General MINI Talk Shared experiences, motoring minutes, and other general MINI-related discussion that applies to all MINIs, regardless of model, year or trim.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine Carbon Buildup Problem census count

Old Jun 10, 2014 | 01:54 PM
  #351  
JPMM's Avatar
JPMM
6th Gear
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 11
From: East IA
good description of the trouble ,to fix it


two words

catch can



(or buy a new redesigned car )


https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...catch-can.html









Originally Posted by Systemlord
Direct Injection itself isn't the problem, it's the design of the PCV system that's lacking which was greatly improved upon in the N18 engine. A well designed PCV system that returns oil to the pan rather than throwing it at the intake valves is what makes the difference. There are a few DI engines out there that don't have any issues with their DI cars.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 08:00 PM
  #352  
yesti's Avatar
yesti
5th Gear
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 44
Originally Posted by jcauseyfd

It is not a flaw. It is a result of the decision to use direct injection. I'd suggest re-orienting your frame of reference to see carbon cleaning as a routine maintenance item. I'd also suggest finding a different source for walnut blasting that can do it much cheaper than what your dealer is proposing.
It is easily solved by combining conventional fuel injection with direct injection. So it was designed to fail. Like so many things on this car it seems.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 08:33 PM
  #353  
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 37
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by JPMM
good description of the trouble ,to fix it


two words

catch can



(or buy a new redesigned car )


https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...catch-can.html


I just don't care to have oil all through my intercooler and intake tubing looping around the left side of the engine only to be inhaled by the intake valves. I rather take a shortcut because you're not going to catch all of the oil even if it were 50 % percent.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 09:34 PM
  #354  
markharmanpowell's Avatar
markharmanpowell
Neutral
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa
Originally Posted by DneprDave
There are many car marques, not just MINI, with direct injection that suffer from carbon build up on the intake valves. It is caused by oil vapor from the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system, not getting washed off the valves, as it is on an engine with port injection. Part of the reason for the redesign of the cylinder head on the N18 engine was to reduce carbon build up on the valves.

Adding an Oil Catch Can and/or methanol injection, can help prevent carbon build up on your intake valves.

Dave
Thanks for the reply/posting. I see the issue stems from the direct injection versus injecting fuel into the intake that washes oil vapor away during the induction cycle. I spoke to another MINI dealer today who quoted only $600 to do the walnut blasting. Car goes in next week - and the catch can/bottle project begins.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 09:36 PM
  #355  
markharmanpowell's Avatar
markharmanpowell
Neutral
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa
Originally Posted by Systemlord
I just don't care to have oil all through my intercooler and intake tubing looping around the left side of the engine only to be inhaled by the intake valves. I rather take a shortcut because you're not going to catch all of the oil even if it were 50 % percent.
Thanks SystemLord, catch can it will be after the walnut blasting. Then later, a big valve head and other silliness : )
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2014 | 03:53 PM
  #356  
Danae's Avatar
Danae
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by markharmanpowell
Thanks for the reply/posting. I see the issue stems from the direct injection versus injecting fuel into the intake that washes oil vapor away during the induction cycle. I spoke to another MINI dealer today who quoted only $600 to do the walnut blasting. Car goes in next week - and the catch can/bottle project begins.
Hopefully you can find it for even less $ than that. Motoring Magic in Thousand Oaks did mine for $445. That's a long way from Costa Mesa, but if MM can do it for that much then perhaps you can find another vendor down your way who can manage a similar price.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2014 | 04:05 PM
  #357  
Danae's Avatar
Danae
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Systemlord
I bet if you remove your spark plugs you'll see black instead of silver. How much oil does your MCS go through when checking your oil levels? Since you're already at 55k and you aren't pinging yet that suggests you don't burn much oil.
I had Motoring Magic do the walnut blast and while they were at it we took a look at my spark plugs. They actually weren't bad at all, interestingly. Not at all black. A little dirty but really not bad at all. I wouldn't have even bothered replacing them except you could see the spark gap was larger than it should be on several of them.

