Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Installing Fireballed Head and Schrick cam this month.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #76  
Mini Mizer's Avatar
Mini Mizer
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by TampaMCS
We have a member in S. Fla that pulled back to back 166 Hp runs stock...

There we pullied people who were in complete disbelief. It is very possible for some cars to be much stronger than others from the get go.
very VERY true. these engines are massed produced. While they are the same engine, not all of the parts are exactly the same. Like im sure not all the pistons are within 1 gram weight difference like you would see on race pistons/rods. Tolerances are most likely not as close as they could be, if they were all hand built. Pistons rings might be slightly different, changing compression. The list goes on, not every stock engine will perform the same even if they were all put on the same dyno.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #77  
62Lincoln's Avatar
62Lincoln
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Mini Mizer
dyno tunes are waaaay better than a flash tune.

when you have the car up on the dyno adjusting a/f ratio for every 50rpm. for your exact setup, the results are awesome.

"cookie cutter" ECU flashes, are ok...but not the best, as they provide a generic performce setup for what they "think" would work well.

everyones setup is different. some cars exhaust might flow a little more, some intakes might work a little better, someones head might flow more...ect...ect...

Thats why putting your car up on a dyno and having it tuned, is the best option. The performance gained vs. a ECU flash is far greater and you can squeeze out the full potential of any mods you have done to the car.
Mizer, is there someone in the Jacksonville area that can dyno tune the MINI?

I agree with your thoughts regarding dyno tuning, but I would be concerned on our MINI's because of the difficulty in reproducing the correct air flow through the i/c for the purpose of tuning the ecu. Are there tuners that have a method for addressing that area?
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #78  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by Mini Mizer

..... and aim for that 11k mark. If Hondas can do it, we should be able to.
this is something I belive as well... only problem... the SC RPM is limited... if we reved even a stock pully it would be about...ooooo 6000 rpms past it's efficency.... whiiiiich could cause a problem.... LOL saaay somethign like this...

 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #79  
Mini Mizer's Avatar
Mini Mizer
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Fireballed Tuls
this is something I belive as well... only problem... the SC RPM is limited... if we reved even a stock pully it would be about...ooooo 6000 rpms past it's efficency.... whiiiiich could cause a problem.... LOL saaay somethign like this...


 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #80  
Mini Mizer's Avatar
Mini Mizer
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by 62Lincoln
Mizer, is there someone in the Jacksonville area that can dyno tune the MINI?

I agree with your thoughts regarding dyno tuning, but I would be concerned on our MINI's because of the difficulty in reproducing the correct air flow through the i/c for the purpose of tuning the ecu. Are there tuners that have a method for addressing that area?
There are places here who do dyno tuning. (like Velocity Trends on Atlantic Blvd) But i personally havent had my car done at any of them, so i dont know how good or bad they are at it. My car only has just over 600 miles on it (still in break in mode )

BUT...as for the air over the IC. It would be like any other IC'ed car. (hard to believe, but the MINI isnt the only car with a IC that gets dyno tuned) Like for instance a MkII Toyota Mr2 with a side mount IC. No air is going to be going over it except for the air produced by the shop fans while its on the dyno. Unless they have an aftermarket fan hooked up to it, which still will not produce wind speeds as high as on the street. Infact i think the fans at the dyno shop would favor the MCS more then a Mr2 because their IC is on the side near the rear wheel and the MCS is on the front.

No shop fans are gonna be able to duplicate 60-70mph winds while its on the dyno. So all IC'ed cars suffer a little, some more then others. But its still the best route to take for performance. Unless you have a lap-top computer mounted in your passanger seat and you can tune it while driving. Probably not the safest way.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #81  
skillet's Avatar
skillet
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
From: Cornfields of Indiana
Not to get off topic, but what about running a electric leaf blower (mine is rated at 265 mph) in front of the IC to flow more air over it than a fan? Would that even benefit the IC more-so than one of the shop fans?

Just curious...
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 04:10 PM
  #82  
dmh's Avatar
dmh
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Metro NY
Originally Posted by Fireballed Tuls
like I said... My 164 whp was an anomoly... when I posted that # it was in reference to the gains I made with mods... I know 164 is high... like I said I was pulling on people with pully, intake exhaust... people said "you need to dyno that thing!" so I did...LOL...

I have seen the 135 whp range as well... but with the newer motor I have also seen 170 whp stock...so as we have all discussed on here for years... there seems to be a 30 HP variance.... no biggie... just that if you have 130 WHP stock... you will have trouble getting to 200 WHP for sure... but if you are like me or some of the cars I have done... you can get there with out a head... LOL... crazy... yes... but it's there...

also just so you know i am not crazy LOL... I took the car to the track when stock.. ran 92 MPH...that's accually 170 WHP... running a 15.1 ... I really did alot of testing cause I was so suprised...

as far as the head... I don't know what to tell you... have you broken going there? what's going on that you say you "can't safely"
It's not an anomaly if you seen it just a few times and you say you have: your car and the 170 car.

No biggie; it's actually quite huge.

20% variance? I've never seen anything remotely close. Biggest I've ever seen is 4%. This is why posting dyno numbers without knowing all the variables is a waste of time.

No, I've never broken one. But when I have run up a stock head past 7500 the power dropped precipitously.

What else can I say?
 

Last edited by dmh; Oct 9, 2006 at 04:16 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #83  
dmh's Avatar
dmh
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Metro NY
Originally Posted by Mini Mizer
dyno tunes are waaaay better than a flash tune.

when you have the car up on the dyno adjusting a/f ratio for every 50rpm. for your exact setup, the results are awesome.

