Drivetrain 231.9WHP with new big valve head. Stock cam and ECU.
All of this would be less necessary if Jan had not been kicked off in the first place... a move I never understood... he was one of the more colorful characters and I always enjoyed his contributions..... so much of NAM has turned to "milk toast" can't we preserve the characters that make it fun
The head should stand on its merits not it name....... BS from the left and right....what about all us people in the middle who don't give a ***
It will be interesting at the Dragon as a lot of the players in this thread will be there... are you going to bring bats and chains or maybe nerf bats..... I will be on the sideline.....
The head should stand on its merits not it name....... BS from the left and right....what about all us people in the middle who don't give a ***
It will be interesting at the Dragon as a lot of the players in this thread will be there... are you going to bring bats and chains or maybe nerf bats..... I will be on the sideline.....
p.s. maybe popcorn too.
We then just jetted it to suit the fuel pressure, simple as that.
Well it has to be simple for me to figure it out
Sorry but I have an issue with this. I would like to know what is offensive? I would like to know what % of the NAM population has been offended?
Examples -
1) I was in the extior/interior section - there I saw roof graphics of the Japanese flag and bonzai symbols which could be offensive to some. Will you remove those ? will you allow vendors to offer them on NAM?
2) What if this had been called Martin Luther King HEAD w/ a picture of Martin Luther King and someone said it was offensive - would you react the same? Equally the Sadam Hussien Head? The Star of David Head? The Adolf Hitler Head or the Clansman Head?
While I appreicate that there must be guidelines and supervision of a Board - it is a community and when a FEW are able to dictate, we are no longer an open community. Those offended have the option of withdrawing from the Board.
The board should not be DICTATED by a FEW.
Examples -
1) I was in the extior/interior section - there I saw roof graphics of the Japanese flag and bonzai symbols which could be offensive to some. Will you remove those ? will you allow vendors to offer them on NAM?
2) What if this had been called Martin Luther King HEAD w/ a picture of Martin Luther King and someone said it was offensive - would you react the same? Equally the Sadam Hussien Head? The Star of David Head? The Adolf Hitler Head or the Clansman Head?
While I appreicate that there must be guidelines and supervision of a Board - it is a community and when a FEW are able to dictate, we are no longer an open community. Those offended have the option of withdrawing from the Board.
The board should not be DICTATED by a FEW.
And Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Wilt.
My thoughts exactly. If you're offended by it, don't read the thread! This is a public internet forum guys, not aired broadcast radio/tv. You have the CHOICE to come here. You registered to be on the site, and there's PLENTY of stuff that other people could say was offensive. Go on youtube. You don't see them pulling off questionable religious material because people find it offensive.
First of all, there's nothing offensive about a picture of Jesus. The simple fact that people find something so subtle/harmless offensive confuses me. Second of all, even if you DO find it offensive, it's the choice of the individuals who posted it, not you. If I had a bumper sticker on my car with the same thing, would you call the DMV and have them make me remove it?
If everything worked the way this signature picture thing was handled in this country, things would be pretty wacked out.
Imagine if anytime something bothered .1-.2% of the population they just called up the president and had him change it in their favor. So much for freedom
.
Welcome to America, a free country, with freedom of speech, expression, and religion
.
Or so we think
.
First of all, there's nothing offensive about a picture of Jesus. The simple fact that people find something so subtle/harmless offensive confuses me. Second of all, even if you DO find it offensive, it's the choice of the individuals who posted it, not you. If I had a bumper sticker on my car with the same thing, would you call the DMV and have them make me remove it?

