Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain M7 vs Alta intercooler, what one and why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #451  
ingsoc's Avatar
ingsoc
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by gnatster
As an early mod it doesn't make a lot of sense return on the dollar wise. Once other modifications to the power train have been affected and there is still room in the budget then it's time to bring in one of the aftermarket I/C's that fit your driving style and climate to help make the most of the other expenditures.
Spot on. You can make/save/whatever lots more power through pulley and head mods than you can with a conventional top-mounted air-to-air I/C. Some water-to-air or even front-mounted A2A intercoolers make significant gains without regard to the level of modification of your car, but this is simply not the case with A2A's.

Of course, probably the best-performing A2A out there is the JCW GP I/C. Yes, you need to buy one from Europe, but they're the same price or cheaper than the Alta or M7 yet they perform better. Plus, they're factory parts!
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #452  
Revolution Mini Works's Avatar
Revolution Mini Works
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,878
Likes: 2
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by maxmini
I could not agree more with Nate on the priority of a aftermarket IC with regards to upgrading your power plant. With rare exception , the main one being climate , there are several other things that will give you a much bigger bang for the buck. A pulley conversion is usually the foremost on anyone's list and after that it is all a law of diminishing returns. In my opinion a IC rates up with here with a header for example. A header on a stock car will give you next to nothing as far as an increase in power but once you begin to modify the car with a intake and perhaps a head and cam you begin to truly get your monies worth out of that purchase. The key thing to remember with any IC is that they don't really make much HP, they SAVE it .

Randy
M7 tuning

you couldn't be more wrong in this case

if you bought the proper header it IS WELL DOCUMENTED that they make power. Look at the dyno days and who had what parts.
There lies your answer
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #453  
ThumperMCS's Avatar
ThumperMCS
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 19
From: OC, CA
Originally Posted by Revolution Mini Works
you couldn't be more wrong in this case

if you bought the proper header it IS WELL DOCUMENTED that they make power. Look at the dyno days and who had what parts.
There lies your answer
yea, heck...even my OBX made power, with a cheapo One-Ball attached to it
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #454  
minimyke's Avatar
minimyke
2nd Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Thanks Gnat for the clarification because that wasnt an advertisement especially since I dont even own anything from RMW, but I have spent countless hours on NAM researching what works and what doesnt,and the backbone to my previous statements lies in the dyno sheets and I appreciate the fact that you recognized that.

MyKE
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #455  
ingsoc's Avatar
ingsoc
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by Revolution Mini Works
you couldn't be more wrong in this case

if you bought the proper header it IS WELL DOCUMENTED that they make power. Look at the dyno days and who had what parts.
There lies your answer
Lies! Since M7 does not make a header, it is patently obvious that no header works. Simple, logical, M7.

(Of course, it could just be that BECAUSE M7 does not make a header, they won't say that a header makes power. It's much easier and more lucrative to sell a DFIC or a Cosworth head for twice the price of a header as long as they can convince people to buy them!)
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #456  
JIMINNI's Avatar
JIMINNI
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 3
From: Fresno Ca.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
Spot on. You can make/save/whatever lots more power through pulley and head mods than you can with a conventional top-mounted air-to-air I/C. Some water-to-air or even front-mounted A2A intercoolers make significant gains without regard to the level of modification of your car, but this is simply not the case with A2A's.

Of course, probably the best-performing A2A out there is the JCW GP I/C. Yes, you need to buy one from Europe, but they're the same price or cheaper than the Alta or M7 yet they perform better. Plus, they're factory parts!
You just contrididcted yourself on the A2A statement. And concerning performance, this is what Intense is testing right now.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 03:00 PM
  #457  
ingsoc's Avatar
ingsoc
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by JIMINNI
You just contrididcted yourself on the A2A statement. And concerning performance, this is what Intense is testing right now.
I did not. I said "significant gains."
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #458  
Intense's Avatar
Intense
252whp 200trq RMW style
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 702
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Originally Posted by JIMINNI
You just contrididcted yourself on the A2A statement. And concerning performance, this is what Intense is testing right now.
Keep in mind that I'm not doing an end all beat all test and I want to be clear on that. The testing that I am doing is gong to show basic inlet/outlet temps. No pressures, no dyno and no track. I'm simply running some temp probes and seeing how each intercooler does cooling wise under "street conditions"


Originally Posted by ingsoc
Lies! Since M7 does not make a header, it is patently obvious that no header works. Simple, logical, M7.

