R50/53 2005 MCS 1/4 mile time
2005 MCS 1/4 mile time
hi,
does anyone know what the stock 2005 MCS 1/4 mile time is? I know MINI claims 0-60 in 7.2 (which seems a bit slow)
but I could not find the factory numbers for 1/4 mile runs. Also, is there a complete review with statistics of the 2005 MCS? I'm looking for something like one of the big car mags would produce...
Any help would be greatly appriciated!
(The benz is getting more and more boring as delivery date approches!
)
does anyone know what the stock 2005 MCS 1/4 mile time is? I know MINI claims 0-60 in 7.2 (which seems a bit slow)
but I could not find the factory numbers for 1/4 mile runs. Also, is there a complete review with statistics of the 2005 MCS? I'm looking for something like one of the big car mags would produce...Any help would be greatly appriciated!
(The benz is getting more and more boring as delivery date approches!
)
I realize these figures are for the '03 (lower hp, different gear ratios, no LSD) but Road & Track got a 15.9 sec at 89.3 mph for the 1/4 mile. They got a 7.7 sec for 0-60 mph.
Don't know what you're expecting (??); the performance is respectable but it ain't no supercar. The '05 should be somewhat better, but would still get smoked by a Dodge Neon SRT-4 (but who the hell wants a Neon
).
Don't know what you're expecting (??); the performance is respectable but it ain't no supercar. The '05 should be somewhat better, but would still get smoked by a Dodge Neon SRT-4 (but who the hell wants a Neon
).
Originally Posted by gr8britwjh
The '05 should be somewhat better, but would still get smoked by a Dodge Neon SRT-4 (but who the hell wants a Neon
).
).
Trending Topics
The February '05 issue of Motor Trend had a comparo of the MCS, Mazda 3 5door, Focus ST4, and something else.
The article is not available online, but here is the road test results of the MCS.
6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
The article is not available online, but here is the road test results of the MCS.
6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
Originally Posted by mielnicki
The February '05 issue of Motor Trend had a comparo of the MCS, Mazda 3 5door, Focus ST4, and something else.
The article is not available online, but here is the road test results of the MCS.
6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
The article is not available online, but here is the road test results of the MCS.
6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
There was a lot of discussion of this when the issue first came out, here in the MINI Talk forum. The 05's have 7 more HP, much lower gearing (14%) in 1st and 2nd, and the MT test vehicle was a bare bones, no-options model - so light in weight (eg, no sunroof, no HK, etc.) and with 16" wheels (better acceleration). And FWIW - no LSD.
Pretty cool - almost as fast as a pre-05 JCW! I test drove an 03 MCS before I ordered my 05, and I remember thinking, wow, my car is fast! It definitely felt faster than the 03 I test drove. Now I know why.
I'll bet MT had an excellent driver and a good track when they ran that 6.4. I wonder how much better an LSD model would have done? And I'm looking forward to some reliable 0-60 times on the MCS automatic!
Originally Posted by mielnicki
6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
Originally Posted by mcswrks
But add an LSD and 40 more HP, and what do you think the 0-60 times will be around? I think that they will be around the mid to high 5's, and for the quarter, maybe a 14.0

Originally Posted by mielnicki
Heh, probably not. 40hp and LSD may drop the time to 6.1 at best, maybe 14.4 for the 1/4. Keep in mind LSD or not traction is the time killer here, at a certain point more power means more wheelspin.
Originally Posted by WindMeUp
Yes, that is true, but think about how the other cars do it, it's not like that's an insane amount of horsepower and torque, if you have good tires, they can handle it. On the stock runflats though, definately not 

In response to a previous post, the Neon SRT-4 can be factory-modded (MOPAR) to generate insane levels of power for not a lot of $$.....it would certainly leave a JCW MCS in its dust. Before anyone asks; no I don't own, or evn intend to own, an SRT-4
Originally Posted by gr8britwjh
In response to a previous post, the Neon SRT-4 can be factory-modded (MOPAR) to generate insane levels of power for not a lot of $$.....it would certainly leave a JCW MCS in its dust. Before anyone asks; no I don't own, or evn intend to own, an SRT-4

Originally Posted by WindMeUp
If you want a cheap rice thrill, I'm sure the SRT-4 is great... but it is one of the ugliest cars on the market 

This IS a thread talking about quarter mile times... which is a little ironic considering the car in question. IMO, if you're a drag-racer you bought the wrong car. The neon would be a big step in the right direction... although I've never understood the desire to drag race anything FWD.
Originally Posted by british kompressor
I know MINI claims 0-60 in 7.2 (which seems a bit slow)

I, however, don't put much stock in acceleration time from rest, as so much technique (and potential for abuse) is involved. Interval times are much more realistic for road course and autocross potential.
For those who've not seen the recent M/T article
[QUOTE=mielnicki]The February '05 issue of Motor Trend had a comparo of the MCS, Mazda 3 5door, Focus ST4, and something else.
Scion Tc and Mitsu Lancer Ralliart were the other two. BTW, the 05 MCS with those nice light OEM 16" wheels flat out hands down over the hill and thru the woods @105.3 HP/litre
and lb/hp of 15 to 8
smoked the others into oblivion. Kinda unfair in a way....
Jimbo
Scion Tc and Mitsu Lancer Ralliart were the other two. BTW, the 05 MCS with those nice light OEM 16" wheels flat out hands down over the hill and thru the woods @105.3 HP/litre
and lb/hp of 15 to 8
smoked the others into oblivion. Kinda unfair in a way....
Jimbo
Originally Posted by JeffS
So the neon is ugly and the mini is slow... what's your point?
This IS a thread talking about quarter mile times... which is a little ironic considering the car in question. IMO, if you're a drag-racer you bought the wrong car. The neon would be a big step in the right direction... although I've never understood the desire to drag race anything FWD.
This IS a thread talking about quarter mile times... which is a little ironic considering the car in question. IMO, if you're a drag-racer you bought the wrong car. The neon would be a big step in the right direction... although I've never understood the desire to drag race anything FWD.
But the MINI is my daily driver, and my car of choice.
Originally Posted by LombardStreet
I just checked this issue out from the library, and 6.4 secs is what I recall. Are you sure it wasn't the Jan '05 issue, though? (I borrowed both the Jan and Feb MT, so I'm not sure.)



But who buys a Neon..............