Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R56) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain What is keeping such a brilliant engine(S) at 175 hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:08 AM
  #1  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
What is keeping such a brilliant engine(S) at 175 hp?

My vote goes for factory ecu tuning, and exhaust restriction.

What does everyone else think?


Granted its 1.6 liter, but between the direct injection and the variable valve timing, and erm raising boost, it should be able to put down some more power.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #2  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
yeah I think a ecu tweaking and freeing up the flow will make some large improvments
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #3  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
my archaic 1.6 liter in my Mr2 is capable of putting down 200whp with 15psi of boost. Thats using 80's technology(well besides using standalone..). this is the latest technology that is available mainstream. With the same sort of boost we should be able to far surpass that.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:24 AM
  #4  
dave's Avatar
dave
pug poo picker-upper
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,803
Likes: 30
From: California
What is keeping such a brilliant engine(S) at 175 hp?
JCW

If they keep the MCS at 175 (slight bump but nothing dramatic) then they can have a significant jump in power for the JCW kit when that comes out. If the MCS were 200 HP stock, then the take rate on a 225/230 HP JCW kit would be a lot less.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:45 AM
  #5  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
That does make sense, but how could 225 be the maximum for this engine to be safe?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #6  
dave's Avatar
dave
pug poo picker-upper
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,803
Likes: 30
From: California
Originally Posted by sixblade
That does make sense, but how could 225 be the maximum for this engine to be safe?
That's not the max either.

Keep in mind that "SAFE" to MINI/JCW means that the kit will still have warranty AND meet Euro Noise standards AND U.S. and Euro emissions standards.

I'm sure the aftermarket will make more power "safely" with the R56 engine, but they don't have to deal with the same constraints.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #7  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
write it down...on this day.... SpiderX said "250whp will be as easy to get to as 200 is for our current models and guys like Tuls will coax 300 without breaking a sweat."

it has too many of the right things standard

Oh and the new car will run around our current models....JMO

by the way..... this does not make me happy .... until I get my "Clubman"
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #8  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Thats pretty much what I figured, too much technology put into it to be making 175 horse imo.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #9  
RandyBMC's Avatar
RandyBMC
Temporarily Banned
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,382
Likes: 2
From: Denver
We will be making serious power out of this motor - I just don't know if it will be as reliable as the R53.

The exhaust looks pretty straight, but there may be some improvement to be had.

I think the ECU will be the true ticket on this car.

We will know in February when our R56 test mule gets here (but we will continue with our R53 development as well).

Randy
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #10  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RandyBMC
We will be making serious power out of this motor - I just don't know if it will be as reliable as the R53.

The exhaust looks pretty straight, but there may be some improvement to be had.

I think the ECU will be the true ticket on this car.

We will know in February when our R56 test mule gets here (but we will continue with our R53 development as well).

Randy
Welcome back Randy
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #11  
chows4us's Avatar
chows4us
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15,478
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by SpiderX
write it down...on this day.... SpiderX said "250whp will be as easy to get to as 200 is for our current models
You are, of course, correct about the next gen cars running rings around the current car ... its the nature of technology change. And that is why I believe the 05/06 cars prices will drop heavily once the car is on the street and ppl see what can be done (not so much for the older cars as their depreciation curve is flattening out).

Originally Posted by RandyBMC
I think the ECU will be the true ticket on this car.
Interesting, they dont sound all that optimistic on MINI2 and they have the cars. Its obvious to crank up the boost. One vendor does agree with Randy, its ALL in cracking the ECU. Link

Originally Posted by Dave
JCW

If they keep the MCS at 175 (slight bump but nothing dramatic) then they can have a significant jump in power for the JCW kit when that comes out. If the MCS were 200 HP stock, then the take rate on a 225/230 HP JCW kit would be a lot less.
So you really think its all marketing? Tricky.

