Drivetrain Intake Shootout/Dyno Day
Originally Posted by SpiderX
I don't think this event ever happened
Haha....much like the moon landing....
Anyways, it would be hard to believe considering someone has already posted the data from their individual dyno. So please check on validity of statements before saying things that would lead people astray.
Hope your back feels better
Originally Posted by joker
hey 'rally' wheres the info? i clicked on tmm link but did not find it there either....
Hey dude....we are still working on it. I promise this will be worth the wait....we will reveal the numbers and you guys can finally see how they compare.
Sorry about the wait.
Originally Posted by RallyMINI
Haha....much like the moon landing....
Anyways, it would be hard to believe considering someone has already posted the data from their individual dyno. So please check on validity of statements before saying things that would lead people astray.
Hope your back feels better
Anyways, it would be hard to believe considering someone has already posted the data from their individual dyno. So please check on validity of statements before saying things that would lead people astray.
Hope your back feels better
...........hey, getting all his WMS exhaust stuff going has been a chore....I can appreciate the task.......Thanks for the well wishes
what's the time frame on this data being published because i am just itching to get a new intake, and this is killing me. i'm really looking forward to this test, because of the inclusion of Helix's intake, i'm trying to stay loyal to East Coast...J.K.- i just like the work that Eric and Dane do.
welcome to the EastSide.....disco
PMsent......
Originally Posted by RallyMINI
Hey dude....we are still working on it. I promise this will be worth the wait....we will reveal the numbers and you guys can finally see how they compare.
Sorry about the wait.
Sorry about the wait.
Hello everyone, thanks for your patience, we are working on an article, not just numbers.
If you are waiting and would like specific info, feel free to pm me.
thanks
If you are waiting and would like specific info, feel free to pm me.
thanks
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
I see none of them making the sort of gains that the HAI made:



! Remember, R1 kid did only one run with each. His runs can't, scientifically-speaking, be compared to each other or to the numbers from our scientific trial. For one, his car was cold on the first run and hot when he did a quick second run. There is little power in his single measurements, anyways. The article will make for good reading
. In terms of scientific basis and repeatability, you will no doubt be impressed. We did multiple runs and controlled many variables :smile:
I'll revise my prediction. I predict that this "shootout" will show gains of:
Helix: 0 hp
Alta: 2 hp
M7: 4 hp
It was by choice that your "team" didn't test the HAI alongside the other intakes.
Helix: 0 hp
Alta: 2 hp
M7: 4 hp
It was by choice that your "team" didn't test the HAI alongside the other intakes.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
I see that as presumptive and off-base
! Remember, R1 kid did only one run with each. His runs can't, scientifically-speaking, be compared to each other or to the numbers from our scientific trial. For one, his car was cold on the first run and hot when he did a quick second run. There is little power in his single measurements, anyways. The article will make for good reading
. In terms of scientific basis and repeatability, you will no doubt be impressed. We did multiple runs and controlled many variables :smile:
! Remember, R1 kid did only one run with each. His runs can't, scientifically-speaking, be compared to each other or to the numbers from our scientific trial. For one, his car was cold on the first run and hot when he did a quick second run. There is little power in his single measurements, anyways. The article will make for good reading
. In terms of scientific basis and repeatability, you will no doubt be impressed. We did multiple runs and controlled many variables :smile:
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
I'll revise my prediction. I predict that this "shootout" will show gains of:
Helix: 0 hp
Alta: 2 hp
M7: 4 hp
It was by choice that your "team" didn't test the HAI alongside the other intakes.
Helix: 0 hp
Alta: 2 hp
M7: 4 hp
It was by choice that your "team" didn't test the HAI alongside the other intakes.
what do you think the HAI would have shown?
Bob
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
I'll revise my prediction. I predict that this "shootout" will show gains of:
Helix: 0 hp
Alta: 2 hp
M7: 4 hp
It was by choice that your "team" didn't test the HAI alongside the other intakes.
Helix: 0 hp
Alta: 2 hp
M7: 4 hp
It was by choice that your "team" didn't test the HAI alongside the other intakes.

.
pm sent but........
ur box is full
Originally Posted by ingsoc
Umm, no. K&N would not allow that. Plain and simple. We told everyone here, I do believe. Regardless, we had hoped to do so and inquired repeatedly for more than a month, but with no luck. Ask your filter manufacturer 
.

.
It doesn't make sense given past dyno tests, but yet that is my prediction for the results of this particular shootout.
Originally Posted by discodan
Andy, you think that m7 will show more gains than the Helix and Alta? wow! never thought i'd see this day!
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
It doesn't make sense given past dyno tests, but yet that is my prediction for the results of this particular shootout.
It's a little strange that someone would make predictions that "[don't] make sense," and do so with emphasis.
Wow, enough with the condescending tone please.
I was there, I saw the results and saw the tests right in front of me. It was completely equal, completely fair.
We only tested the three because it's what we had permission to test. We went about it that way to keep it as fair as possible and keep people from saying that anything was less than 100% accurate. Also, these results are going to be posted on a site as an article, it's just generally a good idea to get permission before posting tests done on someone else's product.
More shootouts will be done when more companies give permission and on other types of products.
If you don't think the testing was done fairly, please don't be rude, go test them yourself.
I was there, I saw the results and saw the tests right in front of me. It was completely equal, completely fair.
We only tested the three because it's what we had permission to test. We went about it that way to keep it as fair as possible and keep people from saying that anything was less than 100% accurate. Also, these results are going to be posted on a site as an article, it's just generally a good idea to get permission before posting tests done on someone else's product.
More shootouts will be done when more companies give permission and on other types of products.
If you don't think the testing was done fairly, please don't be rude, go test them yourself.


