SUVs ... that bad?!?
Well my SUV is quite easy to see out of and I have never had issues parking. At a Wal-Mart parking lot you are going to judge cars from?! Oh man. Walmart is like the death of car politeness. I won't even take the MINI to one. But even though SUVs may be bigger, sedans can take up just enough room. Yes, I've thought about taking 2 spaces with the MINI but that wouldn't be very nice
You stated over 60% of the cars are parked poorly. I'll buy that (especially at a wal-mart!). But why just mention the SUVs? I'm sure that of that percentage there is still a large non-SUV percentage that are parked poorly.
You stated over 60% of the cars are parked poorly. I'll buy that (especially at a wal-mart!). But why just mention the SUVs? I'm sure that of that percentage there is still a large non-SUV percentage that are parked poorly.
Since MINIs are small, and since SUVs proliferated in a manner that was uncalled for, and because the "SUV Backlash" was part of early MINI marketing, yeah, we do tend to bash SUVs. I don't think it's really all that serious, though...just an inside joke. Everybody knows that some SUV drivers really need them, and that many SUV drivers park fine, and that some are even good drivers. It's just a stereotype we use to poke fun. Nothing more. Lucas gets some jabbing, too.
Since MINIs are small, and since SUVs proliferated in a manner that was uncalled for, and because the "SUV Backlash" was part of early MINI marketing, yeah, we do tend to bash SUVs. I don't think it's really all that serious, though...just an inside joke. Everybody knows that some SUV drivers really need them, and that many SUV drivers park fine, and that some are even good drivers. It's just a stereotype we use to poke fun. Nothing more. Lucas gets some jabbing, too.

I just don't understand how the things became status symbols. It was quite a marketing coup to get people to buy these high-profit auto-standards-exempt trucks simply to impress their equally dimwitted neighbors. I'm not saying that's the only reason anyone buys them, but it is why there are so many on the road.
If the auto makers took their Navigators or Escalades and kept the same drivetrain and suspensions, but put in cloth seats and manual windows and plain steel wheels; priced them at $25,000, they wouldn't sell a one.
If the auto makers took their Navigators or Escalades and kept the same drivetrain and suspensions, but put in cloth seats and manual windows and plain steel wheels; priced them at $25,000, they wouldn't sell a one.
I just don't understand how the things became status symbols. It was quite a marketing coup to get people to buy these high-profit auto-standards-exempt trucks simply to impress their equally dimwitted neighbors. I'm not saying that's the only reason anyone buys them, but it is why there are so many on the road.
If the auto makers took their Navigators or Escalades and kept the same drivetrain and suspensions, but put in cloth seats and manual windows and plain steel wheels; priced them at $25,000, they wouldn't sell a one.
If the auto makers took their Navigators or Escalades and kept the same drivetrain and suspensions, but put in cloth seats and manual windows and plain steel wheels; priced them at $25,000, they wouldn't sell a one.
Who cares? Just because you don't like the SUV doesn't mean that they should not exist. I like mine for so many reasons. Mainly for the space it provides that we use almost weekly just because we're busy people. I certainly don't drive it as a status symbol.
I can't beleive nobody brought up winter driving! My main complaint with a majority of SUV drivers is that they don't slow down in slippery winter conditions. I have a 25 mile commute each way to work, and it is all highway with one major hill over a mountain in central PA.
When it starts snowing and road conditions start to decline, these nuts just truck along at 75mph or more! I guess they think that because they have 4 -wheel drive they don't need to slow down. Ice is ice, and 4-wheel drive just means you have 4 wheels spinning instead of 2.
By the way, my other vehicle is a 2004 Land Rover Discovery. I know, I know. It is a major gas hog and huge. However, I only use it on weekends for hauling my 4 dogs, or going mountainbiking, or foul weather and only put a few thousand miles a year on it. I do know when to slow down, when to get out of the left lane, and what my vehicle's capabilities are.
When it starts snowing and road conditions start to decline, these nuts just truck along at 75mph or more! I guess they think that because they have 4 -wheel drive they don't need to slow down. Ice is ice, and 4-wheel drive just means you have 4 wheels spinning instead of 2.
