R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 a little different point of view

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 07:44 AM
  #1  
PepperWhiteR56's Avatar
PepperWhiteR56
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
a little different point of view

I hope the title of this thread serves as a disclaimer just in case R53 owners don’t like what I have to say.

I test drove the R53 few months back and the first thing that came to mind was “WOW this feels like a hayride”. The ride was jerky, especially at slow speeds and there was a noticeable and annoying lag in response from the engine when you step on the accelerator. I actually thought there was something wrong with the car, so I went back to the dealer to ask for another car for a test drive. And the other one felt the same. Other than that, I had no issues with the car but I wasn’t going to spend 25K on a car with a jerky ride. A few weeks later, reviews of the R56 started coming out of Europe and it appeared that it was a much smoother ride, so I placed an order for an R56.

So, while my MCS was in production, I went to the dealer last night to test drive one of the newly arrived models. As soon as we sped of in the R56, the first words that came out of our mouths was “Wow, this is smooth and doesn’t feel like a hayride any more”. And the acceleration lag was gone too. There was an animal under the hood waiting to be unleashed and I found myself in 3 digit speeds in a very short stretch (will have to watch out or I’ll be collecting lots of speeding tickets). And the other complaint I’ve read all over these forums is about cheap materials used on the center-console but I have no clue what folks are complaining about and the console (and the rest of the interior) looked quite good to me.

The R56 had exactly what the R53 lacked. Mini has made an almost perfect car.

The things that I loved:
- The smooth ride
- The unleashed power
- The cool interior
- The fun key/fob
- The telescoping wheel
- The hidden storage compartment above the glove box
- The 4 powerful windshield washer jets
- The new sparkling silver exterior (even though I've already ordered Pepper White)

What I hated:
- The fact that I have to wait another 3 weeks before I take delivery of my MCS
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 07:51 AM
  #2  
dbhouston's Avatar
dbhouston
4th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Amen. The moral of the story: Drive what you like.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 07:58 AM
  #3  
reelsmith.'s Avatar
reelsmith.
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 11
From: Ridgefield, CT
PepperWhiteR56 and dbhouston: I agree on all counts.

dean.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:20 AM
  #4  
designerMINI's Avatar
designerMINI
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Hudson Valley, NY
You are entitled to your point of view. Thank you for sharing it here. I happen to agree with it. Some will not. That is what opinions are about otherwise they would be facts. Just don't let someone else's opinion dampen your passion. I think passion is a big part of the MINI experience.
I would hope that most people ordering the new MINI have your enthusism. If so the MINi community can and will remain unique, rewarding and fun. The differences in builds are great, each with it's strong points.
Good luck with your wait. Don't get discouraged by what others say this will be your car, your opinion is all that matters.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #5  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
The R53 is rough around the edges compared to the R56 MCS. That is what I love about it. Also, my 100% stock '05 MCS accelerates plenty fast with no "lags" so I am not sure if those testers had some issues with them

I do not disagree on the points you made as to why the R56 may be a more appealing choice for a vast majority of people, but the R53 has a "magic" to it with the sharper steering, firmer ride and generally the "trueR" go kart ride demeanor that the R56 has diminished some in the name of sheer refinement and more BMW-Like feeling.

I am not an "anti-R56" snob. Quite on the contrary, the new car is very intriguing to me and some things about it I really like (Powertrain, interior) and less crazy about others (Chunky bonnet, higher waistline, car sits higher off the ground).

The R53 was indeed not for everybody. BMW now wants to bring more people under the MINI fold and therefore it has made the car more approachable and less rough for those people that find those attributes annoying on a day in and day out basis.

The R56 is in our future for sure, more specifically, the R55 Clubman which we hope to take delivery in about a year from now and will replace my wife's 2002 MC CVT.

As for me, since I still have 2 full years left in the factory warranty (and 2 paid for schedule maintenance stops), I will keep my ultra reliable '05 MCS for at least another 3 years and see how the R56 has progressed so far at that point.

