Drivetrain M7 DFIC
OK, just so I understand this right, the intake temp after the SC but before the IC (Pre-Core) was 182° and AFTER the IC it was 63° 
Anyone know off the top of their heads what the average drop is for the std IC?

Anyone know off the top of their heads what the average drop is for the std IC?
This is from WMS website from Randy's testing:
Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚
As you can see the M7 peice is kicking butt! I might have a GRS IC for sale soon.
Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚
As you can see the M7 peice is kicking butt! I might have a GRS IC for sale soon.

Would it be possible to lengthen the IC inlet and shorten the "horn" that bolts to the intake to move this unit a little to the drivers side for the guys that have the Ram Air scoop? Just a thought.
Originally Posted by mdsbrain
This is from WMS website from Randy's testing:
Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚
As you can see the M7 peice is kicking butt! I might have a GRS IC for sale soon.

Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚
As you can see the M7 peice is kicking butt! I might have a GRS IC for sale soon.


I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.
But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers
Originally Posted by Mugami
It is??
I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.
But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers
then ill say its kicking butt
I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.
But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers

that looks cool Sid.
Glad to see you having an opportunity to flex your design muscle over at M7. I think its a good fit, congrats.
Originally Posted by MSFITOY
CNC milled top plate and CF Ram Intake V3.0...


Originally Posted by Mugami
It is??
I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.
But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers
then ill say its kicking butt
I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.
But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers

Originally Posted by Mugami
It is??
I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.
But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers
then ill say its kicking butt
I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.
But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers

Good Morning....
I wan't to appologize for a small number eff-up.....
THe foncusion....
come from a set of numbers that was non printable
as of now.....heheheh.
Pre-core 121 degrees
Post-core 63 degrees
These numbers are still incredibly good, proving that our design is
the best in the MINI universe.
peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
I wan't to appologize for a small number eff-up.....
THe foncusion....
come from a set of numbers that was non printableas of now.....heheheh.
Pre-core 121 degrees
Post-core 63 degrees
These numbers are still incredibly good, proving that our design is
the best in the MINI universe.
peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
Originally Posted by M7
Good Morning....
I wan't to appologize for a small number eff-up.....
THe foncusion....
come from a set of numbers that was non printable
as of now.....heheheh.
Pre-core 121 degrees
Post-core 63 degrees
These numbers are still incredibly good, proving that our design is
the best in the MINI universe.
peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
I wan't to appologize for a small number eff-up.....
THe foncusion....
come from a set of numbers that was non printableas of now.....heheheh.
Pre-core 121 degrees
Post-core 63 degrees
These numbers are still incredibly good, proving that our design is
the best in the MINI universe.
peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
Magic 
Peter...check with Will and ask him about the "XTREME" core design I sent him for CFD testing
No magic, just physics! I'm still formulating my theory, but soon I should be able to explain what we're seeing.
And the proper term is "Xtreme", Sid. We no longer require the E, just ask MTV.
And the proper term is "Xtreme", Sid. We no longer require the E, just ask MTV.
Originally Posted by Will @ M7 Tuning
No magic, just physics! I'm still formulating my theory, but soon I should be able to explain what we're seeing.
And the proper term is "Xtreme", Sid. We no longer require the E, just ask MTV.
And the proper term is "Xtreme", Sid. We no longer require the E, just ask MTV.
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Disclaimer: I think M7s IC design is a great innovation, and much needed for our cars.
Question: From the data supplied above I calculated the temperature drop across the IC:
Stock = 142 degF (ambient 83)
GRS = 165 degF (ambient 83)
M7 = 119 degF (ambient 70 ?)
M7b = 58 degF (see post #86)
Isn't the M7 the worst performer here?
Just asking...
phil
Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚
Question: From the data supplied above I calculated the temperature drop across the IC:
Stock = 142 degF (ambient 83)
GRS = 165 degF (ambient 83)
M7 = 119 degF (ambient 70 ?)
M7b = 58 degF (see post #86)
Isn't the M7 the worst performer here?
Just asking...
phil
Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚
The numbers are good...
but incomplete. They will be "filled in" as testing completes.
FWIW, the stock IC has WOT thermal efficiencies at redline (2nd gear) of 60%-70%. Cruising at 75 or so it can reach over 80% (not that it really matters).
Let's just call Peter and Randy's initial numbers that, initial numbers.
Matt
FWIW, the stock IC has WOT thermal efficiencies at redline (2nd gear) of 60%-70%. Cruising at 75 or so it can reach over 80% (not that it really matters).
Let's just call Peter and Randy's initial numbers that, initial numbers.
Matt
Originally Posted by gandini
Question: From the data supplied above I calculated the temperature drop across the IC:
Stock = 142 degF (ambient 83)
GRS = 165 degF (ambient 83)
M7 = 119 degF (ambient 70 ?)
M7b = 58 degF (see post #86)
Isn't the M7 the worst performer here?
Just asking...
phil
Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182?
Post core 63?
Stock = 142 degF (ambient 83)
GRS = 165 degF (ambient 83)
M7 = 119 degF (ambient 70 ?)
M7b = 58 degF (see post #86)
Isn't the M7 the worst performer here?
Just asking...
phil
Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F
GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F
From Peter's post:
M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182?
Post core 63?
(inlet - outlet)/(inlet - ambient)
You can find more info here:
http://www.nissanperformancemag.com/april05/nerds/
So, plugging in numbers:
stock: (262-120)/(262-83) = 79%
GRS: (270-114)/(270-83) = 83%
M7: (182-63)/(182-70) = 106%
The M7 has MORE THAN 100% efficiency!!!!
That, guys, is SICK.
Originally Posted by MSFITOY
And the ambient temperature was 70F
Magic

