R56 2011 mcs most mini drivers are apple consumers
Rumor's coming out now is iPhone 5 wont be out till after September 24th, but before Christmas.
just checked they already scheduled there spot in the WWDC which means a release somewhere in june just like all the years before
I have the same MCSE as you do btw.
It feels like a 100 years ago I got that thing, along with an MCSD at around the same time. I had several Lotus and Sun Java certifications as well. Thankfully, I haven't bothered with any "certifications" in years now. Once I passed 10 years of "experience" it seems like everyone quit caring to see those. Times have certainly changed since those NT 4 days my friend.
I still remember that TCP/IP test. 
We also did not even support them at all. We had a separate contract with a local Mac support business. It really depends on the overall IT strategy they have in place.
Trifecta here:
MINI + Apple Nano 6th gen (on my wrist as we speak) + full Campagnolo equipped road bike
I also own a couple of vintage Macintoshs: SE and a IIcx. I would have a current Mac or 2, but just haven't come up with a good point to switch. Could be soon, however. Working on the wife: bought her a Shuffle as a tease...
From the discussion here, I think we're forgetting the inertia of Windows products. Remember the old saying "No one ever got fired for specifying IBM."? The meaning is that there was little or no risk. It's an easy decision. Often when something is just a little different, you will need ear plugs to keep your sanity over the roar of complaints. Apple products are different in some significant and some very positive ways. But the basic problem is that difference. To assume that Microsoft dominance is based on superiority and Apple's lack of prowess is a bit like revisionist history.
But a little personal history:
My first contact with computers was in engineering college. We punched cards to use on IBM 360 and 370 systems. Although my education and the bulk of my career has been in mechanical engineering, I did various kinds of programming for 6 or 7 years (Fortran, Basic, database languages and discrete event simulation languages). I've used PCs, Macintoshes, Unix workstations, IBM mainframes and IBM and DEC minicomputers (Gawd, that's an old term). The computer work also includes 5 different 2-D CAD packages and 2 3-D CAD packages. Anyway, I say all this to mean that I've been around for a long time and have used lots of different things.
So, what I see is this:
Apple has a business model that requires SIGNIFICANT innovation and product development. That's what drives them; the Cool Factor. They would be loath to do something that wasn't Cool. Microsoft, for better or for worse, doesn't have that. How many times has Microsoft been 2nd to market?
I think a big portion of the reason that Apple "locks" (the term of others, not me) their products is how else can you insure that the user experience with be exactly as you have designed it? This is an important concept to Apple, but I think Microsoft gives up some of that when they allow HP, Dell, etc. to put little tweaks into the operating system. By the way, my last nightmare was attempting to get a LogiTech web cam running on my Dell system. It took 3 calls to support and they kicked it up to their 2nd highest level of experts before it got solved. PlugnSortaPlay...
And this:
iPod Touch vs Zune? The Touch is essentially an iPhone without the phone. Since when did any Zune function as a PDA? Sounds like Apples and Oranges...
One other thing:
AutoCAD is back on the Macintosh platform. And it isn't a neutered version either. As has been suggested, Macintoshes are useless for professional work, beyond artsey endeavors. Evidently AutoDesk doesn't think so...
MINI + Apple Nano 6th gen (on my wrist as we speak) + full Campagnolo equipped road bike
I also own a couple of vintage Macintoshs: SE and a IIcx. I would have a current Mac or 2, but just haven't come up with a good point to switch. Could be soon, however. Working on the wife: bought her a Shuffle as a tease...
From the discussion here, I think we're forgetting the inertia of Windows products. Remember the old saying "No one ever got fired for specifying IBM."? The meaning is that there was little or no risk. It's an easy decision. Often when something is just a little different, you will need ear plugs to keep your sanity over the roar of complaints. Apple products are different in some significant and some very positive ways. But the basic problem is that difference. To assume that Microsoft dominance is based on superiority and Apple's lack of prowess is a bit like revisionist history.
