Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Long term impact of 15% pulley and no software?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-03-2007, 05:21 AM
Minipapa's Avatar
Minipapa
Minipapa is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Long term impact of 15% pulley and no software?

I have an 05 MCS. I am considering a 15% pulley along with JWC CAI and Milltek exhaust. I am not interested in anything radical. I would like to skip a software upgrade. My local tuner, Out Motoring, only sells Unichip and it is far too expensive for simple modifications. Will the Mini software keep up with the 15% pulley upgrade? Is there any danger of running lean? Are there long-term reliability concerns with going the route? I have already checked with my dealer and they will not do a JCW software upgrade like some of the other dealers. Thanks for your wisdom.
 
  #2  
Old 04-03-2007, 05:29 AM
MINIotaple's Avatar
MINIotaple
MINIotaple is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many people run the 15% without ECU and I haven't seen any problem, but that's only anecdotal/statistical evidence. Perhaps somebody will chime in with some theoretical/scientific evidence since that's all way above my head. If you are willing to forgo driving the car for a day or two, try Lucky Dog Garage. They seem to be doing some impressive things with the ECU and it will only cost $350 + shipping.
 
  #3  
Old 04-03-2007, 07:05 AM
Bahamabart's Avatar
Bahamabart
Bahamabart is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The NAM community has many members running the mods you present w/ std ecu. You should not be concerned what so ever.

If you wanted to upgrade your ECU - you could a) see if dealer will flash the JCW tune - various people have done it and seemed pleased however there is little history. b) find a GIAC dealer near you - 325 bucks / 30 day return policy. See a thread I did "GIAC ecu upgrade".
 
  #4  
Old 04-03-2007, 07:11 AM
MI MINI S's Avatar
MI MINI S
MI MINI S is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've had an Alta 15% pulley along with cooler Denso IK22 spark plugs, on my '05-S for one year now with NO problems at all and my wife and I drive it a lot. We are installing a JCW CAI on Wednesday. My friend Crashton is modded the same way except he just added a JCW exhaust and he has had no problems except the need to drive the car more. It's is a rock solid mod and the car should have come from the factory with a 15% smaller supercharger pulley. Do it, you will not regret it.
 
  #5  
Old 04-03-2007, 12:42 PM
Bigcoyote's Avatar
Bigcoyote
Bigcoyote is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona, USA
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey there,

I ran with the 15% and std ecu for a while with no problems. On hot days or during hard driving the engine would ping a little - but not bad -- I added some octane booster to the tanks I knew I would be driving hard on.

I have heard that if you switch to the colder ( IK22 ? ) spark plug , that will cure most of the pinging ( pre-detonation ) problems.

Good luck and have fun!!
 
  #6  
Old 04-03-2007, 02:56 PM
MiniMacPR's Avatar
MiniMacPR
MiniMacPR is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Juan, PR
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are interested in the Unichip, I have one for sale in the marketplace that was mapped for Intake/15%/Exhaust by Outmotoring. Send me a PM if interested.

As most have already stated, you shouldn't have a problem running without a software upgrade. It does tie everything together nicely and makes for a smoother ride in my opinion, but is not a necessity.
 
  #7  
Old 04-03-2007, 03:19 PM
markldriskill's Avatar
markldriskill
markldriskill is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I ran just such a setup with the one-step colder plugs (22's as one other poster said above) but with K&N "typhoon" CAI for over a year. I have just recently gotten a tune (Fireballed!) and header (OBX) and JCW injectors (380cc).

Have never experienced any problems. The 15% made a very noticeable difference in performance. I added the Milltek CAT-back later. It's all been good.

Only thing that might have occurred on rare occasions was some timing pulled, when knock's detected, but not terrible. I added an M7 Extreme scoop and Alta IC diverter and it really helped reduce timing retardation. And I am in CA, running on 91 octane all the time.
 
  #8  
Old 04-04-2007, 10:43 PM
caminifan's Avatar
caminifan
caminifan is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If you check out this thread: https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ad.php?t=93689 , you willl notice that the hp & ft/lbs was achieved with a stock ECU. Even at the higher hp & ft/lbs level, the a/f ratios were in the 11 to 12:1 territory. It seems that there is a persistent urban legend that recurs every so often that if you add a s/c reduction pulley, you need to worry about leaner operating conditions. The only time that you need to worry about leaner operating conditions is when you fiddle with the ECU and fuel maps.
 
  #9  
Old 04-06-2007, 06:39 AM
vdubdoug's Avatar
vdubdoug
vdubdoug is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Centerville, Ohio
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I ran a 17% for a while on my 02 S with no software. The car runs as rich a fuel mixture as it would with a stock pulley.

