August Photo Contest Topic
Originally Posted by 89AKurt
Would the splash of red disqualify this photo for the contest? I like the idea, but how **** will the boss be?
The topic is "black and white" and members are invited to interpret that how they will.
This is an older photo in color I took, but I would think that it fits the theme and there was no black/white color conversion.

It is possible to take an all color photo that would work for the topic if shot with the topic in mind. That said, there have been a few all color enteries that have been rejected because they clearly didn't have anything to do with the "black and white" topic (say a photo of a HB/W MINI at the beach).
Originally Posted by 89AKurt
speednut: Do I see a sepia tone to your conversion? And don't you think the classics are more appropriate for the theme?
I adore the classic Minis and relish any chances to photograph them; maybe someday I'll even own one? However, the "color" photo Dave B. just posted is gorgeous. I think Juan hit it on the head when he said it comes down to lines, textures, and shapes for B&W. I doubt this is the place to discuss whether the Rover or BMW Mini has more photogenic lines. That said, I do hope to find a classic Mini to use for this month's contest, but reserve the right to use an good photo of a new Mini instead.
Juan, please do add your photo to the reflections thread as it is a perfect fit. I'm personally not seeing the need however for the red brake calipers as my eyes are already attracted to that portion of the photo because of the lines direction. The photo already has great flow due to the lines present. Maybe this effect is just getting a bit overdone in my opinion. It seems to work better when a subject needs to be drawn out and highlighted, or when a background is too cluttered or distracting. This would work perfectly for a big brake kit advertisement though.
For example, on this photo posted to another thread today, does the yellow brushed back in do anything to make the photo more attractive or is it just Hollywood gimmickry?
Originally Posted by blacknblue
Not using color can be a way of emphasizing textures, lines, and/or a specific subject.
(such as this guy's work)
(such as this guy's work)
Originally Posted by minibill
here is project that I'm doing
all shot in color then converted to b&w
http://web.mac.com/imcallen/iWeb/bal...re%20book.html
all shot in color then converted to b&w
http://web.mac.com/imcallen/iWeb/bal...re%20book.html
Originally Posted by speednut
... I'll get you to use PS Elements before too long Kurt, stop trying to resist, come to the creative side.
...
...
I'de rather be motoring.
I'll fess up, some of my shots on Flickr have had moderate tweaking, I even took out a light post in one.
*ooooh*
Originally Posted by speednut
For example, on this photo posted to another thread today, does the yellow brushed back in do anything to make the photo more attractive or is it just Hollywood gimmickry?
Experimenting...
Motored for a good fog shot this morning, was hoping to be IN the fog. Discovered a new phase in a subdivision with this cool culdesac.

Juan, my clicker finger was sore for awhile.

Juan, my clicker finger was sore for awhile.
Originally Posted by 89AKurt
Motored for a good fog shot this morning, was hoping to be IN the fog. Discovered a new phase in a subdivision with this cool culdesac.

Juan, my clicker finger was sore for awhile.

Juan, my clicker finger was sore for awhile.

Originally Posted by 89AKurt
Motored for a good fog shot this morning, was hoping to be IN the fog.
I agree with Dave about the fog working well with the white sky.
Originally Posted by 89AKurt
Juan, my clicker finger was sore for awhile.

-Juan
Originally Posted by 89AKurt
Motored for a good fog shot this morning, was hoping to be IN the fog. Discovered a new phase in a subdivision with this cool culdesac.
Such nice people here!
Thanks for the pat-on-the-back guys.
When converting to b&w, the sky gets white anyway, the fog made a great backdrop to cover the cluttery hill.
I'm also thinking Zen (which ain't much); I just cringe at junk that distacts from the subject. I better spend more time on my official entry...
When converting to b&w, the sky gets white anyway, the fog made a great backdrop to cover the cluttery hill.
I'm also thinking Zen (which ain't much); I just cringe at junk that distacts from the subject. I better spend more time on my official entry...
Originally Posted by blacknblue
Be glad you're not competing against a Robert Frank or Diane Arbus.
This is gonna be a great month!
This is gonna be a great month!

Went to a gallery show of her work in SF last year. Amazing to see them "in person". Plus they had displays of her actual notebooks, contact prints and a Nikon F and her Rollei. Gave me goosebumps.
OK. I'm going to fumble my way through PS Elements and try this B&W thang.
Jim
Originally Posted by speednut
Apologies in advance to a certain car nut who can't stand cars on grass.
Photos are from the Shallow Alto Concours D'Elegance in June.
Photos are from the Shallow Alto Concours D'Elegance in June.
Jim
Originally Posted by jimz68
Grass is for grazing!
Jim
Jim
I've just finished picking and converting and touching up my entry. But there are still 13 days before deadline, and I'll never know if a better opportunity presents itself, like a trip to Sedona or something.
The anguish of being my own worst critic.
BTW: here is an look at my newest setting. Nice background, eh?
I shot what I think is going to be my contest entry tonight. One small issue, I forgot my tripod and wound up shooting it hand held at ISO 1600.
The finished product doesn't seem any worse for the wear though.
The finished product doesn't seem any worse for the wear though.
Originally Posted by blacknblue
. . . or Flagstaff on Aug. 23rd. 


I decided against this because it was rushed, and is out of focus... and too late for the Out-of -Focus theme.

I admire those who can photograph in urban settings.
Originally Posted by blacknblue
reminds me of pushing Tri-X to 1600. I loved the grain.


A little Neat Image cleaned things up nicely.
I wish I would have shot at ISO 3200 just to see how much worse the noise was. I didn't remember the D200 would push ISO that hard until tonight when I was spinning the subcommand dial.




Thank goodness for the fog and the low camera angle in the first shot.