Engine Carbon Buildup Problem census count
good description of the trouble ,to fix it
two words
catch can
(or buy a new redesigned car
)
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...catch-can.html

two words
catch can
(or buy a new redesigned car
) https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...catch-can.html

Direct Injection itself isn't the problem, it's the design of the PCV system that's lacking which was greatly improved upon in the N18 engine. A well designed PCV system that returns oil to the pan rather than throwing it at the intake valves is what makes the difference. There are a few DI engines out there that don't have any issues with their DI cars.
It is not a flaw. It is a result of the decision to use direct injection. I'd suggest re-orienting your frame of reference to see carbon cleaning as a routine maintenance item. I'd also suggest finding a different source for walnut blasting that can do it much cheaper than what your dealer is proposing.
good description of the trouble ,to fix it
two words
catch can
(or buy a new redesigned car
)
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...catch-can.html

two words
catch can
(or buy a new redesigned car
) https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...catch-can.html

There are many car marques, not just MINI, with direct injection that suffer from carbon build up on the intake valves. It is caused by oil vapor from the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system, not getting washed off the valves, as it is on an engine with port injection. Part of the reason for the redesign of the cylinder head on the N18 engine was to reduce carbon build up on the valves.
Adding an Oil Catch Can and/or methanol injection, can help prevent carbon build up on your intake valves.
Dave
Adding an Oil Catch Can and/or methanol injection, can help prevent carbon build up on your intake valves.
Dave
Thanks SystemLord, catch can it will be after the walnut blasting. Then later, a big valve head and other silliness : )
Thanks for the reply/posting. I see the issue stems from the direct injection versus injecting fuel into the intake that washes oil vapor away during the induction cycle. I spoke to another MINI dealer today who quoted only $600 to do the walnut blasting. Car goes in next week - and the catch can/bottle project begins.
The valves, on the other hand... there was some serious grunge in there. I have before and after pictures but I'll have to upload them later.
I had Motoring Magic do the walnut blast and while they were at it we took a look at my spark plugs. They actually weren't bad at all, interestingly. Not at all black. A little dirty but really not bad at all. I wouldn't have even bothered replacing them except you could see the spark gap was larger than it should be on several of them.
The valves, on the other hand... there was some serious grunge in there. I have before and after pictures but I'll have to upload them later.
The valves, on the other hand... there was some serious grunge in there. I have before and after pictures but I'll have to upload them later.
Last edited by Systemlord; Jun 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM.
2009 JCW R57. 38k miles. Brought it to the dealer with symptoms of "stuttering" (tech report called it "chugging" around 3,000 rpm under heavy acceleration most noticeable in gears 3-6. Diagnosed as "severe" carbon buildup, to quote report. Also found injectors to have buildup, spark plugs worn & valve cover leak.
Dealer resolution was walnut shell carbon cleaning, fixing valve cover, replacing spark plugs, cleaning injectors & DME reprogram. Cost was apx. $2,800. MBI coverage took care of cost (minus small deductible) due to valve cover leak possibly being a factor.
Picked up the car today & stuttering/chugging is gone & overall acceleration much smoother again. I do notice louder & more prevalent exhaust pops, especially at higher rpms. JCWs do this anyway, but it seems more frequent & louder now. Possibly result of DME reprogramming, but that's just a guess.
SA also advised me on ways to slow down future carbon buildup (drive it hard at least weekly, rev engine occasionally when hot to blow out deposits, use additives every 3k-5k to clean injectors), but also said that future carbon buildup & cleaning to remedy is all but inevitable. This is essentially a maintenance issue & in my opinion should be covered under maintenance/service plans, just like clutch, brakes, wipers, oil changes, etc.
Dealer resolution was walnut shell carbon cleaning, fixing valve cover, replacing spark plugs, cleaning injectors & DME reprogram. Cost was apx. $2,800. MBI coverage took care of cost (minus small deductible) due to valve cover leak possibly being a factor.
