Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R56) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Uprating Internals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 11:29 PM
  #26  
Jcw'11's Avatar
Jcw'11
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 60
Likes: 4
From: Houston tx USA
Originally Posted by squawSkiBum
You guys realize that you're replying to a thread from 2013? Talk about zombies - would have been perfect if you had waited a day for 10/31... :-)
lol I can't even get mad at you bro.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 11:31 PM
  #27  
Jcw'11's Avatar
Jcw'11
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 60
Likes: 4
From: Houston tx USA
Originally Posted by cornjuice
MCS have weaker pistons and ringlands vs JCW (JCW can support ~300hp @ crank in stock form).. I would at least be looking to get a good set of forged pistons, along with ARP rod-bolts and head studs. If you had $$$ in your budget still.. +42mm turbo or WMI would be a real good addition.

*blown pistons before a tune are likely carbon related (rings get caked up, scrape/stuck/fail) due to poor maintenance
*blown pistons after a tune could be from the same.. but more likely caused by too much timing and not enough octane.
that is correct... I was hoping it could support more though. My jcw project has just really started will be building a 300 to 350 hp jcw. Which is enough in my opinion... hard to beat
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 11:53 AM
  #28  
oldbrokenwind's Avatar
oldbrokenwind
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 203
From: Northern NV
300HP at the crank (BHP) is quite a bit less at the wheels (WHP), as measured on most USA dynos. If you go for 300 - 350WHP you should plan on doing the internals.

Also, I question Cornjuice's statement about MCS vs JCW pistons. The only OEM difference I'm aware of is the compression ratio --- 10.5:1 for MCS and 10.0:1 for JCW. Lower compression is preferred for high, sustained boost, and should last longer. If you go for a forged set, look at CP Carrillo, they have a good variety off-the-shelf, and will do customs for about the same price.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 02:22 PM
  #29  
Jcw'11's Avatar
Jcw'11
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 60
Likes: 4
From: Houston tx USA
Originally Posted by oldbrokenwind
300HP at the crank (BHP) is quite a bit less at the wheels (WHP), as measured on most USA dynos. If you go for 300 - 350WHP you should plan on doing the internals.

Also, I question Cornjuice's statement about MCS vs JCW pistons. The only OEM difference I'm aware of is the compression ratio --- 10.5:1 for MCS and 10.0:1 for JCW. Lower compression is preferred for high, sustained boost, and should last longer. If you go for a forged set, look at CP Carrillo, they have a good variety off-the-shelf, and will do customs for about the same price.
duly noted... but I want 300 hp to 350 hp to the wheels. A lil jet
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 03:10 PM
  #30  
cornjuice's Avatar
cornjuice
Banned
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 442
Likes: 38
From: NCAL
Originally Posted by oldbrokenwind
300HP at the crank (BHP) is quite a bit less at the wheels (WHP), as measured on most USA dynos. If you go for 300 - 350WHP you should plan on doing the internals.

Also, I question Cornjuice's statement about MCS vs JCW pistons. The only OEM difference I'm aware of is the compression ratio --- 10.5:1 for MCS and 10.0:1 for JCW. Lower compression is preferred for high, sustained boost, and should last longer. If you go for a forged set, look at CP Carrillo, they have a good variety off-the-shelf, and will do customs for about the same price.
From my own research: I could find NO discernible differences in spec, material or other for the pistons. There IS a difference in the head gasket, which for JCW is thicker (and I assume is the reason for lower compression).

From my experience speaking with tuners/builders: They have all told me the same "MCS internals are weak, and for whatever reason the ringlands fail at a much higher rate vs. JCW."

 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2018 | 11:01 AM
  #31  
oldbrokenwind's Avatar
oldbrokenwind
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 203
From: Northern NV
If we can trust the Bentley manual, page 010-15 (1st edition) shows the summary of changes for JCW. One of them is "Strengthened piston side faces, and adapted to a reduced compression ratio of 10.0." It also mentions a different head gasket, but in terms of heat distribution and coolant flow, not compression ratio.

So, apparently I stand corrected on piston materials. However, I'd still go for aftermarket pistons when targeting 300+ WHP.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2018 | 10:34 PM
  #32  
Jcw'11's Avatar
Jcw'11
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 60
Likes: 4
From: Houston tx USA
Originally Posted by oldbrokenwind
If we can trust the Bentley manual, page 010-15 (1st edition) shows the summary of changes for JCW. One of them is "Strengthened piston side faces, and adapted to a reduced compression ratio of 10.0." It also mentions a different head gasket, but in terms of heat distribution and coolant flow, not compression ratio.

So, apparently I stand corrected on piston materials. However, I'd still go for aftermarket pistons when targeting 300+ WHP.
thanks for the info I was thinking about sticking with the factory jcw pistons.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NYMADMINI
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
13
Dec 14, 2016 02:33 PM
martinb
General MINI Talk
9
Oct 7, 2015 05:00 PM
MINI Stupor
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:36 AM
HaveATank
General MINI Talk
1
Sep 16, 2015 08:32 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:39 PM.