R50/53 MINI Superiority Complexes
MINI Superiority Complexes
I'm going preface this by saying that the two factors that are most often mentioned by MINI owners in focus groups regarding why they purchased a MINI are: the handling and the appearance. As owners, we come to the table with near universal appreciation for those two MINI virtues that together make us smile whenever we drive or look at our MINIs.
With that in mind, there are some superiority complexes within the MINI community that I could do without.




Stick Superiority Complex 


MINI owners that hate on other MINI owners for driving a MINI that doesn't match their own narrow definition of what real motoring is about. Motoring doesn't need a clutch! You don't have to shift to enjoy an open twisty road and not everyone wants to play with a **** in traffic every day on the way to work. It doesn't make your MINI any more special or someone else's any less special based on what your left leg is doing.
You each are happy with the way your MINI is. Let it be. 



MCS Superiority Complex 


The COOPER is just as much of a MINI as the COOPER S is. The MINI made its name on handling and style and the COOPER has both in huge amounts. MINI's claim to fame hasn't been straight-line speed or making astronomical power. The COOPER driving experience and the S driving experience are different, but the COOPER isn't any less rewarding of a car to drive. Sure it forces the driver to be more cognoscente of the gear and rpm they are in and to manage momentum in corners more wisely, but is that really something we should hold up as a bad thing? One troubling aspect to some of the "just a COOPER" line of thinking is an underlying assertion that MC owners would be MCS owners if they just had the money. THAT isn't the motoring spirit.



Hardtop Superiority Complex 



Yet again we turn on our fellow motorers by somehow implying that the Cabrio isn't as good as the Hardtop. Not everyone has the same priorities. Not everyone wants to have a dark headliner over their head on a sunny day.
The Cabrio is every bit a MINI. If you don't like it, don't buy it! Then again, maybe the cabrio haters would have purchased one themselves if they just had the money. 



Performance Mod Superiority Complex 



Basically this one holds that MINIs that are modified with performance in mind are superior to those that aren't and that stock MINIs are to be looked down upon. This, in spite of the fact that in stock form, the MINI is already a giant killer in the handling and looks departments. "Stock" MINIs are still for the most part custom ordered by their owners and just because they stay the way their owners fell in love with them the day they brought it home doesn't make stock MINIs any less special.



MC/MCS Superiority Complex 



This one is a more recent development. MINI owners claiming that the Traveller isn't a real MINI. It's still going to be about 16" shorter than an Audi A3. It's still going to have driving dynamics tuned by the same people that brought us the MC and MCS, the fact that it's a little longer and makes a MINI approachable for people that previously had concerns about the utility of something as small as the MC and MCS really shouldn't scare us. Regardless of what cars they come from, Traveller owners will still be driving one of the smallest new cars on the road and one of the best handling and best looking ones to boot.
In Freakin Conclusion
These complexes shouldn't be part of a community that is brought together by a car as fun as the MINI. MC, MCa, MCS, MCSa, MCc, MCca, MCSc, MCSca, Ta, TSa, T, or TS, it’s still all MINI and we all have our reasons for picking the type and spec that we did. It’s all good. Embrace that already!
With that in mind, there are some superiority complexes within the MINI community that I could do without.



Stick Superiority Complex 


MINI owners that hate on other MINI owners for driving a MINI that doesn't match their own narrow definition of what real motoring is about. Motoring doesn't need a clutch! You don't have to shift to enjoy an open twisty road and not everyone wants to play with a **** in traffic every day on the way to work. It doesn't make your MINI any more special or someone else's any less special based on what your left leg is doing.
You each are happy with the way your MINI is. Let it be. 


MCS Superiority Complex 


The COOPER is just as much of a MINI as the COOPER S is. The MINI made its name on handling and style and the COOPER has both in huge amounts. MINI's claim to fame hasn't been straight-line speed or making astronomical power. The COOPER driving experience and the S driving experience are different, but the COOPER isn't any less rewarding of a car to drive. Sure it forces the driver to be more cognoscente of the gear and rpm they are in and to manage momentum in corners more wisely, but is that really something we should hold up as a bad thing? One troubling aspect to some of the "just a COOPER" line of thinking is an underlying assertion that MC owners would be MCS owners if they just had the money. THAT isn't the motoring spirit.



Hardtop Superiority Complex 



Yet again we turn on our fellow motorers by somehow implying that the Cabrio isn't as good as the Hardtop. Not everyone has the same priorities. Not everyone wants to have a dark headliner over their head on a sunny day.
The Cabrio is every bit a MINI. If you don't like it, don't buy it! Then again, maybe the cabrio haters would have purchased one themselves if they just had the money. 