Picked up the car today & stuttering/chugging is gone & overall acceleration much smoother again. I do notice louder & more prevalent exhaust pops, especially at higher rpms. JCWs do this anyway, but it seems more frequent & louder now. Possibly result of DME reprogramming, but that's just a guess.
SA also advised me on ways to slow down future carbon buildup (drive it hard at least weekly, rev engine occasionally when hot to blow out deposits, use additives every 3k-5k to clean injectors), but also said that future carbon buildup & cleaning to remedy is all but inevitable. This is essentially a maintenance issue & in my opinion should be covered under maintenance/service plans, just like clutch, brakes, wipers, oil changes, etc.
Last edited by chinarider; Jul 23, 2014 at 01:34 AM. Reason: Adding content
I received the latest Bavarian Autosport newsletter in the mail last week and they show a new product for a DIY: Walnut Media Blasting Kit for $229.95. It says it initially launched a special adapter for the BMW N54 twin turbo with a similar direct injection system as the Mini. Hopefully they will produce a Mini adapter. Sounds like a less expensive DIY option, especially if this is a common occurrence of build. Has anyone tried walnut blasting themselves?
http://www.bavauto.com/newsletter/20...newsletter.pdf
Video: http://blog.bavauto.com/15543/bmw-di...-walnut-blast/
http://www.bavauto.com/newsletter/20...newsletter.pdf
Video: http://blog.bavauto.com/15543/bmw-di...-walnut-blast/
Last edited by TJANK; Jul 23, 2014 at 05:05 AM.
Looks like a Harbor Freight blaster and media. The overall price is pretty fair, especially as they've done the work of making sure you have all the right adapters.
Carbon build up
May as we'll throw my 2c in. Chk engine light came on this week at 50k miles on our 2007 Cooper S and took it in for service. Turns out we had a timing chain tensioner issue which thankfully was covered under a recall. However SA advised me I could use a new oil separator (?) and had huge carbon build up on the valves. I could easily see it w a weak flashlight and technicians mirror. Asked about cost. Oil separator was $700ish and valve cleaning about $400+. They seemed to consider that a deal bc they already had part of the engine apart for the timing chain issue. I politely declined and will use some injector cleaner to try to break down the buildup. Worst case scenario I'll just have to take it back if power continues to decline.
May as we'll throw my 2c in. Chk engine light came on this week at 50k miles on our 2007 Cooper S and took it in for service. Turns out we had a timing chain tensioner issue which thankfully was covered under a recall. However SA advised me I could use a new oil separator (?) and had huge carbon build up on the valves. I could easily see it w a weak flashlight and technicians mirror. Asked about cost. Oil separator was $700ish and valve cleaning about $400+. They seemed to consider that a deal bc they already had part of the engine apart for the timing chain issue. I politely declined and will use some injector cleaner to try to break down the buildup. Worst case scenario I'll just have to take it back if power continues to decline.
When a tensioner has an issue the damage is already done, see the tensioner provides proper tension on the timing chain and if the tensioner is having issues than most likely the tensioner hasn't been properly tensioning the chain. This is why almost everyone who just had the tensioner replaced have had problems at a later date with the timing chain.
After I paid $800 to have my intake valves and intake runners my Mini had gain at least 10hp, it was night and day difference!
Last edited by Systemlord; Aug 5, 2014 at 08:33 PM.
Injector cleaner won't work for carbon build up on the valves. Well, unless you apply it directly to the intake valves and scrub the carbon off with a wire brush.
It is much easier to have a shop do a walnut shell blast to remove the carbon.
What is the oil separator the SA was talking about? I don't think the dealer would recommend an Oil Catch Can as that would be altering the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system and they can't do that. Maybe they meant a new valve cover? It has a kind of oil separator in it.
Dave
It is much easier to have a shop do a walnut shell blast to remove the carbon.