You shouldn't have any problems
 
  #10  
Old 04-16-2007, 10:20 AM
RaT48's Avatar
RaT48
RaT48 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an 06 MCS just hit 7,000 miles yesturday. The only thing that I have in there is an intake. I was considering a pulley because for the price I think you can get the most power out of, but I'm concenered about my baby's health of his engine. I also wanted to ask whats the difference between a %15, %17 , or %19 pulley. Thanks!
 
  #11  
Old 04-16-2007, 02:20 PM
Crashton's Avatar
Crashton
Crashton is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Over there on MA
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I run a 15% Alta pulley with a JCW intake & exhaust. Stock plugs & no reflash of the computer. Runs like a dream. In 10,000 miles of driving I've had zero issues.

Now onto the pulley question. 15% is the safest route to go IMO. 17% & 19% require a smaller belt while the 15% will use the stock one. The % is how much faster the supercharger will spin. The faster you spin the supercharger the shorter its life. No free lunch. I'm sure someone much wiser that I will chime in here & give you the skinny.
 
  #12  
Old 04-16-2007, 03:18 PM
herbie hind's Avatar
herbie hind
herbie hind is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i've got a set up like yours . 15% , full alta exhaust , intake , etc. i can say if you want a huge torque jump for little more than 400.00 find a GIAC dealer .
 
  #13  
Old 04-17-2007, 11:56 AM
RaT48's Avatar
RaT48
RaT48 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I would go with the %15 just to be safe. Now the problem off installing it!!!
 
Attached Thumbnails Long term impact of 15% pulley and no software?-mini_logo_jpg.jpg  
  #14  
Old 04-18-2007, 09:56 AM
Guest's Avatar
Guest
Guest is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCaL (Agoura Hills)
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Crashton
I run a 15% Alta pulley with a JCW intake & exhaust. Stock plugs & no reflash of the computer. Runs like a dream. In 10,000 miles of driving I've had zero issues.

Now onto the pulley question. 15% is the safest route to go IMO. 17% & 19% require a smaller belt while the 15% will use the stock one. The % is how much faster the supercharger will spin. The faster you spin the supercharger the shorter its life. No free lunch. I'm sure someone much wiser that I will chime in here & give you the skinny.
With a 19% pulley you may see some blower cavitation at higher RPM's, but unless you run around at 6500 RPM's all day you're not really going to do much.

I run a 15% and have no issues at all. The general concensus is that much faster than 15% and the heat you create is outweiging the additional HP you make.

17% and 19% Pulley's have shown to make a bit more power down low, and about the same, or slightly less up top.
 
  #15  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:40 AM
CXRK's Avatar
CXRK
CXRK is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan - California
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Installed a 15% Alta pulley almost three years ago at 10,000 miles. I have 48,000 miles now. I've added in that time an Alta intake, performance exhaust, IK22 plugs and have been running a stock ECU. Not even updated since mid 2004. No issues what so ever and runs great. Just dyno'd last weekend and numbers were decent I guess. 180.6 hp 157.6 tq. I'm be seeing LDG at the Dragon so we'll see how an ECU remap, etc effects things. I don't know the old saying "If it ain't broken don't fix it" may apply here! Since the car runs great. But we'll see.
 
  #16  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:54 AM
Guest's Avatar
Guest
Guest is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCaL (Agoura Hills)
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by CXRK
Installed a 15% Alta pulley almost three years ago at 10,000 miles. I have 48,000 miles now. I've added in that time an Alta intake, performance exhaust, IK22 plugs and have been running a stock ECU. Not even updated since mid 2004. No issues what so ever and runs great. Just dyno'd last weekend and numbers were decent I guess. 180.6 hp 157.6 tq. I'm be seeing LDG at the Dragon so we'll see how an ECU remap, etc effects things. I don't know the old saying "If it ain't broken don't fix it" may apply here! Since the car runs great. But we'll see.
HP and torque seems low. With similar mods I pulled 192 whp and 180 torque. What exhaust are you running? Do you have a header installed? I noticed you recently dynoed your car, do you have the AF readings off the Dyno?
 
  #17  
Old 04-18-2007, 11:17 AM
RedSkunk's Avatar
RedSkunk
RedSkunk is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MINIapolis
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rustyboy155
HP and torque seems low. With similar mods I pulled 192 whp and 180 torque. What exhaust are you running? Do you have a header installed? I noticed you recently dynoed your car, do you have the AF readings off the Dyno?
Above 190whp with just pulley, intake, and exhaust sounds a little high.
 