If everything worked the way this signature picture thing was handled in this country, things would be pretty wacked out.
Imagine if anytime something bothered .1-.2% of the population they just called up the president and had him change it in their favor. So much for freedom
.Welcome to America, a free country, with freedom of speech, expression, and religion
. Or so we think
.1) The site, admins, etc. have no problem with free speech. In fact I'd like to see more of it. That said free speech entails a responsibility to knowing who your audience is and being considerate of them. Given the site is MINI related I personally would prefer not to have political or religious discussions on the site. It doesn't benefit the intent of the site which is MINI-related information.
2) Jan's banning - this was a couple of years ago, was not product related, and purely based on his actions toward others on the site. He will be at the Dragon as a vendor and I have heard that he would like to open a discussion about getting RMW onto the site in some manner. It is currently up to him as to whether this initiative is taken.
Mark
Is NAM a Mini Cooper and Anti-Jesus Christ pictures community ? I thought we were just a Mini Cooper community made up of a global group of people with diverse backgrounds that only need to agree on one thing - that being Mini Cooper topics. Since when have we cease being tolerant of one another?
I love seeing this unfold and I hate it when people are told not to post in others' threads, as if they own a section of the internet. The fact that Don gets a rise out of you all says something. Nothing to prove? Then why even address the comments?
Anyhoozle, by all visible accounts on this site, the head sold by Jan is excellent.
mb
That said free speech entails a responsibility to knowing who your audience is and being considerate of them. Given the site is MINI related I personally would prefer not to have political or religious discussions on the site. It doesn't benefit the intent of the site which is MINI-related information.
Mark
Mark
That's why I love NJ! I also think Don does a good job, but that's just from experience.
I love seeing this unfold and I hate it when people are told not to post in others' threads, as if they own a section of the internet. The fact that Don gets a rise out of you all says something. Nothing to prove? Then why even address the comments?
Anyhoozle, by all visible accounts on this site, the head sold by Jan is excellent.
mb
I love seeing this unfold and I hate it when people are told not to post in others' threads, as if they own a section of the internet. The fact that Don gets a rise out of you all says something. Nothing to prove? Then why even address the comments?
Anyhoozle, by all visible accounts on this site, the head sold by Jan is excellent.
mb
Just to chime in on a few points....
1) The site, admins, etc. have no problem with free speech. In fact I'd like to see more of it. That said free speech entails a responsibility to knowing who your audience is and being considerate of them. Given the site is MINI related I personally would prefer not to have political or religious discussions on the site. It doesn't benefit the intent of the site which is MINI-related information.
2) Jan's banning - this was a couple of years ago, was not product related, and purely based on his actions toward others on the site. He will be at the Dragon as a vendor and I have heard that he would like to open a discussion about getting RMW onto the site in some manner. It is currently up to him as to whether this initiative is taken.
Mark
1) The site, admins, etc. have no problem with free speech. In fact I'd like to see more of it. That said free speech entails a responsibility to knowing who your audience is and being considerate of them. Given the site is MINI related I personally would prefer not to have political or religious discussions on the site. It doesn't benefit the intent of the site which is MINI-related information.
2) Jan's banning - this was a couple of years ago, was not product related, and purely based on his actions toward others on the site. He will be at the Dragon as a vendor and I have heard that he would like to open a discussion about getting RMW onto the site in some manner. It is currently up to him as to whether this initiative is taken.
Mark
Gee, I have black rims so if you and a FEW of your buddies complain to NAM, NAM will remove my pics? maybe my posts? maybe I will be asked to leave ?
It has been pointed out - that one joins this community freely and can leave freely. Memebers can opt not to particpate in a thread. They can "ignore" certain members if they like.
Is NAM a Mini Cooper and Anti-Jesus Christ pictures community ? I thought we were just a Mini Cooper community made up of a global group of people with diverse backgrounds that only need to agree on one thing - that being Mini Cooper topics. Since when have we cease being tolerant of one another?
It has been pointed out - that one joins this community freely and can leave freely. Memebers can opt not to particpate in a thread. They can "ignore" certain members if they like.
Is NAM a Mini Cooper and Anti-Jesus Christ pictures community ? I thought we were just a Mini Cooper community made up of a global group of people with diverse backgrounds that only need to agree on one thing - that being Mini Cooper topics. Since when have we cease being tolerant of one another?
Really what it comes down to is a few people found it offensive and site admin caved in under the pressure and asked that it be removed. As I said, if someone had mentioned that it bothered them, and asked politely that it be removed, I would have done it in an instant. The fact that admins had to REQUIRE that it be removed is what bothers me.
I stand by what I said, where do you draw the line. Perhaps the black wheels example was a bit overdramatic, you get the point though. You can't just censor everything that bothers a few people
.
Moderators & folks who were offended need to have their eyes checked... Surely they know the Jesus when they see him... The Jesus "had skin in like burnt bronze and hair like lamb's wool".
You guys got upset about the wrong Jesus! The guy who posed for the head logo.... completely different dude!
In fact, I have it on good authority that Tommy Chong was the Jesus head model!

