R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 2005 MCS 1/4 mile time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #1  
british kompressor's Avatar
british kompressor
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
2005 MCS 1/4 mile time

hi,

does anyone know what the stock 2005 MCS 1/4 mile time is? I know MINI claims 0-60 in 7.2 (which seems a bit slow) but I could not find the factory numbers for 1/4 mile runs. Also, is there a complete review with statistics of the 2005 MCS? I'm looking for something like one of the big car mags would produce...

Any help would be greatly appriciated!

(The benz is getting more and more boring as delivery date approches! )
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #2  
jinubob81's Avatar
jinubob81
4th Gear
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Mennnnnner
umm... motor trend clocked 6.5 seconds 0-60mph on a recent comparo.

looks like mini was sorry about the last time they estimated 0 - 60 times.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #3  
british kompressor's Avatar
british kompressor
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
6.5! that's great.


do you have a link to that article?
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #4  
british kompressor's Avatar
british kompressor
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
still open for answers.... anyone.... ???
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #5  
gr8britwjh's Avatar
gr8britwjh
4th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
I realize these figures are for the '03 (lower hp, different gear ratios, no LSD) but Road & Track got a 15.9 sec at 89.3 mph for the 1/4 mile. They got a 7.7 sec for 0-60 mph.

Don't know what you're expecting (??); the performance is respectable but it ain't no supercar. The '05 should be somewhat better, but would still get smoked by a Dodge Neon SRT-4 (but who the hell wants a Neon ).
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #6  
TheWrks's Avatar
TheWrks
Coordinator :: Michigan MINI Motor Club
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
From: Farmington,MI Ex-Pat
Originally Posted by gr8britwjh
(but who the hell wants a Neon ).
Too True
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #7  
mcswrks's Avatar
mcswrks
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by gr8britwjh
The '05 should be somewhat better, but would still get smoked by a Dodge Neon SRT-4 (but who the hell wants a Neon ).
But not by an 05 S Works!
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #8  
Rawhyde's Avatar
Rawhyde
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 931
Likes: 14
From: NW Georgia, USA
Originally Posted by mcswrks
But not by an 05 S Works!
Is that wishful thinking, or is an 05 MCS/JCW faster than a SRT4?

Rawhyde
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #9  
TheWrks's Avatar
TheWrks
Coordinator :: Michigan MINI Motor Club
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
From: Farmington,MI Ex-Pat
Originally Posted by mcswrks
But not by an 05 S Works!
I know this But who buys a Neon..............
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:34 PM
  #10  
mielnicki's Avatar
mielnicki
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Irwin, PA
The February '05 issue of Motor Trend had a comparo of the MCS, Mazda 3 5door, Focus ST4, and something else.

The article is not available online, but here is the road test results of the MCS.

6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #11  
ScottinBend's Avatar
ScottinBend
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 2
From: Oregon, USA
My best run with a G-tech pro was 6.5 0-60 and 14.2 and 100mph for the 1/4.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #12  
LombardStreet's Avatar
LombardStreet
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 941
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by mielnicki
The February '05 issue of Motor Trend had a comparo of the MCS, Mazda 3 5door, Focus ST4, and something else.

The article is not available online, but here is the road test results of the MCS.

6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
I just checked this issue out from the library, and 6.4 secs is what I recall. Are you sure it wasn't the Jan '05 issue, though? (I borrowed both the Jan and Feb MT, so I'm not sure.)

There was a lot of discussion of this when the issue first came out, here in the MINI Talk forum. The 05's have 7 more HP, much lower gearing (14%) in 1st and 2nd, and the MT test vehicle was a bare bones, no-options model - so light in weight (eg, no sunroof, no HK, etc.) and with 16" wheels (better acceleration). And FWIW - no LSD.

Pretty cool - almost as fast as a pre-05 JCW! I test drove an 03 MCS before I ordered my 05, and I remember thinking, wow, my car is fast! It definitely felt faster than the 03 I test drove. Now I know why.

