Drivetrain 204.9 & 177.8 at 6600 elevation
204.9 & 177.8 at 6600 elevation
So
I have done:
CAI
15% pulley
Cam
380 Injectors
Header
Cat back
I pulled 193.5 & 173.7 base line at 84 degress at 6,600 ft elevation.
after the tune I pulled 204.9 and 177.83 - lovin it
here is the dyno chart
I have done:
CAI
15% pulley
Cam
380 Injectors
Header
Cat back
I pulled 193.5 & 173.7 base line at 84 degress at 6,600 ft elevation.
after the tune I pulled 204.9 and 177.83 - lovin it
here is the dyno chart
RMW/Newman street cam. Jan also tuned it - Mini5280 (our local club) organized the tune session so I took advantage of it
Trending Topics
Thanks and I agree - it really puts you in the seat for the full range of the RPMs when you get on it. As your accelerating you just keep waitting for it to let up and it does not.
this car just plane gets it now Bonny(the driver)
informed me on Friday that the redline of 7800K is crazy.. (Jan raised the redline to 78k but we only dyno'd her to 7K)(her words)
I was racing a 350z up the on ramp and as I was pulling away on him the rev limiter kickied in and scared the **** out of me when it cut out at 7.8K
(her words)I told her if she keeps that up I will be putting a 2.0 stroker in Lilly - i am not sure if that is a threat or a promise
Jan - True Dat - your see'in the dyno sheet as is, no smoke - no mirrors at MORE than 1 mile up, 6600 ft at Macs at 84 Degrees.
Silver - Thanks
KC - I am not sure what the conversion would be but I would love to see this car at sea level
. I LOVE THIS THING - oh Yea I live at 7,250 FT - Did I mention I love this car
After reading this thread, it made me pull out the good old thermodynamics textbook and review some tables.
At 6600ft and 84 degrees F, the barometric pressure is approximately 11.3 psi compared to 14.5 psi at sea level. 11.3/14.5= 77.9% which means it is approximately 22.1% less powerful than what it would be measured at sea level. With that reasoning, the car would have 250.2 hp at sea level? How is this possible without going to a BV cylinder head?
What am I missing?
At 6600ft and 84 degrees F, the barometric pressure is approximately 11.3 psi compared to 14.5 psi at sea level. 11.3/14.5= 77.9% which means it is approximately 22.1% less powerful than what it would be measured at sea level. With that reasoning, the car would have 250.2 hp at sea level? How is this possible without going to a BV cylinder head?
What am I missing?
C99 - I have no idea if that is correct or what it would be at sea level - I just know it is a blast to drive. The dyno sheet speaks for itself
Last edited by Hippie; Aug 25, 2009 at 08:49 AM.
After reading this thread, it made me pull out the good old thermodynamics textbook and review some tables.
At 6600ft and 84 degrees F, the barometric pressure is approximately 11.3 psi compared to 14.5 psi at sea level. 11.3/14.5= 77.9% which means it is approximately 22.1% less powerful than what it would be measured at sea level. With that reasoning, the car would have 250.2 hp at sea level? How is this possible without going to a BV cylinder head?
What am I missing?
At 6600ft and 84 degrees F, the barometric pressure is approximately 11.3 psi compared to 14.5 psi at sea level. 11.3/14.5= 77.9% which means it is approximately 22.1% less powerful than what it would be measured at sea level. With that reasoning, the car would have 250.2 hp at sea level? How is this possible without going to a BV cylinder head?
What am I missing?
One thing I have to say about the RMW tune, I have to look at the tach to know when to shift. I just don't feel any loss of power as it revs up, it just keeps pulling (I have hit the rev limiter more than I want to admit). Maybe I should get one of those stupid shift lights.
One thing I have to say about the RMW tune, I have to look at the tach to know when to shift. I just don't feel any loss of power as it revs up, it just keeps pulling (I have hit the rev limiter more than I want to admit). Maybe I should get one of those stupid shift lights.
True Dat
I do still bounce the limiter from time to time though
when I am pushing her up the canyon
One thing I have to say about the RMW tune, I have to look at the tach to know when to shift. I just don't feel any loss of power as it revs up, it just keeps pulling (I have hit the rev limiter more than I want to admit). Maybe I should get one of those stupid shift lights.
I love the sig..........9 out of 10 voices...........classic
You are absolutely correct, it feels like it would keep pulling forever, LOL. When I first got the tune, I almost always hit rev limiter in first. Now I short shift a little in first (6500) so as to not do it.
Last edited by davisflyer; Sep 5, 2010 at 04:25 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pauhana
1st Annual MINIs in the Mountains (2006)
24
Jul 24, 2006 01:20 PM
Drivetrain Environmental Impact to Power Creation
TonyB
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
8
Jun 15, 2005 07:15 PM



