R52 :: Cabrio Talk (2005-2008) Cooper and Cooper S convertible (R52) discussion.

R52 Improving handling in the cabrio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #1  
SkyZero's Avatar
SkyZero
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Improving handling in the cabrio

My car is now 1 month old with over 2500+ miles with a large mount of a daily driving sprinkled in with the occasional canyon run with my fellow SCMMers and (hopefully) a planned autox event to attend in June.

I have come to the conclusion that I want to tighten up the suspension and handling on it. I was initally thinking of going with the M7 USS and their front strut tower brace to improve upon the handling of my ride. After reading a bit on the forums, I came across the thread regarding rear sway bars and started to contemplate getting the H-Sport rear sway bar. Question I have is should I just get the rear sway bar and forego the USS and STB or would the USS and STB benefit me more? Any insight into this would be greatly appreciated!
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #2  
Mastersonics's Avatar
Mastersonics
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Paradise!
I would say go with the USS and Swaybar then the strut bar

hope this helps
regards,
Charles
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #3  
Mini Works's Avatar
Mini Works
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
just go for the sway bar and some shocks, works for my 05 MCS Cabrio

Victor
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
Gr8Force's Avatar
Gr8Force
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA (Atlanta suburbs)
I have M7's USS that was just put on at the Dragon by Way Motor Works. Props and thanks to Peter & Way. One great product and one great installer. Way has installed all my mods and it was great to finally meet Peter. Also thanks to Will.

Let's just say the difference this makes for the car is unbelievable! It takes a huge amount to make it understeer now. I thought the problem was my stupid runflats (I'm still going to get rid of them) but now I know that the biggest problem was the chasis of the cabrio. The body roll has been drastically reduced and it tracks beautifully through the curves. Evidently the rear sway bar induces oversteer and helps eliminate body roll. One of the guys in AtlantaMINI's says the combination of both the USS & a rear sway makes his cabrio perfectly balanced. He said he can't imagine being without either one.

After four days at the Dragon and the USS, the next mods will be new wheels/tires & brakes! Before the Dragon I thought the next ones would be the rear sway bar and shocks (Koni FSD's). Those will now wait until the others first but hopefully not too long after.

The front sway bar evidently dials oversteering back into the mix. I don't have any plans to add one of those. They do look cool though!
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 08:11 PM
  #5  
JustGo4It_'s Avatar
JustGo4It_
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA.
You mentioned autocrossing. Before you get all wild and crazy and start modding your car find out what mods are legal for the class you are going to run. If you are planning on running in stock class the rear bar is not allowed. Check out the racing and competition forums.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #6  
mistro's Avatar
mistro
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 1
From: Highland Park, IL
I added all 3 at the Dragon. H Sport 1st day. BIG improvement. If I stopped there, I'd have been satisfied. 2nd day added M7 USS. Marginal but significant improvement. No doubt these mods added by Way were the most bang for my buck. Even the wife noticed that with these two mods we were MUCH more controlled on trhe twisties at the Dragon. 3rd day I added a Dinan Strut Bar (it was already in route from another NAM member). Marginal additional stiffness, but it does look cool. Put your money into handleing mod, BIG improvements... Michael
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 04:42 AM
  #7  
Gr8Force's Avatar
Gr8Force
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA (Atlanta suburbs)
Mistro - Could you define what you mean by "marginal but significant"? Those kind of seem to be opposites. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #8  
MiniMargie's Avatar
MiniMargie
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
we've got half of the USS on, with an M7 front strut bar and Koni FSD sitting in the garage awaiting install. Should do the trick. We'll pick up a second MCS and do the same treatment, but will probably add a swaybar too as it will be a hardtop and the more 'agressively' driven of the pair.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #9  
dave's Avatar
dave
pug poo picker-upper
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,803
Likes: 30
From: California
Originally Posted by JustGo4It_
If you are planning on running in stock class the rear bar is not allowed. Check out the racing and competition forums.
the Under Strut System won't be permitted either.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #10  
maxmini's Avatar
maxmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 9
From: L.A ca
The USS will not be allowed in any stock autocross classes as it provides too big of an advantage Sorry about that!

Randy
m7 Tuning
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 04:01 AM
  #11  
sam.ben's Avatar
sam.ben
1st Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Front Strut Brace Alone = a mistake?

I am presently awaiting arrival of an '06 Cool Blue MCSC with JCW kit and added the JCW front strut brace to be installed by dealer on arrival (along with iPOD). I seem to recall from a prior thread that the front strut brace was somewhat necessary for the Cabrio to improve cornering. Is adding this alone a mistake and should I consider skipping it or adding something to it, i.e M7 USS?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #12  
MiniMargie's Avatar
MiniMargie
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
the JCW bar is more than double the M7 bar (my dealer has it stickered for $495/installed on their cars). In my opinion, a front strut bar doesn't make enough difference period to justify $400++, not to mention you can get the same performance for alot less than the factory option. Get the M7 bar for $200 and take the difference and put it towards getting the USS.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #13  
Call's Avatar
Call
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: Flowery Branch , Georgia
SkyZero, not knowing your level of driving skills, let's just assume your not a pro for arguments sake. The best mod you will ever make on you cabrio is a few novice autox schools and maybe a track school like Phil Wicks. It would give you a chance to get a real good feel for what you have in your Mini and what you have between your eyes...a starting point. Then go slow with one or two mods, see what they do, adjust, and go from there. You'll end up with a better car, you'll be a better driver and you'll have more fun than any dream you've ever had...well, almost.

On the other hand, if you are just going to spend some money regardless, the rear sway bar first, for sure.

Call
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #14  
sam.ben's Avatar
sam.ben
1st Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
JCW Springs?

Can anyone verify what I have been told by my dealer that the JCW springs are NOT available on convertibles. Is there a good reason for this?
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #15  
MiniMargie's Avatar
MiniMargie
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
I'd suspect that stiffer springs would induce more cowl shake, showing the lack of ridgity of the open top. Ford neuters the Mustang convertible for the same reasons.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #16  
tommybwell's Avatar
tommybwell
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 153
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
The best way to make most any convertible handle better is to weld a roof on it
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #17  
sam.ben's Avatar
sam.ben
1st Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Is that why you have FSD's and not the JCW springs...what's your take on them....pros and cons?
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #18  
sam.ben's Avatar
sam.ben
1st Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
thanks

Originally Posted by tommybwell
The best way to make most any convertible handle better is to weld a roof on it
Thanks Tommybwell....is yours available? A lot of hardtop folk would consider donating theirs once they got 'wind' of the convertible.

But seriously, what would be the 'dream set up' for street (extensive canyon) driving, some level of comfort but emphasis on cornering with minimal body roll, balanced over/understeer, and lowering the car not more than 1 to 1 1/2 inches.

Share your dreams!
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 05:58 PM
  #19  
tommybwell's Avatar
tommybwell
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 153
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by sam.ben
Thanks Tommybwell....is yours available? A lot of hardtop folk would consider donating theirs once they got 'wind' of the convertible.

But seriously, what would be the 'dream set up' for street (extensive canyon) driving, some level of comfort but emphasis on cornering with minimal body roll, balanced over/understeer, and lowering the car not more than 1 to 1 1/2 inches.

Share your dreams!
I think I’ll hold on to my top but you’re right there are plenty of folks that would donate them if they could. Not sure how to build the dream car, you either sacrifice structure for wind or wind for structure.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #20  
sam.ben's Avatar
sam.ben
1st Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
My plan is to stick with the wind as ordered but then tune the chassis as best I can to optimize for its lack of rigidity (now this is starting to sound downright dirty)
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #21  
rkw's Avatar
rkw
OVERDRIVE
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 127
From: San Francisco
Getting back to the original question... I've had a rear sway for the past 6 months and just had the M7 USS installed a couple of weeks ago. They are both valuable mods. As the first step for a convertible, I would recommend starting with the USS. The USS by itself reduces some understeer, and I think it provides a good foundation for all other stock and mod suspension components to work better. To improve handling in a cabrio, you can pretty much follow the same recommendations as for the hardtop (rear sway, lighter wheels, grippier tires, etc.) but specifically for the cabrio the USS makes a noticable improvement in all conditions, whether driving hard or not.

BTW, I also have the Koni FSDs, already a great mod by themselves and even more awesome in combination with the M7 USS.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 05:36 AM
  #22  
Call's Avatar
Call
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: Flowery Branch , Georgia
I feel I have my MCSC "dailed in" as for the suspension and regidity that's needed to overcome what was lacking from the factory; but, it was expensive to get there:
1) M7 front tower plates
2) M7 USS
3) Koni Sport Adj Shocks
4) H-Sport Lowering Springs
5) H-Sport Lower Rear Camber Links

I'm very satisfied with the handling in traffic or on twisties. I haven't tracked or autox'ed Paris, yet, but trust me the twisties I have taken her through is like autoxing and tracking rolled in one. She handles great.

KK
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 09:08 AM
  #23  
Phurbahl's Avatar
Phurbahl
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
I just put on an Alta rear sway and M7 USS and highly recommend the Swaybar/USS combo. it really tightens up the flex and keeps the car flat and neutral. Best money spent so far.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #24  
idoc's Avatar
idoc
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Which mod would you recommend first specifically to reduce cowl shake in the MCSC?
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #25  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
FSD's
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:58 PM.