R56 240 Torque? is their a typo?
#1
240 Torque? is their a typo?
I see on the engine specs for the MINI on www.newmini2006.co.uk. it says 240 torque. is that just the UK version? or is that 80 more torque than the supercharged old one?
i could be wrong dont quote me for it but i think it might be a typo or it is relaly 240
i could be wrong dont quote me for it but i think it might be a typo or it is relaly 240
#3
I see on the engine specs for the MINI on www.newmini2006.co.uk. it says 240 torque. is that just the UK version? or is that 80 more torque than the supercharged old one?
i could be wrong dont quote me for it but i think it might be a typo or it is relaly 240
i could be wrong dont quote me for it but i think it might be a typo or it is relaly 240
Scott
#6
The new engine is rated at least 177 lb-ft from 1600 through 5000 rpm (besides the Saab-like overboost mode). In comparison the old car's JCW option produces a peak of 177 lb-ft at 4000 rpm. Peak horsepower for the new engine will also be developed at a low 5500 rpm, while the old JCW peaked at 6950.
What this means is the new powerplant should feel considerably stronger than the old JCW's but will probably run out of breath and require a shift some 1000 rpm sooner. So it'll be a stump-puller just like the VW 1.8T which also runs out of rpm quickly due to a tiny turbo. The bright side is that a tiny turbo causes little turbo lag (develops 11.6psi at just 1400 rpm!), and upping the boost should be a simple way to produce bucketloads of usable torque. But those looking for high hp numbers will undoubtedly need to swap out the turbo for a larger one.
Interestingly the new engine is rated 25+ less horsepower than the JCW but has the same 140mph top speed. Either it's underrated or the aerodynamics are much improved.
What this means is the new powerplant should feel considerably stronger than the old JCW's but will probably run out of breath and require a shift some 1000 rpm sooner. So it'll be a stump-puller just like the VW 1.8T which also runs out of rpm quickly due to a tiny turbo. The bright side is that a tiny turbo causes little turbo lag (develops 11.6psi at just 1400 rpm!), and upping the boost should be a simple way to produce bucketloads of usable torque. But those looking for high hp numbers will undoubtedly need to swap out the turbo for a larger one.
Interestingly the new engine is rated 25+ less horsepower than the JCW but has the same 140mph top speed. Either it's underrated or the aerodynamics are much improved.
#7
Coordinator :: STLMini
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Top speed has very little to do with power. It is usually determined by gearing or electronic limits (which is often because of the tires) There can also be safety concerns (becoming unstable at high speeds), or politics (Europe used to have a gentleman's agreement not to exceed 155 mph)
Trending Topics
#8
Torque building from 1000 RPM and peaking 240Nm (177 ft lbs.) at 1600 RPM. The curve is flat as can be until 5000 RPM where it starts to drop off gradually until it's producing near 180Nm (132 ft. lbs.) at the 6500 RPM red line (or at least where the graph stops).
Overboot reaches it's maximum torque output a little later: 260Nm (192 ft. lbs.) at 2000 rpm... and trails off a little earlier around 4500 rpm.
My hope is that the car will be really fun to drive using that bottom end power on my local coastal twisties. I won't have to keep the car revved as high to get the same pull out of corners and such.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EVMini
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
4
09-28-2015 10:20 AM
Mini Mania
Vendor Announcements
0
09-25-2015 12:32 PM