Performance Mod Superiority Complex 



Basically this one holds that MINIs that are modified with performance in mind are superior to those that aren't and that stock MINIs are to be looked down upon. This, in spite of the fact that in stock form, the MINI is already a giant killer in the handling and looks departments. "Stock" MINIs are still for the most part custom ordered by their owners and just because they stay the way their owners fell in love with them the day they brought it home doesn't make stock MINIs any less special.



MC/MCS Superiority Complex 



In Freakin Conclusion

These complexes shouldn't be part of a community that is brought together by a car as fun as the MINI. MC, MCa, MCS, MCSa, MCc, MCca, MCSc, MCSca, Ta, TSa, T, or TS, it’s still all MINI and we all have our reasons for picking the type and spec that we did. It’s all good. Embrace that already!
Last edited by dave; Jan 29, 2006 at 10:38 AM.
Well said, and I agree. After reading post after post about the MCS being a better car, I sold my MCC and bought an MCS because I felt the MCS was the Mini to have. Although I really like my "S", I miss the unique handling characteristics of the Cooper that I find missing in the "S". Both really are great cars in their own ways.
Isn't this what makes us all "different". I remember when going through the auto versus manual trans thing, it was a tough choice. In the end I chose it only because the LSD was available with the stick. Hense I got a stick.
It's been a hack of a time "relearning" but it was like picking up where I left off. Cabs are really fun, anyone who has not driven in a convertable is missing alot in life. I'm lucky to have a '90 mustang conv at home
.
In the end, are we not all smiling while driving our minis? Looking at the speedo and seeing you doing like 70 around a turn that says 35mph only :impatient.
I'm sure I'll get heck for not doing the pulley just yet, but eh I don't need more power right now. I have a 350hp mustang that I can get my fun out of
It's been a hack of a time "relearning" but it was like picking up where I left off. Cabs are really fun, anyone who has not driven in a convertable is missing alot in life. I'm lucky to have a '90 mustang conv at home
.In the end, are we not all smiling while driving our minis? Looking at the speedo and seeing you doing like 70 around a turn that says 35mph only :impatient.
I'm sure I'll get heck for not doing the pulley just yet, but eh I don't need more power right now. I have a 350hp mustang that I can get my fun out of
Human nature....
it kinda sucks.... But where would we be without it!
You forgot two:
Matt
You forgot two:
- that is that JCW sucks because it's expensive....
- that the world will end when the 07 comes out because it has a different motor!
Matt
I agree with most of that. However, I take exception here:
While I agree that a driver doesn't necessarily need to have to fiddle with shifting and gearing, it should an imperative inside the automotive industry to move toward pedalless clutch systems and away from torque convertors. I don't think the efficiency and utility of a solid connection between wheels and engine will ever be matched by a fluid dynamic interface and we're now at a point in the development of automobile technology that an automatic transmission could realistically use a clutch. And I'm honetsly curious what could be possible with a clutch-fed CVT. The clutch could conceivable last longer than the engine if it's programmed well and the car would probably accelerate like an electric. It would be interesting, that's for sure.
Motoring doesn't need a clutch!
Why stop there?
Originally Posted by effusant
I agree with most of that. However, I take exception here:
While I agree that a driver doesn't necessarily need to have to fiddle with shifting and gearing, it should an imperative inside the automotive industry to move toward pedalless clutch systems and away from torque convertors. I don't think the efficiency and utility of a solid connection between wheels and engine will ever be matched by a fluid dynamic interface and we're now at a point in the development of automobile technology that an automatic transmission could realistically use a clutch. And I'm honetsly curious what could be possible with a clutch-fed CVT. The clutch could conceivable last longer than the engine if it's programmed well and the car would probably accelerate like an electric. It would be interesting, that's for sure.
While I agree that a driver doesn't necessarily need to have to fiddle with shifting and gearing, it should an imperative inside the automotive industry to move toward pedalless clutch systems and away from torque convertors. I don't think the efficiency and utility of a solid connection between wheels and engine will ever be matched by a fluid dynamic interface and we're now at a point in the development of automobile technology that an automatic transmission could realistically use a clutch. And I'm honetsly curious what could be possible with a clutch-fed CVT. The clutch could conceivable last longer than the engine if it's programmed well and the car would probably accelerate like an electric. It would be interesting, that's for sure.

Change the original post to "Motoring TODAY doesn't need a clutch"
Matt
Amen DID! Can't find anything in your post that I have seen or experienced myself. My MCS is still bone stock and I feel that some folks here and in my local club look down upon me because my MINI(s) is still tuned the way BMW wanted it in the first place. I don't care about pulleys, intakes, etc, etc. I think MINI tuned this car to perfection at the assembly line, thank you very much!
Trending Topics
I have another one to add:
MC superiority complex. I love my MC and having driven a bone stock MCS and a pullied MSC I just do not get it. More power sure, but at what point does the extra power take away from the experience? While I respect that everybody is doing their own thing I look at the MCS and think 1. Waste of the extra cash and 2. Dear god why put a hole in the best looking bonnet in the world?
MC superiority complex. I love my MC and having driven a bone stock MCS and a pullied MSC I just do not get it. More power sure, but at what point does the extra power take away from the experience? While I respect that everybody is doing their own thing I look at the MCS and think 1. Waste of the extra cash and 2. Dear god why put a hole in the best looking bonnet in the world?
Originally Posted by mbcoops
please laugh.
DiD - I agree with your rant. I've seen them played out here on NAM, especially the manual-shifting superiority complex, but I can thankfully say that I haven't felt effects from any of them--I'm really happy with my MINI, regardless of what anyone else thinks might make it better!
I think most people feel that way, but it's just the nature of online forums for people to disagree, and the nature of car guys and gals to think their cars are better than anybody else's! Out in the real world, I think we're all motoring together.
Like Chip Foose said on some TV show - everyone at a car show is a potential best friend. Some may like hot rods, some may like monster trucks, and we may like MINIs, but we're all alike deep down in our motoring cores.
(Except for MINI owners who don't wave. They're out of it.)
he he he...
Very Good Rant, DiD!
Truthfully though, the ones I most frequently encounter on NAM are:
MY WHEELS ARE LIGHTER THAN YOURS...MY WHEELS ARE LIGHTER THAN AIR!
RUNFLATS HURT YOUR TUSHIE...GET NON-RUNFLATS NOW!
"REAL" DRIVER'S DON'T USE CUPHOLDERS...
MOD--AND SCREAM "MOSS MAGNUSSON"
DRIVE IT LIKE YOU STOLED IT vs. BREAK IT IN PROPER
and of course:
JCW IS CRAP vs. JCW IS CRAP-TACULAR, CRAP-TASTIC, CRAP-TABULOUS, and Super CRAP-AFRAGALISTIC EXPIALIDOCIOUS!
Very Good Rant, DiD!
Truthfully though, the ones I most frequently encounter on NAM are:
MY WHEELS ARE LIGHTER THAN YOURS...MY WHEELS ARE LIGHTER THAN AIR!
RUNFLATS HURT YOUR TUSHIE...GET NON-RUNFLATS NOW!
"REAL" DRIVER'S DON'T USE CUPHOLDERS...
MOD--AND SCREAM "MOSS MAGNUSSON"
DRIVE IT LIKE YOU STOLED IT vs. BREAK IT IN PROPER
and of course:
JCW IS CRAP vs. JCW IS CRAP-TACULAR, CRAP-TASTIC, CRAP-TABULOUS, and Super CRAP-AFRAGALISTIC EXPIALIDOCIOUS!
Originally Posted by Tarzan
and of course:
JCW IS CRAP
JCW IS CRAP
Funny to see the subcultures within the Culture of the MINI. Sometimes MINI owners also trash other, non-sporting vehicles lacking to understand that everyone has different needs and not everyone (in fact percentage wise, probably very few) cares about "performance".
To each, their own...
Well done DiD
. I also love the "my tires are lighter than yours" that Tarzan said, part of a wheel superiority complex that sometimes keeps me out of the "show me your wheels thread". I would like to add one if I may:
"Traditional MINI Values" Superiority Complex...
Those who think that they are better because their MINI upholds some unwritten "Mini Cooper traditions and norms", whatever those are, and who hate on MINI owners whose MINI's do not follow these norms, as in bigger wheels, chrome (
OH NO!), lambo doors, extreme body kits, or anything not conservative and eurostyle. I'm tired of hearing it. If I want to put neon under my car and blinking LED's on my valve stems then I will and that doesnt make me any less of a person. (not that I do, but go for it if thats you) If it is not on your car then keep your mouth shut!
Whew, that felt good. I cant believe that anyone would actually make arguments against the complexes that DiD wrote, that's bascially admitting to having the complex. Thats funny.
"Traditional MINI Values" Superiority Complex...
Those who think that they are better because their MINI upholds some unwritten "Mini Cooper traditions and norms", whatever those are, and who hate on MINI owners whose MINI's do not follow these norms, as in bigger wheels, chrome (
OH NO!), lambo doors, extreme body kits, or anything not conservative and eurostyle. I'm tired of hearing it. If I want to put neon under my car and blinking LED's on my valve stems then I will and that doesnt make me any less of a person. (not that I do, but go for it if thats you) If it is not on your car then keep your mouth shut!Whew, that felt good. I cant believe that anyone would actually make arguments against the complexes that DiD wrote, that's bascially admitting to having the complex. Thats funny.
