Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain M7 DFIC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 12:54 AM
  #76  
Drillslinger's Avatar
Drillslinger
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
From: Germany
OK, just so I understand this right, the intake temp after the SC but before the IC (Pre-Core) was 182° and AFTER the IC it was 63°

Anyone know off the top of their heads what the average drop is for the std IC?

 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 04:45 AM
  #77  
mdsbrain's Avatar
mdsbrain
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,390
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
This is from WMS website from Randy's testing:

Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F

GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F


From Peter's post:

M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚


As you can see the M7 peice is kicking butt! I might have a GRS IC for sale soon.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 05:27 AM
  #78  
Mastersonics's Avatar
Mastersonics
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Paradise!
:impatient

holy crap those are awesome numbers!,

Oh Man,
just when I though I could relax a bit
my wallet is getting ansty yet again,

regards,
Charles
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 05:55 AM
  #79  
Partsman's Avatar
Partsman
Legion_of_Doom
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 1
From: Westerly, RI
Would it be possible to lengthen the IC inlet and shorten the "horn" that bolts to the intake to move this unit a little to the drivers side for the guys that have the Ram Air scoop? Just a thought.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 05:56 AM
  #80  
Mugami's Avatar
Mugami
Coordinator :: River City Minis
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mdsbrain
This is from WMS website from Randy's testing:

Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F

GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F


From Peter's post:

M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚


As you can see the M7 peice is kicking butt! I might have a GRS IC for sale soon.
It is??

I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.

But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers then ill say its kicking butt
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #81  
MSFITOY's Avatar
MSFITOY
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 40
From: Greensboro, NC
CNC milled top plate and CF Ram Intake V3.0...

 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 06:20 AM
  #82  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mugami
It is??

I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.

But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers then ill say its kicking butt
I ordered one last night....... it just makes too much intuitive sense...... there is no room for the Alta and the GRS to evacuate hot air...... the M7 solves that problem....I know core length/density/eddy currents etc, etc..... this is very promising and the best design air 2 air, I have seen so far
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 07:29 AM
  #83  
haulinS's Avatar
haulinS
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CA
that looks cool Sid. Glad to see you having an opportunity to flex your design muscle over at M7. I think its a good fit, congrats.

Originally Posted by MSFITOY
CNC milled top plate and CF Ram Intake V3.0...

 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 07:42 AM
  #84  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by Mugami
It is??

I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.

But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers then ill say its kicking butt
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 07:45 AM
  #85  
mdsbrain's Avatar
mdsbrain
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,390
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
Originally Posted by Mugami
It is??

I guess i must be reading the numbers wrong. the GRS and Stock done on a dyno at WOT, Full boost and unknown speed of fan is any blowing air across it with 90deg hotter pre core yet only 50deg hotter post core. VS the DFIC on a moving road (more air) with unknown throttle (anywhere from 0-20 percent) and possible no boost whats so ever. Not to mention Ambient temp and humidity. To me thats not Kicking Butt comparision.

But hey that IMHO. Now if its done in a simular test (dyno, fan and near same ambient) and puts out better numbers then ill say its kicking butt
I understand where your coming from. A similar test would have to be run to be able to compare this data side by side.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #86  
M7's Avatar
M7
Former Vendor
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 2
From: los angeles
Good Morning....

I wan't to appologize for a small number eff-up.....
THe foncusion.... come from a set of numbers that was non printable
as of now.....heheheh.

Pre-core 121 degrees

Post-core 63 degrees

These numbers are still incredibly good, proving that our design is
the best in the MINI universe.

peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 07:58 AM
  #87  
MSFITOY's Avatar
MSFITOY
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 40
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by M7
Good Morning....

I wan't to appologize for a small number eff-up.....
THe foncusion.... come from a set of numbers that was non printable
as of now.....heheheh.

Pre-core 121 degrees

Post-core 63 degrees

These numbers are still incredibly good, proving that our design is
the best in the MINI universe.

peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
And the ambient temperature was 70F Magic

Peter...check with Will and ask him about the "XTREME" core design I sent him for CFD testing
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 08:14 AM
  #88  
Peter@M7Tuning's Avatar
Peter@M7Tuning
Former Vendor
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
No magic, just physics! I'm still formulating my theory, but soon I should be able to explain what we're seeing.

And the proper term is "Xtreme", Sid. We no longer require the E, just ask MTV.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #89  
MSFITOY's Avatar
MSFITOY
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 40
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by Will @ M7 Tuning
No magic, just physics! I'm still formulating my theory, but soon I should be able to explain what we're seeing.

And the proper term is "Xtreme", Sid. We no longer require the E, just ask MTV.
I stand corrected...but I'm not hip enough for MTV
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 08:26 AM
  #90  
Peter@M7Tuning's Avatar
Peter@M7Tuning
Former Vendor
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
You're only as hip as you feel!
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #91  
DrPhilGandini's Avatar
DrPhilGandini
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Disclaimer: I think M7s IC design is a great innovation, and much needed for our cars.
Question: From the data supplied above I calculated the temperature drop across the IC:

Stock = 142 degF (ambient 83)
GRS = 165 degF (ambient 83)
M7 = 119 degF (ambient 70 ?)
M7b = 58 degF (see post #86)

Isn't the M7 the worst performer here?

