Drivetrain Pulley make supercharger go boom?
Pulley make supercharger go boom?
Ok so my friend was talking to a MINI service tech guy and he said that putting a new supercharger on a Cooper S would make the supercharger spin faster that it was designed for, and it would shatter the turbine. He even said hes seen that happen a lot. Is this true? My guess is that the ones he services for that problem have someting other than a 15% installed. i.e. a 17& or 19% or whatever. I only want to get a 15%, is there a worry of this happening?
t
The JCW kit uses a 14ish% Pulley so obviously spinning the SC 1% faster isn't going to cause the shaft to shatter... and since when does steel "Shatter"
. You would need to heat and shock cool the SC shaft many times to make it brittle enough to shatter. Sounds like more BS from someone that has absolutly no clue what they're talking about.
Ok so my friend was talking to a MINI service tech guy and he said that putting a new supercharger on a Cooper S would make the supercharger spin faster that it was designed for, and it would shatter the turbine. He even said hes seen that happen a lot. Is this true? My guess is that the ones he services for that problem have someting other than a 15% installed. i.e. a 17& or 19% or whatever. I only want to get a 15%, is there a worry of this happening?
. You would need to heat and shock cool the SC shaft many times to make it brittle enough to shatter. Sounds like more BS from someone that has absolutly no clue what they're talking about.
Last edited by Guest; May 6, 2007 at 08:17 PM.
That's true, but I wouldn't worry. Do you have any idea how many people on this board have a 15% pully. (I'd like to have dollar for every one). Me thinks Mr. Tech wanna be is full of poo.
No, the JCW kit is the EXACT same SC. On the early models, they swapped out the stock SC for one with ceramic coated vanes. As of 2005 every single MCS has the upgraded Gen 5 SC with the coated vanes. There's no doubt that spinning the SC 15% faster is going to reduce the life of the SC, It's not going to catastrophically fail at 12k miles though.
No, the JCW kit is the EXACT same SC. On the early models, they swapped out the stock SC for one with ceramic coated vanes. As of 2005 every single MCS has the upgraded Gen 5 SC with the coated vanes. There's no doubt that spinning the SC 15% faster is going to reduce the life of the SC, It's not going to catastrophically fail at 12k miles though.
It was something like
Stock ~ 120,000 miles
JCW ~ 100,000 miles
15% ~ 90,000 miles
17% ~ 80,000 miles
19% ~ 70,000 miles
But don't quote me on those numbers

Anyone know which thread I am talking about?
Trending Topics
The original JCW supercharger had a coating on the vanes that was not applied to the standard suerchargers, in addition to the smaller pulley. Beginning in late 04 the standard superchargers also received the coating. Except for the pulley size the JCW and standard superchargers are identical. Using a 19% pulley brings the supercharger closer to it's redline and may exceed it if the engine's redline is raised. More problematic however is possible cavitation in the engine cooling system (the water pump is driven by the supercharger) if the engine is run at high rpm for extended periods. That's why the 19% is not recommended for cars that are autocrossed or raced. In addition the 19% is more prone to throw or break belts due to it's smaller diameter and higher load. The 19% is more suited for cars that are mostly street driven, since it gives higher boost at lower rpm. From the posts I've read on here there don't seem to be any increased reliability issues with pullied superchargers but I would think they would wear faster since they run faster than standard. I've been reading about the pulleys for the last 5 years and I decided to go with 19% FWIW.
The original JCW supercharger had a coating on the vanes that was not applied to the standard suerchargers, in addition to the smaller pulley. Beginning in late 04 the standard superchargers also received the coating. Except for the pulley size the JCW and standard superchargers are identical. Using a 19% pulley brings the supercharger closer to it's redline and may exceed it if the engine's redline is raised. More problematic however is possible cavitation in the engine cooling system (the water pump is driven by the supercharger) if the engine is run at high rpm for extended periods. That's why the 19% is not recommended for cars that are autocrossed or raced. In addition the 19% is more prone to throw or break belts due to it's smaller diameter and higher load. The 19% is more suited for cars that are mostly street driven, since it gives higher boost at lower rpm. From the posts I've read on here there don't seem to be any increased reliability issues with pullied superchargers but I would think they would wear faster since they run faster than standard. I've been reading about the pulleys for the last 5 years and I decided to go with 19% FWIW.
I just bought my second used MINI, and it already has a 19% on. Although I'd prefere the 15% probably not worth the swap. Good to hear yours is having no issues though!
In December '03 Helix installed a pulley hup with 15% outer. My car had about 35K miles at the time. In May of that year, I switched to a 19% outer section, which has been on the car ever since. Currently at 103K miles, same supercharger.
I change belts every 15-20K miles, but have never had one break nor have the belts I remove looked very bad.
I autocross frequently, and depending on the course I've never hesitated to run to the rev limiter or sit on it for a second or two. I'm using the GIAC flash, so the rev limiter kicks in at 7300rpm. The first event for this car was in October 2002. Since then, I've used it in about 150 events.
I wouldn't pick this combination for road course use, but it has served me well. It's not conclusive, but I can monitor both coolant temperature and oil temperature and I've never seen indications of water pump cavitation.
The issue is not the so much the pulley diameter as it is the dutycycle it is exposed to. The vast majority of my driving is below 3500rpm, typically more like 3000rpm. Even with the 19% pulley on my car, a more aggressive driver with a stock pulley who spends more time in traffic and reving up into the 4000+ range will probably wear out their supercharger (and the rest of the engine) well before I do.
Scott
90SM
I change belts every 15-20K miles, but have never had one break nor have the belts I remove looked very bad.
I autocross frequently, and depending on the course I've never hesitated to run to the rev limiter or sit on it for a second or two. I'm using the GIAC flash, so the rev limiter kicks in at 7300rpm. The first event for this car was in October 2002. Since then, I've used it in about 150 events.
I wouldn't pick this combination for road course use, but it has served me well. It's not conclusive, but I can monitor both coolant temperature and oil temperature and I've never seen indications of water pump cavitation.
The issue is not the so much the pulley diameter as it is the dutycycle it is exposed to. The vast majority of my driving is below 3500rpm, typically more like 3000rpm. Even with the 19% pulley on my car, a more aggressive driver with a stock pulley who spends more time in traffic and reving up into the 4000+ range will probably wear out their supercharger (and the rest of the engine) well before I do.
Scott
90SM
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ebowling
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
90
Aug 4, 2019 09:15 AM
blackie
MINI Parts for Sale
31
Jan 18, 2017 09:56 PM
Drivetrain Pulley Modification. Is it harmful?
cw40342
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
10
Oct 6, 2015 05:07 PM
gmonde
MINIs & Minis for Sale
1
Sep 8, 2015 06:37 AM
iamcamkeenan
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
3
Aug 10, 2015 03:31 PM