What is the oil separator the SA was talking about? I don't think the dealer would recommend an Oil Catch Can as that would be altering the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system and they can't do that. Maybe they meant a new valve cover? It has a kind of oil separator in it.
Dave
Injector cleaner won't work for carbon build up on the valves. Well, unless you apply it directly to the intake valves and scrub the carbon off with a wire brush.
It is much easier to have a shop do a walnut shell blast to remove the carbon.
What is the oil separator the SA was talking about? I don't think the dealer would recommend an Oil Catch Can as that would be altering the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system and they can't do that. Maybe they meant a new valve cover? It has a kind of oil separator in it.
Dave
It is much easier to have a shop do a walnut shell blast to remove the carbon.
What is the oil separator the SA was talking about? I don't think the dealer would recommend an Oil Catch Can as that would be altering the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system and they can't do that. Maybe they meant a new valve cover? It has a kind of oil separator in it.
Dave
Thanks for the heads up on the carbon build up. If it's taken 50K to become a problem, I can live with doing the routine maintenance (prob will just do it every 30K bc I'm sure it's been a prob for awhile now).
Yes, the oil separator the SA referred to was basically the top of the valve cover.
Also, they are replacing the timing chain as well bc of the stretching issue.
Yes, the oil separator the SA referred to was basically the top of the valve cover.
Also, they are replacing the timing chain as well bc of the stretching issue.
Thanks for the heads up on the carbon build up. If it's taken 50K to become a problem, I can live with doing the routine maintenance (prob will just do it every 30K bc I'm sure it's been a prob for awhile now).
Yes, the oil separator the SA referred to was basically the top of the valve cover.
Also, they are replacing the timing chain as well bc of the stretching issue.
Yes, the oil separator the SA referred to was basically the top of the valve cover.
Also, they are replacing the timing chain as well bc of the stretching issue.
After reading forums (NAM and others) and other I decided to try BG-44K fuel additive at 21,000 miles. It suggests a can every 7,500 miles. I just finished my first tank with a can of BG-44K. I used it as preventative. Maybe it is in my head, but my CM seems to be a little peppier and my mpg has definately increased.
http://www.bgprod.com/catalog/gasoli...ystem-cleaner/
http://www.bgprod.com/catalog/gasoli...ystem-cleaner/
Last edited by TJANK; Aug 7, 2014 at 06:07 AM.
If that BG 44K was a fix you'd see the dealer's using it rather than walnut blasting. It may clean some carbon off the piston tops.
The real problem is the intake manifold & especially the back side of the intake valves. On a direct injection engine the fuel never sees the back of the valves. That means this stuff won't work on an N14-N18 engine.
The real problem is the intake manifold & especially the back side of the intake valves. On a direct injection engine the fuel never sees the back of the valves. That means this stuff won't work on an N14-N18 engine.
I'm the original owner of a 2009 Mini Cooper S Hardtop (R56) automatic with approx 37,000 miles. I'm somewhat **** about having it serviced frequently at my dealer (Mini Of Universal City, Calif). I've been lucky, my Mini has been driven less frequently, and sits in the garage moreso. I've been able to savor it.
To this date I'm not sure if there has been any mention of any sign of carbon build-up from the service managers. I have used mostly 76 brand fuel (91 octane). It seems to drive mostly responsive.
After looking through my files, analyzing a few detailed service reports, the only significant [fix] I notice was an open recall item (M 11 04 13):
"checking and replacing timing chain tensioner, timing chain and removing and installing/sealing engine oil pan to remove fragments." (quote).
I did notice better overall response after this above service.
I've driven my Mini mostly in default (non-sport) mode for the most part- just being conservative. However I've played around with Sport Mode more and more recently. Now that I realize it's healthier to drive in Sport Mode (to alleviate carbon build-up) I will gladly make a point to do so.
I love this little "Mini" car, best little car I've ever owned. I've been through the rice-burner thing for maybe 15 years, owned modified Acura Integra's, they were a lot of fun (especially for the price). But these Mini's outshined those Honda's in stock form. I'm hoping my Mini will exhibit the same level of reliability the Honda's provided me though?