"cookie cutter" ECU flashes, are ok...but not the best, as they provide a generic performce setup for what they "think" would work well.

everyones setup is different. some cars exhaust might flow a little more, some intakes might work a little better, someones head might flow more...ect...ect...

Thats why putting your car up on a dyno and having it tuned, is the best option. The performance gained vs. a ECU flash is far greater and you can squeeze out the full potential of any mods you have done to the car.

now as far as valve float....just put in a custom grind hallow cam shaft, with dual high rev valve springs and aim for that 11k mark. If Hondas can do it, we should be able to.
Dyno tunes and flash tunes: these ideas do not even go together. You can get a dyno tune that is a flash or piggyback and you can get a flash tune with or without a dyno.

Custom tuning is available and I have been doing MoTec systems for close to 18 years now. Your point is?

You are sadly misinformed, however, if you think that the best tunes come off the dyno. Manufactures take the dyno data and apply it in real world situations. And that same idea is in action when you see tuning done at the track: drag or road race.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #84  
TampaMCS's Avatar
TampaMCS
5th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Hence test and tune nights
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #85  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fireballed Tuls
this is something I belive as well... only problem... the SC RPM is limited... if we reved even a stock pully it would be about...ooooo 6000 rpms past it's efficency.... whiiiiich could cause a problem.... LOL saaay somethign like this...

what is that?
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 05:10 PM
  #86  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by SpiderX
what is that?

Some ugly arsed impellers from the SC.

Unless you were talking about the haircut, then I don't know
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #87  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by dmh
It's not an anomaly if you seen it just a few times and you say you have: your car and the 170 car.

No biggie; it's actually quite huge.

20% variance? I've never seen anything remotely close. Biggest I've ever seen is 4%. This is why posting dyno numbers without knowing all the variables is a waste of time.

No, I've never broken one. But when I have run up a stock head past 7500 the power dropped precipitously.

What else can I say?
well I have seen about 10 cars with high HP numbers... but prolly as many with low... and the rest right in the middle... that's been the norm for me... even when I was doing bikes... same thing... some people would make crazy power over thier buddies... stock to stock... it was funny...

as for the power drop off over 7500 there are many reasons this can happen... if it's a stock pullied car I'd say the tune was a problem... or the pulley was too small to be reving that high... the list goes on from there I would say that's my first guess... but I dunno I wasn't there
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #88  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by obehave
Some ugly arsed impellers from the SC.

Unless you were talking about the haircut, then I don't know
yeah the SC was spinning a little fast... but I had to break something... the car just would break... sigh...

as for the hair.. that's from going so fast
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #89  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by SpiderX
what is that?

that's what happens when you over spin the SC for 5 mins at 150 mph.. but boy you get places fast... LOL... well untill it stops...
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #90  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by Fireballed Tuls
that's what happens when you over spin the SC for 5 mins at 150 mph.. but boy you get places fast... LOL... well untill it stops...

What was the OD percentage on the SC pulley?

I'm thinking you proved that spinning the M45 over 14K RPM for extended periods is a bad thing
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #91  
TampaMCS's Avatar
TampaMCS
5th Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
No kidding that s/c was fubar!
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #92  
ScottinBend's Avatar
ScottinBend
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 2
From: Oregon, USA
Originally Posted by dmh
You are correct and all that is described on my web site. But what you failed to address is the theme of my question: how does Fireball get to 8500 rpm without problems? He claims it still is making power up there in the stock configuration.
Our Stage 2 addresses all expect the hydraulics. Wegner can get the rpm up to NASCAR level but it requires, as I mentioned, a large sum of money to purchase the exotic materials. The CNC porting is less than $800; the rest of the money is for the valve train components.
What kind of materials are the Honda S2000 using in their valvetrain?
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #93  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by obehave
What was the OD percentage on the SC pulley?

I'm thinking you proved that spinning the M45 over 14K RPM for extended periods is a bad thing

it was way over 14k...LOL... like 20K
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #94  
TheBlackBrian's Avatar
TheBlackBrian
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by Fireballed Tuls
it was way over 14k...LOL... like 20K
Yea, I think the redline in the 16-17k range.

-Brian
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #95  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by TheBlackBrian
Yea, I think the redline in the 16-17k range.

-Brian
yeah.... pretty much.....at 7k with stock pulley its 14k....then with a 15% it's almost 17... but I was oooh a little over 7k...heh... with a 15%.... it was mostly the prolonged rev.... just too much heat for that about of time.... good times
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:10 AM
  #96  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by dmh
Your MCS is making 164 WHP (that is the DIN HP Mini lists)? Or 164 HP at the flywheel?
Last time I checked WHP stood for "WHEEL horse power"
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:16 AM
  #97  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Fireballed Tuls
I completely understand what you mean... I am very carful to type WHP vs HP... I know that 164 is the DIN HP Mini lists which is funny... and the only reason I dynoed stock was cause I was pulling on people with mods and pullies.. where I had none! LOL
To this I can attest! My wimpy 2003 with Alta 15% an Alta intake could barely keep up with his car. Only in certain RPM ranges would my modded MCS pull on his car. Chris's car was a godsend from the factory. Very strong!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:20 AM
  #98  
dmh's Avatar
dmh
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Metro NY
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
Last time I checked WHP stood for "WHEEL horse power"
That is my point!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:20 AM
  #99  
dmh's Avatar
dmh
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Metro NY
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
To this I can attest! My wimpy 2003 with Alta 15% an Alta intake could barely keep up with his car. Only in certain RPM ranges would my modded MCS pull on his car. Chris's car was a godsend from the factory. Very strong!
I highly doubt it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:29 AM
  #100  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by dmh
I highly doubt it.
Evs!

I guess the first AMVIV was also a figment of my imagination too. :impatient
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:13 PM.