Drivetrain R56 Cutom Tune by Mynes
R56 Cutom Tune by Mynes
I just saw this on MT and thought id share. Looks like great things to come to the R56!!! Way to go Mynes!!!
Here is the beginning of a long list of test results we'll be releasing for the R56 platform. The first car is as follow: Model: 2009 MCS (R56) Automatic
Dyno: ABF's Mustang Chassis Dyno
Stock Figures: 156whp | 175wtqe
Stock with custom tune: 169whp | 191wtqe
K&N Filter added: 175whp | 198wtqe
Gains from a Custom tune: +13whp | +16wtqe
Gains from Custom tune + K&N typhoon system: +19whp | 23wtqe
Below are the graphical comparisons.
Stock Graph (Base mapping):

Custom Tuned on the stock parts:

Tuned with K&N Filter added:

===================================
***Comparison mappings***
1) Stock mapping vs Custom Tuned (+13whp | +16wtqe)

2) Custom Tuned (stock parts) vs. Custom Tuned + K&N system (+6whp | +7wtqe)

3) Stock mapping vs. Custom Tuned + K&N system (+19whp | 23wtqe)
Here is the beginning of a long list of test results we'll be releasing for the R56 platform. The first car is as follow: Model: 2009 MCS (R56) Automatic
Dyno: ABF's Mustang Chassis Dyno
Stock Figures: 156whp | 175wtqe
Stock with custom tune: 169whp | 191wtqe
K&N Filter added: 175whp | 198wtqe
Gains from a Custom tune: +13whp | +16wtqe
Gains from Custom tune + K&N typhoon system: +19whp | 23wtqe
Below are the graphical comparisons.
Stock Graph (Base mapping):

Custom Tuned on the stock parts:

Tuned with K&N Filter added:

===================================
***Comparison mappings***
1) Stock mapping vs Custom Tuned (+13whp | +16wtqe)

2) Custom Tuned (stock parts) vs. Custom Tuned + K&N system (+6whp | +7wtqe)

3) Stock mapping vs. Custom Tuned + K&N system (+19whp | 23wtqe)
I wouldn't say so...Mustang dynos run notoriously "low" (i.e., realistic) than others, no? At least there's a baseline and progression that puts things in perspective...
And here we go about numbers again, its the delta that looks good
Trending Topics
Doesn't really matter tacostrk. Without a baseline there is no delta shown. Who knows what the actual change was. Since it was on a different dyno, on a different day, under different conditions, your pull doesn't reflect a direct comparison to the ones in the initial post. If you have a baseline pull on the same dyno, please post that so that we can compare your numbers.
Doesn't really matter tacostrk. Without a baseline there is no delta shown. Who knows what the actual change was. Since it was on a different dyno, on a different day, under different conditions, your pull doesn't reflect a direct comparison to the ones in the initial post. If you have a baseline pull on the same dyno, please post that so that we can compare your numbers.
mmmm k....i dont care about the peak numbers.
For the second time, it's the DELTA that I'm commenting on here. 13 whp, 16 trq?
I will say give them this though....the AFR does look nice.
For the second time, it's the DELTA that I'm commenting on here. 13 whp, 16 trq?

I will say give them this though....the AFR does look nice.
They're on the chart. He even mentions that in the quote u used in your post....
The beauty of that dyno chart is its even on a dynodynamics dyno....so you guys can't pull the old "dynapack at Church's reads high" card.
Look. Not everyone is instantly available to handle every complaint you guys make. This one was handled in under a half hour. I recommend you gather some patience if you are looking to report a post and see INSTANT results.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
ECSTuning
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 12, 2015 01:24 PM
ECSTuning
Accessory Products
0
Aug 11, 2015 12:19 PM
ECSTuning
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 11, 2015 12:18 PM



just for reference