But a little personal history:
My first contact with computers was in engineering college. We punched cards to use on IBM 360 and 370 systems. Although my education and the bulk of my career has been in mechanical engineering, I did various kinds of programming for 6 or 7 years (Fortran, Basic, database languages and discrete event simulation languages). I've used PCs, Macintoshes, Unix workstations, IBM mainframes and IBM and DEC minicomputers (Gawd, that's an old term). The computer work also includes 5 different 2-D CAD packages and 2 3-D CAD packages. Anyway, I say all this to mean that I've been around for a long time and have used lots of different things.
So, what I see is this:
Apple has a business model that requires SIGNIFICANT innovation and product development. That's what drives them; the Cool Factor. They would be loath to do something that wasn't Cool. Microsoft, for better or for worse, doesn't have that. How many times has Microsoft been 2nd to market?
- DOS came after CP/M
- the Newton was the first PDA
- the PalmPC came after the Palm Pilot
- Windows came after the MacOS (although both were preceded by the system developed at the PARC)
- Microsoft couldn't create a significant tablet market until the iPad came along
- the ZUNE came after the iPod
- Windows was PlugnPlay well after the Macintosh
I think a big portion of the reason that Apple "locks" (the term of others, not me) their products is how else can you insure that the user experience with be exactly as you have designed it? This is an important concept to Apple, but I think Microsoft gives up some of that when they allow HP, Dell, etc. to put little tweaks into the operating system. By the way, my last nightmare was attempting to get a LogiTech web cam running on my Dell system. It took 3 calls to support and they kicked it up to their 2nd highest level of experts before it got solved. PlugnSortaPlay...
And this:
iPod Touch vs Zune? The Touch is essentially an iPhone without the phone. Since when did any Zune function as a PDA? Sounds like Apples and Oranges...
One other thing:
AutoCAD is back on the Macintosh platform. And it isn't a neutered version either. As has been suggested, Macintoshes are useless for professional work, beyond artsey endeavors. Evidently AutoDesk doesn't think so...
Last edited by flatlander_48; Mar 30, 2011 at 07:33 AM.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/a6bP-47_E0I this is proof that mini is going after apple consumers this looks like a apple/mini commercial
AutoDesk disagrees because there is a segment of the population dealing in those types of programs that refuses to work with a PC out of habit (even though the majority of the "power" is there too). Thats just supply and demand working itself out. This isn't a topic worth cracking open again though, as its already been established that there are segments of the corporate world that will use Macs for a few reasons, and also very large segments that would laugh in your face at the notion of putting one on their cherished "corporate network".
As for the iPod Touch being a PDA? /shrug They should have called it something else then. As for me, short of playing music and using a browser on it, I could care less what else it does. Then again, I've never once used a PDA and liked it. I have no use for one, never have. I also keep reading that its anything but an iPhone without the phone. Apparently it is sorely lacking in a few areas, none of which I remember off the top of my head -- because I loathe mobile devices, lol (one of them was the .7 MP camera for instance).
As for the iPod Touch being a PDA? /shrug They should have called it something else then. As for me, short of playing music and using a browser on it, I could care less what else it does. Then again, I've never once used a PDA and liked it. I have no use for one, never have. I also keep reading that its anything but an iPhone without the phone. Apparently it is sorely lacking in a few areas, none of which I remember off the top of my head -- because I loathe mobile devices, lol (one of them was the .7 MP camera for instance).
Last edited by MINI11; Mar 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM.
well mobile devices are taking over.. most of the books stores around me are closing down cause of the ebooks now
http://www.youtube.com/embed/a6bP-47_E0I this is proof that mini is going after apple consumers this looks like a apple/mini commercial
But I digress, I guess I finally have gotten "old"... because IMHO the world was better off before. It was friendlier for sure... no "internet tough guys" existed who disrespected strangers constantly. /Rant off ... but I know many of you over 30 know what I'm talking about.
Speak of the devil, the UPS guy just dropped off the new 32gb iPod Touch. This marks the first ever Apple product I've purchased -- err acquired, since I'm writing this thing off against the business, lol.
My first impression is its REALLY shiny! I'm glad I got the silicone gel case as I don't see how you could ever keep this thing from looking like hell with the chrome back on it. I'll post some impressions later maybe, coming from a hardcore Apple-avoider.
