Drivetrain Burger Motorsports (BMS) Tune(s)
#776
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: terry@burgertuning.com
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I've not tested it under those conditions. I would speculate around 19psi peak but much less boost at higher RPM. The DME typically raises boost to make up for pumping losses at higher elevation but at the same time shifts the power curve down to keep turbo speeds reasonable.
#778
thanks for the help, i mean, the car feels fantastic, and i have no doubt its putting down the +20 HP, im just trying to wrap my head around the numbers.....
so if i understand correctly, the lower boost numbers are a result of the ECU limiting the boost to reach a target power level?
so on a warmer day, i can expect to see higher boost numbers as a result of the ECU trying to compensate for less optimal conditions?
so if i understand correctly, the lower boost numbers are a result of the ECU limiting the boost to reach a target power level?
so on a warmer day, i can expect to see higher boost numbers as a result of the ECU trying to compensate for less optimal conditions?
#780
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: terry@burgertuning.com
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
thanks for the help, i mean, the car feels fantastic, and i have no doubt its putting down the +20 HP, im just trying to wrap my head around the numbers.....
so if i understand correctly, the lower boost numbers are a result of the ECU limiting the boost to reach a target power level?
so on a warmer day, i can expect to see higher boost numbers as a result of the ECU trying to compensate for less optimal conditions?
so if i understand correctly, the lower boost numbers are a result of the ECU limiting the boost to reach a target power level?
so on a warmer day, i can expect to see higher boost numbers as a result of the ECU trying to compensate for less optimal conditions?
#781
I don't mean to be an interloper (I have the n14 - got one coming out Terry? ) but can you define load? The engine will see a load based upon torque requested at a given rpm but how does that translate to a target output and how does the DME measure whether it is meeting that target? I believe you that it adjusts for a set output but if you have changed what that output should be via the tune, what else could we measure concurrently to check overall function of the tune? Timing? Airflow? 0-60 times? My curiosity is peaked as I see 13.9 psi stock in a variety of conditions. Oh and if you need a tester for the n14, I could probably help out
Just trying to understand the Germans that designed a British car.
Just trying to understand the Germans that designed a British car.
#782
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: terry@burgertuning.com
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
The amount of information you'd need to truly understand the DME's internal operation is beyond what I have time or motivation to provide (sorry) but the DME is mapped on load (and torque) and translates that to boost as its final step in determine a boost set point at any given time.
To get a better understanding of how the DME works you may want to subscribe to threads where flash tuners are discussing internal table mapping. Cobb has some good documents as well on the N54 you could review.
To get a better understanding of how the DME works you may want to subscribe to threads where flash tuners are discussing internal table mapping. Cobb has some good documents as well on the N54 you could review.
#783
I don't mean to be an interloper (I have the n14 - got one coming out Terry? ) but can you define load? The engine will see a load based upon torque requested at a given rpm but how does that translate to a target output and how does the DME measure whether it is meeting that target? I believe you that it adjusts for a set output but if you have changed what that output should be via the tune, what else could we measure concurrently to check overall function of the tune? Timing? Airflow? 0-60 times? My curiosity is peaked as I see 13.9 psi stock in a variety of conditions. Oh and if you need a tester for the n14, I could probably help out
0-60 times are a pretty good indicator of the car producing more power than before. If the computer is pulling timing then 0-60 times will suffer. Just looking at boost is misleading as that is only one variable to making power. Fuel and timing seem to be big players as well.
I'm sure Terry and others can explain this way better than me, but asking when the N14 version is coming out probably won't do you any favors
Edit: Dang Terry is fast nowadays
#784
everyone should just monitor fueling and timing, the boost can fluctuate from day to day. you don't want to be leaner than normal....ever....unless you're on e85 or some ****. in the spool range it should be near stoic of 14.7-15 or so (BMW lean spool idea) tapering to ~12 in high rpms. if you're not down near 12 then something is awry. if you have an aftermarket intake and you can't reach fueling, try putting the stock one back on.
#785
No software changes since second round of beta testing on the S motor.
Although I guess the JCW/GP2 folk are starting their own self testing. Just be sure to turn it down from default (12 'oclock) before putting it on your car Maybe 10'oclock to start if you're not running E85 and/or meth/water injection.