Peter...check with Will and ask him about the "XTREME" core design I sent him for CFD testing
Magic 
Peter...check with Will and ask him about the "XTREME" core design I sent him for CFD testing

Where does it say ambient was 70º?
Given that temp this would make this IC 113% efficient. That I'd really like to see
Please check my math
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
What about post #86 from Peter which revises the M7 figures? These say tempIN=121 and tempOUT=63, so the equation gives you (121-63)/(121-70) = 58/51 = 1.14.
It's MSFITOYs post that says the ambient was 70. It must have been pretty cool given those in and out temperatures, or the M7 AGS is working really well too, these days.
PS--I know these are all *preliminary* and not test bed numbers, but come on, all us guys with PhDs will take anything and run with it, that's how we're taught...
phil
It's MSFITOYs post that says the ambient was 70. It must have been pretty cool given those in and out temperatures, or the M7 AGS is working really well too, these days.
PS--I know these are all *preliminary* and not test bed numbers, but come on, all us guys with PhDs will take anything and run with it, that's how we're taught...
phil
Originally Posted by obehave
Where does it say ambient was 70º?
Given that temp this would make this IC 113% efficient. That I'd really like to see

Please check my math
Given that temp this would make this IC 113% efficient. That I'd really like to see
Please check my math
Originally Posted by minimute
Matt, I think the responses are going to be this way when Peter says its the best ever without all of the info attached.
Yes, these are preliminary numbers, and we know that we need independent verification, which is why Matt will also be testing the DFIC.
Originally Posted by gandini
What about post #86 from Peter which revises the M7 figures? These say tempIN=121 and tempOUT=63, so the equation gives you (121-63)/(121-70) = 58/51 = 1.14.
It's MSFITOYs post that says the ambient was 70. It must have been pretty cool given those in and out temperatures, or the M7 AGS is working really well too, these days.
PS--I know these are all *preliminary* and not test bed numbers, but come on, all us guys with PhDs will take anything and run with it, that's how we're taught...
phil
It's MSFITOYs post that says the ambient was 70. It must have been pretty cool given those in and out temperatures, or the M7 AGS is working really well too, these days.
PS--I know these are all *preliminary* and not test bed numbers, but come on, all us guys with PhDs will take anything and run with it, that's how we're taught...
phil
Those are the numbers I used. Rounded down to be conservative.
Using your 1.14 equals 114% efficiency.
To the best of my limited knowledge that is impossible.
If this was accomplished maybe room temperature fusion is on the horizon. That is something I'd buy for sure.
I am gald you all are having as much fun with this information as we were yesterday when we were recording them. I can confirm that the ambient was 70 degrees . We took readings at several speeds including as low as 30 MPH which would put us in a disadvantage with some of the other units dyno results and the drop percentages were still VERY good . As for we , M7 , saying it is the best I do not recall seeing that anywhere and if we did then I apologize. It will be up to you all once the final numbers are in to decide that. Our feeling is that you will 
Randy
M7 tuning

Randy
M7 tuning