My first impression is its REALLY shiny! I'm glad I got the silicone gel case as I don't see how you could ever keep this thing from looking like hell with the chrome back on it. I'll post some impressions later maybe, coming from a hardcore Apple-avoider.
Speak of the devil, the UPS guy just dropped off the new 32gb iPod Touch. This marks the first ever Apple product I've purchased -- err acquired, since I'm writing this thing off against the business, lol.
My first impression is its REALLY shiny! I'm glad I got the silicone gel case as I don't see how you could ever keep this thing from looking like hell with the chrome back on it. I'll post some impressions later maybe, coming from a hardcore Apple-avoider.
My first impression is its REALLY shiny! I'm glad I got the silicone gel case as I don't see how you could ever keep this thing from looking like hell with the chrome back on it. I'll post some impressions later maybe, coming from a hardcore Apple-avoider.

Yes please do share you thoughts
http://www.youtube.com/embed/a6bP-47_E0I this is proof that mini is going after apple consumers this looks like a apple/mini commercial
Well, for starters... granted I haven't played with this thing THAT much, I will actually.... post 1 positive comment.
Aside from the fact that I had to HACK THE REGISTRY to get iTunes installed on a relatively new install of Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate (
)... I like one thing so far. My music collection is about 100gb, so too big to fit onto most devices in its entirety... so I setup iTunes/iPod to sync selectively, and the interface to do that in iTunes is VERY NICE compared to the Zune software. It is far easier to manage what I want on the device, and what I do not. Now, whether the device actually can play said music to my satisfaction, I'm not sure.
I'll post back again when I've had a chance to do more with this thing.And heres one complaint: The music on iTunes is a rip-off. It is anywhere from 10-30% more expensive than Amazon MP3.
Well, for starters... granted I haven't played with this thing THAT much, I will actually.... post 1 positive comment.
Aside from the fact that I had to HACK THE REGISTRY to get iTunes installed on a relatively new install of Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate (
)... I like one thing so far. My music collection is about 100gb, so too big to fit onto most devices in its entirety... so I setup iTunes/iPod to sync selectively, and the interface to do that in iTunes is VERY NICE compared to the Zune software. It is far easier to manage what I want on the device, and what I do not. Now, whether the device actually can play said music to my satisfaction, I'm not sure.
I'll post back again when I've had a chance to do more with this thing.And heres one complaint: The music on iTunes is a rip-off. It is anywhere from 10-30% more expensive than Amazon MP3.
yes I know its like pulling teeth for you to give a good comment on a apple product, but I think you will find its not as bad as you thought.
What would you expect? That the new guy is going to start up with higher prices than the competition? Let's see if they stay at those prices...
I've been buying from Amazon MP3 for around 3 years since it opened in January of 08... and the prices have always been the same. They are hardly "new" anymore. But maybe you're right (if so, they are taking their sweet time in raising prices), but personally, I think iTunes is simply charging the "apple premium".
This isn't a topic worth cracking open again though, as its already been established that there are segments of the corporate world that will use Macs for a few reasons, and also very large segments that would laugh in your face at the notion of putting one on their cherished "corporate network".
As for the iPod Touch being a PDA? /shrug They should have called it something else then. As for me, short of playing music and using a browser on it, I could care less what else it does. Then again, I've never once used a PDA and liked it. I have no use for one, never have. I also keep reading that its anything but an iPhone without the phone. Apparently it is sorely lacking in a few areas, none of which I remember off the top of my head -- because I loathe mobile devices, lol (one of them was the .7 MP camera for instance).
Ok man, whatever. I've said my piece on the first 2 items. Theres nothing to add to the discussion. I speak from what I've seen for nearly 20 years in the IT field. My opinion is my own, and so is yours.
As to your last question? Yeah, for me, the Touch looks like a Zune equivalent based on features *I* care about. Clearly you're an Apple fan, lol. So far I'd label it as "neat". If buying solely for personal reasons would I buy another Apple product? Unlikely.
As to your last question? Yeah, for me, the Touch looks like a Zune equivalent based on features *I* care about. Clearly you're an Apple fan, lol. So far I'd label it as "neat". If buying solely for personal reasons would I buy another Apple product? Unlikely.


