R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 Brake Light Mod Warranty Issue!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #51  
115hp's Avatar
115hp
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Greatbear
The brake light is also the taillight, so trying to find a dual filament LED equivalent becomes even tougher.
Dang, I forgot that it's also the taillight. I don't think I want LEDs as taillights. Thanks for your reply.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 06:50 AM
  #52  
planeguy's Avatar
planeguy
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by chows4us
Considering this thread https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...477#post823477
thats probably a non-starter
Agreed, that is really only your last card as a customer. Its a bluff and 98% of the time the dealer will call your bluff and you will lose. All the talk of MM on NAM is really mis-placed and even someone who had the means and resources to push a suit thinks twice and backs down. I hope that thread finnaly puts a stop to the logic that you can mod away under protection of law.

laws are of only benefit in the court room and unless you willing to go to court then they don't help you. So unless you are a lawyer or completely bored and need an expensive hobby (if you are spending thousands on mods I guess that shoe fits ) Dont think the MM act means a thing to you. Mods void warranty...period....Unless you have a very good relationship with your dealer.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 04:26 PM
  #53  
gr8britwjh's Avatar
gr8britwjh
4th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Planeguy,
I'm with you 100% on this one
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #54  
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
hmmm

went thru this myself a little while ago, tha light mod i used had a resistor of sum sort inline .first dealer would not cover it under warranty wanted 700bux to fix, cuz they saw bits of wire insulation missin' (where light mod wuz clamped on) so a long trip to another dealer(where i bought my MINI) and a good long talk to a buddy i have there took care of it...
it sure does pay to noe people in high places
btw, on my mini it wuz only on one side that wuz inop(faulty) everythin' werk'd but tha break light.
so anyways, no more goofy light mods fer me, thats fer sure!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #55  
Skiploder's Avatar
Skiploder
Banned
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Kristina:

There is a TSB out that deals with moisture related problems and the BC1 module/wiring.

PM me if you'd like a PDF copy of the complete TSB.........it's about 25 pages long.

Slightly OT:

I had the chance to spend some time talking to a consumer advocacy attorney here in the SF Bay - a rather well known one at that.

We discussed the MM Act in length and his experience with it.

His claim is that the MM Act has been wrongly interpreted to infer that you can do whatever you want to any product and be protected by the manufacturer's warranty.

He stated that the intent of the Act was to protect consumers from having, let's say, Ford tell you that you can only use Bridgestone Tires on your car, or Fram oil filters on your truck. It was not intended to provide you protection under the law to change the performance parameters of your car.

There is a fine line here and people need to begin to understand it before they encourage people to mods the heck out of their cars or threaten a lawsuit.

He brought up a case in which he reviewed where an SRT4 owner bought the Stage II(?) upgrades and then blew a head gasket. Dodge refused to honor his warranty even though the kit was sold through a local Dodge Dealer (but not installed by them). He told me there was nothing he could do for the gentleman.

Why?

Well, Dodge is pretty upfront about informing people that these packages void the warranty. I didn't really believe it, so I checked for myself....

Straight from the Mopar website:

Mopar Performance Parts Warranty

Mopar Performance Parts are sold "as is," without any warranty whatsoever. Implied warranties, including warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, are excluded. The entire risk as to quality and performance of such parts is with the buyer. Should such parts prove defective following their purchase, the buyer and not the manufacturer, distributor or retailer, assumes the entire cost of all necessary servicing or repair.

Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep® vehicle and parts warranties are voided if the vehicle or parts are used for competition or if they fail as a result of modification.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #56  
not-so-rednwhitecooper's Avatar
not-so-rednwhitecooper
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 3
From: Chardon, Ohio
If stage I or II is installed by the dealer, it is covered under the standard warranty.

Stage III is the only SRT4 package that isnt covered under any warranty and is NOT a dealer installed option. You have to get the parts an have someone else install them for you!
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #57  
Skiploder's Avatar
Skiploder
Banned
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by not-so-rednwhitecooper
If stage I or II is installed by the dealer, it is covered under the standard warranty.

