R56 Intake Manifold Spacer
I doubt it's reading the correct sensor or displaying a legitimate value. The n18 briefly warms up on the conventional throttle, then kicks in the variable valve lift and opens the throttle fully. Apparently it will revert to the traditional throttle in limp mode as well. You can determine whether the throttle is wide open by monitoring boost / vacuum. During normal operation you will notice about -.2IN Hg if you're just driving along, meaning there is no vacuum being drawn against the throttle butterfly. If the throttle is in use, the vacuum will fluctuate as you drive.
I doubt it's reading the correct sensor or displaying a legitimate value. The n18 briefly warms up on the conventional throttle, then kicks in the variable valve lift and opens the throttle fully. Apparently it will revert to the traditional throttle in limp mode as well. You can determine whether the throttle is wide open by monitoring boost / vacuum. During normal operation you will notice about -.2IN Hg if you're just driving along, meaning there is no vacuum being drawn against the throttle butterfly. If the throttle is in use, the vacuum will fluctuate as you drive.
after ~30 seconds, the tp slowly falls to 13-15% and the rpm falls to normal idle speed with -7.5--9.5 in/hg
when the oil temp passes ~75F, the tp raises to 15-17% as the vacuum falls to ~-.5 in/hg
as i drive, i can watch the tp vary with the gas pedal
I figured this out when I installed a boost gauge on my N18. I never saw vacuum except at first start on a cold morning. Then I'd see vacuum just for a minute or two until the engine warmed up, then it would suddenly jump from -20 to 0. What happens is at cold start, the throttle plate in the throttle body regulates airflow, since it is mostly closed at idle there's vacuum in the intake manifold which is the engine pulling air against the restriction. Once the engine warms up a bit, the variable intake valve lift takes over and the throttle plate opens all the way, remove the restriction and there's no more vacuum in the intake manifold.
If you look at a graph of MAP over time using the Torque app, you'll see how the ECU manages boost and how MAP is zero unless you are accelerating.
The whole point of variable intake valve lift is higher efficiency from eliminating the pumping loss that occurs with a partially open throttle plate.
Edit: u238 beat me to it.
That's just how far down you have the accelerator pressed. You need to look at Manifold Air Pressure (MAP) instead. Cruising at 70mph on level ground, MAP is zero.
I figured this out when I installed a boost gauge on my N18. I never saw vacuum except at first start on a cold morning. Then I'd see vacuum just for a minute or two until the engine warmed up, then it would suddenly jump from -20 to 0. What happens is at cold start, the throttle plate in the throttle body regulates airflow, since it is mostly closed at idle there's vacuum in the intake manifold which is the engine pulling air against the restriction. Once the engine warms up a bit, the variable intake valve lift takes over and the throttle plate opens all the way, remove the restriction and there's no more vacuum in the intake manifold.
If you look at a graph of MAP over time using the Torque app, you'll see how the ECU manages boost and how MAP is zero unless you are accelerating.
The whole point of variable intake valve lift is higher efficiency from eliminating the pumping loss that occurs with a partially open throttle plate.
Edit: u238 beat me to it.
I figured this out when I installed a boost gauge on my N18. I never saw vacuum except at first start on a cold morning. Then I'd see vacuum just for a minute or two until the engine warmed up, then it would suddenly jump from -20 to 0. What happens is at cold start, the throttle plate in the throttle body regulates airflow, since it is mostly closed at idle there's vacuum in the intake manifold which is the engine pulling air against the restriction. Once the engine warms up a bit, the variable intake valve lift takes over and the throttle plate opens all the way, remove the restriction and there's no more vacuum in the intake manifold.
If you look at a graph of MAP over time using the Torque app, you'll see how the ECU manages boost and how MAP is zero unless you are accelerating.
The whole point of variable intake valve lift is higher efficiency from eliminating the pumping loss that occurs with a partially open throttle plate.
Edit: u238 beat me to it.
One correction, MAP should be showing atmospheric pressure, since it's Manifold Absolute Pressure. The boost gauge treats atmospheric pressure as 0, so you don't have to do the math to determine whether you're drawing vacuum or in boost.
i have a friend that owns a transmission shop ... he just upgraded his profession grade obd tool to include minis as he is getting many calls for automatic transmission problems on out of warranty minis
he wants me to come to his shop and plug in ... he says he can read tp and vanos ... so we can resolve this issue
he wants me to come to his shop and plug in ... he says he can read tp and vanos ... so we can resolve this issue
1) Isn't the resonance effect going to be very small compared to the boost in a forced induction engine?
2) For the N14 engine, I could see how there would be resonance between the intake valves and the throttle body since the throttle body presents a restriction in the intake path. What about on the N18 engine which uses variable intake valve lift, so the throttle body is always wide open?
Not saying it doesn't work, just trying to understand why.
2) For the N14 engine, I could see how there would be resonance between the intake valves and the throttle body since the throttle body presents a restriction in the intake path. What about on the N18 engine which uses variable intake valve lift, so the throttle body is always wide open?
Not saying it doesn't work, just trying to understand why.
Intake runner length is always of less importance than turbo or cam selection in a turbo application. Less but not nonexistent. That why this bolt on helps but can't give you a 50hp increase. I mentioned earlier air has mass therefore inertia. In a turbo application the intake charge is denser meaning more mass per given volume. More mass means more inertia as well so the principle still applies. Resonance tuning is timing the pressure waves caused by the closure of the intake valve to arrive back at the intake valve as it's opening. The returning pressure wave does not bounce off of the intake butterfly but the mass of air continuing to flow into the engine. To choose optimal runner length you'd need engine simulation software like Dynomation running the wave action model to get really close numbers. For a N/A engine you can try to calculate by hand with this formula and it will get you in the ballpark.
max rpm due to mass = 0.0056(cu. inches)2 - 8.89(cu. inches) + 11527
intake runner length = 137532/((.7)(max rpm due to mass))2(.15)(bore)
Don't forget us, I want the review. I'm guessing the Mini will need some miles to adapt?
__________________
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
what's that extra piece? Is it for those running the stock intake?
Never mind, checked the website again and got my answer once I scrolled down. Standing by for some real feedback👍
Never mind, checked the website again and got my answer once I scrolled down. Standing by for some real feedback👍
Agreed, but knowing Cerenkov, I'm sure he is going to give us some honest feed back on wether this really ads performance, or is just a well machined paper weight 😁
I'm having a little difficulty getting the intake to sit flush on the spacer. The spacer changes the angles and intake manifold really needs to pivot differently from the bottom but the lower intake manifold support bracket prevents this and I don't want to use the bolts to try and draw it in since the head is aluminum.
It's time for beer, steak and football...I'll finish this tomorrow.
BTW - Normally the first time that I attempt to do something it takes 10 times longer than it should.
On a good note the intake valves look fairly clean (15,000 miles).
It's time for beer, steak and football...I'll finish this tomorrow.

BTW - Normally the first time that I attempt to do something it takes 10 times longer than it should.
On a good note the intake valves look fairly clean (15,000 miles).
I'm having a little difficulty getting the intake to sit flush on the spacer. The spacer changes the angles and intake manifold really needs to pivot differently from the bottom but the lower intake manifold support bracket prevents this and I don't want to use the bolts to try and draw it in since the head is aluminum. It's time for beer, steak and football...I'll finish this tomorrow.
BTW - Normally the first time that I attempt to do something it takes 10 times longer than it should. On a good note the intake valves look fairly clean (15,000 miles).
BTW - Normally the first time that I attempt to do something it takes 10 times longer than it should. On a good note the intake valves look fairly clean (15,000 miles).
[QUOTE="SPRINTCARS;3993833" Also, is your car an N14 ? If you could or don't mind, on the bottom of the intake, there's two electric vacuum valves. Would you be able to tell which electrical plug goes to which ? And how the vacuum lines are routed and where they run too ? Mine is all apart and I forget where they go. I picture would be awesome as well. Thanks in advance. If not, it's no big deal. No worries.[/QUOTE]
No problem. Mines a N18 but I think it would be the same, the intakes share the same part numbers.
No problem. Mines a N18 but I think it would be the same, the intakes share the same part numbers.
And that is how one recognizes a fellow perfectionist.
Last edited by Tigger2011; Sep 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM.
Wow! Thanks for the insight! With that type of claim, immediately refuting any claim from the supplier, you'd think we should have some proof! I'm sure your not just some troll that wouldn't supply said dyno sheets to show that this is a 0HP gain product. Please post them so we can contact the manufacturer and let them know that all the R&D they did was for nothing and to close up shop
...(continuing to wait for a non-troll to post)
No I'm sorry I didn't mean to come across that way, what I should have said was, installing that on my heavily modded mini didn't change anything, but that's because of all the work I did before. On the contrary two people I know installed it and gained roughly 3bhp. Cravenspeed is a great company, nice people too, I live near their office and buy their products
I install the manifold spacer this morning. Definitely had to undo the lower support bracket. Anyone know the torque spec to the intake manifold bolts? I did 15 ft-lbs. It's o-ringed so it shouldn't be all that tight.
***Warning*** - be careful when installing the new longer bolts, it can be difficult to line them up and you don't want to cross-thread the head.
IMO Cravenspeed should include an intermediate bracket so that the manifold is continued to be supported from the bottom. It's now about an inch apart. I wonder of if the test cars never had this bracket reattached from previous carbon cleaning services.

When installed it's not even noticeable:

Now on to put everything back together and go for a drive.
***Warning*** - be careful when installing the new longer bolts, it can be difficult to line them up and you don't want to cross-thread the head.
IMO Cravenspeed should include an intermediate bracket so that the manifold is continued to be supported from the bottom. It's now about an inch apart. I wonder of if the test cars never had this bracket reattached from previous carbon cleaning services.

When installed it's not even noticeable:

Now on to put everything back together and go for a drive.
I'm having a little difficulty getting the intake to sit flush on the spacer. The spacer changes the angles and intake manifold really needs to pivot differently from the bottom but the lower intake manifold support bracket prevents this and I don't want to use the bolts to try and draw it in since the head is aluminum.