The valves, on the other hand... there was some serious grunge in there. I have before and after pictures but I'll have to upload them later.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2014 | 04:21 PM
  #358  
RobMuntean's Avatar
RobMuntean
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 5
From: West Bloomfield, Michigan
Detroit Tuned does it for $392.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2014 | 05:46 PM
  #359  
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 37
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by Danae
I had Motoring Magic do the walnut blast and while they were at it we took a look at my spark plugs. They actually weren't bad at all, interestingly. Not at all black. A little dirty but really not bad at all. I wouldn't have even bothered replacing them except you could see the spark gap was larger than it should be on several of them.

The valves, on the other hand... there was some serious grunge in there. I have before and after pictures but I'll have to upload them later.
How did your cylinders look? I easily see myself driving from Mission Viejo all the way up to Motoring Magic to have my valves blasted again, I love driving so it's a plus, plus for me. My spark plugs looked absolutely normal, the hotter areas in the cylinders tend to stay the cleanest (white/gray) while the colder areas seem to have the most build-up of carbon.
 

Last edited by Systemlord; Jun 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2014 | 10:45 PM
  #360  
The M People's Avatar
The M People
1st Gear
10 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RobMuntean
Detroit Tuned does it for $392.
Good to know in case I need their service later on.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 01:09 AM
  #361  
chinarider's Avatar
chinarider
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
2009 JCW R57. 38k miles. Brought it to the dealer with symptoms of "stuttering" (tech report called it "chugging" around 3,000 rpm under heavy acceleration most noticeable in gears 3-6. Diagnosed as "severe" carbon buildup, to quote report. Also found injectors to have buildup, spark plugs worn & valve cover leak.

Dealer resolution was walnut shell carbon cleaning, fixing valve cover, replacing spark plugs, cleaning injectors & DME reprogram. Cost was apx. $2,800. MBI coverage took care of cost (minus small deductible) due to valve cover leak possibly being a factor.

Picked up the car today & stuttering/chugging is gone & overall acceleration much smoother again. I do notice louder & more prevalent exhaust pops, especially at higher rpms. JCWs do this anyway, but it seems more frequent & louder now. Possibly result of DME reprogramming, but that's just a guess.

SA also advised me on ways to slow down future carbon buildup (drive it hard at least weekly, rev engine occasionally when hot to blow out deposits, use additives every 3k-5k to clean injectors), but also said that future carbon buildup & cleaning to remedy is all but inevitable. This is essentially a maintenance issue & in my opinion should be covered under maintenance/service plans, just like clutch, brakes, wipers, oil changes, etc.
 

Last edited by chinarider; Jul 23, 2014 at 01:34 AM. Reason: Adding content
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 03:38 AM
  #362  
Mike Mondeau's Avatar
Mike Mondeau
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
2009 S Clubman ~90k, the dealer and MINI ate the cost because I had had the car a month and when I bought it they said it had just been done.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 04:02 AM
  #363  
TJANK's Avatar
TJANK
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 519
Likes: 13
From: Charlottesville, VA
I received the latest Bavarian Autosport newsletter in the mail last week and they show a new product for a DIY: Walnut Media Blasting Kit for $229.95. It says it initially launched a special adapter for the BMW N54 twin turbo with a similar direct injection system as the Mini. Hopefully they will produce a Mini adapter. Sounds like a less expensive DIY option, especially if this is a common occurrence of build. Has anyone tried walnut blasting themselves?
http://www.bavauto.com/newsletter/20...newsletter.pdf
Video: http://blog.bavauto.com/15543/bmw-di...-walnut-blast/

 

Last edited by TJANK; Jul 23, 2014 at 05:05 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 09:53 AM
  #364  
bratling's Avatar
bratling
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 218
From: North of Boston, MA
Originally Posted by TJANK
I received the latest Bavarian Autosport newsletter in the mail last week and they show a new product for a DIY: Walnut Media Blasting Kit for $229.95.
Looks like a Harbor Freight blaster and media. The overall price is pretty fair, especially as they've done the work of making sure you have all the right adapters.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 08:09 PM
  #365  
Sperb's Avatar
Sperb
Neutral
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Carbon build up

May as we'll throw my 2c in. Chk engine light came on this week at 50k miles on our 2007 Cooper S and took it in for service. Turns out we had a timing chain tensioner issue which thankfully was covered under a recall. However SA advised me I could use a new oil separator (?) and had huge carbon build up on the valves. I could easily see it w a weak flashlight and technicians mirror. Asked about cost. Oil separator was $700ish and valve cleaning about $400+. They seemed to consider that a deal bc they already had part of the engine apart for the timing chain issue. I politely declined and will use some injector cleaner to try to break down the buildup. Worst case scenario I'll just have to take it back if power continues to decline.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 08:26 PM
  #366  
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 37
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by Sperb
May as we'll throw my 2c in. Chk engine light came on this week at 50k miles on our 2007 Cooper S and took it in for service. Turns out we had a timing chain tensioner issue which thankfully was covered under a recall. However SA advised me I could use a new oil separator (?) and had huge carbon build up on the valves. I could easily see it w a weak flashlight and technicians mirror. Asked about cost. Oil separator was $700ish and valve cleaning about $400+. They seemed to consider that a deal bc they already had part of the engine apart for the timing chain issue. I politely declined and will use some injector cleaner to try to break down the buildup. Worst case scenario I'll just have to take it back if power continues to decline.
There's only one way to remove the carbon from your valves and intake runners, that's walnut blasting which is why they quoted you $400+. Also if the dealer only replaced the tensioner I guarantee your timing chain and tensioner problem will return because the tensioner allowed the chain to stretched and it's only a matter of time before your chain fails also.

When a tensioner has an issue the damage is already done, see the tensioner provides proper tension on the timing chain and if the tensioner is having issues than most likely the tensioner hasn't been properly tensioning the chain. This is why almost everyone who just had the tensioner replaced have had problems at a later date with the timing chain.

After I paid $800 to have my intake valves and intake runners my Mini had gain at least 10hp, it was night and day difference!
 

Last edited by Systemlord; Aug 5, 2014 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 08:26 PM
  #367  
DneprDave's Avatar
DneprDave
6th Gear
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 87
From: Pacific NW
Injector cleaner won't work for carbon build up on the valves. Well, unless you apply it directly to the intake valves and scrub the carbon off with a wire brush.

It is much easier to have a shop do a walnut shell blast to remove the carbon.

What is the oil separator the SA was talking about? I don't think the dealer would recommend an Oil Catch Can as that would be altering the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system and they can't do that. Maybe they meant a new valve cover? It has a kind of oil separator in it.

Dave
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 08:36 PM
  #368  
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 37
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by DneprDave
Injector cleaner won't work for carbon build up on the valves. Well, unless you apply it directly to the intake valves and scrub the carbon off with a wire brush.

It is much easier to have a shop do a walnut shell blast to remove the carbon.

What is the oil separator the SA was talking about? I don't think the dealer would recommend an Oil Catch Can as that would be altering the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system and they can't do that. Maybe they meant a new valve cover? It has a kind of oil separator in it.

Dave
I'm curious as well, the cyclone separator built into the valve cover does a poor job on the N14 engines, much improved on N18 engines. I can only dream of owning an N18 engine. That carbon build-up is stubborn, remember there's no injector to spray gas onto the valves in a Direct Injection Engine.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2014 | 03:54 AM
  #369  
Sperb's Avatar
Sperb
Neutral
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Thanks for the heads up on the carbon build up. If it's taken 50K to become a problem, I can live with doing the routine maintenance (prob will just do it every 30K bc I'm sure it's been a prob for awhile now).

Yes, the oil separator the SA referred to was basically the top of the valve cover.

Also, they are replacing the timing chain as well bc of the stretching issue.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2014 | 07:16 PM
  #370  
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 37
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by Sperb
Thanks for the heads up on the carbon build up. If it's taken 50K to become a problem, I can live with doing the routine maintenance (prob will just do it every 30K bc I'm sure it's been a prob for awhile now).

Yes, the oil separator the SA referred to was basically the top of the valve cover.

