D Stock ANOTHER wheels and tires thread...sorry.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #1  
DrkSilver163's Avatar
DrkSilver163
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
From: ??
ANOTHER wheels and tires thread...sorry.

I was curious to see what are the qualifications necessary for a wheel to be in order to stay in a stock class? I was thinking these wheels from edgeracing.com...but i dont know if ill stay stock...som help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Marco
http://www.edgeracing.com/2004/Mini/...ll)/wheel/126/
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
satay-ayam's Avatar
satay-ayam
5th Gear
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 1
From: Wappingers Falls, NY
The wheel has to be the same diameter and width as stock, and within +/- 0.25" of the OEM offset.

All of the 16" wheels on that site are 7" wide, so no soup for you
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #3  
Motoring's Avatar
Motoring
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
I think the wheel you are looking at is the Flik bullet A 17x7... correct? if yes then it is legal. But the best R compound tire choices are in 16 inch sizes.
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 07:28 PM
  #4  
BGarfield's Avatar
BGarfield
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Airy, MD USA
Actually...

We've said that for awhile now. But, the 205/40R17 is exactly the same dimensions as the 205/45R16 in Hoosiers. So, it really comes down to how much sidewall is better IF you're running 17's that weigh the same as the 16's. It's easier to get a lightweight 16" wheel, but not in a 6.5" width.

Let's consider this:
A set of Centerlines RPM's (on sale for $179! 13.5lbs!) or other good forged 17's might have an advantage.
Essentially, if you can find a 17" wheel under say 17lbs that you're happy with, you may be in business.

You only have to figure out, through some good test and tune, if the smaller sidewall with the 7" width is helpful or not. Heck, my Enkei RPO-1's are 14.5lbs, I may have to consider the 17's...

Ahh, an epiphany!
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #5  
BGarfield's Avatar
BGarfield
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Airy, MD USA
Just rethought some stuff:
1) The extra .5" of wheel width wouldn't necessarily help the camber challenged MINI. The MINI probably benefits from the more rounded shoulder it gets from a 6.5 vs. 7.
2) Although the weight is similar, you still have the heavy part of the wheel on the outside of the circle, creating more rotational mass.
3) Not sure a lower sidwall would help on the MINI, especially with a launch at a Pro Solo.

Whoops, did I get too technical in this thread? Sorry.

Brian
 
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #6  
morknmini's Avatar
morknmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Left Coast
Fascinating stuff (especially about the camber challenged MINI). Thanks, everyone! Glad DrkSilver163 launched another wheel and tire thread.
 

Last edited by morknmini; May 4, 2005 at 09:09 PM. Reason: explication
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 07:50 AM
  #7  
OasisT's Avatar
OasisT
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
One other thing to note, when I spoke with a Hoosier rep, on the 205/40/17, they were said to be slightly skinnier than the 205/45/16 since they have a margin for deviation on the widths when building tires. I'm not sure if that matters or not but I figured I would throw that out there since the 17's on the Hoosier site are shown to be 8.6" wide just like the 16's but thats printed incorrect on the Hoosier website and all the Hoosier dealers.

With that said, I have still been thinking of trying 17's for kicks. I did run my Kosei K1-TS(14lbs) with Kumho MX's locally for kicks and it seemed good(and the time showed it according to other national trophy drivers, beat STX and DS) to me but obviously more testing would be needed.

So, who wants to be the Guinea Pig? I think I might.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 07:53 AM
  #8  
BGarfield's Avatar
BGarfield
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Airy, MD USA
Heck, you've already GOT the 17's

Thanks for clearing that up with Hoosier. I was aware they have a range to build the tire in, but ASSumed their site would be correct

Brian
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
OasisT's Avatar
OasisT
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by BGarfield
Heck, you've already GOT the 17's
Yeah, I figure, even if they happen to be a bit slower, I might as well give them a try at 3-4 divisionals and just have a spare set of 16's ready to run in case things go badly. If Kumho will follow suite with the V710, who knows, they may make a 215/40/17 which would be interesting.

