Drivetrain WHP max without Turbo
Originally Posted by mmMatt
I'm not sure what issues you've been having, but we've installed complete stage 4 Madness kits on several '05 cars in house... and they're running great to this day.
[font="]There's definitely a problem with some 05 cars when it comes to the TB.
CEL /EML is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason.
Peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
[/font]
Originally Posted by Helix13mini
Braggart: Helix has done more dyno runs, has more experience dynoing MINIs than any other MINI tuner. We have between 600 and 700 files on MINIs alone. We never use correction factors for any of our dyno numbers, because therein lies one of the many ways to fudge numbers.
Wet Blanket: As you can imagine, we have tested cars ranging from bone stock to every modification under the sun. We have never seen a car make more than 200whp (uncorrected) without a turbo or nitrous. Two cars have come close but no cigar. The below quote is true that Mustangs typically show lower numbers, but I don't think that's a bad thing. Our numbers match the numbers published by the manufacturer: a '05 MINI produces 150whp on our dyno. With a 12% drivetrain loss that is 168chp.
Wet Blanket: As you can imagine, we have tested cars ranging from bone stock to every modification under the sun. We have never seen a car make more than 200whp (uncorrected) without a turbo or nitrous. Two cars have come close but no cigar. The below quote is true that Mustangs typically show lower numbers, but I don't think that's a bad thing. Our numbers match the numbers published by the manufacturer: a '05 MINI produces 150whp on our dyno. With a 12% drivetrain loss that is 168chp.
I'll brag a little. It is because of the difference in the claims, especially from across the pond that I ..... yes I ...... check it out.....made the sugggestion that we all chip in for a dyno test of the AGS. Thanks to Sid, et. al, for actually doing it. And THIS is my thread. Am I trying to cause trouble,...NO.... I am just tired of spending money and not getting the same results that others post. I don't want to claim BS here but there are no standards....at least nothing I can tell......and I don't have an answer other than to say....look to your own deltas for gains and losses and don't compare your car with other reports......figure don't lie but sometimes people get creative with figures ( paraphrase) to justify there agenda.
That being said, this is a cool place to hang and once you get to know the personalities and can wade your way through, it makes owning a Mini that much more satisfying. I would say that if were not for this board I probably would be driving a new M3 but this Mini community is pretty fun.
Oh yeah, bring back El!
What fault codes do you have? CEL/EML are not triggered randomly, for no apparent reason.
Originally Posted by M7
Matt....
[font="]There's definitely a problem with some 05 cars when it comes to the TB.
CEL /EML is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason.
Peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
[/font]
[font="]There's definitely a problem with some 05 cars when it comes to the TB.
CEL /EML is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason.
Peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
[/font]
I guess I have all winter to make up my mind and I do have a lot of spare time during the winter months, so I'll be reading and talking to more people that own modified cars and I'm sure eventually I'll know exactly what I want, I might even go for a ride in one of your cars if at all possible, I'd like to compare a few of them, I'm not looking for the maximum hp, I'm looking for a fast set up that will be reliable and can still cruise on the highway without taking too much more gas than stock, I don't mind getting 15 mpg if I drive like I stole it but not when I need to travel a long distance.:smile:
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
What fault codes do you have? CEL/EML are not triggered randomly, for no apparent reason.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
If the cause cannot be isolated, then what exactly is apparent about the CELs? Really dude, think about it. Nothing. Likewise, if there is no pattern, then it is random. Right?
Patient: "Dr. Ingsoc, why is that heart monitor alarm going off?"
Dr. Ingsoc: "Rather than looking at the machine to see what the readout says, I'm going to tell you that the alarm is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason."
Really dude, think about it.
Dr. Ingsoc: "Rather than looking at the machine to see what the readout says, I'm going to tell you that the alarm is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason."
Really dude, think about it.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
If the cause cannot be isolated, then what exactly is apparent about the CELs? Really dude, think about it. Nothing. Likewise, if there is no pattern, then it is random. Right?
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
Patient: "Dr. Ingsoc, why is that heart monitor alarm going off?"
Dr. Ingsoc: "Rather than looking at the machine to see what the readout says, I'm going to tell you that the alarm is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason."
Really dude, think about it.
Dr. Ingsoc: "Rather than looking at the machine to see what the readout says, I'm going to tell you that the alarm is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason."
Really dude, think about it.
So, if the heart monitor alarm was going off, and you had the ability to look at the readout to see why it was going off, would you?
Originally Posted by ingsoc
FYI, many medical conditions are directly characterized by random presentations of symptoms. Does that mean that you don't investigate? No! It's actually a very important/characteristic finding in many cases. There is a science AND an art to medicine. Likewise, there is a science and an art to car work. Peter said he was "working on it." He also gave a characterization of the problem. His words upstand. Care to re-phrase? 
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
So, if the heart monitor alarm was going off, and you had the ability to look at the readout to see why it was going off, would you?
. I hope that your later years will find you less critical
.Before you phreak: Just kidding
. Get to know me, man, and you'll realize that I may just be a good person after all. And, a good doctor.
Originally Posted by ingsoc
FYI, many medical conditions are directly characterized by random presentations of symptoms. Does that mean that you don't investigate? No! It's actually a very important/characteristic finding in many cases. There is a science AND an art to medicine. Likewise, there is a science and an art to car work. Peter said he was "working on it." He also gave a characterization of the problem. His words upstand. Care to re-phrase? 
If we consider certain aspects of the automotive and medical spheres to be analogous, then obtaining the fault codes for the SES/EML lights is an essential part of establishing the necessary data base that will be used to "solve" the problem(s). This is part of the science, not the art, of automotive diagnostics and therapeutics.
If you think a patient may have had a heart attack, you'll obtain an ECG and cardiac enzymes in addition to your history and physical examination. If your car goes on the fritz with SES/EML lights on, you'll obtain the fault codes and other objective information, in addition to defining the circumstances (history) and presence/absence of readily observed mechanical faults (physical examination).
Wouldn't it be nice if doctors' offices had a sophisticated "OBD-II" reader, just like some tuner shops have a stethoscope? ---
. Where is that Star Trek tricorder when we need it? ---
Last edited by RECOOP; Sep 14, 2005 at 02:07 PM. Reason: correct spelling...
Wait a minute
Originally Posted by ingsoc
FYI, many medical conditions are directly characterized by random presentations of symptoms. Does that mean that you don't investigate? No! It's actually a very important/characteristic finding in many cases. There is a science AND an art to medicine. Likewise, there is a science and an art to car work. Peter said he was "working on it." He also gave a characterization of the problem. His words upstand. Care to re-phrase? 
From the looks of it a lot of supposed mechanics think they are in the same business or would like us to believe they are. Some even go as far as charging the same fee's, but you know they are just practicing till they get it right.
This is not soft tissue science wrapped around the human enigma.
There are reasons for hardware, mechanical/software failures. Getting to the bottom line of a trouble requires a list of conditions, symptoms and diagnostics. This is cold metal and plastic here, it can't be fixed with feathers and excuses. It's not about the MINI said i just don't feel good today. Is random corrective action needed here? Code for let's try this.