WTF?!
IT WAS AN ARTISTS CONCEPTION OF JESUS! NOT HIS FREAKIN PICTURE!
Helluva standard being set here re: what's political, religious, and or offensive/disrespectful...
a) Image/depiction: Someone draws a stick figure and calls it Jesus. The stick figure's gotta go.
b) Symbol: Factions of the membership conspire to string together 3 alpha-numeric characters to symbolize Jesus - gotta go
Where's the shakes head in disbelief emoticon?:impatient
You guys got upset about the wrong Jesus! The guy who posed for the head logo.... completely different dude!
In fact, I have it on good authority that Tommy Chong was the Jesus head model!

Just to chime in on a few points....
1) The site, admins, etc. have no problem with free speech. In fact I'd like to see more of it. That said free speech entails a responsibility to knowing who your audience is and being considerate of them. Given the site is MINI related I personally would prefer not to have political or religious discussions on the site. It doesn't benefit the intent of the site which is MINI-related information.
Mark
1) The site, admins, etc. have no problem with free speech. In fact I'd like to see more of it. That said free speech entails a responsibility to knowing who your audience is and being considerate of them. Given the site is MINI related I personally would prefer not to have political or religious discussions on the site. It doesn't benefit the intent of the site which is MINI-related information.
Mark
IT WAS AN ARTISTS CONCEPTION OF JESUS! NOT HIS FREAKIN PICTURE!Helluva standard being set here re: what's political, religious, and or offensive/disrespectful...
a) Image/depiction: Someone draws a stick figure and calls it Jesus. The stick figure's gotta go.
b) Symbol: Factions of the membership conspire to string together 3 alpha-numeric characters to symbolize Jesus - gotta go
Where's the shakes head in disbelief emoticon?:impatient
Last edited by minimc; Apr 27, 2007 at 07:55 PM.
Moderators & folks who were offended need to have their eyes checked... Surely they know the Jesus when they see him... The Jesus "had skin in like burnt bronze and hair like lamb's wool".
You guys got upset about the wrong Jesus! The guy who posed for the head logo.... completely different dude!
In fact, I have it on good authority that Tommy Chong was the Jesus head model!

WTF?!
IT WAS AN ARTISTS CONCEPTION OF JESUS! NOT HIS FREAKIN PICTURE!
Helluva standard being set here re: what's political, religious, and or offensive/disrespectful...
a) Image/depiction: Someone draws a stick figure and calls it Jesus. The stick figure's gotta go.
b) Symbol: Factions of the membership conspire to string together 3 alpha-numeric characters to symbolize Jesus - gotta go
Where's the shakes head in disbelief emoticon?:impatient
You guys got upset about the wrong Jesus! The guy who posed for the head logo.... completely different dude!
In fact, I have it on good authority that Tommy Chong was the Jesus head model!

WTF?!
IT WAS AN ARTISTS CONCEPTION OF JESUS! NOT HIS FREAKIN PICTURE!Helluva standard being set here re: what's political, religious, and or offensive/disrespectful...
a) Image/depiction: Someone draws a stick figure and calls it Jesus. The stick figure's gotta go.
b) Symbol: Factions of the membership conspire to string together 3 alpha-numeric characters to symbolize Jesus - gotta go
Where's the shakes head in disbelief emoticon?:impatient

Eventually when we get back to the point, I have a question for the Jesus head people. If the cars are seeing 230s with no tuning, what can we expect after tuning? Is there a Jesus head car out of the 6 or so out there that has the head and is tuned at the same time? If so, is there an available graph for that one? Thanks.
mb
Really what it comes down to is a few people found it offensive and site admin caved in under the pressure and asked that it be removed. As I said, if someone had mentioned that it bothered them, and asked politely that it be removed, I would have done it in an instant. The fact that admins had to REQUIRE that it be removed is what bothers me.
PS - going forward when discussing this head please pronounce JESUS (HAY-zeus) - latin style.
Last edited by Bahamabart; Apr 28, 2007 at 06:59 AM.
How about we call it the Devil head... Think anyone will be offended by that!?
It matches better with the name of the builder anyway!
El Diablito!
Or, how about the Holy $H|T head.
Can someone make an avatar of a pile of $H|T with a halo over it?
It matches better with the name of the builder anyway!
El Diablito!
Or, how about the Holy $H|T head.
Can someone make an avatar of a pile of $H|T with a halo over it?
Last edited by jymontoya; Apr 28, 2007 at 08:31 AM.
And I have a new favorite NAM member 
. Funny stuff.
Eventually when we get back to the point, I have a question for the Jesus head people. If the cars are seeing 230s with no tuning, what can we expect after tuning? Is there a Jesus head car out of the 6 or so out there that has the head and is tuned at the same time? If so, is there an available graph for that one? Thanks.
mb

