Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Tuning for Fuel Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #1  
iblack's Avatar
iblack
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Tuning for Fuel Economy

Ok, here's a topic I haven't seen discussed here yet. Trying to tune your MINI for better fuel economy.

I have a 2008 MCS Cabrio that's all stock right now. I have heard from time to time that some changes can improve fuel economy (for example, and CAI). I realize that 95% of fuel economy comes from the way you drive, but for this discussion, let's just assume that the way we're driving is the same regardless.

What items would (in theory) improve gas mileage?

Is it possible to have improved gas mileage at low RPMs and better performance at high RPMs? (i.e. if you always shift below 3500 RPM, you get better fuel economy after change the component, but if you consistently rev up above 3500 RPM before shifting, you get more power).

Thanks in advance.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #2  
totamdu's Avatar
totamdu
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Underside panels. front and rear splitters/diffusers. wheel well covers.
Keep the tire pressure up.
You could get smaller injectors and a tune.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #3  
heyduard's Avatar
heyduard
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: nnj
justacooper FTW!!!

wheel choices can come into play as well. lightweight 15's would be a good choice.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #4  
iblack's Avatar
iblack
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
I should probably add that I wouldn't want to lose power for the sake of better fuel economy. If I were willing to do that, I wouldn't have gotten the "S" model in the first place.

How much would you expect from aerodynamic adjustments, such as underside panels and wheel well covers? Are we talking about fractions of a percent difference or something more meaningful? Other than aesthetics, are there any downsides to either?

Thanks again.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 10:16 AM
  #5  
Eric_Rowland's Avatar
Eric_Rowland
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,382
Likes: 47
From: Santa Cruz, CA
iblack, you've got a convertible S - mechanically and aerodynamically the least amenable to fuel economy.

For relatively better mileage, shift up as early as possible, leave the top up, put on hard, skinny tires, and then go beat your head against a wall, because it won't really make a difference.

Panels and covers would not make a meaningful difference, IMO.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #6  
Guest's Avatar
Guest
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 2
From: SoCaL (Agoura Hills)
At relatively slow speeds aerodynamics don't make much of a difference in the required power. At 30-40 MPH a change in CD of .1 (Huge, that's like a Ford F150 vs a MINI) wouldn't mean a whole lot. Maybe good for 1-2 mpg. At speeds above 80 though, it's a big difference.

The easiest way to improve fuel economy is to drive more carefully. Tunes, CAI's and all the rest aren't going to do anything (Not to mention even if you could save 3-4 mpg, how long would it take you to realize any savings after the initial $500+ outlay).
 

Last edited by Guest; Mar 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #7  
iblack's Avatar
iblack
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Fair enough. I had a feeling it wasn't too likely to make a big difference either way, but figured it was worth checking.

I ran the numbers before and figured that even a big improvement in mileage (say, from 25 to 30 mpg) would only save me about $360 per year (assuming 15,000 miles and gas around $3.60 per gallon).

I guess I'll just enjoy the ride not worry about this stuff.

Thanks for the help.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 11:58 AM
  #8  
gokartride's Avatar
gokartride
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 38,578
Likes: 2
Let's just say projects are in the works on this...
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #9  
goin440's Avatar
goin440
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Speedway
gearing on the S would make a big difference.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #10  
SteveS's Avatar
SteveS
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: Santa Ana, CA
Rolling resistance is a major factor in fuel economy. At the cost of performance, you can keep your tire pressures higher and make sure your alignment, especially toe out/in, is correct. Also, driving style, and keeping speed down on highway is paramount.

This does not come from someone with high economy experience. Even driving conservatively with equal mix of freeway and around town, my car only gets 21 -22 mpg. Most of the blame is attributable to Jan and his 239 hp. tune on my car. That and 215-45x16 Azeni tires on my car which are a lot smaller in diameter than stock and beg to be tested all the time.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
Mini Mania
Drivetrain Products
0
Aug 27, 2015 03:18 PM
Mini Mania
Drivetrain Products
0
Aug 27, 2015 12:25 PM
HaveATank
1st Gear
4
Aug 24, 2015 10:26 AM
flredmini
MINI Parts for Sale
6
Aug 12, 2015 06:35 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:14 PM.