(Of course, it could just be that BECAUSE M7 does not make a header, they won't say that a header makes power. It's much easier and more lucrative to sell a DFIC or a Cosworth head for twice the price of a header as long as they can convince people to buy them!)
I think you need to re read Randy's post... oh wait, let me quote it for you so its all in one place for you.

Originally Posted by maxmini
In my opinion a IC rates up with here with a header for example. A header on a stock car will give you next to nothing as far as an increase in power but once you begin to modify the car with a intake and perhaps a head and cam you begin to truly get your monies worth out of that purchase. The key thing to remember with any IC is that they don't really make much HP, they SAVE it .

Randy
M7 tuning
All he said was its "his opinion" that a header rates up there with an IC on a stock car. And once you start modifying that increase will be greater. This is the truth

Are you guys saying that a header on a stock car with no other mods is a good investment? .....come on
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #459  
big howe's Avatar
big howe
5th Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Intense
Keep in mind that I'm not doing an end all beat all test and I want to be clear on that. The testing that I am doing is gong to show basic inlet/outlet temps. No pressures, no dyno and no track. I'm simply running some temp probes and seeing how each intercooler does cooling wise under "street conditions"




I think you need to re read Randy's post... oh wait, let me quote it for you so its all in one place for you.



All he said was its "his opinion" that a header rates up there with an IC on a stock car. And once you start modifying that increase will be greater. This is the truth

Are you guys saying that a header on a stock car with no other mods is a good investment? .....come on
The Mini header is notoriously restrictive and full of compromises. There are dyno sheets years back showing improvements even with the cheap OBX. I wish I had dynoed before and after with the OBX on my stock car as there was a vast improvement.
At least with the header you have performance all the time, it's always the same. With the IC, what you get varies with the conditions making it even less of a dollar/performance value.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #460  
JIMINNI's Avatar
JIMINNI
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 3
From: Fresno Ca.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
I did not. I said "significant gains."
Ahh, I think you need to read your own post again, Let me help you, you said, "Some water-to-air or even front-mounted A2A intercoolers make significant gains" Then you procede to say, "but this is simply not the case with A2A's." So what is it?
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #461  
JIMINNI's Avatar
JIMINNI
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 3
From: Fresno Ca.
Originally Posted by Intense
Keep in mind that I'm not doing an end all beat all test and I want to be clear on that. The testing that I am doing is gong to show basic inlet/outlet temps.


I understand that Intense, atleast you are trying
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #462  
JIMINNI's Avatar
JIMINNI
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 3
From: Fresno Ca.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
Lies! Since M7 does not make a header, it is patently obvious that no header works. Simple, logical, M7.

(Of course, it could just be that BECAUSE M7 does not make a header, they won't say that a header makes power. It's much easier and more lucrative to sell a DFIC or a Cosworth head for twice the price of a header as long as they can convince people to buy them!)
So are you saying Cosworth sucks?
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #463  
Mark's Avatar
Mark
North American Motoring :: Founder
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Regarding the reported posts about this thread....so far this thread, of late, is staying pretty civil so unless it gets personal we're going to let it continue running.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:58 PM
  #464  
gnatster's Avatar
gnatster
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by JIMINNI
So are you saying Cosworth sucks?
This is just asking for problems.

To bad the sarcasm in ingsoc's post is lost.

Lets stick the issue at hand please. We need to sit back and wait to see what Instense brings to the table.

I hate the whip..but I'll crack it if need be.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #465  
big howe's Avatar
big howe
5th Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JIMINNI
So are you saying Cosworth sucks?
Hey, Mr. Negativity here I don't believe I see the words Cosworth sucks anywhere in his post. Can we stay on topic?
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #466  
JIMINNI's Avatar
JIMINNI
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 3
From: Fresno Ca.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
Lies! Since M7 does not make a header, it is patently obvious that no header works. Simple, logical, M7.

(Of course, it could just be that BECAUSE M7 does not make a header, they won't say that a header makes power. It's much easier and more lucrative to sell a DFIC or a Cosworth head for twice the price of a header as long as they can convince people to buy them!)
Originally Posted by big howe
The Mini header is notoriously restrictive and full of compromises. There are dyno sheets years back showing improvements even with the cheap OBX. I wish I had dynoed before and after with the OBX on my stock car as there was a vast improvement.
At least with the header you have performance all the time, it's always the same. With the IC, what you get varies with the conditions making it even less of a dollar/performance value.
Originally Posted by big howe
Hey, Mr. Negativity here I don't believe I see the words Cosworth sucks anywhere in his post. Can we stay on topic?
So these are on topic?
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #467  
JIMINNI's Avatar
JIMINNI
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 3
From: Fresno Ca.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
Lies! It's much easier and more lucrative to sell a DFIC or a Cosworth head for twice the price of a header as long as they can convince people to buy them!)
Originally Posted by JIMINNI
So are you saying Cosworth sucks?
Originally Posted by big howe
Hey, Mr. Negativity here I don't believe I see the words Cosworth sucks anywhere in his post. Can we stay on topic?
This looks like a shot to me I'm done for now
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #468  
gnatster's Avatar
gnatster
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by JIMINNI
This looks like a shot to me I'm done for now
Looks like a shot because you are looking for a shot.

