R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 Mini gets new engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 11:33 PM
  #1  
ralphie's Avatar
ralphie
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Mini gets new engines

If you are planning to get one, either hold off for new engines

OR

expect to see some sharp pricing on existing stock

Mini S gets Valvetronic
- 175hp to 184hp
- 41-49mpg
- improved revability and response

Mini 1.6
- lower friction materials
- 120hp to 122hp
- improved revability and response

Mini ONE and First gets 'new' engines but not really interested in those 98hp and 75hp units

and yeah damn i just got a mini too...
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 05:40 AM
  #2  
drewstermalloy's Avatar
drewstermalloy
6th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 16
From: Buffalo, New York
Woah... maybe I will hold off till the end of the year..
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 06:59 AM
  #3  
Blainestang's Avatar
Blainestang
6th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 59
All those figures are misleading because they're Euro numbers. The hp numbers are slightly inflated (the current S has 172hp, not 175... The Cooper has 118, not 120). Also, the mileage numbers are significantly inflated because the Euro testing is different and a US gallon is significantly smaller than an Imperial gallon.

Basically, both engines will make a few more horsepower and mabe a little better mileage. The S getting Valvetronic on top of the existing VANOS (both of which the Cooper already had) is nice, but all the changes are more evolutionary rather than revolutionary, IMO.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 07:18 AM
  #4  
bigsmittyJAS's Avatar
bigsmittyJAS
2nd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 1
From: Ann Arbor Michigan
I wonder if they'll sound like a diesel too when they start up....that'd be really special.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 08:00 AM
  #5  
Crashton's Avatar
Crashton
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 3
From: Over there on MA
Originally Posted by bigsmittyJAS
I wonder if they'll sound like a diesel too when they start up....that'd be really special.
That is what is keeping me from buying an R56 S. So far only band aide fixes that don't last. Me I'd give up a few horse power for an engine that doesn't beat itself on cold start.

Well I'll keep driving my R53 for a while longer.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #6  
r56mini's Avatar
r56mini
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
From: home
Reducing the noise alone will increase the HP by at least 10.
All the friction from the chain rubbing against the wall and making that horrible noise saps away power.
So maybe the increase in hp number is from the real fix of the issue.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #7  
rtg54's Avatar
rtg54
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
According to the article new engines will be starting with the March production. How far out is the wait on a MCS at this point?
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 09:13 PM
  #8  
skippydog's Avatar
skippydog
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Hrm I wonder if they are doing this to avoid any higher numbers of cold start issues to avoid a recall for the prince engine.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 06:53 AM
  #9  
moreorless's Avatar
moreorless
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 1
From: A pile of sawdust
Originally Posted by Crashton
That is what is keeping me from buying an R56 S. So far only band aide fixes that don't last. Me I'd give up a few horse power for an engine that doesn't beat itself on cold start.

Well I'll keep driving my R53 for a while longer.

And you've got a Nice R53 Chuck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #10  
Porthos's Avatar
Porthos
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 14
From: None yours!
Its the same block they are just fixing some stuff that they have learned over the last 3 years and adding valvetronic. Its going to be sweet non the less.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #11  
rkw's Avatar
rkw
OVERDRIVE
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 127
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by drewstermalloy
Woah... maybe I will hold off till the end of the year..
The updated engine is said to start production in March, but another possible reason to wait is that the 2011 model (starting this August/September) will have the mid-cycle refresh. It is expected to debut soon (Geneva auto show) and will include some styling updates including the center stack. However it might be accompanied by the annual price increase.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #12  
Helix13mini's Avatar
Helix13mini
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 17
From: Under your car
I'm waiting for a wholesale change in motors. There's no doubt that the new motors are better than the old, but they just don't have the soul .
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #13  
Porthos's Avatar
Porthos
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 14
From: None yours!
Why is everyone so worried about this new motor? I just don't get it. It is going to be a great improvement.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 05:55 PM
  #14  
rkw's Avatar
rkw
OVERDRIVE
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 127
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by Helix13mini
I'm waiting for a wholesale change in motors. There's no doubt that the new motors are better than the old, but they just don't have the soul .
But the next generation engines could very well have even less of the "soul" you want. Look at the general progression of engines produced by BMW and you'll get a feeling for the likelihood that it might happen for you.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 06:59 PM
  #15  
miniclubman's Avatar
miniclubman
6th Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 5
From: Hauppauge, NY
Originally Posted by rkw
But the next generation engines could very well have even less of the "soul" you want. Look at the general progression of engines produced by BMW and you'll get a feeling for the likelihood that it might happen for you.
??? BMW is widely regarded as one of the finest engine manufacturers in the world.

The current generation of BMW engines are among the best performing and most sophisticated available, and are usually at or near the top of many independent engine design evaluations.

I'm not sure what "soul" means in engine design, but BMW has it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 01:03 AM
  #16  
KevinC's Avatar
KevinC
5th Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 952
Likes: 6
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by miniclubman
??? BMW is widely regarded as one of the finest engine manufacturers in the world.
He's got a valid point. If you'd owned a few BMWs going back a few years, you'd be able to relate.