Should I specifically ask the technician to check for carbon buildup?
To this date I'm not sure if there has been any mention of any sign of carbon build-up from the service managers. I have used mostly 76 brand fuel (91 octane). It seems to drive mostly responsive.
After looking through my files, analyzing a few detailed service reports, the only significant [fix] I notice was an open recall item (M 11 04 13):
"checking and replacing timing chain tensioner, timing chain and removing and installing/sealing engine oil pan to remove fragments." (quote).
I did notice better overall response after this above service.
I've driven my Mini mostly in default (non-sport) mode for the most part- just being conservative. However I've played around with Sport Mode more and more recently. Now that I realize it's healthier to drive in Sport Mode (to alleviate carbon build-up) I will gladly make a point to do so.
I love this little "Mini" car, best little car I've ever owned. I've been through the rice-burner thing for maybe 15 years, owned modified Acura Integra's, they were a lot of fun (especially for the price). But these Mini's outshined those Honda's in stock form. I'm hoping my Mini will exhibit the same level of reliability the Honda's provided me though?
Should I specifically ask the technician to check for carbon buildup?
I'm the original owner of a 2009 Mini Cooper S Hardtop (R56) automatic with approx 37,000 miles. I'm somewhat **** about having it serviced frequently at my dealer (Mini Of Universal City, Calif). I've been lucky, my Mini has been driven less frequently, and sits in the garage moreso. I've been able to savor it.
To this date I'm not sure if there has been any mention of any sign of carbon build-up from the service managers. I have used mostly 76 brand fuel (91 octane). It seems to drive mostly responsive.
After looking through my files, analyzing a few detailed service reports, the only significant [fix] I notice was an open recall item (M 11 04 13):
"checking and replacing timing chain tensioner, timing chain and removing and installing/sealing engine oil pan to remove fragments." (quote).
I did notice better overall response after this above service.
I've driven my Mini mostly in default (non-sport) mode for the most part- just being conservative. However I've played around with Sport Mode more and more recently. Now that I realize it's healthier to drive in Sport Mode (to alleviate carbon build-up) I will gladly make a point to do so.
I love this little "Mini" car, best little car I've ever owned. I've been through the rice-burner thing for maybe 15 years, owned modified Acura Integra's, they were a lot of fun (especially for the price). But these Mini's outshined those Honda's in stock form. I'm hoping my Mini will exhibit the same level of reliability the Honda's provided me though?
Should I specifically ask the technician to check for carbon buildup?
To this date I'm not sure if there has been any mention of any sign of carbon build-up from the service managers. I have used mostly 76 brand fuel (91 octane). It seems to drive mostly responsive.
After looking through my files, analyzing a few detailed service reports, the only significant [fix] I notice was an open recall item (M 11 04 13):
"checking and replacing timing chain tensioner, timing chain and removing and installing/sealing engine oil pan to remove fragments." (quote).
I did notice better overall response after this above service.
I've driven my Mini mostly in default (non-sport) mode for the most part- just being conservative. However I've played around with Sport Mode more and more recently. Now that I realize it's healthier to drive in Sport Mode (to alleviate carbon build-up) I will gladly make a point to do so.
I love this little "Mini" car, best little car I've ever owned. I've been through the rice-burner thing for maybe 15 years, owned modified Acura Integra's, they were a lot of fun (especially for the price). But these Mini's outshined those Honda's in stock form. I'm hoping my Mini will exhibit the same level of reliability the Honda's provided me though?
Should I specifically ask the technician to check for carbon buildup?
I read a few quotes from previous post's claiming that periodic high-rev driving stints [could] have the tendency to help clear intake valve train and injectors. Am I totally incorrect?
Last edited by WestCoastD; Sep 7, 2014 at 09:45 PM.







