How To Drivetrain :: Operation Vacuum Gain System (VGS)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 07:03 PM
  #476  
Applesauce's Avatar
Applesauce
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 243
Likes: 4
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by joe_bfstplk
The fuel pressure regulator needs to pay attention to the amount of boost in the manifold after the supercharger, so that it can regulate (or adjust) the pressure of the fuel entering the injectors, which allows them to spray the right amount of fuel into each cylinder when opened.

The VGS taps into that boost pressure line in order to put boost pressure on the diaphragm that opens/closes the bypass valve (which is supposed to open at light throttle or idle, and dump the boost made by the supercharger). This helps it close more quickly and as completely as possible.
Thanks Dutch for attempting to explain it to me... I'm still confused, though: did Mini simply include a vacuum nipple (or a pair, given the short loop) on the BPV for the sole purpose of "sucking" the BPV closed should the user decide it might be better off that way?

In a driving report, this mod does...something. I'm not sure what. It definitely makes the car feel faster. I can't describe it much better than that! It also makes a funny noise, especially at WOT. Why would a 10" length of 5/32" hose make the car sound so very, very different, especially across the powerband? (i.e., it's not just different in the region where the BPV is actively closing or opening.) Sorry to sound so incredulous...but I am!
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 10:20 PM
  #477  
joe_bfstplk's Avatar
joe_bfstplk
5th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 96
From: Mount Doom, Mordor
Originally Posted by Applesauce
Thanks Dutch for attempting to explain it to me... I'm still confused, though: did Mini simply include a vacuum nipple (or a pair, given the short loop) on the BPV for the sole purpose of "sucking" the BPV closed should the user decide it might be better off that way?
Actually, the vacuum sucks the BPV open, not closed. Its purpose is to dump boost pressure as soon as you let off the throttle. This helps with deceleration and doubtless makes it easier for the ECU to maintain useful air/fuel ratios during these transitions. The short loop on the BPV pulls vacuum from just inside the throttle body and uses it to pull the BPV open on light throttle and at idle.

Capping the vacuum port off and instead using boost/vacuum from the output side of the supercharger to operate the diaphragm allows the boost to push the valve closed when the spring has given up or is otherwise weak and not closing the valve soon enough or completely enough.

HTH!

C ya,
Dutch
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2012 | 12:23 PM
  #478  
JoeyBoy53's Avatar
JoeyBoy53
Neutral
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I've read this entire thread and I must say that there are some pretty damn good ideas out there. I've already done the chrome "Blackout" with Plasti-Dip and Electrical tape as well as the LED Bulb install. I've gone as far as replacing the headliner with a black and grey Union Jack flag and spray painted all the plastics matte black with a matte clear coat. Before I swapped out the "little kitty" and stock BPV under the bonnet for the Spintex, I looped a wire to the BPV and brought the other end to the front left screw of the intercooler diverter plate in order to keep that damn valve closed. Then I reset the ECU. Cost me $2. The results were amazing.



~Joe

2003 Mini Cooper S
Chili Red w/ Black Roof, Caps, & Interior
"Make it whine like a puma in heat"
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2013 | 03:29 AM
  #479  
k567's Avatar
k567
Neutral
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Has anyone tried setting this up with a re circulation valve or bypass valve that does opporate under boost and vacuum?

So effectively going with a BOV but the recirculating type vacuum holds it open to allow bleed off back to intake after TB as normal?
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2013 | 07:19 AM
  #480  
JumpingJackFlash's Avatar
JumpingJackFlash
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 4
From: Yorktown, VA
Originally Posted by k567
Has anyone tried setting this up with a re circulation valve or bypass valve that does opporate under boost and vacuum?

So effectively going with a BOV but the recirculating type vacuum holds it open to allow bleed off back to intake after TB as normal?
If you are referring to the 2nd-Gen turbo models, they are designed for and are better suited for the recirculation valve. Way sells the upgraded valve. Supposed to be a good bang-for-the-buck part.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2013 | 10:47 AM
  #481  
k567's Avatar
k567
Neutral
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
No talking about the R53
I've looked at the theory on the VGS and Ryephix methods along with the DT bypass
And just thought to myself a recirculating valve or diverter valve would do the same job and truly be able to use generated boost to close properly but under vacuum light throttle - idle will open the same way?
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2013 | 10:39 AM
  #482  
JumpingJackFlash's Avatar
JumpingJackFlash
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 4
From: Yorktown, VA
The idea behind the DT BPV is to alleviate the need for doing the VGS mod. I tried the mod about three years ago and actually created the condition it's designed to correct. So much for converting the stock BPV from vacuum-activated to boost-activated.

