JCW Garage Interested in John Cooper Works (JCW) parts for your 1st Generation MINI? This is where JCW upgrades and accessories for the Cooper (R50), Cabrio (R52), and Cooper S (R53) MINIs are discussed.

R53 JCW 210 healthy number?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2016 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
R53 JCW 210 healthy number?

Hi guys,

Been on the dyno today for a remap for my JCW 210 (with GP cooler and ITG filter):

206 hp
240 nm
Rev limit upped 6900 > 7200
(Crank numbers)

I know this dyno reads a bit low, from what i've read, but whatever..
I have the dyno sheet at home, so could post that tomorrow.

Do you guys think this is a healthy number?
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2016 | 11:39 AM
  #2  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Using their calculations, i should have 170 hp on the wheels, i honestly thought it would make 180 at least.
Quess i was wrong..

They did the dyno test with the hood opened up, does someone know if this makes a difference for the cooling/intake charge?

Are there any things i should check?

Thanks,
Otto
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2016 | 11:52 AM
  #3  
gsfent's Avatar
gsfent
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by DutchMini
Using their calculations, i should have 170 hp on the wheels, i honestly thought it would make 180 at least.
Quess i was wrong..

They did the dyno test with the hood opened up, does someone know if this makes a difference for the cooling/intake charge?

Are there any things i should check?

Thanks,
Otto
You don't say what kind of dyno, but almost take measurements at the wheels. 206 at the wheels would be a reasonably well built engine. What kind of dyno did you use?


Regards,
Jerry
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2016 | 04:13 PM
  #4  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gsfent
You don't say what kind of dyno, but almost take measurements at the wheels. 206 at the wheels would be a reasonably well built engine. What kind of dyno did you use?


Regards,
Jerry
Sorry, don't know the brand, but they measure torque by putting load on the wheels every 1000 rpm.
Maybe someone can explain this method to me..

I've asked their correction factor and it's 1.22, which seems a bit high to me..

170 x 1.22 would be approximately 206 hp, that's why i calculated it back to that.

Regards,
Otto
 

Last edited by DutchMini; Jun 26, 2016 at 04:01 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2016 | 04:37 PM
  #5  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
The dyno's brand is Maha Sun, judging from the info i've found (which isn't alot)!
It's for both 2WD and AWD.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2016 | 06:30 AM
  #6  
gsfent's Avatar
gsfent
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by DutchMini
Sorry, don't know the brand, but they measure torque by putting load on the wheels every 1000 rpm.
Maybe someone can explain this method to me..

I've asked their correction factor and it's 1.22, which seems a bit high to me..

170 x 1.22 would be approximately 206 hp, that's why i calculated it back to that.

Regards,
Otto

Ok, so wheel hp was 170. I don't know much about that dyno, I am familiar with Dynojet and Mustang (which reads lower than a Dynojet).


If you use a standard correction factor (friction losses) or 15% for a 2wd vehicle, you come up with 200 bhp.


For comparison, my recent dyno run on a Dynojet put out a best of 183 rwhp compared to your 170. That is with an AFR of 10.5 (too rich), so there is some hp left with good tuning.


Regards,
Jerry
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2016 | 06:49 AM
  #7  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gsfent
Ok, so wheel hp was 170. I don't know much about that dyno, I am familiar with Dynojet and Mustang (which reads lower than a Dynojet).


If you use a standard correction factor (friction losses) or 15% for a 2wd vehicle, you come up with 200 bhp.


For comparison, my recent dyno run on a Dynojet put out a best of 183 rwhp compared to your 170. That is with an AFR of 10.5 (too rich), so there is some hp left with good tuning.


Regards,
Jerry
Hmm, okay then..
Do you think it could be something to do with the cooling (heatsoak)?
Obviously this is something i can't check, apart from the fact they measured with the hood open and i honestly believe wind from driving is more effective..

The car drives very good and smooth, it also reaches 1 bar of boost, so i quess no leaks (stock JCW pulley).

A friend of mine has a regular S (2003) with a CAI, 17% pulley, GRS intercooler, remap and full exhaust (one ball + decat).

We had some runs and our acceleration was pretty much identical.
Is this normal or should one of us be noticeably faster than the other?