Stage III is the only SRT4 package that isnt covered under any warranty and is NOT a dealer installed option. You have to get the parts an have someone else install them for you!
You sure? That is a quote cut and pasted from the Mopar website itself.

Mopar's own warranty statement is that added performance parts (parts not originally supplied on the vehicle from the factory) are not covered by the vehicle's warranty, and any failure that they may cause is also not covered by the vehicles warranty.

The installing Dealer may warranty the actual install, but it seems Dodge is being pretty up front in saying their performance parts carry no warranty and they won't be held responsible if you grenade your enigne due to them.

Regardless, in Kristina's case, she can try to show them the relevant TSB......however, they can point to her mod and place the blame there (it's all in RKW's post on Page 1 of this thread).........she's fighting an uphill battle.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 09:12 PM
  #58  
not-so-rednwhitecooper's Avatar
not-so-rednwhitecooper
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 3
From: Chardon, Ohio
Yeah, stages I & II are kinda like what we have for the MINI in the form of JCW.

Stage III is like twincharge

Its quite a bit more involved than either of the lower stages. Stage 3 is prety much for off-road use only.
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #59  
chrisneal's Avatar
chrisneal
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,062
Likes: 1
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by thedoctorisin
i think my best recommendation would be to get another opinion if you feel the dealer the car has been taken to is not accurate in their diag or determination of coverage. pay 1 hr checkout (which should be credited to the repair if you return there) and take your car elsewhere. if determined by another dealer to be warranty, go ask for your money back for the diag. it does not matter if they ordered a BC1, these are not coded to your particular vehicle and can be used for most other cars. if 2 dealers say the same thing, then make your move from there. if they differ in their findings, ask them to sort it out w/ MINIUSA. i honestly would rather be able to have repairs be warranty than not. if the dealer can just go ahead and fix your car w/o having to call for a $ authorization, it's easier. not to mention how many service advisors have surveys hanging over their head when they are fixing your car. so many people slam the advisor on the survey just because they had to pay for somehting they feel they shouldn't. some people always fight the dealer when they have to pay for anything; the prices are what they are, it is not "Let's Make A Deal"....HOWEVER, the relationship you foster with the dealer can help save you money over time. a cust who has always been difficult and unaccomodating (and probably gave low survey scores) will never be offered goodwill on a repair when their car is just out of warranty...they will not be offered a loaner car for an extended down-time on their car (at least not for free)....they will always pay the full price for anything not covered...
this is not an attempt to say that there are not service personnel out there that will try to rip you off or avoid covering an item which may be borderline for coverage. i can tell you this though, people that treat me well get better treatment than those that act like i have to answer to them. the guy that gives the perfect surveys and takes care of his car is more likely to get the h/l bulb replaced n/c once out of warranty than the guy that always gives the terrible survey scores and acts like somebody is trying to steal a kidney from him every time you recommend he buy something...imagine if you got surveyed at your job by every customer you dealt with. would you change the way that you handle them? you have to do your best for everybody. most svc advisors work about 12 hrs a day. that is a hell of a lot of stress to deal with. every cust that decides to make a huge ordeal out of something minor(not to downplay a $1300 estimate by any means), takes away from the level of customer service that is able to be provided to fellow MINI owners. be considerate to your dealership (if they are being considerate of you) and other MINI owners. if the dealer has determined something is not to be covered and they submit it for reimbursement anyway, they have to pay for it. did anyone really pay that much for their car that they feel the dealership fixing it should foot the bill? did they cut into wiring and install an unauthorized mod? not if they have a clue they didn't. these type of things being drawn out excessively makes the cars cost more, and the service too. you catch more flies w/ honey... if you do not trust a dealer to tell you something is not covered and give you an estimate, take your car out of there and do not go back. at that point you have already slapped them in the face. take that as good or bad. if you did not trust them, why would you take your car there in the first place? if you did trust them, why not now?
is it because you (despite knowing what you have done to your car) feel that something should be covered? try looking at it from the other side. of course, there always 2 sides to every argument
several people have put a lot of time into this thread to provide very high-quality info...maybe this can help you achieve what you need...unfortunately, posts on a website can not be used as fact, just opinion. however, the tech info provided here should provide an excellent point of reference to plead your case.
i know i'm responding to an old post but i just wanted to say wow, did anyone actually read this post? because i find it very very hard to read a thousand word long post when the person doesn't use any capital letters or paragraphs and goes with the stream of consciousness approach versus actually organizing their thoughts into a cohesive response. this must have taken a while to write, so personally i would try to organize it in such a way that people might actually read it. kristina i hope that you eventually got the problem with your car solved, it's too bad when dealers try to take advantage of people that they can tell don't have technical knowledge to refute their bs claims. and this is a belated comment too, but greatbear that's a really great post that you wrote about the electrical system. very useful information for anyone who might have to deal with a warranty denial such as this one in the future. when it really comes down to it, it doesn't seem like the moss-magnusson act is worth the paper it's written on, dealers can basically make any claim they want to and take advantage of situations where someone needs their car back asap and doesn't have a wealth fo technical knowledge to draw upon to refute the dealer's claim.