I don't think a BOV is effective on a supercharger setup. Never heard of anyone using one when I used to go to the hangout, and I would see plenty of roots and centrifugal setups on a wide variety of old-school American muscle. Superchargers quit applying boost the instant you let your foot off the accelerator. Turbos take longer to spin down, which is why some kind of recirculation/blowoff is effective.

These two threads explain where others thought of the same thing:

https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...rged-mini.html

https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ve-on-r53.html
 

Last edited by JumpingJackFlash; Nov 25, 2013 at 10:41 AM. Reason: Added notes regarding the VGS mod
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 05:03 PM
  #483  
one73ronin's Avatar
one73ronin
3rd Gear
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 282
Likes: 5
just so I'm understanding this, but this method doesn't work anymore for fixing the yo-yo effect?
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2014 | 10:44 AM
  #484  
JumpingJackFlash's Avatar
JumpingJackFlash
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 4
From: Yorktown, VA
If you are referring to my last post, that is not what I said. I did not have the yo-yo problem to begin with. The VGS mod attempts to fix the yo-yo effect and converts the bypass valve from a vacuum-operated device to a boost-operated device. I wanted to do the mod so I could get the valve to close faster. However, as a by-product, I created the yo-yo condition. My solution was to go back to the stock configuration, then purchase and install the Detroit-Tuned bypass valve. It has a different spring in the vacuum modulator and slams shut at the slightest tap of the accelerator.


The benefit of the VGS mod it it's a very low-cost, low effort solution. It does change how the engine responds and requires a bit of getting used to. If you do in-fact have the yo-yo condition, give it a try. The alternative is to get the DT BPV, which was $125 the last time I checked.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2014 | 11:41 AM
  #485  
Koopah's Avatar
Koopah
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 3
From: Over there -->
Just to chime in on the VGS mod vs. the DT spring. The "getting used to" issue related to the VGS mod comes from the introduction of a rather binary throttle response produced by the boost actuation of the BPV -- feathering the throttle becomes a more difficult (but doable) exercise. There is a very abrupt transition from no SC to full SC. The DT spring, however, produces a nice linear response and allows feathering of the throttle with predictable response.

I don't track my '04 MCS JCW any more so I have kept the VGS mod active. If I had continued to drive the track, I would have switched over to the DT spring for finer throttle control.

FWIW,

Theo
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2014 | 11:53 PM
  #486  
808keith's Avatar
808keith
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 312
Likes: 7
From: HaWaI'I
Jus did this mod and wow what a difference. Car is much smoother and more fun to drive now. Thanks for the tip!
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2018 | 12:13 PM
  #487  
Serafin's Avatar
Serafin
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 835
Likes: 90
From: St, Petersburg, FL
=)

Thank You
 

Last edited by Serafin; Oct 21, 2020 at 06:59 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2024 | 05:01 PM
  #488  
mountainhorse's Avatar
mountainhorse
6th Gear
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 331
From: Cali
Question

Any long term feedback on this.... Is this still a good idea, in light of th DT-valve, on our W11's ??



.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2024 | 08:22 PM
  #489  
JumpingJackFlash's Avatar
JumpingJackFlash
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 4
From: Yorktown, VA
Read my previous responses. Still stands it's not worth it. Better to stay stock or get the Detroit Tuned BPV.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2024 | 02:28 AM
  #490  
clootted's Avatar
clootted
Neutral
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Thumbs up Do it!

Just done this mod on my 2004 R53, with a tuned BPV. Got it first time, no codes or issues at all. Amazing difference, so responsive. Car is 20 years young!
I left the intake manifold end of the stock hose attached, and attached the other end (originally attached to the fuel pressure regulator) to the T.
Bit tricky getting the vacuum hose on the BPV and on the fuel pressure regulator nipple, but a drop of isopropyl alcohol for temporary lube and some wiggling with needle nose pliers and clamp scissors helped a lot.

To note, 4mm ID hose seemed too loose on the fuel pressure regulator nipple, so used 3.2mm ID for that, and forced on a 5mm brass T. Then used 4mm ID for the other pieces which worked great.
Also the rubber right angled piece on the stock hose (coming from intake manifold) is a little delicate, would connect that to the T last.


Highly recommend 🇬🇧
 

Last edited by clootted; Apr 17, 2024 at 02:46 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06minirube
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
7
Nov 23, 2020 11:36 AM
trippyloaf
Stock Problems/Issues
3
Jan 22, 2019 06:24 PM
supermini23
Stock Problems/Issues
21
Oct 9, 2018 07:01 PM
Khai
Stock Problems/Issues
6
Jun 1, 2017 08:37 AM
Cooperb!
Stock Problems/Issues
10
Nov 5, 2004 08:31 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 PM.