R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 Who would buy a MINI ONE D if avalable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 04:40 AM
  #1  
jibeho's Avatar
jibeho
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Grasonville, MD
Who would buy a MINI ONE D if avalable

I can't see why BMW is balking at configuring a diesel MINI for the US market. Other manufactures are making this work. As an owner of a 2000 VW NB TDI I can't complain about my 700 mile tanks with diesel selling for about 3 cents more then regular. I just looked up the specs on the current MINI ONE D sold in the UK they list it at 58.9 MPG top speed of 109 and 0-62 in 11 seconds. As a current owner of a MCS and someone that has to commuter 75 miles a day I would stand in line to buy one. How can anyone turn down a car that can get over 800 miles on a fill up?
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 04:45 AM
  #2  
mistro's Avatar
mistro
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 1
From: Highland Park, IL
I'd buy one, especially if they came in a Cabrio! Don't understand this either.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 04:54 AM
  #3  
IanF's Avatar
IanF
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: PA/NJ
As a fellow TDI owner, the ONE D would be tempting... but at the moment, I'm not holding my breath...

(an excerpt from the MotoringFile interview with Jeff Stracco of MINIUSA)
MF: With gasoline headed towards $4 in parts of the country is there any chance that the MINI D will be coming to the US?

Stracco: We would love it. However, the problem with diesel is tailpipe emissions, particularly smog causing NOx. Unfortunately, the MINI D does not comply with emissions regulations for all 50 states. So a VERY large portion of our dealers could not sell it even if it were offered.

Cleaner diesel fuel will not solve the NOx problem because NOx is a result of high combustion temperatures and not fuel impurities. Now there are some new technologies like Bluetec which reduce NOx. Bluetec injects a urea solution in the exhaust stream and effectively scrubs NOx emissions. However, one key issue to using something like Bluetec on a MINI is space. Where are you going to put a big tank of urea solution? This is not an insurmountable problem, but it will be a while before a solution is found. Fortunately, we’ve got some of the most talented engineers on the planet, and we tend to let them worry about such things.

So for the time being we are going to concentrate on more efficient gas engines. And the next generation gas engines will be both more powerful and get better mileage.
http://motoringfile.com/2006/05/23/m...u-the-answers/
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 05:08 AM
  #4  
Yucca Patrol's Avatar
Yucca Patrol
Coordinator :: Alabama Motoring Society & South East
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 2
From: Burning-Ham Alabama
Where are you going to put a big tank of urea solution? This is not an insurmountable problem, but it will be a while before a solution is found.
Look no further than the 2005-2006 gigantic cupholder!
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 05:16 AM
  #5  
jibeho's Avatar
jibeho
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Grasonville, MD
I have read this before and consider it VERY LAME. I can't see how Daimler Chrysler and VW can make it work but BMW can't, LAME,LAME, LAME



Originally Posted by IanF
As a fellow TDI owner, the ONE D would be tempting... but at the moment, I'm not holding my breath...

(an excerpt from the MotoringFile interview with Jeff Stracco of MINIUSA)
MF: With gasoline headed towards $4 in parts of the country is there any chance that the MINI D will be coming to the US?

Stracco: We would love it. However, the problem with diesel is tailpipe emissions, particularly smog causing NOx. Unfortunately, the MINI D does not comply with emissions regulations for all 50 states. So a VERY large portion of our dealers could not sell it even if it were offered.

Cleaner diesel fuel will not solve the NOx problem because NOx is a result of high combustion temperatures and not fuel impurities. Now there are some new technologies like Bluetec which reduce NOx. Bluetec injects a urea solution in the exhaust stream and effectively scrubs NOx emissions. However, one key issue to using something like Bluetec on a MINI is space. Where are you going to put a big tank of urea solution? This is not an insurmountable problem, but it will be a while before a solution is found. Fortunately, we’ve got some of the most talented engineers on the planet, and we tend to let them worry about such things.

So for the time being we are going to concentrate on more efficient gas engines. And the next generation gas engines will be both more powerful and get better mileage.

http://motoringfile.com/2006/05/23/m...u-the-answers/
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 07:14 AM
  #6  
IanF's Avatar
IanF
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: PA/NJ
Originally Posted by jibeho
I have read this before and consider it VERY LAME. I can't see how Daimler Chrysler and VW can make it work but BMW can't, LAME,LAME, LAME
Actually, I've read DCX and VW are having trouble making it work in the US for '07 and beyond. Keep in mind, neither sell diesels in states that have adopted CA's emmisions laws. Also, I read CA has not given their blessing to the urea injection method for reducing NOX. CA likes emission equipment to be a totally passive, no-maintenance sort of thing. Periodic urea refills are not something they're keen on. Then there's that packaging issue. If you've worked on MINI's a lot (and I have...) then you know there is not a lot of extra "space" for a urea container of unknown size. Hell, just changing the oil filter can be a yogo exercise... I seriously doubt the R56 will magically create more space that may otherwise go unused in gas models.

Then there's the matter of economics. Certifying car/engine combos in the US is not cheap, so you need to sell a lot of them and/or at a premium price for it to pay for the additional engineering and certification expense.

To add further bleakness to the picture... I've read that many European countries have laws on the table for tightening NOX emissions. This may put a hurting on diesels in general. Even VW is starting to look at other options - re: the Golf GT with it's twin-charged 1.4L that gets 38mpg. I'd love to see an engine like that in an even lighter car like the MINI.

Look, I'm with you. I love having a car that can carry 2x as much as my g/f's MCS and get's 50% better fuel mileage. However, I'd love to have a MINI and be able to give up some space but have a lot more fun during my 100 daily commute. But I can also see how the engineering and economic issues make the One D a tough car to sell in the US.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 07:29 AM
  #7  
jibeho's Avatar
jibeho
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Grasonville, MD
I'm no rocket scientist, but I can't seem to be able to buy the notion that a 9MPG SRT10 is better on the environment then a 60MPG MINI.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
krenzkes's Avatar
krenzkes
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 409
Likes: 1
From: Festus, MO
I have brought this up in other threads and the general answer was the type of diesel fuel sold in the US is different then in Europe so BMW was not looking to bring the MINI One D into the US. I makes sense form a fuel consumption perspective and I would get one if it were available.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #9  
mbabischkin's Avatar
mbabischkin
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,406
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Ohio
Originally Posted by krenzkes
I have brought this up in other threads and the general answer was the type of diesel fuel sold in the US is different then in Europe so BMW was not looking to bring the MINI One D into the US. I makes sense form a fuel consumption perspective and I would get one if it were available.
That's changing, we'll be getting the low sulfur diesel common elsewhere here in the states by the end of the year... It's required by law now...
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 08:04 AM
  #10  
Yucca Patrol's Avatar
Yucca Patrol
Coordinator :: Alabama Motoring Society & South East
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 2
From: Burning-Ham Alabama
I noticed that the diesel pumps now have a sign saying that the type of fuel sold is not compatible with new models (2007's?)
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #11  
acitydweller's Avatar
acitydweller
6th Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 0
From: New York City
id consider a diesel.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #12  
Greatbear's Avatar
Greatbear
Moderator :: Performance Mods
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,427
Likes: 6
From: A Den in Maryland
I'd buy one (no pun intended) in a heartbeat.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #13  
IanF's Avatar
IanF
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: PA/NJ
Originally Posted by jibeho
I'm no rocket scientist, but I can't seem to be able to buy the notion that a 9MPG SRT10 is better on the environment then a 60MPG MINI.
You'll need to ask the folks at CARB that one. Although they'll probably mutter something about the amount of NOX produced for the projected production volume of a vehicle...
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 09:47 AM
  #14  
Gromit801's Avatar
Gromit801
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,600
Likes: 1
From: West French Camp, CA
Only problem I have with diesel, and this applies to all diesels, is that it is a carcinogenic, more so than other forms of fuel.