Eventually when we get back to the point, I have a question for the Jesus head people. If the cars are seeing 230s with no tuning, what can we expect after tuning? Is there a Jesus head car out of the 6 or so out there that has the head and is tuned at the same time? If so, is there an available graph for that one? Thanks.
mb
For those curious about numbers after tune, I'd say expect the cars to be north of 240 with a tune (Depending on where they were before the tune). Jan says expecting 250 whp wouldn't be far fetched
I believe Jan is organizing a Dyno day in the coming weeks, I know i'll be going. Feel free to stop by and see the dyno results for yourself. If we end up going to Autowave, the facility is at sea level, and almost always at or near SAE, so there are no corrections whatsoever. The dyno shows actual numbers recorded. None of this 20% correction factor BS to skew results.
I don't know of any actual date to expect tunes, Jan would be the person to ask about that, I know that once it's available i'll be getting one
Last edited by Guest; Apr 28, 2007 at 08:57 AM.
...Eventually when we get back to the point, I have a question for the Jesus head people. If the cars are seeing 230s with no tuning, what can we expect after tuning? Is there a Jesus head car out of the 6 or so out there that has the head and is tuned at the same time? If so, is there an available graph for that one? Thanks.
mb
mb
I haven't followed this thread in a quite a while, thankfully, at least considering the most recent discussion... I think it was here where I inquired fairly early-on about A/F ratios, and was informed that they are darn near ideal. That said, if indeed true, a tune would seem not to have much upside. But with 230 whp, I have a feeling that many would be more than pleased...
To all the nuts out there that thing any car with more than 200 whp is undrivable, the car is perfectly drivable. I have 215/40/R17 Kumho SPT's with the JCW Dampers and H-Sport Springs, It's pretty damn hard to break the tires loose unless i'm doing 3k RPM clutch drops, which I have no interest in doing. No issues whatsoever with drivability. The power is very linear, there's no snappy jump in power past a certain RPM, etc. And this is on the stock tune!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Santa Margarita
There's more to a tune than AF :-). AF just shows how safely you're making power, yes a really rich AF does present some upside in power, but much of the power in a tune comes from timing and redline changes. When my car is fully tuned I expect it to run north of 8500 RPM's. My valvetrain is rated to 10k
. 230 whp is what this car should have felt like from the factory. It has power in all gears, and it's amazingly torquey around town in 3rd at 2-3k.
To all the nuts out there that thing any car with more than 200 whp is undrivable, the car is perfectly drivable. I have 215/40/R17 Kumho SPT's with the JCW Dampers and H-Sport Springs, It's pretty damn hard to break the tires loose unless i'm doing 3k RPM clutch drops, which I have no interest in doing. No issues whatsoever with drivability. The power is very linear, there's no snappy jump in power past a certain RPM, etc. And this is on the stock tune!
To all the nuts out there that thing any car with more than 200 whp is undrivable, the car is perfectly drivable. I have 215/40/R17 Kumho SPT's with the JCW Dampers and H-Sport Springs, It's pretty damn hard to break the tires loose unless i'm doing 3k RPM clutch drops, which I have no interest in doing. No issues whatsoever with drivability. The power is very linear, there's no snappy jump in power past a certain RPM, etc. And this is on the stock tune!
It's at 5K. We (paying customer and crazy tuner) were driving around last night with the new exhaust fully finished and we were real surprised to "feel" this extra pull at around 5K. It's crazy. Kinda like a VTEC.
All the Jesus head Mini cars are not all the same. One has a 19% pulley and I hear pulls like a monster. Another is using 400cc injectors. All of these cars will benefit from a good tune. Hopefully mine will get done next week.
Longboard





