confused here. If you can pick up horsepower from a larger pulley then why do so many vendors sell the reduction pulley?
Are you serious?? I'm pretty sure a m62 maybe move more air than a m45. So the same size pulley would move more air on the m62...perhaps? Therefor a larger pulley on a m62 can theoretically produce more boost or equal to a smaller pulley on m45...I thought that you twin charged guys had all this figured out??? -- Johan
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #217  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 4
From: Woodside, CA
Half of the equation is being forgotten....

IAT, along with boost, determin available power (all else being the same).....

Some one posted the 62 moves 30% more air, so about at 30% oversize pulley will give same volume rates as stock, with less heating, so it would generate a bit more power than the stock set up.... Anyway, you can use that as a limit for the oversize pulley..... a 15%-20% oversize might be a good place to start.....

Have fun!

Matt
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:49 PM
  #218  
goin440's Avatar
goin440
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Speedway
Speaking of oversize pulleys....

My brother works with a guy that has an alcohol tractor puller. 3000hp and 60% overdrive SC pulley(s-?). Yeah, 60%.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #219  
ChiliCooperS's Avatar
ChiliCooperS
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by SpiderX
sorry I missed you as well...got to ride in the car and it is very nice.....

re the 45 vs 62....the reduction pulley even the stock pulley is too much for the stock engine..... on my car they will recompute and figure best size.... the great news is that you should be able to get nice gains with easy integration..... my car was nightmare to get that kind of power....search through alll the posts and miscues in the non synergistic parts....subtraction by addition...... those who have done a lot know exactly what i am talking about
So were talking about an oversize pulley here... So I'll have to sell the M7 pullies I'll recieve here in... 4 days?

Mikey
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 02:13 PM
  #220  
spillman's Avatar
spillman
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfordton, NC
Originally Posted by Johan
Are you serious?? I'm pretty sure a m62 maybe move more air than a m45. So the same size pulley would move more air on the m62...perhaps? Therefor a larger pulley on a m62 can theoretically produce more boost or equal to a smaller pulley on m45...I thought that you twin charged guys had all this figured out??? -- Johan
Yes you will make more boost than on a M45. But you will not make more horserpower by going from stock size to oversize.

And yes I do have this figured out.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #221  
Minian's Avatar
Minian
5th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 883
Likes: 2
DIY Kit

[I asked Dave if he considered his design to be a DIY and he said absolutely that is the goal once the front is off he can put it on in about 1 1/2 hr. [/quote]

I stumbled on to this thread and have been reading evey page for the past 1.75 hrs when I got to the above statement oh my Gawd!!! My compuscreen was covered w/sticky stuff.
I am SOLD!!!! The beauty of this kit is that you can later twin charge it if you want to get crazy.

Shoot! I can't find any towels to clean my screen off.
P.S. the sticky stuff is soda
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #222  
Johan's Avatar
Johan
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
From: The Swamp
Originally Posted by spillman
Yes you will make more boost than on a M45. But you will not make more horserpower by going from stock size to oversize.

And yes I do have this figured out.
Ok so if a oversize pulley on a m62 is making (for example) 18 lbs of boost, that's not more HP than a stock pulley m45???
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #223  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ChiliCooperS
So were talking about an oversize pulley here... So I'll have to sell the M7 pullies I'll recieve here in... 4 days?

Mikey
we don't know yet what the size of the pulley will be for modded/free flowing engines...this is something that Brant is working out and there may be some trial and error
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #224  
sprp85's Avatar
sprp85
6th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 1
From: Ecity.MD
.. come on fellas they said they are working on calculating size of the reduction pulley. let's just wait til tuesday and see what's really happening
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #225  
spillman's Avatar
spillman
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfordton, NC
Originally Posted by Johan
Ok so if a oversize pulley on a m62 is making (for example) 18 lbs of boost, that's not more HP than a stock pulley m45???
What are you talking about? I stated that a larger pulley on the M62 would generate less boost than the stock pulley that comes on the M62. I never said it wouldn't make less horsepower than the M42. I was stating that if they use a larger pulley than they would loose horsepower through out the entire rev range.

A larger pulley spins the supercharger slower producing less boost. A smaller pulley (the reduction pulley that everyone sells) generates more boost.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:06 AM.