There are quite a few thinly veiled cheap shots at all kinds of things in the thread. So to get this far in and start reporting stuff ...yikes...

Hello Pot, please meet Kettle...
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #469  
maxmini's Avatar
maxmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 10
From: L.A ca
Originally Posted by Revolution Mini Works
you couldn't be more wrong in this case

if you bought the proper header it IS WELL DOCUMENTED that they make power. Look at the dyno days and who had what parts.
There lies your answer
I disagree with you .Perhaps I wasn't clear enough but my point was that like an aftermarket IC you will get more " bang for your buck " further down the mod list with a header. You can't tell me that you will make the same horsepower gain with a header on a stock engine as one you have done a head, intake and cam to.

Randy
M7 Tuning
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #470  
Intense's Avatar
Intense
252whp 200trq RMW style
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 702
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Originally Posted by big howe
The Mini header is notoriously restrictive and full of compromises. There are dyno sheets years back showing improvements even with the cheap OBX. I wish I had dynoed before and after with the OBX on my stock car as there was a vast improvement.
At least with the header you have performance all the time, it's always the same. With the IC, what you get varies with the conditions making it even less of a dollar/performance value.

A header making more power all the time versus an IC makes sense to me. Also making more power with a after market header over stock does too. I just wasn't under the impression that it was more than a few ponies.

Not like I really know more than I've read on forums tho. I have yet to take the header plunge I've been trying to keep my car as civil as I can.... not sure I'll be able to withstand the draw of the "big power" from a head, header, Quaif...and so on much longer.

Anyway, as many twists and turns as this thread has had I really do think there is much knowledge in it from many informed people in the NAM community.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #471  
HighLife4136's Avatar
HighLife4136
5th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere just left of off center
Originally Posted by gnatster
Looks like a shot because you are looking for a shot.

There are quite a few thinly veiled cheap shots at all kinds of things in the thread. So to get this far in and start reporting stuff ...yikes...

Hello Pot, please meet Kettle...
Finally, a mod holding someone accountable within a forum
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #472  
ingsoc's Avatar
ingsoc
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by JIMINNI
This looks like a shot to me I'm done for now
You don't know me. I've owned nearly every M7 "go fast" part and seen all of them fail to make my car any faster. Oh, and, the Cosworth kit that was on my car actually ruined my previous engine. But... no, I did not say that Cosworth anything sucked (although I may believe it does after owning it).

I made a comment about the DFIC I/C, a part which also does not deliver. It has no appreciable gains on a dyno and to me seems to make no difference in my few driving experiences in cars with the DFIC. The difference is certainly not significant, but the price certainly is. I believe that I have the right to say that. And, apparently so do the moderators. Carry on... and please leave me alone. I have done nothing to you.
 

Last edited by ingsoc; Jun 26, 2008 at 08:21 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #473  
Larry Clemens's Avatar
Larry Clemens
5th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
My 2005 MCS w/ $1,000 in bolt on mods (pulley, CAI, one-ball exhaust) was faster than a Cosworth car.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #474  
Revolution Mini Works's Avatar
Revolution Mini Works
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,878
Likes: 2
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by maxmini
I disagree with you .Perhaps I wasn't clear enough but my point was that like an aftermarket IC you will get more " bang for your buck " further down the mod list with a header. You can't tell me that you will make the same horsepower gain with a header on a stock engine as one you have done a head, intake and cam to.

Randy
M7 Tuning
I would think we disagree on almost all points concerning Mini Tuning.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #475  
maxmini's Avatar
maxmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 10
From: L.A ca
Originally Posted by Larry Clemens
My 2005 MCS w/ $1,000 in bolt on mods (pulley, CAI, one-ball exhaust) was faster than a Cosworth car.
Larry I am really curious as to exactly how was this detremined ?

Randy
M7 Tuning
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:43 PM.