R56 Rebel flag roof graphic?
Off topic: Would the confederate flag be less offensive if it was blessed by the pope? GW thinks so.

As for Captain Lou, I know he wouldn't eat here.

As for Captain Lou, I know he wouldn't eat here.
Last edited by JudgeS; Aug 3, 2008 at 04:14 PM.
Battle over Confederate flag hits highways
Huge displays along interstates raise old debates over the history of war and slavery.
By Patrik Jonsson | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0804/p03s02-ussc.html
If nothing else ya'll are timely on the news...
Huge displays along interstates raise old debates over the history of war and slavery.
By Patrik Jonsson | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0804/p03s02-ussc.html
If nothing else ya'll are timely on the news...
Although...
-1 to dismissing/reducing the transgressions of the Patriot Act to a "gnat bite."
MD is a lot different than TN, in TN every other car (or truck I should say) has a rebel flag on it, so its not that nobody would find it offensive, its that they would be in such a minority that there is 0 chance they would vocalize it let alone do anything about it, so no reason to worry.
That was basically the opinion I formed from my experiences, but again that was mostly North GA (with many visits to TN). Where maybe not every other car had one, but you couldn't go out for the day and not see one.
I'm also sure its very dependent on what part of TN your in, ie, the opinions in Memphis will probably be a lot different then those in Nashville or Chattanooga.
Then again I also think your perception may not be as close to reality as you think it is, as indicated in the last two lines of the article that gnatster brought up, although it mostly pertains to Florida.
"Still, it's not clear whether the flag is actually that sensitive a topic. The economic effect of NAACP and NCAA boycotts in South Carolina has been minimal, according to state officials.
More recently, a Florida newspaper poll revealed that few drivers found the Tampa flag offensive, which surprised many officials."
Last edited by JudgeS; Aug 3, 2008 at 08:16 PM.
His rights are not in dispute. As far as I can tell, neither are anyone's rights to own property in this country (unless you mean fully-automatic weapons). You are obviously an intelligent well-spoken person with strong convictions, and although I'm sure we're on opposite sides of the aisle on most issues, I enjoyed reading your post.
Although...
-1 to dismissing/reducing the transgressions of the Patriot Act to a "gnat bite."
Although...
-1 to dismissing/reducing the transgressions of the Patriot Act to a "gnat bite."
I can see how my comment could be misconstrued. I don't believe privacy is an irrelevancy, but privacy is one of the concepts covered by the 18th Century definition of property. You can have a property in ideas, also. Today we think of property as something tangible--acreage, a car, an iPod--but it is much more in political philosophy.
As to my comment, a property in privacy is meaningless if one has no control over the tangible aspects of life--this may seem trite, but bear with me. Extend this to tangibles. If you cannot control your body, your car, your house, your fishing pole and such, what meaning does individual liberty have? That you're free to sit where someone else will allow? That you can drive when somone else is willing to let you have your vehicle? That you are at liberty to starve because someone else wants to use your fishing pole? You get the point. It was exactly this point that led the Supreme Court to over-rule state laws that prevented blacks from eating and sleeping in many places. How were they to be considered 'free' if they could not travel at will do to exclusion from necessary services and supplies?
So, when I said that privacy was a gnat's bite on the elbow of liberty, what I was gesturing at is its reliance upon property as that which gives privacy meaning.
Are we still on opposite sides?
R
Last edited by rrcaniglia; Aug 3, 2008 at 08:57 PM.
Are there? There isn't a lot of people who even posted in this thread let alone that disagree with me (a few yes), but I have to say they are quite wrong.
My point is there should really be no reason to worry in the South, I mean if some one associates the confederate flag with anything more than southern pride that is their problem, but they are most definitely not southern, and the chances of that happening in Tennessee is almost 0, and more likely they'd be the once getting lynched (I made a funny).
My point is there should really be no reason to worry in the South, I mean if some one associates the confederate flag with anything more than southern pride that is their problem, but they are most definitely not southern, and the chances of that happening in Tennessee is almost 0, and more likely they'd be the once getting lynched (I made a funny).