By the way, my other vehicle is a 2004 Land Rover Discovery. I know, I know. It is a major gas hog and huge. However, I only use it on weekends for hauling my 4 dogs, or going mountainbiking, or foul weather and only put a few thousand miles a year on it. I do know when to slow down, when to get out of the left lane, and what my vehicle's capabilities are.
Reason why i dislike SUVs:
1. Big vehicles and i cannot see past them as to wth is going on the road
2. They are gas-guzzlers
Reason why i should dislike SUV drivers
1. They are the ones who buy and drive those big vehicles and guzzle up gas so the government can inv.. oh wait - this will open a whole different can.
1. Big vehicles and i cannot see past them as to wth is going on the road
2. They are gas-guzzlers
Reason why i should dislike SUV drivers
1. They are the ones who buy and drive those big vehicles and guzzle up gas so the government can inv.. oh wait - this will open a whole different can.
I can't beleive nobody brought up winter driving! My main complaint with a majority of SUV drivers is that they don't slow down in slippery winter conditions. I have a 25 mile commute each way to work, and it is all highway with one major hill over a mountain in central PA.
When it starts snowing and road conditions start to decline, these nuts just truck along at 75mph or more! I guess they think that because they have 4 -wheel drive they don't need to slow down. Ice is ice, and 4-wheel drive just means you have 4 wheels spinning instead of 2.
By the way, my other vehicle is a 2004 Land Rover Discovery. I know, I know. It is a major gas hog and huge. However, I only use it on weekends for hauling my 4 dogs, or going mountainbiking, or foul weather and only put a few thousand miles a year on it. I do know when to slow down, when to get out of the left lane, and what my vehicle's capabilities are.
When it starts snowing and road conditions start to decline, these nuts just truck along at 75mph or more! I guess they think that because they have 4 -wheel drive they don't need to slow down. Ice is ice, and 4-wheel drive just means you have 4 wheels spinning instead of 2.
By the way, my other vehicle is a 2004 Land Rover Discovery. I know, I know. It is a major gas hog and huge. However, I only use it on weekends for hauling my 4 dogs, or going mountainbiking, or foul weather and only put a few thousand miles a year on it. I do know when to slow down, when to get out of the left lane, and what my vehicle's capabilities are.
Reason why i dislike SUVs:
1. Big vehicles and i cannot see past them as to wth is going on the road
2. They are gas-guzzlers
Reason why i should dislike SUV drivers
1. They are the ones who buy and drive those big vehicles and guzzle up gas so the government can inv.. oh wait - this will open a whole different can.
1. Big vehicles and i cannot see past them as to wth is going on the road
2. They are gas-guzzlers
Reason why i should dislike SUV drivers
1. They are the ones who buy and drive those big vehicles and guzzle up gas so the government can inv.. oh wait - this will open a whole different can.
and owning a $35K MINI isn't? What do you call it when a $22K car is turned into a $35K car with $13K of options and then $10K in aftermarket parts? Then people realize they have a $45K MINI Cooper and can't anywhere near they money they thought the could on resale? That's not conspicuous consumption?And so? Most cars carry one and no cargo. It's called "freedom of choice" and last time I checked, this was still America
1. Gas
2. War
3. Deaths
*Puts on his flame shield and leaves the planet*
Since I mentioned the parking issue let me clarify again, it is not just about poor parking which any car can do of course, but that so frequently SUVs/big trucks park in compact spaces. Yes regular non compact cars do that as well sometimes but the width and bulk of the SUV makes it especially bad.
In any case, for me the bottom line is that anything done badly by the driver of an SUV is worse then if they were in a car or on a motorcycle in the threat they pose. From the real increased tendancy to rollover that hurts the occupants, to the fact that they pose more of a danger to people in passenger cars when involved in an accident are factual problems inherent to the breed. Even in low speed accidents they cause more damage (http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/bumper_tests.html).
So beyond the variables based on driving skill and borderline dangers like more likely to dazzle higher lights and some visibility issues, the fact remains that SUVs/trucks pose more of a danger.
In any case, for me the bottom line is that anything done badly by the driver of an SUV is worse then if they were in a car or on a motorcycle in the threat they pose. From the real increased tendancy to rollover that hurts the occupants, to the fact that they pose more of a danger to people in passenger cars when involved in an accident are factual problems inherent to the breed. Even in low speed accidents they cause more damage (http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/bumper_tests.html).
