Drivetrain oil catch cans
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
Here's an easy thing you can do to prove wether or not the line that runs from the upstream side of the supercharger to the one-way valve on passenger side of the valve cover ever "pulls" air out from the valve cover. Disconnect the one-way valve and ensure it is truely a one-way valve and air flows. Once you're satisfied that it flows in one direction, disconnect the hose to the valve. Start the engine and let it idle. While it is idling, place a moistened finger tip over the hose opening to feel what it is doing.
Originally Posted by 62Lincoln
Since the popcorn was my contribution, I'll respond. The popcorn icon is accepted to mean "watch the show", without picking sides. Sorry if it offended you, it was not meant to be a barb at anyone, more an attempt at levity. 

I was levitated and I thank you for it
Originally Posted by obehave
DialM earlier in this thread jokingly(?) said "Really? Then however does the air get in them?". Funny but not accurate. Place a Magnehelic or any vacuum gauge in the intake tube ahead of the throttle body. You will not find conditions less than atmospheric. Post throttle plate you will start to see lower pressure conditions. Put your hand on the end of a vacuum cleaner hose, what happens? That's why you pull a lot of vacuum at idle. The supercharger at this point isn't doing much of anything. Highest vacuum when the supercharger is doing the least work, hmmmmm, just like an NA motor.
Further, I believe the roots was invented for mine ventilation, not building. But I could be wrong.
I didn't "attack" anybody.
Dude, whatever.
Thank you for taking your last post tone down a notch but I have nothing more to say to you....good day.
Dude, whatever.
Originally Posted by obehave
Well since you asked.
1. Atrocious spelling
2. You really shouldn't "steal" braided hose it's against the law.
(see #1)
3. How on earth can a hose "implode"? Collapse maybe but implode?
4. Normal "vacuum" hoses will work fine. Mine have for thousands of miles.
5. And since when does a supercharger create "vacuum"?
6. Don't get all angry because you asked
1. Atrocious spelling
2. You really shouldn't "steal" braided hose it's against the law.
(see #1)3. How on earth can a hose "implode"? Collapse maybe but implode?
4. Normal "vacuum" hoses will work fine. Mine have for thousands of miles.
5. And since when does a supercharger create "vacuum"?
6. Don't get all angry because you asked

Originally Posted by DialM
The only way for there to be a boost condition post s/c is for there to be a vacuum condition pre s/c. THAT is why I said, "however does the air get in." The supercharger sucks at one end, and blows out the other: vacuum and boost. Well, I am not certain if the Eaton creates boost, as it may be compressed post s/c (as a true roots does, I believe).
Further, I believe the roots was invented for mine ventilation, not building. But I could be wrong.
Further, I believe the roots was invented for mine ventilation, not building. But I could be wrong.
n. pl. vac·u·ums or vac·u·a (-y-)
Absence of matter.
A space empty of matter.
A space relatively empty of matter.
A space in which the pressure is significantly lower than atmospheric pressure.
A state of emptiness; a void.
A state of being sealed off from external or environmental influences; isolation.
You may very well be right about the mine ventilation. You are wrong about the vacuum though.
Conditions below atmospheric are a normal part of how an engine works.
Once again, naturally aspirated engines exhibit vacuum conditions. These are the same conditions in our motor.
Maybe I'm just not explaining this right.
For those interested this is actually quite a good read. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/supercharger3.htm
BTW yes they were infact used for ventilating mines.
This thread is actually quite amusing to read!!
BTW yes they were infact used for ventilating mines.
This thread is actually quite amusing to read!!
Originally Posted by DialM
The only way for there to be a boost condition post s/c is for there to be a vacuum condition pre s/c. THAT is why I said, "however does the air get in." The supercharger sucks at one end, and blows out the other: vacuum and boost. Well, I am not certain if the Eaton creates boost, as it may be compressed post s/c (as a true roots does, I believe).
Further, I believe the roots was invented for mine ventilation, not building. But I could be wrong.
Further, I believe the roots was invented for mine ventilation, not building. But I could be wrong.
Jet engines are capable of sucking human beings and other large objects into their intake. Jet engines are probably the most powerful turbo chargers/gas turbine generators out there. They are also capable of reversing the flow of air through the compressors, creating compressor stalls. This can be caused by turbulent air and/or abruptly closing the throttles.
suction - the act or process of exerting a force upon a solid, liquid, or gaseous body by reason of reduced air pressure over part of its surface.
vacuum - a degree of rarefaction below atmospheric pressure
It seems like we are splitting hairs or turning this post into a science class to determine whether we are creating suction or vacuum. I guess if you are a physicist I can see this thread might get your panties in a bunch.
And yes, I did look up the proper spelling of physicist while looking up the other definitions.
I guess it is a "suction cleaner" not a vacuum cleaner?!?!?
DialM - thanks again for your humble opinion
Originally Posted by saifa
For those interested this is actually quite a good read. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/supercharger3.htm
BTW yes they were infact used for ventilating mines.
This thread is actually quite amusing to read!!
BTW yes they were infact used for ventilating mines.
This thread is actually quite amusing to read!!
Not much mention of vacuum though
It's been 16 hours and no-one has even gone out to try to see what is happening first hand (specifically first finger LOL)?
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
All I wanted to do was share what I did concerning the OCC's. I kept the stock routing. I even asked Jeff Perrin (Alta) about what I was planning to do and he said that this was fine. I did my research and shared. This was just a simple thing. I am sorry it became more than just sharing. Just stick to the facts. We are here to learn from one another, not bash each other.
CARL
CARL
Are you the Riddler..?? Why not just tell those debating and end it all.
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
It's been 16 hours and no-one has even gone out to try to see what is happening first hand (specifically first finger LOL)?
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
It's been 16 hours and no-one has even gone out to try to see what is happening first hand (specifically first finger LOL)?
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
What if we already know the answer. Are we supposed to go try anyway and report back to you?
Originally Posted by SurlyGuy
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!

Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
It's been 16 hours and no-one has even gone out to try to see what is happening first hand (specifically first finger LOL)?
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
Thanks dominicminicoopers!
I just hope I had the correct air line now.

I even showed Pep'r my accountant wife even knows the answer.

Once you do it twice....it is less than 45sec.
Originally Posted by Arly
All I wanted to do was share what I did concerning the OCC's. I kept the stock routing. I even asked Jeff Perrin (Alta) about what I was planning to do and he said that this was fine. I did my research and shared. This was just a simple thing. I am sorry it became more than just sharing. Just stick to the facts. We are here to learn from one another, not bash each other.
CARL
CARL

Thank you again for taking the time to post your work so others could learn for it.
The install is very clean and thank you for giving me the idea of fab'ing a mount off the motor mount.
Ditto that......
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
It's been 16 hours and no-one has even gone out to try to see what is happening first hand (specifically first finger LOL)?
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
Want to learn something, instead of spouting off theories? Go get your hands dirty. It's as simple as starting the engine, openning the bonnet, pulling off one hose. All of 45 seconds from start to finish. Rather you'd spend hours typing/debating something you've got no actual experience with!
No wonder people who do have both their hands and heads inside the engine tend to leave NAM (or the performance forum), because there seems to be no stopping the ones that spread ignorance.
I love getting my hands dirty.....I just could not check it yesturday becasue I was at work and did not get home until 10pm. Just give me a reason to touch an engine and I am on it.
Originally Posted by Arly
All I wanted to do was share what I did concerning the OCC's. I kept the stock routing. I even asked Jeff Perrin (Alta) about what I was planning to do and he said that this was fine. I did my research and shared. This was just a simple thing.
Carl, it is vitally important to know what's going on with that line from the upstream side of the s/c. I say this because it's ALTA who says to disconnect and plug that pipe. Now, being a smart consumer, you need to understand the mechanics and application of why BMW decided to run a hard line there and why they decided have a vacuum applied to the head. So I did some research to find out why.
And what I found will suprise you.
Once you do know the truth for that pipes function, you won't be so quick to plug it off. Or even try to attach ALTA's "collaspable" tubing to that vacuum source. I bought ALTA's catch can, but when I received it I decided not to put it on after I found out this little tidbit of knowledge.
I'm not going to cap off the vacuum line! I'm not going to run their easily collapsable tubing that will have vaccum
Originally Posted by Arly
I am sorry it became more than just sharing. Just stick to the facts.
Originally Posted by Arly
We are here to learn from one another, not bash each other.
Originally Posted by obehave
You may very well be right about the mine ventilation. You are wrong about the vacuum though.
Originally Posted by DialM
Uh, no. Air moves on its own because of pressure differences within a system. Atmospheric pressure is higher than the pressure of the air at the supercharger inlet, that is why it moves from, well, the atmosphere, into the supercharger. A roots supercharger captures air pockets in its lobes and moves it. When it takes captured air away from the inlet, a vacuum is created there, causing new air to move towards the inlet. While this is not the location of the vacuum condition earlier posters were referring to, it is a vacuum created by a supercharger, and thus perfect joke material for poking a stick at all the belly-button contemplators that were screaming, "superchargers don't create vacuums." They do, on the inlet side. If they didn't, no air would move into them. Hence my comment that if they don't create vacuum, "however does the air get into them?" 

No wonder Andy and Tuls left.
Originally Posted by DialM
A roots supercharger captures air pockets in its lobes and moves it. When it takes captured air away from the inlet, a vacuum is created there, causing new air to move towards the inlet. While this is not the location of the vacuum condition earlier posters were referring to, it is a vacuum created by a supercharger, and thus perfect joke material for poking a stick at all the belly-button contemplators that were screaming, "superchargers don't create vacuums." They do, on the inlet side. If they didn't, no air would move into them. Hence my comment that if they don't create vacuum, "however does the air get into them?" 

When the engine is at idle, the engine's vacuum is what is seen on the grey tubing in question. This is because the bypass valve is open and the air being pumped by the supercharger is recirculated rather than allowing it to create boost, but the engine still needs to breathe and hence the vacuum seen pre-supercharger.
Originally Posted by obehave
Man oh man.
No wonder Andy and Tuls left.
No wonder Andy and Tuls left.
Originally Posted by DialM
So, instead of an apology for telling me I was wrong, or refuting my explanation, you turn to some disapproving clap-trap? Don't let the door hit you on your way out.
You're still wrong.
There is a "vacuum" on the inlet side due to restrictions in the induction path.
Close the throttle high vacuum, WOT less vacuum. Right?
If what you're saying were true there would be more vacuum at WOT.
Now for arguments sake lets say there is no restriction pre-supercharger. Let's just say it's open to the world. Would there be a measurable pressure drop in front of the inlet? No, not until there is a restriction. Slap your hand over the inlet and yes you will get a lot of negative pressure quickly.
Now lets just say you take the belt of the supercharger and make the car an NA car, stupid I know but I'm trying to speak to the level of my audience, well just one audience member. (Apologies to everyone else for the inane level of name calling this has sunk too but hey! I remember the bad kids in school
)Will you now tell me that the car won't run at all because it can't pull air into the motor? Vacuum exists without the supercharger. What I don't know( yes one again contrary to your assertions otherwise, I don't think I know everything. That's just one of the many nice things you've said about me. Hope you feel all manly about that) is the difference in vacuum readings between an MCS and an MC.
If anyone has this info I'd like to see the data. Based on the proposed theory there should be a significant difference.
So Mr Chest Thumping Name Calling Guy. You're still clueless and quite a bit more rude and pissy than what you've accused me of being.
So I needn't apologize because you're still wrong, except the mine thing but hey Google makes a lot of people look smart.
Your overuse of the whole "door hitting you on the way out" phrase well demontrates your clap trap limit. At least come up with something original
I breathlessly await your witty and acerbic rejoinder. Oh! Some real facts too.
Now go Google something to make you look smart
Once you do know the truth for that pipes function, you won't be so quick to plug it off. Or even try to attach ALTA's "collaspable" tubing to that vacuum source. I bought ALTA's catch can, but when I received it I decided not to put it on after I found out this little tidbit of knowledge.
I'm not going to cap off the vacuum line! I'm not going to run their easily collapsable tubing that will have vaccum
What are you talking about? This makes no sense without any data to back you up.
I'm not going to cap off the vacuum line! I'm not going to run their easily collapsable tubing that will have vaccum
What are you talking about? This makes no sense without any data to back you up.