Picture removed due to content.
Last edited by Xymox; Aug 4, 2008 at 06:17 AM. Reason: Picture removed due to content. Thanks, Xymox.
But you know, I really should have not responded to your remark, My Bad. That last thing I'd relish is a pissing match with someone like you.
Not at all, I just found your response childish since the poster you are (kindly put....having the discussion with) had already said he was exaggerating.
But you know, I really should have not responded to your remark, My Bad. That last thing I'd relish is a pissing match with someone like you.
But you know, I really should have not responded to your remark, My Bad. That last thing I'd relish is a pissing match with someone like you.
And perhaps you should look at the post of 22003 again. You might be able to understand that I was not only agreeing with his comment about the "every other car in TN has a rebel flag on it", but the fact that the general tone JudgeS has taken in this thread is uninformed and someone who has lived there 10 years would certainly have a better understanding of the people of TN than someone who spent a whopping 3 summers there.
Your problem wasn't engaging me in debate. It was jumping in with an ill informed perspective.
You might be able to understand that I was not only agreeing with his comment about the "every other car in TN has a rebel flag on it", but the fact that the general tone JudgeS has taken in this thread is uninformed and someone who has lived there 10 years would certainly have a better understanding of the people of TN than someone who spent a whopping 3 summers there.
The view that you cant accept or respect opinions that differ from yours and move on, so much so you need to pat yourself on the back when someone agrees with you (only 6 pages later btw) is what I would assume he was objecting to and saying was childish (although that was just my impression, I don't want to speak for someone else).
Oh and its 11003, not 22003.
Last edited by JudgeS; Aug 4, 2008 at 07:07 AM.
Yet it was complete different then that of the OP, who also lives in TN, and was the actual person we were discussing at the time (which to me would be the most relevant opinion to the topic), but who really cares at this point, it certainly beating a dead horse.
The view that you cant accept or respect opinions that differ from yours and move on, so much so you need to pat yourself on the back when someone agrees with you (only 6 pages later btw) is what I would assume he was objecting to (although I don't want to speak for someone else).
Oh and its 11003, not 22003.
The view that you cant accept or respect opinions that differ from yours and move on, so much so you need to pat yourself on the back when someone agrees with you (only 6 pages later btw) is what I would assume he was objecting to (although I don't want to speak for someone else).
Oh and its 11003, not 22003.
Yeah... who does care anymore ? We could both live in TN for 20 years and still not agree that some there might be offended with the symbol of the rebel flag.
And one of us needs new reading glasses. Looks like the poster I was agreeing with is new22003.
and yes I guess I do, my eyes must be going bad from reading all these books on the Civil War.
I will bid adieu' with this...
Of course that could change, things are not static, at least not in my world.
To add insult, the Judge was merely correct in reading the meaning of my "childish" remark directed towards your action and was not part of my response.
Sheesh....
I guess you missed this part,
Either you chose to ignore the meaning of the above or that I underestimated your comprehension skills.
To add insult, the Judge was merely correct in reading the meaning of my "childish" remark directed towards your action and was not part of my overall perception of your online persona.
Sheesh....
Either you chose to ignore the meaning of the above or that I underestimated your comprehension skills.
To add insult, the Judge was merely correct in reading the meaning of my "childish" remark directed towards your action and was not part of my overall perception of your online persona.
Sheesh....
Calling my post "childish" or using the adjective on me... still an insult, no matter how you try to slice it and dice it.
Sheesh.
I actually enjoy the lively discussion, but the OP wasn't really asking whether or not he should get the flag.
If I come on here asking for advice on where my girlfriend could get an abortion, do you think that would generate any discussion on abortions ?
I should fully expect it to, wouldn't you say ?
And show me a thread that stays completely on topic and I'll show you a short thread.
I should fully expect it to, wouldn't you say ?
And show me a thread that stays completely on topic and I'll show you a short thread.