 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #60  
mattcoon's Avatar
mattcoon
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Metro-Detroit
Originally Posted by kristina
I don't think that it's as simple as the turn signal/parking light feature. The right tail light was on, then after a few hours, the front right round light (driving light?) came on.

Here's a question. As I said before, I had the hazards on for 10-15 minutes prior to this whole thing happening. Does the brake light mod affect how the hazard lights flash. Could this have overloaded the BC1?

I'm really at a loss about this. Mini of SF has already ordered the BC1 to install. To add insult to injury, they are also charging me for a new battery. I simply lack the technical knowledge to argue my case properly, if I even have a case.
I had the same thing happen. i was driving home and had my right blinker on to make a turn, as i hit the brake, the blinking doubled in speed. I figured the lamp blew, but when i got home, the right side lights would not turn off, even with the lights off and everything locked. i left it as i was late for something. when i came back there was a terrible electronic burning smell. i pulled the fuses so the bc1 would stop the direct short to ground, removed the brake light mod, and the IanCull autoup circuit. The next morning i drove to the dealer and it was replaced under warranty. I put the autoup back in, but the brake mod must be very marginal to the output drivers on the BC1 and once in a while or over time cause the output driver to fail.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 08:52 PM
  #61  
resmini's Avatar
resmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by mattcoon
I had the same thing happen. i was driving home and had my right blinker on to make a turn, as i hit the brake, the blinking doubled in speed. I figured the lamp blew, but when i got home, the right side lights would not turn off, even with the lights off and everything locked. i left it as i was late for something. when i came back there was a terrible electronic burning smell. i pulled the fuses so the bc1 would stop the direct short to ground, removed the brake light mod, and the IanCull autoup circuit. The next morning i drove to the dealer and it was replaced under warranty. I put the autoup back in, but the brake mod must be very marginal to the output drivers on the BC1 and once in a while or over time cause the output driver to fail.
I replaced the upper brake light with an LED bulb from AutoZone. It's plenty bright, comes on a split second quicker when you put on the brakes, and best of all, only draws about 1/20th the current of a regular bulb.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #62  
thedoctorisin's Avatar
thedoctorisin
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: NoVa
Originally Posted by chrisneal
i know i'm responding to an old post but i just wanted to say wow, did anyone actually read this post? because i find it very very hard to read a thousand word long post when the person doesn't use any capital letters or paragraphs and goes with the stream of consciousness approach versus actually organizing their thoughts into a cohesive response. this must have taken a while to write, so personally i would try to organize it in such a way that people might actually read it. when it really comes down to it, it doesn't seem like the moss-magnusson act is worth the paper it's written on, dealers can basically make any claim they want to and take advantage of situations where someone needs their car back asap and doesn't have a wealth fo technical knowledge to draw upon to refute the dealer's claim.