I worked in the railroad for a few years, and there was quite a high incidence of cancer among employees that worked with or around the locomotives.

http://www.afscme.org/health/faq-dies.htm
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #15  
Wagnbat's Avatar
Wagnbat
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
One of my co-workers balked at the price of the MC and MCS compared to regular commuters cars, which is fine because he's not an enthusiast (nor was I until I got it, but anyways...), but he said he'd buy a diesel one if they made it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #16  
rustysteel's Avatar
rustysteel
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Port Hope, ON
I owned a number of diesel VW over the years and loved the gas (diesel?) mileage, but found them dull. Though I am not commuting anymore (I work from home) I used to drive 200km per day, and having that efficient diesel powerplant would have been great. So if the MINI One D is out how about offering the MINI One (gas version, base model) over here. It would be lighter (not as many options) and be cheaper. I've asked MINI.ca and haven't got a response, but an entry level MINI (one) would be great starting at $15k Canadian, sign me up.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #17  
Crusoe's Avatar
Crusoe
4th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Well if they cut out the back and made it a MINI Truck they'd be essentially exempt. Trucks and SUVs have very weak emission requirements. Cars are regulated by cargo and passenger capacity and truck by how much weight they can haul.
The MINI is probably in the top 5 for stringent emission controls and it's only getting tighter. Perhaps the '08 Traveler will have enough cargo capacity to allow a diesel.

So you can go get a caffe latte in your 5.6 liter diesel RAM 3500 but not a 1.4 liter diesel MINI.

Oh, I'd be all over a MINI One D.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #18  
jibeho's Avatar
jibeho
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Grasonville, MD
Originally Posted by gromit801
Only problem I have with diesel, and this applies to all diesels, is that it is a carcinogenic, more so than other forms of fuel.

I worked in the railroad for a few years, and there was quite a high incidence of cancer among employees that worked with or around the locomotives.

http://www.afscme.org/health/faq-dies.htm
ROTFLMAO
Dude everything in California is a carcinogenic
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #19  
jibeho's Avatar
jibeho
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Grasonville, MD
Originally Posted by Wagnbat
One of my co-workers balked at the price of the MC and MCS compared to regular commuters cars, which is fine because he's not an enthusiast (nor was I until I got it, but anyways...), but he said he'd buy a diesel one if they made it.
My daily commute car is the TDI, but I drive the MINI on Fridays to work . I just think a 2007 MINI D would be more fun to drive then the TDI NB
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #20  
Gromit801's Avatar
Gromit801
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,600
Likes: 1
From: West French Camp, CA
Originally Posted by jibeho
ROTFLMAO
Dude everything in California is a carcinogenic
Can't understand why you think cancer is funny. Guess you've never had a loved one suffer from it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #21  
jibeho's Avatar
jibeho
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Grasonville, MD
Originally Posted by gromit801
Can't understand why you think cancer is funny. Guess you've never had a loved one suffer from it.
No I do not think cancer is funny.

What I think is funny is the sticker they put on my buddies care stating that "vehicle exhaust contain chemicals that can cause cancer in the state of California"
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #22  
Gromit801's Avatar
Gromit801
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,600
Likes: 1
From: West French Camp, CA
Ok, given, that's a weird sticker. Must have been a bad Engrish translation at the factory.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #23  
TMGRobyn's Avatar
TMGRobyn
6th Gear
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
I'd buy one in a heartbeat. I had read that it was available in Canada and couldn't verify it at all. However, the turbo diesel beetle is looking good too.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #24  
MiNiBeamer's Avatar
MiNiBeamer
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Ill verify it, being a canadian MINI owner , MINI One D is not available
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 12:06 AM
  #25  
TMGRobyn's Avatar
TMGRobyn
6th Gear
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Thanks MiniBeamer!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 PM.