Just asking...
phil

Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F

GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F


From Peter's post:

M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182˚
Post core 63˚
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 09:07 AM
  #92  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 4
From: Woodside, CA
The numbers are good...

but incomplete. They will be "filled in" as testing completes.

FWIW, the stock IC has WOT thermal efficiencies at redline (2nd gear) of 60%-70%. Cruising at 75 or so it can reach over 80% (not that it really matters).

Let's just call Peter and Randy's initial numbers that, initial numbers.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 09:26 AM
  #93  
ingsoc's Avatar
ingsoc
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by gandini
Question: From the data supplied above I calculated the temperature drop across the IC:

Stock = 142 degF (ambient 83)
GRS = 165 degF (ambient 83)
M7 = 119 degF (ambient 70 ?)
M7b = 58 degF (see post #86)

Isn't the M7 the worst performer here?

Just asking...
phil

Stock Intercooler
Boost - 10.8 PSI
Inlet temp -262F
Outlet temp - 120F
Ambient temp - 83F

GRS Intercooler
Boost - 10.3 PSI
Inlet temp - 270F
Outlet temp - 114F
Ambient - 83F


From Peter's post:

M7 DFIC testing
70mph
5th Gear
3400 rpm
11.7:1 air fuel ratio
Pre core 182?
Post core 63?
You can't just subtract like that. The equation for efficiency is:

(inlet - outlet)/(inlet - ambient)

You can find more info here:
http://www.nissanperformancemag.com/april05/nerds/

So, plugging in numbers:

stock: (262-120)/(262-83) = 79%
GRS: (270-114)/(270-83) = 83%
M7: (182-63)/(182-70) = 106%

The M7 has MORE THAN 100% efficiency!!!! That, guys, is SICK.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #94  
minimute's Avatar
minimute
1st Gear
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Matt, I think the responses are going to be this way when Peter says its the best ever without all of the info attached.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #95  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by MSFITOY
And the ambient temperature was 70F Magic

Peter...check with Will and ask him about the "XTREME" core design I sent him for CFD testing

Where does it say ambient was 70º?

Given that temp this would make this IC 113% efficient. That I'd really like to see




Please check my math
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #96  
DrPhilGandini's Avatar
DrPhilGandini
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
What about post #86 from Peter which revises the M7 figures? These say tempIN=121 and tempOUT=63, so the equation gives you (121-63)/(121-70) = 58/51 = 1.14.
It's MSFITOYs post that says the ambient was 70. It must have been pretty cool given those in and out temperatures, or the M7 AGS is working really well too, these days.

PS--I know these are all *preliminary* and not test bed numbers, but come on, all us guys with PhDs will take anything and run with it, that's how we're taught...

phil
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #97  
MSFITOY's Avatar
MSFITOY
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 40
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by obehave
Where does it say ambient was 70º?

Given that temp this would make this IC 113% efficient. That I'd really like to see




Please check my math
oooops...you didn't hear that...I know nuuuuuuthing
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #98  
Peter@M7Tuning's Avatar
Peter@M7Tuning
Former Vendor
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by minimute
Matt, I think the responses are going to be this way when Peter says its the best ever without all of the info attached.
Just remember that everyone is entitled to their opinion, and our opinion is that ours is the best!

Yes, these are preliminary numbers, and we know that we need independent verification, which is why Matt will also be testing the DFIC.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #99  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by gandini
What about post #86 from Peter which revises the M7 figures? These say tempIN=121 and tempOUT=63, so the equation gives you (121-63)/(121-70) = 58/51 = 1.14.
It's MSFITOYs post that says the ambient was 70. It must have been pretty cool given those in and out temperatures, or the M7 AGS is working really well too, these days.

PS--I know these are all *preliminary* and not test bed numbers, but come on, all us guys with PhDs will take anything and run with it, that's how we're taught...

phil

Those are the numbers I used. Rounded down to be conservative.
Using your 1.14 equals 114% efficiency.
To the best of my limited knowledge that is impossible.

If this was accomplished maybe room temperature fusion is on the horizon. That is something I'd buy for sure.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #100  
maxmini's Avatar
maxmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 9
From: L.A ca
I am gald you all are having as much fun with this information as we were yesterday when we were recording them. I can confirm that the ambient was 70 degrees . We took readings at several speeds including as low as 30 MPH which would put us in a disadvantage with some of the other units dyno results and the drop percentages were still VERY good . As for we , M7 , saying it is the best I do not recall seeing that anywhere and if we did then I apologize. It will be up to you all once the final numbers are in to decide that. Our feeling is that you will

Randy
M7 tuning
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 AM.