Drivetrain Fire up the flame throwers! Estimates of $ per HP by mod type!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
Fire up the flame throwers! Estimates of $ per HP by mod type!
First off, These are my estimates only, and may be wayyyyyyy off. If anyone has good data, I'll start some sort of table to really summarize. But real data is scant, and I don't have a dyno!
I made two tables. one with sceptical HP add numbers, one with , uh aggressive numbers. This isn't perfect, consider it a guide for the eye, but it does show some interesting trends.......
Flame away!!!!!


Comments anyone? I don't really expect any.....
Matt
I made two tables. one with sceptical HP add numbers, one with , uh aggressive numbers. This isn't perfect, consider it a guide for the eye, but it does show some interesting trends.......
Flame away!!!!!
Comments anyone? I don't really expect any.....
Matt
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
There are references...
Originally Posted by chows4us
New spark plug wires get me 1 to 2 HP?
Why don't I believe that?
Why don't I believe that?
I don't know if I believe it either, ask the Nology crowd. Many of them are happy for the $100+ those wires cost!
Matt
I for one would not trade spark duration for increased spark intensity. Yes, capacitive wires produce a big hot (and short) spark like an MSD. However the MSD produces a LOT of hot sparks over 20 degrees of crank rotation, and the Nology wires give you just... one. They do look cool though. You'd need an extra thick flamesuit if you tried to list $/coolness.
Is the "MTH" the MTH software tweaking? I think you have your $$$ figure wrong. More like $78 than $178 I believe. One of the members of my local group has done 3 recently, all for $72. Exchange rate is good right now.
-- Jay
-- Jay
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
True on the pully labor...
but it was my post, and I did pay for the pully install! Only thing I did pay to have installed. But anyway,
I learned that the intake IS a good value, even if you don't do a Hot Air Intake.
I learned that ICs and ported SCs may have good impacts, but it really costs to gain the benefit. you should have crossed most of your mods off your list before you get to these.
For all the GIAC and UniChip people, yes, you probably CAN get more benefit, but it's gonna cost you! IF you borrow a cable, MTH is the best you can do!
These exhaust systems are pretty much overpriced from a performance standpoint. If I can get my el-cheapo exhaust done for $200, and it gets me the 10 HP some others claim, then the exhaust becomes cost effective. But the are expensive, and you can better spend your money elsewhere.
Matt
I learned that the intake IS a good value, even if you don't do a Hot Air Intake.
I learned that ICs and ported SCs may have good impacts, but it really costs to gain the benefit. you should have crossed most of your mods off your list before you get to these.
For all the GIAC and UniChip people, yes, you probably CAN get more benefit, but it's gonna cost you! IF you borrow a cable, MTH is the best you can do!
These exhaust systems are pretty much overpriced from a performance standpoint. If I can get my el-cheapo exhaust done for $200, and it gets me the 10 HP some others claim, then the exhaust becomes cost effective. But the are expensive, and you can better spend your money elsewhere.
Matt
Hey Doc:
I have to disagree with your numbers - my reasoning is as follows:
1. If I made my own pulley out of old Fresca cans and put it on myself the cost per hp would by $0.56.
2. If I talked my neighbor into buying an AGS and then stole it off of his front porch the cost per hp would be $0.00.
3. I have seen dynos that prove that the MTH makes 4.91 hp not 5 as you state on your low estimate chart. Please note this when you make corrections.
Seriously, thanks for the time and the effort. Brace yourself for pages of nitpicking...............
I have to disagree with your numbers - my reasoning is as follows:
1. If I made my own pulley out of old Fresca cans and put it on myself the cost per hp would by $0.56.
2. If I talked my neighbor into buying an AGS and then stole it off of his front porch the cost per hp would be $0.00.
3. I have seen dynos that prove that the MTH makes 4.91 hp not 5 as you state on your low estimate chart. Please note this when you make corrections.
Seriously, thanks for the time and the effort. Brace yourself for pages of nitpicking...............
Originally Posted by goldcountrymini
Did someone say flame throwers???



Thought that I would share...