Case in point: the "old" Z3/Z4. The S54 motor, same L6 as in the M3, resides in late Z3M's and all Z4M's. In US trim, it puts out 330 hp from 3.2 litres of naturally aspirated goodness, with an 8k redline. It has a song like no other, and definitely has a ton of automotive "soul". The new Z4 doesn't (at least not yet) have an M version, but has the 300 hp, N54 motor in the highline version. It has more torque than the S54, but other than that, it's a soulless lump in comparison. Lower redline, throttle not very linear, mountain of torque early, then runs out of breath at relatively low RPMs. The S54 makes power all the way to 7900 rpms before leveling off.

The newer BMW motors lack the older motors' soul, IMHO, and many fellow owners agree. I've never driven an R53 so I can't apply it in this case, but I don't doubt that I'd very possibly feel the same way in the R53/R56 comparison.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:18 AM
  #17  
Helix13mini's Avatar
Helix13mini
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 17
From: Under your car
Originally Posted by rkw
But the next generation engines could very well have even less of the "soul" you want. Look at the general progression of engines produced by BMW and you'll get a feeling for the likelihood that it might happen for you.
Very true. BTW, this motor is not a BMW motor as such: it's a PSV motor.

Originally Posted by KevinC
He's got a valid point. If you'd owned a few BMWs going back a few years, you'd be able to relate.

Case in point: the "old" Z3/Z4. The S54 motor, same L6 as in the M3, resides in late Z3M's and all Z4M's. In US trim, it puts out 330 hp from 3.2 litres of naturally aspirated goodness, with an 8k redline. It has a song like no other, and definitely has a ton of automotive "soul". The new Z4 doesn't (at least not yet) have an M version, but has the 300 hp, N54 motor in the highline version. It has more torque than the S54, but other than that, it's a soulless lump in comparison. Lower redline, throttle not very linear, mountain of torque early, then runs out of breath at relatively low RPMs. The S54 makes power all the way to 7900 rpms before leveling off.

The newer BMW motors lack the older motors' soul, IMHO, and many fellow owners agree. I've never driven an R53 so I can't apply it in this case, but I don't doubt that I'd very possibly feel the same way in the R53/R56 comparison.
Yes, there is truth to what you say, but there's a difference. I own and work on both S54 and N54 motored cars, and I agree that the N54 cars (BMW 335i, 135i etc.) are a little detached from the pure driving experience, but with a little work, you can make them thrilling cars to drive. I'm talking about software, exhaust, and some suspension work, and you have a raw driving machine. Maybe as we develop the R56, I'll feel the same way about it (I've got a trick up my sleeve which may help greatly, but more on that later) but right now, I'm still prefer the older MINIs.
 

Last edited by Helix13mini; Feb 1, 2010 at 06:36 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:10 PM
  #18  
GP0256's Avatar
GP0256
5th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
I am just going to buy an M3 next. wanted one this time and bought a r56 instead. Wife is making me keep it till its paid off so I will have to wait a few years, but if you are looking for a ton more horsepower, might be time to look for another car. Wonder how the M3's 400+ HP will handle in the snow...............
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #19  
TheBigNewt's Avatar
TheBigNewt
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,602
Likes: 107
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by JDUR56
I am just going to buy an M3 next. wanted one this time and bought a r56 instead. Wife is making me keep it till its paid off so I will have to wait a few years, but if you are looking for a ton more horsepower, might be time to look for another car. Wonder how the M3's 400+ HP will handle in the snow...............
BMW's cannot drive in snow lol. They're worse than a Ford F-150.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #20  
KevinC's Avatar
KevinC
5th Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 952
Likes: 6
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by Helix13mini
Yes, there is truth to what you say, but there's a difference. I own and work on both S54 and N54 motored cars, and I agree that the N54 cars (BMW 335i, 135i etc.) are a little detached from the pure driving experience, but with a little work, you can make them thrilling cars to drive.
And therein lies the problem. The VAST majority of car purchasers - even most enthusiasts - don't modify their motors. The enthusiasts in particular don't want a "detached" driving experience. For me, the N54 feels VERY detached, especially when compared to the S54 (which really isn't a fair comparison, being as they were confined to M cars), but even in comparison to the N52. Apparently we're seeing the same thing in the current Mini motor, when owners of R53's compare the driving experience.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 11:10 AM
  #21  
paul_'s Avatar
paul_
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA/Melbourne, FL
Originally Posted by TheBigNewt
BMW's cannot drive in snow lol. They're worse than a Ford F-150.
I've seen it. the M3s and 5-series guys sliding backwards on the inclines
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #22  
skippydog's Avatar
skippydog
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
That is right and another problem is that a majority of BMW customers reside in areas that cannot legally perform modifications even if they want to. The ones that do have to sneak around the rules.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #23  
newmanium's Avatar
newmanium
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TheBigNewt
BMW's cannot drive in snow lol. They're worse than a Ford F-150.
Has nothing to do with BMWs - all about tires, and RWD vs. AWD vs. FWD. A BMW X-Drive with snow tires will be a freaking snow-mobile, a RWD with summer tires will be a nightmare. That's true for any manufacturer.
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #24  
minimini482's Avatar
minimini482
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
factory jcw included?

Do the engine updates rolling out in March 2010 production include the factory JCW's as well -will they include Valvetronic?

Or are JCW's on their own update schedule?
 

Last edited by minimini482; Feb 4, 2010 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 01:53 PM
  #25  
mcoupe's Avatar
mcoupe
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Still confused...Seems the March engine updates are for Europe only. My dealer said he has no info on engine changes until September or 2011 models. Either way, I am putting an order for March production and hope for the best.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:11 AM.