Although I guess the JCW/GP2 folk are starting their own self testing. Just be sure to turn it down from default (12 'oclock) before putting it on your car Maybe 10'oclock to start if you're not running E85 and/or meth/water injection.
#786
I did a 0-60 late last night and it is definitely faster. I got 6.6 sec and that is with traction control rearing its ugly head in first and second gear with an automatic tranny.
I probably could have gotten a few tenths faster.
Pre-JB+ was right at 7.0 seconds. Using the same measuring setup.
I probably could have gotten a few tenths faster.
Pre-JB+ was right at 7.0 seconds. Using the same measuring setup.
#787
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did a 0-60 late last night and it is definitely faster. I got 6.6 sec and that is with traction control rearing its ugly head in first and second gear with an automatic tranny.
I probably could have gotten a few tenths faster.
Pre-JB+ was right at 7.0 seconds. Using the same measuring setup.
I probably could have gotten a few tenths faster.
Pre-JB+ was right at 7.0 seconds. Using the same measuring setup.
#789
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: terry@burgertuning.com
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
everyone should just monitor fueling and timing, the boost can fluctuate from day to day. you don't want to be leaner than normal....ever....unless you're on e85 or some ****. in the spool range it should be near stoic of 14.7-15 or so (BMW lean spool idea) tapering to ~12 in high rpms. if you're not down near 12 then something is awry. if you have an aftermarket intake and you can't reach fueling, try putting the stock one back on.
#790
Turn it down even if i ran 93oct? I like to run e85 which i have down the road so it could be done but i dont know if i need to upgrade the pump/injector and how much e85 to put in. I am coming from an Evo X which i have done turbo and all the bolt-ons to support that so Mini modding is new to me. I did have an 07 335i with a JB3 back in the day tho.
E85 Terry recommends 20-30% maximum on stock fuel system.
#791
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: terry@burgertuning.com
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Ok, maybe 11'oclock, it's your motor. People running 92 octane on the S motor, myself included, are running at high noon (default) and Terry recommends we stay there. I'd play it safe at first then watch timing as Terry detailed earlier to see if you can go higher.
E85 Terry recommends 20-30% maximum on stock fuel system.
E85 Terry recommends 20-30% maximum on stock fuel system.
#795
#796
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Been reading post about adjusting the Pod. Set it to 6 this past weekend. Felt instant power increase, steady vitals. Took it easy for a while only peeking at about 14psi @ 50 deg weather. Well today was a holy **** of a day. Finally hit 16psi @ 78 deg tempts shifting from 3rd to 4th. Damn that is one thrill of a pull and I think it had more power to spare. If my AFR's stay steady do y'all think it's safe to keep it at this level???
BTW, I'm running 93 octane fuel out of NC...
Also, will there be any way to run AFR/Boost/Timing all at once? Seems if I want to track AFR and Timing, I lose my boost hijack...
BTW, I'm running 93 octane fuel out of NC...
Also, will there be any way to run AFR/Boost/Timing all at once? Seems if I want to track AFR and Timing, I lose my boost hijack...
Last edited by Roxspin72; 10-30-2013 at 06:31 PM. Reason: Added question
#800
Battery disconnect vs sleep before install
Originally I let the car go to sleep (~15 min) before installing the JB+. Got used to how the car drove. Low end (off idle to ~1500rpm) was a little boggy, just like stock, when cold so if I had to merge quickly from a stop (parking lot to street, for example) I would use the sport mode to make sure it zipped out of there.
I'm in the process of installing some audio equipment so I unhooked the battery for the first time since installing the JB+ last night. Today I noticed the low end was much smoother. Maybe it's because I'm back in the 50-100 mile adjustment period for the JB+ and/or the engine is relearning how to operate but I can't say I don't like it. Just wondering if anyone else noticed that.
I'm in the process of installing some audio equipment so I unhooked the battery for the first time since installing the JB+ last night. Today I noticed the low end was much smoother. Maybe it's because I'm back in the 50-100 mile adjustment period for the JB+ and/or the engine is relearning how to operate but I can't say I don't like it. Just wondering if anyone else noticed that.