So beyond the variables based on driving skill and borderline dangers like more likely to dazzle higher lights and some visibility issues, the fact remains that SUVs/trucks pose more of a danger.
Oh and one other thing before I forget...
The reason to purchase an SUV to begin with was purely personal. Before the Expedition, I had a rash of Car totals (ie 4 in 1 calendar year...none of which I was involved AT ALL) so I can see the point in driving the SUV - Even if someone decides to hit me, my car will endure no damage) works for me!
Look at it from another perspective will you? With a couple apparent tries on my life, I purchased an SUV. In 4 years I did not experience 1 hit/near encounter. Now, the only thing I am worried about is starting that all over again in the MINI. Thank goodness the MINI has 8 airbags...
The reason to purchase an SUV to begin with was purely personal. Before the Expedition, I had a rash of Car totals (ie 4 in 1 calendar year...none of which I was involved AT ALL) so I can see the point in driving the SUV - Even if someone decides to hit me, my car will endure no damage) works for me!
Look at it from another perspective will you? With a couple apparent tries on my life, I purchased an SUV. In 4 years I did not experience 1 hit/near encounter. Now, the only thing I am worried about is starting that all over again in the MINI. Thank goodness the MINI has 8 airbags...
I drove a Saturn for 4 years and 9 months, through 69,000+ miles with zero accidents. In the three months I was attempting to sell it, I was hit 4 times by other drivers, 2 of which were in SUV's and decided to play the I'm bigger than you so I'm coming into your lane whether/not you like it game.
I'd like to believe that I was hit just purely out of the fact I was trying to sell my car (murphy's law), but I have no way to prove it.
Since I mentioned the parking issue let me clarify again, it is not just about poor parking which any car can do of course, but that so frequently SUVs/big trucks park in compact spaces. Yes regular non compact cars do that as well sometimes but the width and bulk of the SUV makes it especially bad.
In any case, for me the bottom line is that anything done badly by the driver of an SUV is worse then if they were in a car or on a motorcycle. From the real increased tendancy to rollover that hurts the occupants, to the fact that they pose more of a danger to people in passenger cars when involved in an accident are factual problems inherent to the breed. Even in low speed accidents they cause more damage (http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...er_tests.html).
So beyond the variables based on driving skill and borderline dangers like more likely to dazzle higher lights and some visibility issues, the fact remains that SUVs/trucks pose more of a danger.
In any case, for me the bottom line is that anything done badly by the driver of an SUV is worse then if they were in a car or on a motorcycle. From the real increased tendancy to rollover that hurts the occupants, to the fact that they pose more of a danger to people in passenger cars when involved in an accident are factual problems inherent to the breed. Even in low speed accidents they cause more damage (http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...er_tests.html).
So beyond the variables based on driving skill and borderline dangers like more likely to dazzle higher lights and some visibility issues, the fact remains that SUVs/trucks pose more of a danger.
Of course an SUV poses more of a threat to others than a small car does. Just like a teenager does, or a drunk person. But that doesn't mean that the drivers themselves are posing this threat. The space in an SUV is necessary in many instances, so why whine about it?
Actually, to be fair, she did mention dogs in her first post.

This is purely speculative coincidence. I appreciate the fact that you believe such, but it doesn't neccesarily mean it's true.
I drove a Saturn for 4 years and 9 months, through 69,000+ miles with zero accidents. In the three months I was attempting to sell it, I was hit 4 times by other drivers, 2 of which were in SUV's and decided to play the I'm bigger than you so I'm coming into your lane whether/not you like it game.
I'd like to believe that I was hit just purely out of the fact I was trying to sell my car (murphy's law), but I have no way to prove it.
I drove a Saturn for 4 years and 9 months, through 69,000+ miles with zero accidents. In the three months I was attempting to sell it, I was hit 4 times by other drivers, 2 of which were in SUV's and decided to play the I'm bigger than you so I'm coming into your lane whether/not you like it game.
I'd like to believe that I was hit just purely out of the fact I was trying to sell my car (murphy's law), but I have no way to prove it.
Last edited by paceysgl5; Sep 18, 2007 at 08:29 AM.
A market needs to exist for gas companies to flourish. If more people carpooled / bought fuel efficient vehicles / used public transportation, there would be a lesser need for fuel yes?
