Drivetrain Intake Shootout/Dyno Day
Originally Posted by jlm
what was all that snafu about the other website? did that affect the posting of results?

Also for the record, this is a very sad subject for those involved. I can assume the results will be up, but please don't rub any salt in the wounds.
Originally Posted by Bumble78
That is an extreme way to get out of posting the results.


Originally Posted by ingsoc
Again, please, those who have the results have no wish of suppression. Quite the opposite. ::collapses in a pool of hopelessness::
Originally Posted by SpiderX
I don't get it.....these are cars were talking about........this is not the acceptance or rejection of "The Davici Code" or admitting to having sex with sheep........WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL

....the one TMMZ member i can think of is banned from NAM. So that might make it hard to post here
There is a LOT I don't get right now... TMMZ, which has been around for a few years now, is dissolved?? WTF happened?
Regarding results... For gods sake, anyone with half a brain on NAM knows that there are many many variables that go into testing accurately, so almost anything that's posted is taken with a grain of salt... including my OWN dyno results on my car! Just post the facts please... We tested this way, this is the results we saw on this given day etc.
While I appreciate the fact that they "invited" different vendors, and they either chose to participate or not... It makes me think of Consumer Reports.
They buy their products off the shelf, and test em out. Manufacturers don't send in their products, because it leaves room for them to make the unit they send better than the typical off the shelf unit. If you want as objective results as possible, this seems to be a better method of testing. I mean honestly, I would trust your off the shelf K&N results more than I would with the representative there to install and oversee any unit.
In the end, it really doesn't matter for me I suppose...I have an Alta and I'm perfectly happy with it, not changing unless something else makes a lot more power.
Regarding results... For gods sake, anyone with half a brain on NAM knows that there are many many variables that go into testing accurately, so almost anything that's posted is taken with a grain of salt... including my OWN dyno results on my car! Just post the facts please... We tested this way, this is the results we saw on this given day etc.
While I appreciate the fact that they "invited" different vendors, and they either chose to participate or not... It makes me think of Consumer Reports.
They buy their products off the shelf, and test em out. Manufacturers don't send in their products, because it leaves room for them to make the unit they send better than the typical off the shelf unit. If you want as objective results as possible, this seems to be a better method of testing. I mean honestly, I would trust your off the shelf K&N results more than I would with the representative there to install and oversee any unit.
In the end, it really doesn't matter for me I suppose...I have an Alta and I'm perfectly happy with it, not changing unless something else makes a lot more power.
Originally Posted by RallyMINI
Out of respect for their wishes, we didnt. K&N isn't the only company that said they couldn't participate, as you can see there are other companies who were not included as well. We understand that we don't NEED the company's permission legally, but we felt it necessary to be on good terms with such companies so that we could perhaps work with them further to bring you guys more information.
We allowed individual runs of intakes such as the HAI (as i'm sure you already know, since the numbers have already been posted thanks to R1 kid)...We just felt it would be unfair to the tuners to enter their product without their permission. Talk to any car magazine who offers shootouts and ask them about their dealings with tuners...they must ask for approval as well.
I don't know what unsanctioned HP is sorry....
We allowed individual runs of intakes such as the HAI (as i'm sure you already know, since the numbers have already been posted thanks to R1 kid)...We just felt it would be unfair to the tuners to enter their product without their permission. Talk to any car magazine who offers shootouts and ask them about their dealings with tuners...they must ask for approval as well.
I don't know what unsanctioned HP is sorry....
The idea that you are going to provide less information now in hopes that you can provide more information in the future is REDICULOUS. Of course, this follows the trend of self-serving product reviews, making people go to the "team's" website for content, and now the creation of yet another site to fragment the community.
Maybe you'll hire a PR firm to right the release when you finally get your acts together.
Thanks for the attempt.
Originally Posted by JeffS
In a way I hate to pile on here, but this post is just too much. While the magazines may do the same thing, they - just like you - are short-changing the public with their corporate ***-kissing. At least they have a business reason to keep manufacturers happy.
The idea that you are going to provide less information now in hopes that you can provide more information in the future is REDICULOUS. Of course, this follows the trend of self-serving product reviews, making people go to the "team's" website for content, and now the creation of yet another site to fragment the community.
Maybe you'll hire a PR firm to right the release when you finally get your acts together.
Thanks for the attempt.
The idea that you are going to provide less information now in hopes that you can provide more information in the future is REDICULOUS. Of course, this follows the trend of self-serving product reviews, making people go to the "team's" website for content, and now the creation of yet another site to fragment the community.
Maybe you'll hire a PR firm to right the release when you finally get your acts together.
Thanks for the attempt.In reference to your second paragraph. I wasnt saying that we were withholding info IN HOPES of providing more later....we withheld it to avoid flames for "not enough info".
How this could be completely self-serving is beyond me. When released it will serve others as well. Of course it would help the team by drawing to your website, but how much could it possibly help? Unlike NAM, or other forums, it is un-sponsored and gains nothing besides your presence.
We have our acts together, sorry you disagree.
Originally Posted by F15EWeapon
There is a LOT I don't get right now... TMMZ, which has been around for a few years now, is dissolved?? WTF happened?
Regarding results... For gods sake, anyone with half a brain on NAM knows that there are many many variables that go into testing accurately, so almost anything that's posted is taken with a grain of salt... including my OWN dyno results on my car! Just post the facts please... We tested this way, this is the results we saw on this given day etc.
Regarding results... For gods sake, anyone with half a brain on NAM knows that there are many many variables that go into testing accurately, so almost anything that's posted is taken with a grain of salt... including my OWN dyno results on my car! Just post the facts please... We tested this way, this is the results we saw on this given day etc.
looking over back posts, Hollis3 was the main spokesman for the testing; he is now sporting the same sig as Rally Mini...
Samaurai Will was also a TMM fan as was Ingsoc...
what's up? Who are the diehards hanging up the results?
Samaurai Will was also a TMM fan as was Ingsoc...
what's up? Who are the diehards hanging up the results?
Now that you have drawn so much attention to yourselves .... did you really want to do that? .... I am seeing a trend where people are afraid to do anything because of fear of getting flamed...... hell, that's half the fun....
Note to all flamers.... Bob's law #2 "it is easier to critique than to create." Before you flame ,.... ask yourself what new original work you have brought to the party?..... how where you treated? did you like it? where your findings presented in an arrogant manner inviting the "flameing?" How would you like to be treated if you brought something "new?"....... Get my point...... I'm not saying that bogus claims are to be given a pass....... not at all..... or that claims should go unchallenged ..... especially from people who stand to profit from making claims that are unsubstantiated. However, If you think an undertaking like this is easy, try one yourself....... that being said,....I do think that for all the pre promotion on this test we should have heard something by now...... frankly , I have lost interest in the results.... and I was very excited.
Note to all flamers.... Bob's law #2 "it is easier to critique than to create." Before you flame ,.... ask yourself what new original work you have brought to the party?..... how where you treated? did you like it? where your findings presented in an arrogant manner inviting the "flameing?" How would you like to be treated if you brought something "new?"....... Get my point...... I'm not saying that bogus claims are to be given a pass....... not at all..... or that claims should go unchallenged ..... especially from people who stand to profit from making claims that are unsubstantiated. However, If you think an undertaking like this is easy, try one yourself....... that being said,....I do think that for all the pre promotion on this test we should have heard something by now...... frankly , I have lost interest in the results.... and I was very excited.
Gestation is taking a while...
such is life. I think it's best if we all go to other tasks, and we'll all be pleasantly surprised when results show up. Kind of like Social Security in the future when I retire.....
Matt
Matt
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
From: As far away from Florida as I can get.
Originally Posted by MSFITOY
How did I miss 9 pages of this
Without going back to read up, this almost reminds me of the AGS dyno test we did. I'll get some popcorn and shut up
Without going back to read up, this almost reminds me of the AGS dyno test we did. I'll get some popcorn and shut up
tap tap tap........................................drip drip drrrrrrriiiiiiiiiip............................... ....hello..helloo....helllooooo................... .....................is there an echo in here? here? heerrrr?
Originally Posted by jlm
looking over back posts, Hollis3 was the main spokesman for the testing; he is now sporting the same sig as Rally Mini...
Samaurai Will was also a TMM fan as was Ingsoc...
what's up? Who are the diehards hanging up the results?
Samaurai Will was also a TMM fan as was Ingsoc...
what's up? Who are the diehards hanging up the results?
you are correct that all of the posters in here....Will, Ingsoc, Hollis, and I (among others) are now part of Motoring Underground or atleast post over there.
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
such is life. I think it's best if we all go to other tasks, and we'll all be pleasantly surprised when results show up. Kind of like Social Security in the future when I retire.....
Matt
Matt
Somehow, I don't think there will be any surprises with these results.
WOW, I don't where to begin.
1) this thread should proabably JUST BE DELETED.
2) Andy beig accused of inaccuracy thats one for the record books. I could see him being accused of being overly detailed, overly perscise, overly technical and at times overly opinionated and argumentative perhaps but inaccurate?
3) Spidey bringing sheep into the thread. I'll assume its not a confession but it would explain your back problems as well as the fact that at no time did we ever see a picture of the date you took out while testing the new exhaust.
4) I'm still chuckling about the determination that HAI is not an intake and the rogue reference. I understand that you opted not to test and accept that you didn't. I didn't expect for you to test every intake on the market. BUT lets not kid ourselves here, it was NOT because it was not an intake, a velocity stack is a type of intake. It was politics is the answer - kind of hard to sell CAI when an option is simply to add a filter directly to the throttle body. No vendor wants to help in documenting its viability. Okay we get it, we are not stupid.
this thread - lots of foreplay
but no happy ending
.
1) this thread should proabably JUST BE DELETED.
2) Andy beig accused of inaccuracy thats one for the record books. I could see him being accused of being overly detailed, overly perscise, overly technical and at times overly opinionated and argumentative perhaps but inaccurate?
3) Spidey bringing sheep into the thread. I'll assume its not a confession but it would explain your back problems as well as the fact that at no time did we ever see a picture of the date you took out while testing the new exhaust.
4) I'm still chuckling about the determination that HAI is not an intake and the rogue reference. I understand that you opted not to test and accept that you didn't. I didn't expect for you to test every intake on the market. BUT lets not kid ourselves here, it was NOT because it was not an intake, a velocity stack is a type of intake. It was politics is the answer - kind of hard to sell CAI when an option is simply to add a filter directly to the throttle body. No vendor wants to help in documenting its viability. Okay we get it, we are not stupid.
this thread - lots of foreplay
but no happy ending
.