  #18  
Old 04-18-2007, 11:24 AM
SayGoodbye's Avatar
SayGoodbye
SayGoodbye is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedSkunk
Above 190whp with just pulley, intake, and exhaust sounds a little high.
Not if you're on the right dyno
 
  #19  
Old 04-18-2007, 11:37 AM
cfoley's Avatar
cfoley
cfoley is offline
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RaT48
I have an 06 MCS just hit 7,000 miles yesturday. The only thing that I have in there is an intake. I was considering a pulley because for the price I think you can get the most power out of, but I'm concenered about my baby's health of his engine. I also wanted to ask whats the difference between a %15, %17 , or %19 pulley. Thanks!
Sorry, I couldn't pass this up! 2% each

 
  #20  
Old 04-18-2007, 02:35 PM
CXRK's Avatar
CXRK
CXRK is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan - California
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rustyboy155
HP and torque seems low. With similar mods I pulled 192 whp and 180 torque. What exhaust are you running? Do you have a header installed? I noticed you recently dynoed your car, do you have the AF readings off the Dyno?
Actually most of the MINI's that had the mods I had were around this number. Some were 185, some 187 some 175. We only had one car get 192 and that was higher than the GP cars! Maybe it was the dyno. As for a header I do not have one. The exhaust is a Borla race muffler behind the cat with a magnaflow resonator. Basically custom. 2.5 SS. No AF readings I think.

We were all saying the 192 car was running high and the dyno must have been off.
 
  #21  
Old 04-18-2007, 02:44 PM
MaxN's Avatar
MaxN
MaxN is offline
Reverse Gear
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 15% Pulley has been on my '05 MCS for something over 54,000 miles.

Until recently the only other mod was a drop-in fliter.

It has consitently dyno'd in the upper 180's on California grade '91 octane and has been thrashed from day one, yet is is still kicking butt and taking names

Never heard it ping, never felt any timing pull, never had any heat issues.

The 54K miles have been hard ones too - many track days, many road trips and a lot of grid-locked SoCal driving.

Fitting it was a nightmare, but I am glad I went through with it !
 
  #22  
Old 04-18-2007, 02:51 PM
Guest's Avatar
Guest
Guest is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCaL (Agoura Hills)
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RedSkunk
Above 190whp with just pulley, intake, and exhaust sounds a little high.
It was a Dyno Dynamics, which is known to show lower than most of the dyno's out there. The only other modification I had was MTH software, but based on the dynoplot, we think it did more harm than help. My AF was wacked to all hell, and the plot was very rough. I've since swapped to the JCW and despite the lower rev limiter the car pulls MUCH stronger than before.

Custom tune soon anyway, so we'll see
 
  #23  
Old 04-18-2007, 02:56 PM
Guest's Avatar
Guest
Guest is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCaL (Agoura Hills)
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by CXRK
Actually most of the MINI's that had the mods I had were around this number. Some were 185, some 187 some 175. We only had one car get 192 and that was higher than the GP cars! Maybe it was the dyno. As for a header I do not have one. The exhaust is a Borla race muffler behind the cat with a magnaflow resonator. Basically custom. 2.5 SS. No AF readings I think.

We were all saying the 192 car was running high and the dyno must have been off.
I've seen a car with a Pulley, header, intake, one-ball, and software pull 206 on a dyno dynamics. It all depends on the engine, these arn't race motors, they vary widely. For example, we may have possibly discovered that my cam timing was off from the FACTORY. There's still quite a few people on the forums that think it's IMPOSSIBLE to make more than 200 whp on the factory blower .

156 ft lbs of torque seems low for a motor with a pulley and intake/exhaust though. From what i've seen on other pullied cars it should be closer to 162-168. The lack of a header may explain that, but to me it still seems low.

FYI, for the money, you can't beat the OBX header. 200 bucks, and another 100-150 to cut the stock cat off and weld it onto your new header
 

Last edited by Guest; 04-18-2007 at 03:02 PM.
  #24  
Old 04-23-2007, 11:33 AM
RedSkunk's Avatar
RedSkunk
RedSkunk is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MINIapolis
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rustyboy155
It was a Dyno Dynamics, which is known to show lower than most of the dyno's out there. The only other modification I had was MTH software, but based on the dynoplot, we think it did more harm than help. My AF was wacked to all hell, and the plot was very rough. I've since swapped to the JCW and despite the lower rev limiter the car pulls MUCH stronger than before.

Custom tune soon anyway, so we'll see
Well, I just got my 15%+one-ball+intake dyno'd on Saturday and pulled 188whp / 171tq so now I'm a believer in inflated numbers too I guess.

(mustang dyno, reads the true load, and Helix ought to know how to accurately dyno a MINI by now.)
 

Last edited by RedSkunk; 04-23-2007 at 11:35 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Getrieben
1st Gear
21
11-19-2020 06:03 PM
Getrieben
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
12
08-17-2016 06:32 AM
David.R53
Stock Problems/Issues
4
09-01-2015 06:49 PM
danraabe
General MINI Talk
4
08-18-2015 09:32 AM
minipopkart
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
2
08-13-2015 05:22 AM



Quick Reply: Drivetrain Long term impact of 15% pulley and no software?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:48 PM.