Otto
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2016 | 08:25 AM
  #8  
gsfent's Avatar
gsfent
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by DutchMini
Hmm, okay then..
Do you think it could be something to do with the cooling (heatsoak)?
Obviously this is something i can't check, apart from the fact they measured with the hood open and i honestly believe wind from driving is more effective..

The car drives very good and smooth, it also reaches 1 bar of boost, so i quess no leaks (stock JCW pulley).

A friend of mine has a regular S (2003) with a CAI, 17% pulley, GRS intercooler, remap and full exhaust (one ball + decat).

We had some runs and our acceleration was pretty much identical.
Is this normal or should one of us be noticeably faster than the other?

Otto

If runs are pretty much identical, then given equal driving skills, cars should be putting out similar power.


Some cars are slightly more powerful than others, but usually engines test within abut 3-5%.


Tune is very important, especially as cars get older. When you put the car on a dyno, they should give you a readout that includes the AFR across the rev range. That will tell you how well the engine is running. Too rich or too lean robs power, with lean being dangerous. As such, most cars run rich, and that is where tuners make some power by leaning it out some.


I am not sure where the AFR's should be on our cars. On another SC car I have, best power is low 13's. But that is a little lean for street driving, so that car runs in the high 12's AFR's.


I am guessing our cars should be in the same range, but I don't know.


Regards,
Jerry
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2016 | 04:29 AM
  #9  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Here is the sheet i promised, but totally forgot to upload!

 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2016 | 10:35 PM
  #10  
HaltCatchFire's Avatar
HaltCatchFire
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 256
Likes: 41
From: Portland, OR
Is it just me that thinks it's weird to chart "converted" BHP with the conversion factor already used? I would think they should chart WHP directly.
 
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2016 | 12:23 AM
  #11  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Yeah, was thinking the same!
Most sheets have both bhp and whp in the same graph..
 
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2016 | 06:53 AM
  #12  
HaveATank's Avatar
HaveATank
4th Gear
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 460
Likes: 4
I just Dyno my car yesterday and i made pretty good numbers. Up to 6800 RPM. I love the liner powerband.

03 MCS (not JCW)
Street Cams
17% pulley
Hot air intake
Aluminum Intercooler
Exhaust Manifold (no Cats)
Stock Injectors

Average Wheel HP/TQ
181whp and 148wtq
+15% Lost thru drivetrain
Flywheel HP
208hp and 170tq

If we do it by
+12% Lost thru drivetrain
Flywheel HP
202hp and 165tq

If we do it by
+10% Lost thru drivetrain
FLywheel HP
199hp and 163tq



Name:  20160919_152532.jpg
Views: 528
Size:  196.5 KB
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 05:15 AM
  #13  
MrBlah's Avatar
MrBlah
6th Gear - AX Champion
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,296
Likes: 297
From: Pittsboro NC
anyone done before/after on a stock R53 JCW engine? What kinda gains can we get on a stock car over the factory tune? The oem tune is pig rich I can smell the cats big time every time I push the car
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2016 | 12:16 AM
  #14  
DutchMini's Avatar
DutchMini
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mega72
anyone done before/after on a stock R53 JCW engine? What kinda gains can we get on a stock car over the factory tune? The oem tune is pig rich I can smell the cats big time every time I push the car
I had approx. 8-10hp increase from the tune on a stock JCW.
It's still rich AF, so maybe a bit more when they lean it out.
I wanted it a bit rich for future mods..
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2016 | 05:18 AM
  #15  
MrBlah's Avatar
MrBlah
6th Gear - AX Champion
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,296
Likes: 297
From: Pittsboro NC
good to know thanks! I'm probably keeping my jcw bone stock for autocross but I was considering the 210 tune on my STX/Track car
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MarkRNH
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
11
Aug 31, 2018 10:54 AM
AFN704
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
67
Jun 7, 2016 12:33 PM
DAVIDLEERAD
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
7
Apr 16, 2016 05:49 PM
gknorr
MINI Parts for Sale
0
Mar 30, 2016 11:05 AM
Yam the Bomb
JCW Garage
4
Mar 26, 2016 09:58 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 AM.