Anyone with 215/45/17 tires?
#2
Lots of people running this size. We have a '09 JCW. Have used Blizzaks in this size since the car was new (drove new car home from dealer in snow on them :-O ). At that time there wasn't a Blizzak in the stock size. Couple weeks ago purchased the Michelin Super Sports in this size as they were about $40 cheaper per tire than the 205 size. These replaced the stock runflats --- oh what a difference --- love them :-)
Anyways, no issues with either tire rubbing wise. The 205 width is probably a more ideal fit on the stock (7" width) wheels, the 215s end up with a bit of a rounded shoulder. However, it is hard to beat more rubber for cornering grip.
For any give tire, I'd suggest the following is likely to be true:
205s
lower weight
stock height
sharper steering response
215s
higher weight
slight taller effective gearing --- lower in gear acceleration (mitigated a bit by carrying a given gear longer)
more rolling and aero resistance
softer feel
less turn-in response
more grip at limit
If our JCW was clean, I'd post a pick of it on the super sports, looks pretty sweat if you are into tires ;-)
Anyways, no issues with either tire rubbing wise. The 205 width is probably a more ideal fit on the stock (7" width) wheels, the 215s end up with a bit of a rounded shoulder. However, it is hard to beat more rubber for cornering grip.
For any give tire, I'd suggest the following is likely to be true:
205s
lower weight
stock height
sharper steering response
215s
higher weight
slight taller effective gearing --- lower in gear acceleration (mitigated a bit by carrying a given gear longer)
more rolling and aero resistance
softer feel
less turn-in response
more grip at limit
If our JCW was clean, I'd post a pick of it on the super sports, looks pretty sweat if you are into tires ;-)
#3
Just swapped my Conti RFs for Bridgestone RE970s (in the 215/45/17 configuration) today.
Besides the obvious benefit of a vastly improved ride (the reason I switched tires), the slightly larger tire actually makes the (optimistic) speedometer more accurate.
Losing run flats is well worth doing, even if you don't go up a tire size when you do it.
Besides the obvious benefit of a vastly improved ride (the reason I switched tires), the slightly larger tire actually makes the (optimistic) speedometer more accurate.
Losing run flats is well worth doing, even if you don't go up a tire size when you do it.
#4
#6
Just swapped my Conti RFs for Bridgestone RE970s (in the 215/45/17 configuration) today.
Besides the obvious benefit of a vastly improved ride (the reason I switched tires), the slightly larger tire actually makes the (optimistic) speedometer more accurate.
Losing run flats is well worth doing, even if you don't go up a tire size when you do it.
Besides the obvious benefit of a vastly improved ride (the reason I switched tires), the slightly larger tire actually makes the (optimistic) speedometer more accurate.
Losing run flats is well worth doing, even if you don't go up a tire size when you do it.
Thx,
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Swapping the rigid sidewalls of run flats for conventional tires will take some of the discomfort out of beat-up roads (potholes, etc.).
Going up a size to 215/45 means the sidewall is just a tiny bit taller, too, adding a little more cushion. It's a nice change...car's still a MINI, though.
#9
#14
I previously had the 215/45/17's Sumitomo's (the older non-run flat summer tires they used to make) on my last MINI. I really liked the ride. Handling was comparable to the non-run flat BF Goodrich tires I'm currently on. The 215's cornered well but I did notice some more tendency to tramline. That very well could've just been the tire and not the sizing though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post