I am looking forward to a possible "50th year anniversary" MCS equipped with DSG transmission and AWD. Either of those factory options would make it a lot easier for me to justify letting go of my R53. Also, by 2009-2010 most of the 1st year issues that will crop up with the new car would have been corrected by that point in time and a "mid-life" refreshening hopefully will correct the aweful looking center console.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #6  
R56MCS's Avatar
R56MCS
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 0
Welcome to NAM P56, thanks for the impressions.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #7  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
I also wanted to add something else... It seems to me that there are 2 factions hard at work here...Those R50/53 owners that totally despise the new car for whatever X or Y reasons and those new R56 owners that feel compelled to put the previous car down for whatever X or Y reasons.

Both camps are entitled to their opinions, of course, but what I think everyone fails to see here is that each generation of the car has brought up something good to the table and some qualities that will be enduring for years to come.

Let us not be like some hardcore Classic Mini owners that still to this day, bemoan and resent the fact that BMW moved forward their beloved 1950's Issigonis design into the realms of the 21st century. I have been a 3 time R50/53 MINI owner and have spent over 5 years in the different MINi enthusiast websites to witness and gauge people's responses when something about their beloved car is about to change or something different is going to be offered. probably some of you did not see the negative responses when MINI first unveiled the MINI Convertible test mules a few years back...

I think the R53 captures a more "hardcore" customer base, while the R56 attracts those enthusiasts that liked the MINI but were turned off by the perceived "roughness" of the previous generation car.

If anyone ever wants to experience what a ROUGH MINI is all about, try to get behind the wheel behind of a Classic Mini. Then come back and tell me which was the REAL rough car.LOL

So the moral of the story... don't waste time trying to put down the R53 just to "feel" better and justify your R56 purchase and likewise, don't diss the R56, to justify your obession for the R53.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #8  
CR&PW&JB's Avatar
CR&PW&JB
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,326
Likes: 6
From: PA
^ Post of the Month.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #9  
bamatt's Avatar
bamatt
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 0
From: Overthemountain, AL
Originally Posted by C4
So the moral of the story... don't waste time trying to put down the R53 just to "feel" better and justify your R56 purchase and likewise, don't diss the R56, to justify your obession for the R53.
more like post of the year
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #10  
Ken Cooper's Avatar
Ken Cooper
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by C4
So the moral of the story... don't waste time trying to put down the R53 just to "feel" better and justify your R56 purchase and likewise, don't diss the R56, to justify your obession for the R53.
I don't read this lead-in posting as a put-down, it simply states the situation from the perspective of the writer. He didn't like the perceived lag and he didn't like the rough edges. He told us why he's buying a Mini Cooper now and why he didn't buy one in previous years.

As for other posts that might be perceived as putdowns, I think most are simply responses to the many current owner statements that criticized the R56 before its debut in the U.S.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #11  
inomis's Avatar
inomis
4th Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 5
From: Williamsburg, VA
I think there will be plenty of "hardcore" MINI buyers of the R56 that believe in it's "magic". I think any subjective statements of the R56 vs. R53 is going to step on someone's toes at this point.

I think if the anti-R53 people stay here and the anti-R56 people stay in the 1st gen forums there would be eternal peace, but that ain't gonna happen.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #12  
bamatt's Avatar
bamatt
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 0
From: Overthemountain, AL
Originally Posted by Ken Cooper
I don't read this lead-in posting as a put-down, it simply states the situation from the perspective of the writer. He didn't like the perceived lag and he didn't like the rough edges. He told us why he's buying a Mini Cooper now and why he didn't buy one in previous years.

As for other posts that might be perceived as putdowns, I think most are simply responses to the many current owner statements that criticized the R56 before its debut in the U.S.
Uhh I don't think C4 did either he was just making a very good point
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #13  
Ken Cooper's Avatar
Ken Cooper
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bamatt
Uhh I don't think C4 did either he was just making a very good point
Yeah, you're right. Sometimes when I get up on the wrong side of the bed I can be pretty obnoxious. Case in point.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 12:25 PM
  #14  
msh441's Avatar
msh441
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
If you was the R56 to handle like an older modded S or a works car, simply:

-Get the sport suspention.
-Get some 17", or better 18" wheels.
-Lower the car about an inch.
-Drive with the sport button "ON" all the time

One of the nice things about BOTH generations of the MINI is the Burger King "Have it your way" appeal. Not EVERY R50/R53 was a souped up, flat cornering 210 HP hot rod. Nor will every R56 be a soft-riding couch on wheels with all the performance potential of a Caddilac DeVille. There's a varitey of options you can choose to make the car be what you want it to be. That's one of the big things that attracted me to MINI in the first place. The potential for individuality. We should be relishing the fact that those opportunities will still be availible in the future generations of the brand.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 12:33 PM
  #15  
chows4us's Avatar
chows4us
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15,478
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by C4
So the moral of the story... don't waste time trying to put down the R53 just to "feel" better and justify your R56 purchase and likewise, don't diss the R56, to justify your obession for the R53.
Wow, very philosophical.

But remember life is a two way street.

Dont diss SUVs to satisfy your obsession with MINIs either. Just like SUV drivers should not look down about those itty bitty MINIs that get in their way

If your going to walk the talk, then walk the walk
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #16  
bamatt's Avatar
bamatt
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 0
From: Overthemountain, AL
Originally Posted by chows4us
Dont diss SUVs to satisfy your obsession with MINIs either. Just like SUV drivers should not look down about those itty bitty MINIs that get in their way
I hated SUV's before 2002 so I guess I'm a purist hater
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #17  
ashboomstick's Avatar
ashboomstick
5th Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Chows- I do agree with you, but does every thread have to degenerate in to SUV thread? Or is it just one your personal ? :impatient
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #18  
chows4us's Avatar
chows4us
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15,478
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by bamatt
I hated SUV's before 2002 so I guess I'm a purist hater
Bama, that was for C4. If your going to come up with a great line ... it should apply across the spectrum and it was a great line. BTW, I bet if they sold a very cute, small SUV ... maybe a AWD MINI ... you'd be looking at it?

Originally Posted by ashboomstick
Chows- I do agree with you, but does every thread have to degenerate in to SUV thread?
Nope. Refer to statement above. It was just for C4. He came up with a GREAT line. I'd like to see it applied across the board to the entire spectrum of cars. If not, its just blowing smoke in the wind.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #19  
graphicjoe's Avatar
graphicjoe
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 2
[quote=msh441;1378762]If you was the R56 to handle like an older modded S or a works car, simply:

-Get the sport suspention.
-Get some 17", or better 18" wheels.
-Lower the car about an inch.
-Drive with the sport button "ON" all the time

msh441 is in my veiw only partly right. Sport suspension, for sure. Eighteen inch wheels? Not for me thanks. They are too heavy and in general will provide an unnecessarily harsh ride with little if any gain. The Mini engineers reportedly (R&T I think) designed the suspension around 16" wheels.

I don't know about lowering the car. How much will it help? The answer depends partly upon the measures used to lower the car and also how well the car's suspension geometory works when the car is lowered.

What about the LSD? I would not want my Mini without that. Otherwise corner exits will require a good deal of patience. The new car's marvelous flat torque curve deserves all of the corner exit grip that it can have.

As to the Sport button, I'll wait and see. It might be more fun to use it only when the extra poke is really needed. Doing so will sort of diminish the fun when the button is "needed." Power is a funny thing; what once felt like a lot can quickly become normal. This can lead to the slippery slop of more and more mods. Leaving the magic button off will also save a tiny bit of fuel.

To each his or her own,

Joe
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #20  
Homme's Avatar
Homme
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chows4us
Bama, that was for C4. If your going to come up with a great line ... it should apply across the spectrum and it was a great line. BTW, I bet if they sold a very cute, small SUV ... maybe a AWD MINI ... you'd be looking at it?
Then it wouldn't be a Rav4, now would it?


