Drivetrain Yet another dyno datapoint - Alta 15%, TMIC, Intake, and Milltek, 177whp
Yet another dyno datapoint - Alta 15%, TMIC, Intake, and Milltek, 177whp
177whp
169wtq
Mods: Alta 15% pulley, Milltek exhaust, Alta intake, and Alta intercooler.
I've been told that the Dyno Dynamics dynos read lower than any other dyno out there.

Here's the AF Ratio and Boost graph

Unfortunately I didn't get a baseline for my car before the mods. We will try to get a stock MCS on the dyno ASAP for comparison.
If anyone in the Chicago area is interested on dynoing their car on a VERY nice dyno, send me an email at raudi77 (at) hotmail (dot) com.
169wtq
Mods: Alta 15% pulley, Milltek exhaust, Alta intake, and Alta intercooler.
I've been told that the Dyno Dynamics dynos read lower than any other dyno out there.

Here's the AF Ratio and Boost graph

Unfortunately I didn't get a baseline for my car before the mods. We will try to get a stock MCS on the dyno ASAP for comparison.
If anyone in the Chicago area is interested on dynoing their car on a VERY nice dyno, send me an email at raudi77 (at) hotmail (dot) com.
DL the Quicktime 7 Preview for PCs and it should work.
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/win.html
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/win.html
Macs rock - evrything always just...works.
Sorry, not sure what group/clip you're referring to - can you elaborate?
Sorry, not sure what group/clip you're referring to - can you elaborate?
Trending Topics
Dyno Dynamics' Low Readings
Good job. These '05's make some power don't they? Mine made 178hp with a great torque curve also on the same type of low reading dyno. I expect more when I can change the exhaust.
Here's my recent thread on the topic that comfirms others observations about the low reading.
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ad.php?t=51440
Here's my recent thread on the topic that comfirms others observations about the low reading.
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ad.php?t=51440
Originally Posted by markbradford
DL the Quicktime 7 Preview for PCs and it should work.
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/win.html
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/win.html
I downloaded Quicktime 7 with iTunes and it played the H.264 movies fine. My computer can't play the higher end H.264 encoded HD movies too well, if at all, but the lower quality stuff is fine =) H.264 looks quite nice for it's size/bitrate. I say use it, I don't think there's a better codec right now in relation to size of the file.
Originally Posted by Steeroidz
I don't think there's a better codec right now in relation to size of the file.
I hijacked my own thread, DOH!
Back on track - can anyone comment on the A/F Ratio at lower RPMS? It looks like I might be running fairly lean. Does the MCS use a rising rate FPR? What options do I have to richen up the mixture quicker after getting on boost?
Back on track - can anyone comment on the A/F Ratio at lower RPMS? It looks like I might be running fairly lean. Does the MCS use a rising rate FPR? What options do I have to richen up the mixture quicker after getting on boost?
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
To be honest, I think your 177 wHP is pretty good, and your torque is massive. I did mine last week and got 180 wHP and 160 ft/lbs with way more mods (bummer...) Well, actually many of the same mods (pulley, Milltek, Alta CAI) but also a Unichip and VGS. I don't have the print out to post just now, but the amazing thing was the shift from 14 to 12 in A/F ratio at 4600rpm and the corresponding dips in both HP and torque. THe good thing was that the A/F never dropped below 12--no rich cars here...
Also, I'm told that a good estimate for drive train losses is 11% for a MINI, so your crank HP would be around 200.
cheers,
phil
Also, I'm told that a good estimate for drive train losses is 11% for a MINI, so your crank HP would be around 200.
cheers,
phil
Originally Posted by markbradford
What would you estimate that the crank HP should be?
dont get me wrong tho.. 177 is friking good.. i just thought a car with a list of mods like urs was pumping out more than that.. oh well i guess im wrong.
It *is* a bit more than 177. :smile:
177 is at the WHEELS, and on a notoriously pessimistic Dyno Dynamics dyno. Crank horsepower is at least 200 and perhaps even closer to 210. I really have to get a stock MCS on the Dyno for a baseline.
177 is at the WHEELS, and on a notoriously pessimistic Dyno Dynamics dyno. Crank horsepower is at least 200 and perhaps even closer to 210. I really have to get a stock MCS on the Dyno for a baseline.
Originally Posted by markbradford
It *is* a bit more than 177. :smile:
177 is at the WHEELS, and on a notoriously pessimistic Dyno Dynamics dyno. Crank horsepower is at least 200 and perhaps even closer to 210. I really have to get a stock MCS on the Dyno for a baseline.
177 is at the WHEELS, and on a notoriously pessimistic Dyno Dynamics dyno. Crank horsepower is at least 200 and perhaps even closer to 210. I really have to get a stock MCS on the Dyno for a baseline.
well thats a good sign of relief for me then.. coz ive got more or less the same mods as u (havent dynoed yet)..
at the end of the day. i just want to chomp jcw cars.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patsum
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
26
May 29, 2021 06:29 PM
COOPT UP
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
7
Sep 11, 2015 04:59 AM
Hippiehobbit267
MINI Parts for Sale
0
Sep 1, 2015 06:13 PM