Also, they are replacing the timing chain as well bc of the stretching issue.
That's what I wanted the hear, because if they hadn't you would be back again with the same problem. I see the walnut blasting being done every 30K miles as routine maintenance. Plus the dealer will go ahead an update your ECU, if it wasn't for that I'd take it somewhere else. Many shops offer the carbon cleaning for $350-$550.
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 05:52 AM
  #371  
TJANK's Avatar
TJANK
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 519
Likes: 13
From: Charlottesville, VA
After reading forums (NAM and others) and other I decided to try BG-44K fuel additive at 21,000 miles. It suggests a can every 7,500 miles. I just finished my first tank with a can of BG-44K. I used it as preventative. Maybe it is in my head, but my CM seems to be a little peppier and my mpg has definately increased.

http://www.bgprod.com/catalog/gasoli...ystem-cleaner/

 

Last edited by TJANK; Aug 7, 2014 at 06:07 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 07:33 AM
  #372  
ashchuckton's Avatar
ashchuckton
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 999
Likes: 10
From: Nunavut
If that BG 44K was a fix you'd see the dealer's using it rather than walnut blasting. It may clean some carbon off the piston tops.

The real problem is the intake manifold & especially the back side of the intake valves. On a direct injection engine the fuel never sees the back of the valves. That means this stuff won't work on an N14-N18 engine.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #373  
WestCoastD's Avatar
WestCoastD
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 2
From: Pasadena, California
I'm the original owner of a 2009 Mini Cooper S Hardtop (R56) automatic with approx 37,000 miles. I'm somewhat **** about having it serviced frequently at my dealer (Mini Of Universal City, Calif). I've been lucky, my Mini has been driven less frequently, and sits in the garage moreso. I've been able to savor it.

To this date I'm not sure if there has been any mention of any sign of carbon build-up from the service managers. I have used mostly 76 brand fuel (91 octane). It seems to drive mostly responsive.

After looking through my files, analyzing a few detailed service reports, the only significant [fix] I notice was an open recall item (M 11 04 13):
"checking and replacing timing chain tensioner, timing chain and removing and installing/sealing engine oil pan to remove fragments." (quote).
I did notice better overall response after this above service.

I've driven my Mini mostly in default (non-sport) mode for the most part- just being conservative. However I've played around with Sport Mode more and more recently. Now that I realize it's healthier to drive in Sport Mode (to alleviate carbon build-up) I will gladly make a point to do so.

I love this little "Mini" car, best little car I've ever owned. I've been through the rice-burner thing for maybe 15 years, owned modified Acura Integra's, they were a lot of fun (especially for the price). But these Mini's outshined those Honda's in stock form. I'm hoping my Mini will exhibit the same level of reliability the Honda's provided me though?

Should I specifically ask the technician to check for carbon buildup?
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 01:09 PM
  #374  
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 37
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by WestCoastD
I'm the original owner of a 2009 Mini Cooper S Hardtop (R56) automatic with approx 37,000 miles. I'm somewhat **** about having it serviced frequently at my dealer (Mini Of Universal City, Calif). I've been lucky, my Mini has been driven less frequently, and sits in the garage moreso. I've been able to savor it.

To this date I'm not sure if there has been any mention of any sign of carbon build-up from the service managers. I have used mostly 76 brand fuel (91 octane). It seems to drive mostly responsive.

After looking through my files, analyzing a few detailed service reports, the only significant [fix] I notice was an open recall item (M 11 04 13):
"checking and replacing timing chain tensioner, timing chain and removing and installing/sealing engine oil pan to remove fragments." (quote).
I did notice better overall response after this above service.

I've driven my Mini mostly in default (non-sport) mode for the most part- just being conservative. However I've played around with Sport Mode more and more recently. Now that I realize it's healthier to drive in Sport Mode (to alleviate carbon build-up) I will gladly make a point to do so.

I love this little "Mini" car, best little car I've ever owned. I've been through the rice-burner thing for maybe 15 years, owned modified Acura Integra's, they were a lot of fun (especially for the price). But these Mini's outshined those Honda's in stock form. I'm hoping my Mini will exhibit the same level of reliability the Honda's provided me though?

Should I specifically ask the technician to check for carbon buildup?
Why would you think driving in Sport Mode would be healthier? First time somebody ever claimed that on NAM.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 01:32 PM
  #375  
WestCoastD's Avatar
WestCoastD
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 2
From: Pasadena, California
Originally Posted by Systemlord
Why would you think driving in Sport Mode would be healthier? First time somebody ever claimed that on NAM.
I read a few quotes from previous post's claiming that periodic high-rev driving stints [could] have the tendency to help clear intake valve train and injectors. Am I totally incorrect?
 

Last edited by WestCoastD; Sep 7, 2014 at 09:45 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:11 AM.