Thought that I would share...
And what's the most dependable way to stir up schitt among people clamoring for numbers? Why, the posting of numbers, of course!
Here's my flames!
ECUs. For the low-end gains, the number should be zero or close to it. We've seen both of those ECUs make zero power before.
The one-ball has made 5hp or so on the high-end.
Cat-back. 12 - even for a high number is crazy on the high side. I'd be shocked to see a repeatable dyno get over 10. As for the low side, how can 6 be the minimum or conservative? I'd say 3hp for the low.
Air-intakes are another one. Andy has shown great data with the HAI. It's high numbers should be higher. Other intakes have shown ZERO power so that should be the low (6 is outrageous!) and 12 for the high-end is just as crazy. I'd say 6 is a high number. If there's one thing I learned in modding these cars is that anything over $100 for an intake would probably be a waste of money next time around.
Intercooler. The conservative gain should be zero. There are many situations where a larger intercooler won't help. And even in the ones where it MIGHT help, there hasn't been conclusive data to show what type of gains (or loss prevention) is possible.
Just for kicks I'll post some prices of mods for the new 2005 Mustang GT. Everyone tells me this is the car I should be modding but I don't want to spend the dough modding TWO cars (although the MINI-modding is done - at least on this one
). But for cost and especially for power, I see what people are talking about.
Examples:
Magnaflow FULL exhaust
-True dual exhaust
- DUAL cats
- Header plus catback
Cost? $1600?
$1200?
Try $695!!!
ECU. Not JUST a flash. But a do-it-yourself pod or tool that plugs under your dash. You pick from half a dozen programs with the tool on its own LARGE SCREEN and download it - without addition power or batteries. Also comes complete with a diagnostic SCAN TOOL!
How much for multiple ECU programs, a do-it-yourself programmer (also keeps stock program so you can revert back) and electronic diagnostic tool?
$1500?
$1200?
$895???
Try $495!
How much power for an ECU and exhaust? Try 35hp/torque.
That said, the Mustang is plenty fast and the exhaust sounds absolutely amazing stock. I'll be doing a write-up in the off-topic/autos section very soon.
ECUs. For the low-end gains, the number should be zero or close to it. We've seen both of those ECUs make zero power before.
The one-ball has made 5hp or so on the high-end.
Cat-back. 12 - even for a high number is crazy on the high side. I'd be shocked to see a repeatable dyno get over 10. As for the low side, how can 6 be the minimum or conservative? I'd say 3hp for the low.
Air-intakes are another one. Andy has shown great data with the HAI. It's high numbers should be higher. Other intakes have shown ZERO power so that should be the low (6 is outrageous!) and 12 for the high-end is just as crazy. I'd say 6 is a high number. If there's one thing I learned in modding these cars is that anything over $100 for an intake would probably be a waste of money next time around.
Intercooler. The conservative gain should be zero. There are many situations where a larger intercooler won't help. And even in the ones where it MIGHT help, there hasn't been conclusive data to show what type of gains (or loss prevention) is possible.
Just for kicks I'll post some prices of mods for the new 2005 Mustang GT. Everyone tells me this is the car I should be modding but I don't want to spend the dough modding TWO cars (although the MINI-modding is done - at least on this one
). But for cost and especially for power, I see what people are talking about.Examples:
Magnaflow FULL exhaust
-True dual exhaust
- DUAL cats
- Header plus catback
Cost? $1600?
$1200?
Try $695!!!
ECU. Not JUST a flash. But a do-it-yourself pod or tool that plugs under your dash. You pick from half a dozen programs with the tool on its own LARGE SCREEN and download it - without addition power or batteries. Also comes complete with a diagnostic SCAN TOOL!
How much for multiple ECU programs, a do-it-yourself programmer (also keeps stock program so you can revert back) and electronic diagnostic tool?
$1500?
$1200?
$895???
Try $495!
How much power for an ECU and exhaust? Try 35hp/torque.
That said, the Mustang is plenty fast and the exhaust sounds absolutely amazing stock. I'll be doing a write-up in the off-topic/autos section very soon.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
Some more comments...
Keep the flames coming, I'm not even warm!
KevinR For the AGS, I just made the numbers up. Right now, I do Marketing, so I'm allowed
JLM, I know I left a bunch out, but after re-doing the tables about a dozen times, I just decided to stop....
MDSBrain, yep, cable and reg fees for MTH.
GreatGro, Thanks for the numbers. Sometime I may rev up the table. If I get more numbers to put in that are real, this may actually be usefull to people for planning the Mod strategy.
All, The real performance metric is power to weight ratio changes, and this table doesn't do that. It also doesn't capture benefits in efficiencey, athestics or most importantly, handling. Anyone know how one would rank handling adders? Weight reduction? How do you quantify handling improvement by mod?
Stuff for another day...
Matt
KevinR For the AGS, I just made the numbers up. Right now, I do Marketing, so I'm allowed
JLM, I know I left a bunch out, but after re-doing the tables about a dozen times, I just decided to stop....
MDSBrain, yep, cable and reg fees for MTH.
GreatGro, Thanks for the numbers. Sometime I may rev up the table. If I get more numbers to put in that are real, this may actually be usefull to people for planning the Mod strategy.
All, The real performance metric is power to weight ratio changes, and this table doesn't do that. It also doesn't capture benefits in efficiencey, athestics or most importantly, handling. Anyone know how one would rank handling adders? Weight reduction? How do you quantify handling improvement by mod?
Stuff for another day...
Matt
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
Post Away!
Originally Posted by sevin626
I saw 12 whp with my HAI. No ********. I can post graphs if anyone doesnt believe me.
12 hp on top of 177 from oneball\15% pulley.
So by my count, 45$\12 hp is 3.75$\hp.
Cool chart!
Will.
12 hp on top of 177 from oneball\15% pulley.
So by my count, 45$\12 hp is 3.75$\hp.
Cool chart!
Will.
Matt
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
Some Dyno Charts from European Car Magazin
Hi all, I looked over ECs Mini build up.
First Exhaust...

Next Intake

Pully, different exhaust and intake (Mini Mania Stage II)

Chip Tuning.....

There's a claim of Denso Iridiums adding more at the top (9.4 hp and 7.1 ft-lbs, both at 7000 RPM) but there seems to be a problem with the web page, and the link shows the same link as above....
Matt
First Exhaust...

Next Intake

Pully, different exhaust and intake (Mini Mania Stage II)

Chip Tuning.....

There's a claim of Denso Iridiums adding more at the top (9.4 hp and 7.1 ft-lbs, both at 7000 RPM) but there seems to be a problem with the web page, and the link shows the same link as above....
Matt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patsum
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
26
May 29, 2021 06:29 PM
misterbl
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
3
Sep 16, 2015 11:22 AM