I know atleast two friends whose drive to work is around 2-3mins (6-8min walk) and yet they insist on taking a car. Fuel consumption in general sucks and i usually refer to SUVs by the term "gasholes".
I know i sound like a hypocrite myself but i am 28 and i have driven around 1500-1600 miles all my life (that will change soon but eh). I take the bus/train whenever i can.
So you see, the criticism you hear is never directed at the genuine tow-ers or the genuine off-roaders. It's directed at the 95+% of people who buy them as commuter cars or occasional haulers when there are far more practical and safer vehicles out there for the job.
An SUV is NOT a car, yet they are all too often bought and used like cars, with ill effects.
A market needs to exist for gas companies to flourish. If more people carpooled / bought fuel efficient vehicles / used public transportation, there would be a lesser need for fuel yes?
I know atleast two friends whose drive to work is around 2-3mins (6-8min walk) and yet they insist on taking a car. Fuel consumption in general sucks and i usually refer to SUVs by the term "gasholes".
I know i sound like a hypocrite myself but i am 28 and i have driven around 1500-1600 miles all my life (that will change soon but eh). I take the bus/train whenever i can.
I know atleast two friends whose drive to work is around 2-3mins (6-8min walk) and yet they insist on taking a car. Fuel consumption in general sucks and i usually refer to SUVs by the term "gasholes".
I know i sound like a hypocrite myself but i am 28 and i have driven around 1500-1600 miles all my life (that will change soon but eh). I take the bus/train whenever i can.
Sure, there would be lesser need for fuel if SUVs weren't around. But that could also mean more cars on the road (ie an suv can fit 7-8 people in it, instead of all taking said SUV, people end up driving 3 separate cars out). Large families would need a van instead, as a mini-van does not hold as much. The root of the problem is not the car itself, but those attempting to prove it is while taking the blame off the people who walk away with billions. Unfortunately the gas problem will not go away anytime soon, as long as lawmakers have anything to say about it. And when you introduce other potential fixes, new problems arise (ie hybrid technology relying on those lovely batteries). Bottom line, we need the space (some do anyway) and thus SUVs are helpful. However, I do agree that driving one every day 80miles/day is a bit unnecessary and wasteful. Hence, the MINI
To be fair to SUVs, I went from an Integra to a 4-Runner back in my younger days, and I loved the loss of control, loud squealing of tires, and sensation of rolling over when I took sharp turns. I also enjoyed cutting across grassy medians with lovely wild flowers and running over curbs to bypass parking gates.
Driving my mini is so boring in comparison. No matter how fast I drive or hard I turn, I can't get the thing to lose control.
Driving my mini is so boring in comparison. No matter how fast I drive or hard I turn, I can't get the thing to lose control.
Wow! I had no idea that a larger object would be more harmful! What a concept! Your point is...lets get rid of all the contractors, pets, extra kids, home projects that require large items to be driven around, large pieces of furniture, etc. and then maybe SUVs would go away? Okay, what do you have in your living room, bean bag chairs that fit nicely one at a time in the MINI? Honestly.
Of course an SUV poses more of a threat to others than a small car does. Just like a teenager does, or a drunk person. But that doesn't mean that the drivers themselves are posing this threat. The space in an SUV is necessary in many instances, so why whine about it?
Of course an SUV poses more of a threat to others than a small car does. Just like a teenager does, or a drunk person. But that doesn't mean that the drivers themselves are posing this threat. The space in an SUV is necessary in many instances, so why whine about it?
Your facetious remarks aside, no, that is not my point at all, although I'd be pleased if people stopped thinking of high SUVs as safer for their kids (which they are not, http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...uv_safety.html) and if they really needed them learned to drive and park them correctly. With hope they will regulate them into safer crossever van like vehicles anyway, and ultimately the rest will roll themselves into oblivion

Fwiw, SUVs and trucks can be rented and/or borrowed when moving, hauling, and projects necessitate them. Works great, costs less, and I can get any of that stuff done without being stuck with owning and driving one more then required - too many better cars to own
And we are not whining, you asked why and we answered. Besides, forums are for discussing things, and responding with the issues we have with so many of these large vehicles on the road is par for the course.