Nope. Refer to statement above. It was just for C4. He came up with a GREAT line. I'd like to see it applied across the board to the entire spectrum of cars. If not, its just blowing smoke in the wind.
It doesn't apply to the entire spectrum of cars. Some cars really are indefensible.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #21  
chows4us's Avatar
chows4us
6th Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15,478
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Homme
It doesn't apply to the entire spectrum of cars. Some cars really are indefensible.
Of course it does ...

C4 wrote: don't waste time trying to put down the R53 just to "feel" better and justify your R56 purchase and likewise, don't diss the R56, to justify your obession for the R53

Liking "any" car is just the individuals opinion. Nothing wrong with opinions but an opinion a dollar might buy you a cup of coffee. Bashing other car makes because you as an individual don't like it is ... well meaningless since other people do not or will not like your choices as well.

So opinions really don't mean squat in the big picture of life.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #22  
Homme's Avatar
Homme
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chows4us
So opinions really don't mean squat in the big picture of life.
So then what makes you think we need to read yours?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #23  
minimarks's Avatar
minimarks
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 1
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Originally Posted by C4
The R53 is rough around the edges compared to the R56 MCS. That is what I love about it. Also, my 100% stock '05 MCS accelerates plenty fast with no "lags" so I am not sure if those testers had some issues with them

I do not disagree on the points you made as to why the R56 may be a more appealing choice for a vast majority of people, but the R53 has a "magic" to it with the sharper steering, firmer ride and generally the "trueR" go kart ride demeanor that the R56 has diminished some in the name of sheer refinement and more BMW-Like feeling.

I am not an "anti-R56" snob. Quite on the contrary, the new car is very intriguing to me and some things about it I really like (Powertrain, interior) and less crazy about others (Chunky bonnet, higher waistline, car sits higher off the ground).

The R53 was indeed not for everybody. BMW now wants to bring more people under the MINI fold and therefore it has made the car more approachable and less rough for those people that find those attributes annoying on a day in and day out basis.

The R56 is in our future for sure, more specifically, the R55 Clubman which we hope to take delivery in about a year from now and will replace my wife's 2002 MC CVT.

As for me, since I still have 2 full years left in the factory warranty (and 2 paid for schedule maintenance stops), I will keep my ultra reliable '05 MCS for at least another 3 years and see how the R56 has progressed so far at that point.

I am looking forward to a possible "50th year anniversary" MCS equipped with DSG transmission and AWD. Either of those factory options would make it a lot easier for me to justify letting go of my R53. Also, by 2009-2010 most of the 1st year issues that will crop up with the new car would have been corrected by that point in time and a "mid-life" refreshening hopefully will correct the aweful looking center console.
What he said.... 06'mcs
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #24  
mcarlo52's Avatar
mcarlo52
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: East Bay, CA
Originally Posted by C4
BMW now wants to bring more people under the MINI fold and therefore it has made the car more approachable and less rough for those people that find those attributes annoying on a day in and day out basis.
I wonder about this. There were plenty of reasons to change the MINI; the euro crash standards, absolutely needing a new source for their engine, cost cutting, re-working the suspension for the run flats, well you get the point. I like to think that BMW made the changes for good engineering reasons and "then" worried about whether they could make the car more palatable to the masses. Remember, BMW went to great lengths to keep the general look the same and tried very hard to keep the driving experience "MINI" like.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 12:05 AM
  #25  
dwdyer's Avatar
dwdyer
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 826
Likes: 2
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by C4
The R53 is rough around the edges compared to the R56 MCS. That is what I love about it.
BMW...has made the car more approachable and less rough...
I think C4's onto something here.

Rough edges allow a driving enthusiast to quickly spot potential and then go exploit the strengths and counter the weaknesses, either through technique or mods.

The problem with a more polished product, is that it's harder to spot the relative weaknesses and strengths, so the enthusiast is stuck for something to do.

In the first case, you drive the car and think, "Wow, this car has a lot of potential, I can take this thing several different ways." That's a very specific feeling for those who invest a lot of sweat equity in their vehicles. You don't go out looking for a complete package, you go out looking for something with very little polish that exhibits one or two strong characteristics.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 AM.