Perhaps it is natural to make comparisons when explaining why one chose a certain model/options or when we are asked for an evaluation of particular MINI features or mods, but there is a line that gets crossed, isn't there...and that's where the problems tend to happen.
Fortunately enough of us have been around MINIs long enough to know the real unique benefits offered by different models...too bad the superiority-thing has crept into other discussions.
I have a few Mini/MINI friends around these parts...one drives an MCS, one drives a JCW, I drive a Cooper, and another friend (who has restored many classic Minis) drives a Cooper CVT. It's impossible to argue w/ the choices made by these venerable, long-time enthusiasts.
Personally, I love it when experienced owners give unsolicited kudos to other MINI models and how those express various facets of the motoring spirit...that's a much better vibe than the whole superiority thing.
Fortunately enough of us have been around MINIs long enough to know the real unique benefits offered by different models...too bad the superiority-thing has crept into other discussions.
I have a few Mini/MINI friends around these parts...one drives an MCS, one drives a JCW, I drive a Cooper, and another friend (who has restored many classic Minis) drives a Cooper CVT. It's impossible to argue w/ the choices made by these venerable, long-time enthusiasts.
Personally, I love it when experienced owners give unsolicited kudos to other MINI models and how those express various facets of the motoring spirit...that's a much better vibe than the whole superiority thing.
Thanks DiD, I thought it was just me.
What about the I-take-better-pictures-than-you superiority complex syndrome?
I hope nobody suggests we all get the same thing, and think the same way, and listen to the same music, and...
What about the I-take-better-pictures-than-you superiority complex syndrome?
I hope nobody suggests we all get the same thing, and think the same way, and listen to the same music, and...
I agree that it gets tiresome when people want to force their un asked for opinion on you as if it were more then just their POV and/or they come off as of they have a superior attitude. When people start a thread asking for opinions, though, it can open a can of worms. Generally, considering the nature of a messageboards, people will engage in discussing the whys and wherefores of their preferences, the most you can do is add to it or click off I guess.
Oh, and my wheels are lighter then air and Indi Blue is not nicer then Hyper
Oh, and my wheels are lighter then air and Indi Blue is not nicer then Hyper
Nicely done.
How often can you go to an event like AMVIV and see over 200 of the same kind of car, and not have 2 exactly a like.
That to me makes the Mini so special. If they weren't all different, they would be just another car. ( well maybe not ) they would still be a Mini.
How often can you go to an event like AMVIV and see over 200 of the same kind of car, and not have 2 exactly a like.
That to me makes the Mini so special. If they weren't all different, they would be just another car. ( well maybe not ) they would still be a Mini.
Originally Posted by DiD
This one is a more recent development. MINI owners claiming that the Traveller isn't a real MINI. It's still going to be about 16" shorter than an Audi A3. It's still going to have driving dynamics tuned by the same people that brought us the MC and MCS, the fact that it's a little longer and makes
]
]
the mini traveller detroit. it resembled a mini but the winter
theme was just plain ugly.
hopefully the real thing will be better.
Originally Posted by The MINITOR
Those who think that they are better because their MINI upholds some unwritten "Mini Cooper traditions and norms", whatever those are, and who hate on MINI owners whose MINI's do not follow these norms, as in bigger wheels, chrome (
OH NO!), lambo doors, extreme body kits, or anything not conservative and eurostyle. I'm tired of hearing it. If I want to put neon under my car and blinking LED's on my valve stems then I will and that doesnt make me any less of a person. (not that I do, but go for it if thats you) If it is not on your car then keep your mouth shut!
OH NO!), lambo doors, extreme body kits, or anything not conservative and eurostyle. I'm tired of hearing it. If I want to put neon under my car and blinking LED's on my valve stems then I will and that doesnt make me any less of a person. (not that I do, but go for it if thats you) If it is not on your car then keep your mouth shut!Nobody's going to stop anyone on this forum from making their car look ridiculous and perform worst than stock, but if it's possible to disuade somebody from chroming their intercooler or installing a neon strobe light in their steering wheel, I'll be damned if I'm going to sit back and pretend "it's cool, do what you want".
