2009 Factory JCW
Can I ask what dealer you ordered from? Also, did you add all the JCW items that you listed or are they the "JCW" part of the JCW model? If they are add ons, I'm guessing you are looking at a $40 K car. WOW
Sounds just like what I want, but I now fear it will be beyond my price range.
Sounds just like what I want, but I now fear it will be beyond my price range.
Even more off topic, he loved the car--he's just going to add the LSD and a few suspension tweaks...
Last edited by cct1; Apr 28, 2008 at 05:53 PM.
Other thoughts on the ELDC are requested. Apparently, mechanical LSD will not be offered on the JCW. The ELDC will come standard.
The dealer sent me the option configurations today. Can anyone confirm what comes standard on the JCW. (JCW brakes, suspension, brace,etc.?)
The dealer sent me the option configurations today. Can anyone confirm what comes standard on the JCW. (JCW brakes, suspension, brace,etc.?)
i have two questions about the new BMW eDiff:
1. does it have a speed cutoff after which it no longer is operational? this used to be the case with the audi EDL (elec diff lock) and porsche's PSM-type EDL.
2. if the brakes are used to apply pressure to mimic a mechanical LSD --does this make the brakes fade FASTER because you're using them to bleed energy of spinning wheels as well as the kinetic energy of the car?
1. does it have a speed cutoff after which it no longer is operational? this used to be the case with the audi EDL (elec diff lock) and porsche's PSM-type EDL.
2. if the brakes are used to apply pressure to mimic a mechanical LSD --does this make the brakes fade FASTER because you're using them to bleed energy of spinning wheels as well as the kinetic energy of the car?
where did all of the CooperWorks sycophants go?
i thought they'd stick around to explain the rationale behind using your front brake pads as an eLSD to replace a mechanical unit. i mean, it makes to use the front brake pads that way --they're only responsible for 70% of the car's braking anyway.
i thought they'd stick around to explain the rationale behind using your front brake pads as an eLSD to replace a mechanical unit. i mean, it makes to use the front brake pads that way --they're only responsible for 70% of the car's braking anyway.
where did all of the CooperWorks sycophants go?
i thought they'd stick around to explain the rationale behind using your front brake pads as an eLSD to replace a mechanical unit. i mean, it makes to use the front brake pads that way --they're only responsible for 70% of the car's braking anyway.
i thought they'd stick around to explain the rationale behind using your front brake pads as an eLSD to replace a mechanical unit. i mean, it makes to use the front brake pads that way --they're only responsible for 70% of the car's braking anyway.
my thoughts exactly.
a FWDer has peculiar enough problems having the front wheels steer as well as send power. now you're asking them to do even more? it's just trouble and the brakes simply don't have the added capacity to carry all that added heat during hot lapping --which presumably the CooperWorks car is intended to do well, no?
my thoughts exactly.
a FWDer has peculiar enough problems having the front wheels steer as well as send power. now you're asking them to do even more? it's just trouble and the brakes simply don't have the added capacity to carry all that added heat during hot lapping --which presumably the CooperWorks car is intended to do well, no?
where did all of the CooperWorks sycophants go?
i thought they'd stick around to explain the rationale behind using your front brake pads as an eLSD to replace a mechanical unit. i mean, it makes to use the front brake pads that way --they're only responsible for 70% of the car's braking anyway.
i thought they'd stick around to explain the rationale behind using your front brake pads as an eLSD to replace a mechanical unit. i mean, it makes to use the front brake pads that way --they're only responsible for 70% of the car's braking anyway.
In theory it sounds good. Slow down the wheel that's loosing grip enough so it gains traction again. As with any "new" technology, it still has to be tweaked. Once they get it dialed in, I'm sure all the haters/doubters will come around. I believe Superbike racing uses this technology or something similar on their bikes.
sure would be fun to see this in a JCW factory car (brake failure because of overheating).
actually, i've been in a BMW (xi awd system that relies upon brakes to control wheel slip) and the brake system basically went into shutdown mode and flashed brake warning lights. i had overheated the brakes driving in some deeper slush because the plows weren't out yet.
sure would be fun to see this in a JCW factory car (brake failure because of overheating).
sure would be fun to see this in a JCW factory car (brake failure because of overheating).
Braking the wheel w/ less traction and diverting power from it to the wheel that has more are two completely different things in my opinion. I'll take the mechanical version personally. Not offering a real LSD on the JCW from the factory is a bad decision to me.
Braking to try to simulate a limited slip differential has been around for a while. I had EDL in my '99.5 GTI GLX. It sucked big time. 4.5 years later I got an '04 R32 that had a much more mature version of the same thing. It was much improved (and most importantly had an OFF switch and AWD), but I still would have preferred a mechanical limited slip on the front axle.
Braking the wheel w/ less traction and diverting power from it to the wheel that has more are two completely different things in my opinion. I'll take the mechanical version personally. Not offering a real LSD on the JCW from the factory is a bad decision to me.
Braking the wheel w/ less traction and diverting power from it to the wheel that has more are two completely different things in my opinion. I'll take the mechanical version personally. Not offering a real LSD on the JCW from the factory is a bad decision to me.
In retrospect, they're probably trying to take what is a street application and market it as a performance feature.
Last edited by SmokeM; Apr 29, 2008 at 03:33 AM.
i don't understand this thinking. the BMW paradigm usually has the non-M cars to suffer without a limited slip and the M cars have an LSD unit. this is the reverse and a cheap way out.
the dodge calibre SRT4 (gobs of power, FWD) tries to use an EDL and i believe all of the reviews on it are terrible.
the mazdaspeed 3 and honda si both have limited slip units. my sense is that perhaps MINI will roll out this option once it's properly sorted in the 2nd year?
the dodge calibre SRT4 (gobs of power, FWD) tries to use an EDL and i believe all of the reviews on it are terrible.
the mazdaspeed 3 and honda si both have limited slip units. my sense is that perhaps MINI will roll out this option once it's properly sorted in the 2nd year?
Not LSD per se but the technology meaning, that brakes are applied to limit or eliminate wheel spin. But maybe it may not be brakes for superbikes but rather throttle (or the reduction thereof) and wheel sensors that monitor wheelslipage. True, the dynamics of two vs four wheels are worlds different so my example is slightly off base.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM




