Confused about torque specs
Originally Posted by LombardStreet
I'm used to seeing tightening torques listed with a "plus or minus" value, e.g. "89 +/- 7 ft.lbs." But what does this mean: "22 - 4 ft.lbs"?
At least that's what it looks like to me, but again I haven't seen a torque called out that way.
Originally Posted by DiD
I haven't seen that convention before for torque...
4. Guide bolt - 7 mm Allen - tighten to 30-5 Nm (22-4 ft-lb)
Originally Posted by DiD
...but at least for dimensional tolerancing that looks like 22 +0/-4, which is sort of like 20 +/-2, but biased to the upper end of the torque range.
At least that's what it looks like to me, but again I haven't seen a torque called out that way.
At least that's what it looks like to me, but again I haven't seen a torque called out that way.
Originally Posted by LombardStreet
I'm used to seeing tightening torques listed with a "plus or minus" value, e.g. "89 +/- 7 ft.lbs." But what does this mean: "22 - 4 ft.lbs"?
30.5nm is 22.4ft/lbs (22.49ft/lbs).
Sometimes, when a document is translated, numbering schemes, decimal usage, gets kinda goofed up.
I suspect this is what's happened here. 30-5 and 22-4 are not implying a +0/-n torque tolerance, but simply giving one the values in both units.
Sincerely,
RockC.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by RockC
With the benefit of reading a few other posts, I interpret it as tighten to 30.5nm or 22.4ft/lbs.
30.5nm is 22.4ft/lbs (22.49ft/lbs).
Sometimes, when a document is translated, numbering schemes, decimal usage, gets kinda goofed up.
I suspect this is what's happened here. 30-5 and 22-4 are not implying a +0/-n torque tolerance, but simply giving one the values in both units.
30.5nm is 22.4ft/lbs (22.49ft/lbs).
Sometimes, when a document is translated, numbering schemes, decimal usage, gets kinda goofed up.
I suspect this is what's happened here. 30-5 and 22-4 are not implying a +0/-n torque tolerance, but simply giving one the values in both units.
Besides, I've never seen a hyphen used as a decimal point. (Though some Europeans use commas, I believe.) I mistyped the way it appears in my earlier post above. In the manual, it is very clearly given as: "22(space)hyphen(space)4" not "22-4" (without spaces). And in other parts of the manual, periods are used as decimal points, the way an American would expect. For example, on page 340-32, the gap between the parking brake actuator lever and the notched pin is listed as:
2 - 3 mm
(0.08 - 0.12 in)
(Note the correct "American" use of the period as decimal point, with hyphens to denote a range.)(0.08 - 0.12 in)
After further digging in the manual, I'm beginning to suspect that pooch1 might have the right answer. See, for instance, page 340-41, where it gives the tightening torque for the "heat shield to plastic bulkhead" as:
7 - 10 Nm
(5 - 7 ft-lb)
Interpreting the hyphen as a "minus" (as DiD and I did) would make nonsense of the last line above. (5 - 7 ft-lb)
I take a short cut like this all the time - for example, "see pages 41-7" to mean "41 to 47" in casual correspondence at work. But I'm surprised to see engineers being this casual with something as critical as torque specs. (And, as far as I know, this notation isn't an established "convention.")
Anyway, I just had my torque wrench calibrated. I'm going with 22 ft-lbs. At least I know that's right!
Originally Posted by LombardStreet
That's an interesting interpretation that hadn't occured to me. Not sure what you mean by "translated." The MINI is an English car and the Bentley manual is published in America.
Just set the wrench to the first number, most people I've seen don't even use torque wrenches. Unless the bolt/nut is self locking (not the plastic lined, but oval nut or stretch bolts) then bottom out and turn 1/8 to 1/4 of a turn. This will usally get you right there. Also, I suspect that most people will cause problems over tightening not under.
If anyone is still interested, I went over to Bentley's website and discovered that they have a forum there. The definitive answer is what Dave suggested: 22 ft-lbs is the optimal number, but anywhere from 18 to 22 ft-lbs is acceptable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R50/53 More supercharger hulabaloo
one73ronin
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
23
Sep 22, 2015 09:56 AM
SneedSpeed
Vendor Announcements
0
Sep 21, 2015 06:06 AM