OK, well maybe I was giving extreme examples, as was the example in your response. But if toned down, I'm just tired of the "traditional/conservative" (not sure what to call them) MINI owners who look down at different styles that aren't there own. Like the MINI owner who hates on chrome or big wheels because it is "not appropriate" for the MINI (which I have been told). The beauty of the MINI, as well as other cars, is that you can buy it stock and then add your own style if you like. And you add it to your car, not anyone elses, so why should they care and and act superior? That's what I don't get.
I am all for someone leaving there car stock, blacking it out, having small wheels, or doing whatever they want to their car because it is their car and their style, not my car and variety is good. It is those who try to impose that their style is superior that really erk me, and especially the ones who frown on the "untradtional" MINI styles. Its all good. To each his own, I've said enough. Now I better go install those spinners.
(I would too)
I am all for someone leaving there car stock, blacking it out, having small wheels, or doing whatever they want to their car because it is their car and their style, not my car and variety is good. It is those who try to impose that their style is superior that really erk me, and especially the ones who frown on the "untradtional" MINI styles. Its all good. To each his own, I've said enough. Now I better go install those spinners.
(I would too)
Originally Posted by The MINITOR
OK, well maybe I was giving extreme examples, as was the example in your response. ...
I never understood those threads .... Come see my new bling. The ONLY one it should matter to is YOU ... who paid for it. If you want to brag about it ... looking for validation in the virtual world ... then you pay your money and take your chances because everyone idea of what is "cool" is different. Looking for validation can lead to serious disappointment.
To each their own
How about....
The New MINI ("BINI/BMW MINI") is not a "real MIni," or the closely related, a classic Mini is a rusty death trap with no place on modern highways" syndrom.
Some of us own New MINIs (seems strange to call them that now that they have been a fixture on our roads since 2001); some of us own classic Minis (voted car of the century in several polls, way back in the last milenium); some of us own both. This syndrom exists in many car cultures -- air-cooled versus water-coolded VWs, 60's Pontiac GTOs versus new 2003-on models, round-eye Jeeps versus square headlight models are just a few examples -- and we probably are not going to change anything. However, I think the MINI/Mini communities have much to learn from each other. For the New MINI owner, the heritage that many classic owners are preserving helps us learn of the history that led BMW to select the MiNi brand as worthy of continuation. For the classic Mini owner, the fact that BMW has given the automotive world what possibly is the vehicle that BMC/British Leyland/Rover might be marketing today if they only had the resources/time/energy/inclination to do so through periodic upgrades is worthy of attention.
These two communities have much to learn from each other, in my opinion at least. Granted, flamming idiots exist in both communities. My advice is to ignore that faction and enjoy what brings us together when we do meet.
Motor on,
Paul
p.s. What's in my garage? 2006 MCS (replaced 2003 MCS), 1967 Austin Cooper S, 1968 Morris Traveller Woody, and a 1999 Ford Contour SVT -- all driver's vehicles -- all different and fun!
The New MINI ("BINI/BMW MINI") is not a "real MIni," or the closely related, a classic Mini is a rusty death trap with no place on modern highways" syndrom.
Some of us own New MINIs (seems strange to call them that now that they have been a fixture on our roads since 2001); some of us own classic Minis (voted car of the century in several polls, way back in the last milenium); some of us own both. This syndrom exists in many car cultures -- air-cooled versus water-coolded VWs, 60's Pontiac GTOs versus new 2003-on models, round-eye Jeeps versus square headlight models are just a few examples -- and we probably are not going to change anything. However, I think the MINI/Mini communities have much to learn from each other. For the New MINI owner, the heritage that many classic owners are preserving helps us learn of the history that led BMW to select the MiNi brand as worthy of continuation. For the classic Mini owner, the fact that BMW has given the automotive world what possibly is the vehicle that BMC/British Leyland/Rover might be marketing today if they only had the resources/time/energy/inclination to do so through periodic upgrades is worthy of attention.
These two communities have much to learn from each other, in my opinion at least. Granted, flamming idiots exist in both communities. My advice is to ignore that faction and enjoy what brings us together when we do meet.
Motor on,
Paul
p.s. What's in my garage? 2006 MCS (replaced 2003 MCS), 1967 Austin Cooper S, 1968 Morris Traveller Woody, and a 1999 Ford Contour SVT -- all driver's vehicles -- all different and fun!




