A few shots from this weekend's autocross...
A few shots from this weekend's autocross...
Audi Club autocross this weekend at Maywood Park horsetrack in Maywood, IL. These pictures were taken by an extremely talented friend of mine. His website is www.formulafoto.com





Last edited by dave; May 30, 2006 at 12:17 PM.
Where would i find out about being able to enter in these events, I'd of loved to do an autox this weekend?
Nice photos I too like #3 the best, but they're kinda big so its harder to see the composition.
Nice photos I too like #3 the best, but they're kinda big so its harder to see the composition.
Originally Posted by motor on
Where would i find out about being able to enter in these events, I'd of loved to do an autox this weekend?
Nice photos I too like #3 the best, but they're kinda big so its harder to see the composition.
Nice photos I too like #3 the best, but they're kinda big so its harder to see the composition.
We had 68 cars this weekend and 36 of them were non-Audi/VAG products, so it's a nice mixture.
Mmmm, nice seeing a DS/DS flying around on a track. Now you got me thinking about different wheels (wife is getting tired of me complaining about the R/F tires).
I like photo one the best as it truly conveys you pushing the car to 10/10ths. The other two look like you're parked on the track with the wheels and tire tread tack sharp. Only the body lean (car and driver) lend to the subject of motion. Maybe I'm just too spoiled with Jim's racing photos.
Very well done photos otherwise though and would love to have similiar ones of my car.
I like photo one the best as it truly conveys you pushing the car to 10/10ths. The other two look like you're parked on the track with the wheels and tire tread tack sharp. Only the body lean (car and driver) lend to the subject of motion. Maybe I'm just too spoiled with Jim's racing photos.
Very well done photos otherwise though and would love to have similiar ones of my car.
Yeah I think he has to use a super-high shutter speed on the head-on ones because the distance to the subject is changing so fast. I'm obviously not a photographer, but I think that's why you don't get the motion blur that you do with the side-on shots.
This one shows a little more motion - I'm just getting out of the start gate here...
This one shows a little more motion - I'm just getting out of the start gate here...
Last edited by dave; May 30, 2006 at 12:17 PM.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by markbradford
Yeah I think he has to use a super-high shutter speed on the head-on ones because the distance to the subject is changing so fast. I'm obviously not a photographer, but I think that's why you don't get the motion blur that you do with the side-on shots.
Jim (jimz68), care to share some recommended shutter speeds for car racing photos?
Originally Posted by motor on
Nice photos I too like #3 the best, but they're kinda big so its harder to see the composition.
Originally Posted by speednut
Jim (jimz68), care to share some recommended shutter speeds for car racing photos? 

- For head on shots, shoot wide open so that you neutralize the background as much as possible with the limited DOF
- for panning shots, shoot shutterpriority at roughtly 1/the speed of the car. So if the car was travelling 60 MPH, your shutterspeed would be 1/60th (as a starting point) to capture some background blur and rotation in the tires.
Last edited by dave; May 30, 2006 at 12:20 PM.
Thanks for the link to Jamie's site. Impressive stuff and it's interesting to see he frequents the same tracks I do: Road America, Milwaukee, Cleveland... .
Yeah, you do want to get some rotation in the tires/wheels, especially with the side shots, and I think 1/speed (in MPH) is a pretty good rule of thumb. Maybe a bit higher shutter speed for starters and then drop down. Sometimes it's amusing to go really slow and get lots of blur, but your hit rate will really drop off and only part of the car will be sharp even when you do get it right. It makes for a nice effect, though. You can see it in that last shot where the door number is sharp but not much else is.
Generally, higher shutter speeds for when they're coming right at you, and something in-between for in-between angles where you can see the wheels and want at least a bit of blur.
Mark
Yeah, you do want to get some rotation in the tires/wheels, especially with the side shots, and I think 1/speed (in MPH) is a pretty good rule of thumb. Maybe a bit higher shutter speed for starters and then drop down. Sometimes it's amusing to go really slow and get lots of blur, but your hit rate will really drop off and only part of the car will be sharp even when you do get it right. It makes for a nice effect, though. You can see it in that last shot where the door number is sharp but not much else is.
Generally, higher shutter speeds for when they're coming right at you, and something in-between for in-between angles where you can see the wheels and want at least a bit of blur.
Mark
What Mark said..
I tend to shoot in Manual Mode, taking incident meter readings or using the "Sunny 16" rule. Head on stuff, I usually use 640th @ 7.1 or there abouts.(shooting at ISO 100) For pans, anything up to 250th depending on the distance to the subject and it's speed.
A good book is John Blakemore's "Freezing Speed-Techniques of Grand Prix Photography". Although it's out of print, you can still find it on the web. His stuff is AMAZING! And all before Auto-Focus. John's the one who told me to turn the meter off, and learn to "read" the light.
Hppy Shooting!
Jim
I tend to shoot in Manual Mode, taking incident meter readings or using the "Sunny 16" rule. Head on stuff, I usually use 640th @ 7.1 or there abouts.(shooting at ISO 100) For pans, anything up to 250th depending on the distance to the subject and it's speed.
A good book is John Blakemore's "Freezing Speed-Techniques of Grand Prix Photography". Although it's out of print, you can still find it on the web. His stuff is AMAZING! And all before Auto-Focus. John's the one who told me to turn the meter off, and learn to "read" the light.
Hppy Shooting!
Jim
Originally Posted by jimz68
I tend to shoot in Manual Mode, taking incident meter readings or using the "Sunny 16" rule.

I have a bad habit of spot metering.

Shhhh, every once in a while I'll switch my cameras to matrix just for ***** and giggles.

Juan
Thank you for all the great info everyone!
Shutter speed ~= 1/MPH speed as a starting point is a simple enough of a rule that I could remember it.
Jim, thanks for the book recomendation. I found a used copy on the web as per your suggestion at a reasonable price (unlike the ones on amazon). Looks like it will be great learning material.
Cheers!
Shutter speed ~= 1/MPH speed as a starting point is a simple enough of a rule that I could remember it.
Jim, thanks for the book recomendation. I found a used copy on the web as per your suggestion at a reasonable price (unlike the ones on amazon). Looks like it will be great learning material.
Cheers!
Originally Posted by speednut
Jim, thanks for the book recomendation. I found a used copy on the web as per your suggestion at a reasonable price (unlike the ones on amazon). Looks like it will be great learning material. Cheers!
Jim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elverado
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
2
Jan 18, 2022 02:51 AM
Rohdeandschwarz
Stock Problems/Issues
3
Nov 5, 2015 07:58 AM







