R56 Skeen v BMW July 1 Deadlne
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Skeen v BMW July 1 Deadlne
Object or Exclude? Skeen vs BMW
Deadline to respond in this case is July 1, 2016 in Oregon.
Mini of Portland replaced timing chain assembly without my asking the first time I brought it in for service, the month I bought it in 2014, with 28,000 miles.
My in-service date puts me beyond any benefits from this settlement, (ridiculous, with such low mileage??) so in case I have problems down the road I was going to Exclude myself from the settlement to allow me to pursue another settlement.
I saw an earlier post recommending to write the court and Object, but that would mean I'm without recourse should the decision stand as is.
What is the consensus? Object or Exclude?
And, does anyone know if the tensioner or anything was redesigned to hold up, or did they just swap it? Mini wasn't talking!
Deadline to respond in this case is July 1, 2016 in Oregon.
Mini of Portland replaced timing chain assembly without my asking the first time I brought it in for service, the month I bought it in 2014, with 28,000 miles.
My in-service date puts me beyond any benefits from this settlement, (ridiculous, with such low mileage??) so in case I have problems down the road I was going to Exclude myself from the settlement to allow me to pursue another settlement.
I saw an earlier post recommending to write the court and Object, but that would mean I'm without recourse should the decision stand as is.
What is the consensus? Object or Exclude?
And, does anyone know if the tensioner or anything was redesigned to hold up, or did they just swap it? Mini wasn't talking!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