If they were really smart, they would make the JCW model a separate model designator like the M cars ...
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:07 PM
  #12  
dave's Avatar
dave
pug poo picker-upper
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,803
Likes: 30
From: California
Originally Posted by chows4us
If they were really smart, they would make the JCW model a separate model designator like the M cars ...
I think that's exactly why they're not. They don't want a "direct" comparison to ///M (thus JCW stays as an "option" not a separate model), but they do want to make in-house performance parts (or rather they do want to make profits from performance parts).
Originally Posted by chows4us
So you really think its all marketing? Tricky.
RE: MCS 175hp and the need to have a "healthy" power separation from both the MC (120 HP) and the JCW (225/230 HP). Yes, I think it is Marketing. And, funny enough, 175 HP places the MCS right in the middle between the MC and the JCW.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:27 PM
  #13  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
Chows, regarding further depreciation of the '05 & '06 that remains to be seen.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #14  
rkw's Avatar
rkw
OVERDRIVE
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 127
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by chows4us
So you really think its all marketing? Tricky.
It has already been argued that this was the same reason the 1st gen S didn't ship with a 15% smaller pulley -- would have made it too close in power to the JCW.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #15  
chows4us's Avatar
chows4us
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15,478
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by C4
Chows, regarding further depreciation of the '05 & '06 that remains to be seen.
Well, I have to look at from the point of new buyers. Its pretty fair to say, "the masses" buy new. As many have pointed out on NAM, if you can get a NEW 07 for 500 more than an 06, whats the point in going with old?

Now add to that new technology.

For the enthusiasts, its a nobrainer. Turbo is always better than Supercharged. There is a reason why turbos rule the car market and not superchargers.

ONCE ... it has been established that you will get more power ... game over. The depreciation curve on 02 - 04s is flattening, no issue there. 05/06s will simply not be desirable if you know you can get more power so the gap in prices will increase. Economics 102.

One example, first gen MR2s were supercharged. Once the second gen came out with Turbo and more power ... game over for first Gen. As they say, those that dont learn from history ... This isn't the first time a car has moved from SC to Turbo.

Yes, we will see

Originally Posted by rkw
It has already been argued that this was the same reason the 1st gen S didn't ship with a 15% smaller pulley -- would have made it too close in power to the JCW.
JCW came out a year or so after the 02s? Maybe they had to test them. Dunno.

I chose to buy JCW because to me $6K price for 40+hp on a 170HP car is a huge jump. However, to many, as can be seen by how many do NOT buy JCW, $6K on a 22K car is ridiculous when you can do the same for $2K
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #16  
lava's Avatar
lava
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 1
From: merchantville, nj
I think Peugeot will be using the same mill in their rally cars and its sure to be putting down 300 then.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #17  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
This is going great guys some very interesting information. Anyone have any other suggestions for what maybe holding this car back or other possible improvements?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #18  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chows4us
One example, first gen MR2s were supercharged. Once the second gen came out with Turbo and more power ... game over for first Gen. As they say, those that dont learn from history ... This isn't the first time a car has moved from SC to Turbo.
funny you say that..I will be selling a mk1 supercharged mr2 for about 5k with 155000 miles on it for a downpayment on the mini, the supercharged cars are a rare now in the sort of shape my car is in.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #19  
chows4us's Avatar
chows4us
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15,478
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by sixblade
funny you say that..I will be selling a mk1 supercharged mr2 for about 5k with 155000 miles on it for a downpayment on the mini, the supercharged cars are a rare now in the sort of shape my car is in.
You have good car there. We were sad to let the SC MR2 go. Its a small car. However, let it go for a ... turbo
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 03:25 PM
  #20  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
It is very upsetting for me to have to sell it, but i will only sell it if the person is capable of maintaining it, and isnt going to part it out, ill hunt them down if they every do that to such an awesome car.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #21  
planeguy's Avatar
planeguy
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by Dave
That's not the max either.

Keep in mind that "SAFE" to MINI/JCW means that the kit will still have warranty AND meet Euro Noise standards AND U.S. and Euro emissions standards.

I'm sure the aftermarket will make more power "safely" with the R56 engine, but they don't have to deal with the same constraints.


Yes, and safe to me means long term reliability. safe means that I can drive the car well past 150k miles without powertain failure, if the aftermerket wants to jam 10lbs of crap in a 5lb sack then so be it ......but I like to keep my cars a little longer than that
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 06:56 AM
  #22  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
hopefully the car having an all aluminum block wont cause problems...probably looking at sleeving the cylinders to really make some nasty power.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #23  
surfblue's Avatar
surfblue
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Yessir!

Originally Posted by planeguy
Yes, and safe to me means long term reliability. safe means that I can drive the car well past 150k miles without powertain failure, if the aftermerket wants to jam 10lbs of crap in a 5lb sack then so be it ......but I like to keep my cars a little longer than that
Planeguy, you got that right!! 250 hp or such doesn't mean much when the mill is blown to bits.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #24  
R56MCS's Avatar
R56MCS
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 0
look on the bright side, the same engine in the new Peugeot 207 is only 150 bhp.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #25  
sixblade's Avatar
sixblade
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
OUCH, thats kinda stupid, thats 5 more hp then my 88 mr2 :/, talk about shooting yourself in the face.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:47 AM.