R56 Auto transmission MCS not as fun?
Like I stated before--the automatic in the R56 has tended to be more reliable than the manual.
However. The manual is by no means unreliable. I know of two people with R56s equipped with manuals (a MC and an MCS). The 2007 MCS had its clutch and flywheel replaced at 25k, but has been rock solid up to 78k km--a car that drives a mix of city and highway, and sees the odd AutoX event.
The 2007 MC has 51k km in everyday mixed city/highway driving.
Anyways. Yes, there have been problems with the clutch and throwout bearing in the R56. However, these are not the majority, and for those who have had issues, MINI has remedied the cars (and if the example of the MCS above is any indicator, may have improved the quality of the clutch/throwout bearing).
The Aisin, while reliable, is not completely immune to issues either. Search the forums and you'll find a decent share of problems with the auto.
Pick whichever one you prefer, basically!
Oh, and I have to say... no matter how good a conventional auto can be, it's still a fluid coupling vs. a direct coupling. Which one you prefer is, well, personal.
However. The manual is by no means unreliable. I know of two people with R56s equipped with manuals (a MC and an MCS). The 2007 MCS had its clutch and flywheel replaced at 25k, but has been rock solid up to 78k km--a car that drives a mix of city and highway, and sees the odd AutoX event.
The 2007 MC has 51k km in everyday mixed city/highway driving.
Anyways. Yes, there have been problems with the clutch and throwout bearing in the R56. However, these are not the majority, and for those who have had issues, MINI has remedied the cars (and if the example of the MCS above is any indicator, may have improved the quality of the clutch/throwout bearing).
The Aisin, while reliable, is not completely immune to issues either. Search the forums and you'll find a decent share of problems with the auto.
Pick whichever one you prefer, basically!
Oh, and I have to say... no matter how good a conventional auto can be, it's still a fluid coupling vs. a direct coupling. Which one you prefer is, well, personal.
Last edited by carsncars; Mar 5, 2009 at 06:35 PM.
I lived in SF for eight years and had a stick for the entire time. First was a Capri 2600 and then a VW Dasher. Neither had any premature clutch problems or needed to be replaced. The starting on hills thing is exaggerated, but parallel parking on a steep hill is not. You just have to make judicious use of your parking brake and coordination with your clutch. That said, I currently have an AT ML-320 and BMW 540i but am awaiting delivery of my 09 6-sp MCS. To me, it's more of a what fits the car and its intended use than a rigid AT or manual position. Hope this helps a little. Good luck, either way will be great.
Hill-holder helps but I don't like to take chances when the next car is that close.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
eatsleepautox
MINIs & Minis for Sale
6
Oct 30, 2015 06:46 AM
R50/53 Continentals on my '05 MCS
Piano Man
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
14
Sep 29, 2015 02:50 PM
minipopkart
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
2
Aug 13, 2015 05:22 AM
ki7hy
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
3
Aug 12, 2015 07:07 PM