it's a shame you could not make a response, just an attack. if you can't figure it out, just say so. try to actually supply some info if you actually want to help somebody.
where's your caps? hypocrite and no useful input. hmmm...
enough of that.
HEY, DID ANYBODY READ THAT LITTLE STICKER THAT WAS AT THE TOP OF THE WINDSHIELD ON THE DRIVER SIDE WHEN THEY BOUGHT THE CAR???

and for the guy who said his friend at another dealer covered the repair to the bc1, congrats! not everybody out there seems to realize that being nice goes a long way in terms of getting help when they need it. so many people seem like they are automatically against the dealer, like they are trying to "get" them at every chance. you catch more flies w/ honey...
but then again, some dealers can be extremely shady (not intended as a reference to any particular dealer of any manufacturer)...
service is only as good as the people who provide it...
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #63  
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
Originally Posted by thedoctorisin
it's a shame you could not make a response, just an attack. if you can't figure it out, just say so. try to actually supply some info if you actually want to help somebody.
where's your caps? hypocrite and no useful input. hmmm...
enough of that.
HEY, DID ANYBODY READ THAT LITTLE STICKER THAT WAS AT THE TOP OF THE WINDSHIELD ON THE DRIVER SIDE WHEN THEY BOUGHT THE CAR???
OUCH!!

Originally Posted by thedoctorisin
and for the guy who said his friend at another dealer covered the repair to the bc1, congrats! not everybody out there seems to realize that being nice goes a long way in terms of getting help when they need itso many people seem like they are automatically against the dealer, like they are trying to "get" them at every chance. you catch more flies w/ honey...
but then again, some dealers can be extremely shady (not intended as a reference to any particular dealer of any manufacturer)...
service is only as good as the people who provide it....
DITT0,its tha only way people should be treated!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #64  
cristo's Avatar
cristo
Alliance Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 230
From: York, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by cristo
I did the brake light mod a while back, and although I had no problems,
I decided to change my 1156 fog bulbs to the 1156-24R narrow led bulbs
from http://www.superbrightleds.com/tail-brake-turn.html after reading this thread:
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ad.php?t=50441
They're not nearly as bright as the regular bulbs, but they only draw about 1 watt
versus 21W for the stock 1156's. Also, when a conventional bulb first turns
on, it draws a lot more current the first fraction of a second until the
filament warms up, which happens every time you step on the brakes.
I wouldn't put led bulbs in the main brake light, and they're probably not
bright enough to be good fog light bulbs either, but they do a good job of
augmenting the main brake lights giving me a little more visibility to other
cars when braking. The 24 bulb leds fit in the stock tail light assembly
just fine, but the 30 bulb ones are said to be to big in diameter to fit.
Interstingly, the 19 bulb (all 19 face rearward) ones have a smidge more
axial brightness than the 24 bulb ones (which have 18 rearward pointing leds
and 6 sideways pointing ones).
Since this last post, I found a brighter LED 1156 bulb for the pre-facelift
rear-fog brake light mod. These are more omnidirectional than the ones
described above and light up the top light more evenly with about twice
the brightness of the 24 bulb directional leds described above (checked
with a light meter - one full stop brighter).
They're 3 watts instead of 1 watt, still low enough to put very little extra strain
on the brake light circuit and the BC1.

http://frickinbrite.com/catalog/prod...roducts_id=314
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
28
Dec 23, 2015 10:36 AM
phrza81
MINIs & Minis for Sale
9
Oct 10, 2015 11:37 PM
Colt45Magnus
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
21
Aug 12, 2015 06:43 AM
Terry Gallentine
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
4
Aug 11, 2015 03:31 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM.