Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain 178 WHP with mods-What's a JCW?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 06:13 PM
  #1  
gjpundsack's Avatar
gjpundsack
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
178 WHP with mods-What's a JCW?

I put my '05 MCS on the dyno today and got 178.1 wheel horsepower and similar torque. I guess that makes flywheel HP around 210...How does that compare to an '05 JCW on a dyno? How does that compare to those of you have done mods to your '05 cars? Dynochart attached. It'll be interesting to see the results next with a header and cat-back system...
 
Attached Thumbnails 178 WHP with mods-What's a JCW?-dyno-chart-squirt-09.22.05.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
kyriian's Avatar
kyriian
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, ON
last time we did dyno tests, one bone stock 05 with 210 JCW pulled this:

 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #3  
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 6
From: Lansdale, PA
178.1 whp is pretty good, 178.1 lb-ft at the wheels is astounding.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 06:31 PM
  #4  
Battle Cattle's Avatar
Battle Cattle
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
anyone got a dyno of a 05MCS with ALTA CAI. Maybe a dyno posting thread? I think you got some great results!

-Josh
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #5  
gjpundsack's Avatar
gjpundsack
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Dyno chart now attached to first post of this thread.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #6  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Those torque numbers are very good when compared to WHP...how did you do it? If I could get that ratio going I would be thrilled.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #7  
gjpundsack's Avatar
gjpundsack
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
I must say that I was pleasantly surprised by how closely matched the torque and wheel HP were too. But, I knew from driving the car that it had a great deal of mid-range power. I came out of a C-5 Corvette with 420hp and I am absolutely amazed at the performance--by every measure--this car has. It certainly outhandles the 'Vette; is quieter and nicer riding; and the power absolutely impresses me. I think the results are from a good match of the parts I have installed. Thanks for the kind words. You're making Squirt and I proud!
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #8  
LAMINI's Avatar
LAMINI
Banned
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Conversion

HOW DID you convert 178 whp to 210 fhp?
My MCS put out 170 at the wheels with CAI, Ehaust, and unichip>
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #9  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by gjpundsack
I put my '05 MCS on the dyno today and got 178.1 wheel horsepower and similar torque. I guess that makes flywheel HP around 210...How does that compare to an '05 JCW on a dyno?
Actually the MINI has an 11% driveline loss so 178 wheel horsepower would be exactly 200hp at the flywheel.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #10  
gjpundsack's Avatar
gjpundsack
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
I thought I had read on the web that the conversion for flywheel HP is about 15% greater then dynoed wheel HP. Is that right?
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #11  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by LAMINI
HOW DID you convert 178 whp to 210 fhp?
My MCS put out 170 at the wheels with CAI, Ehaust, and unichip>
He assumed the common 15% driveline loss instead of MINI's 11%.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:39 PM
  #12  
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
_-_wow_-_

on those torque #'s
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:40 PM
  #13  
04yellowS's Avatar
04yellowS
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Originally Posted by gjpundsack
I thought I had read on the web that the conversion for flywheel HP is about 15% greater then dynoed wheel HP. Is that right?
On average, an automatic tranny loses about 15-18% while a manual tranny only loses 10-12%.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #14  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
178.1 whp is pretty good, 178.1 lb-ft at the wheels is astounding.
I've never seen a MINI dyno like that though. The torque curve is a bit odd. Peak torque is very low in the RPM band - in the 3k-3.5k range and the area under the curve isn't that great with the torque line going all the way down to 130 at redline.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:59 PM
  #15  
Tit's Avatar
Tit
5th Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, Australia
Originally Posted by Battle Cattle
anyone got a dyno of a 05MCS with ALTA CAI. Maybe a dyno posting thread? I think you got some great results!

-Josh
http://www.mini2.com/forum/showthread.php?t=97125

I've put on an MTH tuner file since, and just haven't had time to go back..but I'm hoping it will do something to fix up that messy AF Ratio...

I'm going back once my pulley is on...
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #16  
Rossii's Avatar
Rossii
5th Gear
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 917
Likes: 1
From: SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
178.1 whp is pretty good, 178.1 lb-ft at the wheels is astounding.
The torque is high....thats 10lbs more than me .....I WANT THAT!!

I'm thinking about getting the 2% pulley would that effect the torque?
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #17  
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
ITS ALL about the torque

so what might u be insinuating???
Originally Posted by greatgro
I've never seen a MINI dyno like that though. The torque curve is a bit odd. Peak torque is very low in the RPM band - in the 3k-3.5k range and the area under the curve isn't that great with the torque line going all the way down to 130 at redline.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #18  
gjpundsack's Avatar
gjpundsack
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Acknowledging that I am an old hot rodder and not an expert with today's mod technology, I suspect that the crank pulley does have some effect [think of a light flywheel, for example]. However, I think the key element is the EvoTech software map that was tailored to my other mods.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #19  
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
OLD hot rodder here!!!!!!

yea...that EvoTech stuff is up to par, good choice!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 05:45 AM
  #20  
kyriian's Avatar
kyriian
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, ON
i wonder... my 03 pulled 183 at the wheels, but my torque is at a brutally low 160 lb/ft.... i was thinkin of doing a header, but that'd just help top end again, maybe a 2% crank pulley would be in my future... i wonder when pilo's done with the dampened crank pulley
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #21  
Helix13mini's Avatar
Helix13mini
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 17
From: Under your car
Here's a plot with an '05 JCW 210 kit as the baseline (as compared with the Helix TurboKompressor Kit). This is on the high side for JCW 210s: we usually see 179 to 181 peak hp at the wheels. We always use uncorrected wheel torque figures. I might be slim but I'm not shady.


 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 10:07 AM
  #22  
gjpundsack's Avatar
gjpundsack
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Helix Power Is Impressive

Wow! You Helix guys have shown a truly impressive gain with the "dual charger" system you sell.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #23  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Rossii
The torque is high....thats 10lbs more than me .....I WANT THAT!!
I'm thinking about getting the 2% pulley would that effect the torque?
The smaller you make the pulley the more torque you'll have. There's a direct relationship. But you could make a lot more power by ditching the JCW software. It was designed specifically for all the parts of the JCW including the head. It's been tested with aftermarket 15% pulley, intake and exhaust and it lost considerable power. Or get an aftermarket ECU like GIAC and add probably 20hp over that JCW software. The JCW software does some other things including smoothing things out and making it a bit more responsive than stock - so you may actually think the JCW software is making power. But on the dyno, it'll show a loss.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 12:40 PM
  #24  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by joker
so what might u be insinuating???
Nothing actually except that the torque curve really is odd. It peaks very early and comes down fairly fast. I haven't seen a MINI's torque curve look like that - that's all. :smile:
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 12:51 PM
  #25  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
That's awsome!! looks like you got a Wensday build too!!

Originally Posted by gjpundsack
I put my '05 MCS on the dyno today and got 178.1 wheel horsepower and similar torque. I guess that makes flywheel HP around 210...How does that compare to an '05 JCW on a dyno? How does that compare to those of you have done mods to your '05 cars? Dynochart attached. It'll be interesting to see the results next with a header and cat-back system...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 PM.