I should have saved my 666 th post for this but somebody else needed the help on that one.
Originally Posted by M7
Matt....
[font="]There's definitely a problem with some 05 cars when it comes to the TB.
CEL /EML is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason.
Peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
[/font]
[font="]There's definitely a problem with some 05 cars when it comes to the TB.
CEL /EML is triggered randomly, for no apparent reason.
Peter
Team M7
562-608-8123
[/font]
Originally Posted by norm03s
Isn't that the reason doctors call their business a practice?
From the looks of it a lot of supposed mechanics think they are in the same business or would like us to believe they are. Some even go as far as charging the same fee's, but you know they are just practicing till they get it right.
This is not soft tissue science wrapped around the human enigma.
There are reasons for hardware, mechanical/software failures. Getting to the bottom line of a trouble requires a list of conditions, symptoms and diagnostics. This is cold metal and plastic here, it can't be fixed with feathers and excuses. It's not about the MINI said i just don't feel good today. Is random corrective action needed here? Code for let's try this.
I should have saved my 666 th post for this but somebody else needed the help on that one.
From the looks of it a lot of supposed mechanics think they are in the same business or would like us to believe they are. Some even go as far as charging the same fee's, but you know they are just practicing till they get it right.
This is not soft tissue science wrapped around the human enigma.
There are reasons for hardware, mechanical/software failures. Getting to the bottom line of a trouble requires a list of conditions, symptoms and diagnostics. This is cold metal and plastic here, it can't be fixed with feathers and excuses. It's not about the MINI said i just don't feel good today. Is random corrective action needed here? Code for let's try this.

I should have saved my 666 th post for this but somebody else needed the help on that one.

Chaos, though, binds all manner of problem solving. We rarely if ever know every variable. We have only basic theory. Art is what is not known and what is not prescribed.
As this weakly pertains to the topic at hand, clearly M7 is trying to figure out what is necessary to allow 05 TB changes. Likewise, Alta is [presumably] beta testing their intake hoses and accounting for the variability seen between cars. Pilo has been testing their headers. All are, in my opinion, using the best of their knowledge, employing hypotheses, and working towards their goals.
The consequences may not be so severe as in the medical profession, but neither is a car anywhere near as complex as a human body. The anology, though, works fairly well to encapsulate my point. Hope y'all are having a great one! :smile:
Do you know what fault codes appeared when using the larger throttle body with the '05 cars?
Originally Posted by mmMatt
Hence why we moved down to a smaller bore throttle body for our late 2004+ build cars. We found this fixes the problem, we have our research and development department to thank for this. 
Originally Posted by ingsoc
....All are, in my opinion, using the best of their knowledge, employing hypotheses, and working towards their goals... :smile:
.
Originally Posted by RECOOP
Implicit in what you say is actual testing of the hypothesis, with generation of sufficient data either to prove or disprove the hypothesis. Are you confident that commercial ventures in this aftermarket area really consider the nuances of the scientific method? IMO, some manufacturers/marketers may and some may not ...
.
.On the other hand we need champions in this "buyer beware" market place.
Originally Posted by SpiderX
I agree...somewhere way back I said I didn't think the economies were there for all the mfgs to do the kind of in depth testing/R&D necesssary to satisfy the bloodthirsty.
On the other hand we need champions in this "buyer beware" market place.
On the other hand we need champions in this "buyer beware" market place.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
potterstein
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
1
Sep 13, 2015 09:57 PM
Swaan
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
5
Sep 8, 2015 07:46 AM



