Drivetrain Ready to dyno AGS
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
You should have told me prior to the dyno that you couldn't figure out how to use BiM-COM. Please send the BiM-COM Interface back to me.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 36
From: Metro Detroit Area, Michigan
Originally Posted by ted leist
Does stock intake have a disadvantage on dyno as compared to on road
since other intakes have air blown directly on filter element?
since other intakes have air blown directly on filter element?
__________________
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
All I got was a file named ~$Dyno.doc that cannot be opened. Can you send a text email with the results instead?
Originally Posted by kaelaria
LOL then I called that one months ago!!
thanks for posting guys...
thanks to those who did the work..
it's finally over ...sigh
now WHERE'S THE VIDEO!!

Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
So, in terms of average gains over stock, the winner is Alta, followed by Pilo, with M7 bringing up the rear? At least all of them did better than stock. 
ah well at least we know thanks Andy,
will spend my money on something else.
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
So, in terms of average gains over stock, the winner is Alta, followed by Pilo, with M7 bringing up the rear? At least all of them did better than stock. 
Thanks again for doing all the hard work. Nice to see the Alta make such good power. I'm still impressed though with the AGS after seeing and especially after hearing it at the Dragon on Sid's car. Great Work Guys!
That just goes to show you how useless the 'butt-dyno' is and how much it's effected by other things such as noise.
Oh, my intake makes a big bad-azz howling noise, so it's more powerful, I just know it! AHAHAHA!
Oh, my intake makes a big bad-azz howling noise, so it's more powerful, I just know it! AHAHAHA!
I wouldn't jump to any conclusions yet. There's a lot more information that still needs to be digested before we determine which intake provided the most "usable" power/torque gains and at what rpm. Maybe Chad can chime in once he's has time to crunch the stacks of numbers. Also, Pilo had one inexplicable run that we're still scratching our heads over
Originally Posted by kaelaria
That just goes to show you how useless the 'butt-dyno' is and how much it's effected by other things such as noise.
I wouldn't jump to any conclusions yet. There's a lot more information that still needs to be digested before we determine which intake provided the most "usable" power/torque gains and at what rpm. Maybe Chad can chime in once he's has time to crunch the stacks of numbers. Also, Pilo had one inexplicable run that we're still scratching our heads over
no more showing what YOU (whoever YOU are) think is important...just the uncorrupted data
Again...I am only saying that cause the more things are corrupted the more it leaves the door open for speculation...just post the facts...it makes things easy
Good to know the data's getting around. Now can somebody be so nice as to post it so us lay people can see
I'm surprised to hear the AGS didn't perform so well, especially since the HAI is supposed to be better than the Alta. The AGS and HAI both run off the same concept.
I'm surprised to hear the AGS didn't perform so well, especially since the HAI is supposed to be better than the Alta. The AGS and HAI both run off the same concept.
Originally Posted by kapps
I'm surprised to hear the AGS didn't perform so well, especially since the HAI is supposed to be better than the Alta. The AGS and HAI both run off the same concept.
HAI:
4x6.25x7 = filter area of 119 in^2
AGS filter:
11x5x3.25 = filter area of 90 in^2
Since each filter has rounded edges, I calculated areas based on the width of the filter being the diameter of the rounded edge. Looks like filter area of the HAI filter is about 32% larger than that of the AGS filter. Both are pleated, oiled-cotton filters between wire mesh
Last edited by andy@ross-tech.com; Aug 29, 2005 at 10:58 AM. Reason: Added dimensions