One positive factor in trying the 17's is, regardless of whether I'm burining through 16's or 17's, I'm still burning through rubber at the same cost per tire basically(only slightly higher) so its not really going to cost anything additional to do the testing to this point. If only I had the 16's and 17's side by side from Hoosier to see what the width difference was, but, I was told the difference was more than just a couple MM's. But, would it really matter or not? One other factor to consider as well is that they would be Road Race compound as well, but, thats another topic.

Craig
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 08:50 AM
  #10  
DrkSilver163's Avatar
DrkSilver163
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
From: ??
Thanks for the help! I was looking at the 17in Flik bullet-C/A, cant make a decision. In not looking to get R compound tires... $$ . Thinking of just getting a packaged deal from edgeracing with some ultra high performance summer tires for the track. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 08:52 AM
  #11  
OasisT's Avatar
OasisT
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Kumho MX's are a good choice for Street Use and ocassional track use since they don't mind heat like some others(At least I think). I'm running the 215/45/17's.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 11:59 AM
  #12  
DrkSilver163's Avatar
DrkSilver163
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
From: ??
whats the difference between the 215/40s and 215/45's...besides 5 bucks.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #13  
TomA's Avatar
TomA
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Obviously the sidewall (kidding). Kumho Mx 215/40/17 overall diameter is 23.9". The 215/45/17 overall diameter is 24.7". They are taller. The cost difference at tireRack is $30.00 -- the 215/40/17 is a sale item.



 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #14  
BGarfield's Avatar
BGarfield
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Airy, MD USA
Or in other words, the 215/40R17 will give you lower gearing than stock, the 215/45R17 will give you taller gearing than stock.
I would definitely get the 40, I always prefer lower gearing unless the diameter is significantly smaller and the wheel looks funny.

Brian
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 08:59 PM
  #15  
morknmini's Avatar
morknmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Left Coast
Is this true: smaller diameter = better acceleration and larger diameter = higher top speed? Sorry to ask such a basic question, but the premise seems logical enough for it to prove faulty in practice.
 

Last edited by morknmini; May 5, 2005 at 08:59 PM. Reason: typo
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #16  
satay-ayam's Avatar
satay-ayam
5th Gear
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 1
From: Wappingers Falls, NY
Originally Posted by morknmini
Is this true: smaller diameter = better acceleration and larger diameter = higher top speed?
yes . . . although most cars are topspeed limited by aerodynamics and power, not gearing
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #17  
morknmini's Avatar
morknmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Left Coast
Originally Posted by satay-ayam
yes . . . although most cars are topspeed limited by aerodynamics and power, not gearing
Heresy on NAM! Are you suggesting that the sleek MINI could be aerodynamically challenged at top speed? Suppose it had the aero kit and a buncha splitters?
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #18  
ggp's Avatar
ggp
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BGarfield
Let's consider this:
A set of Centerlines RPM's (on sale for $179! 13.5lbs!) or other good forged 17's might have an advantage.
Essentially, if you can find a 17" wheel under say 17lbs that you're happy with, you may be in business.

You only have to figure out, through some good test and tune, if the smaller sidewall with the 7" width is helpful or not. Heck, my Enkei RPO-1's are 14.5lbs, I may have to consider the 17's...

Ahh, an epiphany!.........
Originally Posted by BGarfield
...Just rethought some stuff
No don't rethink it, you want to switch to 17's. And when you do, I'd be happy to buy the RPO-1's from you
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #19  
Tremec's Avatar
Tremec
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville Florida
Originally Posted by morknmini
Heresy on NAM! Are you suggesting that the sleek MINI could be aerodynamically challenged at top speed? Suppose it had the aero kit and a buncha splitters?
Well my bes has been 137 in 5th but I ran into some traffic and had to let off
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
pre shrunk
MINIs & Minis for Sale
0
Aug 18, 2015 11:09 AM
sabjcw
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
4
Aug 14, 2015 07:40 AM
Rennfahrer555
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
10
Aug 13, 2015 09:07 AM
nomar116
MINI Parts for Sale
0
Aug 9, 2015 09:42 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 PM.