I'll bet MT had an excellent driver and a good track when they ran that 6.4. I wonder how much better an LSD model would have done? And I'm looking forward to some reliable 0-60 times on the MCS automatic!
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 05:44 AM
  #13  
mcswrks's Avatar
mcswrks
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by mielnicki
6sp
0-60 6.4
1/4 14.8/95.2MPH
60-0 128ft
Slalom 66.5mph
MT Figure 8 27.5sec @ .63g
But add an LSD and 40 more HP, and what do you think the 0-60 times will be around? I think that they will be around the mid to high 5's, and for the quarter, maybe a 14.0
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:22 AM
  #14  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
Remember that the '05 MCS used by M/T was a basic model with no options, which means, no heavy 17" wheels/tires and no sunroof. Thay may explain the better track times.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 07:11 AM
  #15  
mielnicki's Avatar
mielnicki
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Irwin, PA
Originally Posted by mcswrks
But add an LSD and 40 more HP, and what do you think the 0-60 times will be around? I think that they will be around the mid to high 5's, and for the quarter, maybe a 14.0
Heh, probably not. 40hp and LSD may drop the time to 6.1 at best, maybe 14.4 for the 1/4. Keep in mind LSD or not traction is the time killer here, at a certain point more power means more wheelspin.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 07:18 AM
  #16  
WindMeUp's Avatar
WindMeUp
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Apex, NC
Originally Posted by mielnicki
Heh, probably not. 40hp and LSD may drop the time to 6.1 at best, maybe 14.4 for the 1/4. Keep in mind LSD or not traction is the time killer here, at a certain point more power means more wheelspin.
Yes, that is true, but think about how the other cars do it, it's not like that's an insane amount of horsepower and torque, if you have good tires, they can handle it. On the stock runflats though, definately not
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #17  
mielnicki's Avatar
mielnicki
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Irwin, PA
Originally Posted by WindMeUp
Yes, that is true, but think about how the other cars do it, it's not like that's an insane amount of horsepower and torque, if you have good tires, they can handle it. On the stock runflats though, definately not
Oh absolutely, I agree, I guess my point is that +40hp taking the car to roughly 210bhp, is not gonna get you into the mid to high 5s, nor is it going to drop you to 14 flat. Not even with slicks.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 09:24 AM
  #18  
gr8britwjh's Avatar
gr8britwjh
4th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
In response to a previous post, the Neon SRT-4 can be factory-modded (MOPAR) to generate insane levels of power for not a lot of $$.....it would certainly leave a JCW MCS in its dust. Before anyone asks; no I don't own, or evn intend to own, an SRT-4
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #19  
WindMeUp's Avatar
WindMeUp
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Apex, NC
If you want a cheap rice thrill, I'm sure the SRT-4 is great... but it is one of the ugliest cars on the market
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 10:13 AM
  #20  
mielnicki's Avatar
mielnicki
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Irwin, PA
Originally Posted by gr8britwjh
In response to a previous post, the Neon SRT-4 can be factory-modded (MOPAR) to generate insane levels of power for not a lot of $$.....it would certainly leave a JCW MCS in its dust. Before anyone asks; no I don't own, or evn intend to own, an SRT-4
But it's still a Neon "Hi"

 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 10:32 AM
  #21  
JeffS's Avatar
JeffS
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by WindMeUp
If you want a cheap rice thrill, I'm sure the SRT-4 is great... but it is one of the ugliest cars on the market
So the neon is ugly and the mini is slow... what's your point?

This IS a thread talking about quarter mile times... which is a little ironic considering the car in question. IMO, if you're a drag-racer you bought the wrong car. The neon would be a big step in the right direction... although I've never understood the desire to drag race anything FWD.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #22  
DR61's Avatar
DR61
5th Gear
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 638
Likes: 1
From: Redding, CA 96001
Originally Posted by british kompressor
I know MINI claims 0-60 in 7.2 (which seems a bit slow)
Actually, MINIUSA official specs for the 2005 MCS is 0-60 in 6.8 sec, 134 MPH top speed. This is probably a base model and no LSD since these times were given before LSD was available.

I, however, don't put much stock in acceleration time from rest, as so much technique (and potential for abuse) is involved. Interval times are much more realistic for road course and autocross potential.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #23  
sequence's Avatar
sequence
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 3
From: Your Worst Nightmare :)
For those who've not seen the recent M/T article

[QUOTE=mielnicki]The February '05 issue of Motor Trend had a comparo of the MCS, Mazda 3 5door, Focus ST4, and something else.

Scion Tc and Mitsu Lancer Ralliart were the other two. BTW, the 05 MCS with those nice light OEM 16" wheels flat out hands down over the hill and thru the woods @105.3 HP/litre and lb/hp of 15 to 8 smoked the others into oblivion. Kinda unfair in a way.... Jimbo
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #24  
mielnicki's Avatar
mielnicki
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Irwin, PA
Originally Posted by JeffS
So the neon is ugly and the mini is slow... what's your point?

This IS a thread talking about quarter mile times... which is a little ironic considering the car in question. IMO, if you're a drag-racer you bought the wrong car. The neon would be a big step in the right direction... although I've never understood the desire to drag race anything FWD.
I have a 1969 Chevy Nova SS396, 4sp, 396ci Big Block ported and polished .030 over, 1050 Holley DP, Custom Mandrel bent dual exhaust, 4.56 12bolt posi, NOS, and Hoosier Slicks. Dyno'd 498hp at the rear wheels. 10.90 @ 139mph 1/4 mile. a whopping 3-5 mpg on the street.

But the MINI is my daily driver, and my car of choice.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #25  
LombardStreet's Avatar
LombardStreet
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 941
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by LombardStreet
I just checked this issue out from the library, and 6.4 secs is what I recall. Are you sure it wasn't the Jan '05 issue, though? (I borrowed both the Jan and Feb MT, so I'm not sure.)
For the record, mielnicki was right - it is the Feb '05 issue of Motor Trend!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM.