R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 87 or 91... any difference in MPG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
lawnboy's Avatar
lawnboy
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
87 or 91 or 93... any difference in MPG?

When running the MCS with automatic on 87 or 91 instead of 93, is there any difference in MPG?
 

Last edited by lawnboy; Feb 18, 2009 at 08:47 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #2  
Calmante's Avatar
Calmante
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: SouthCoast, Massachusetts
There are 5,001 threads about this.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #3  
lawnboy's Avatar
lawnboy
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Thanks, but a simple Yes or No would had been more than sufficient.

Originally Posted by Calmante
There are 5,001 threads about this.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #4  
IzzyG's Avatar
IzzyG
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Don't know. Never tried going below 91(there's only 87,89 and 93 sold here-so I've not gone below 93 actually). I think my main concern would be more to do with a damaged engine versus mpg consideration. I'm sure there's Mini's who has been filled with 87 all their lives and been fine. However, the 20 cents difference is cheap insurance IMO. :P

Although, seeing as how diesel is only 20 cents more than premium here, I wish I had a Mini diesel and enjoy 60mpg. ;/
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:41 PM
  #5  
PatM's Avatar
PatM
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Washington
I think I would only use the recommeded fuel type. The longevity of the engine running trouble free would probably be in jeopardy.

I think premium is recommended.

Pat
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #6  
Oxybluecoop's Avatar
Oxybluecoop
6th Gear
15 Year Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #7  
Tsar's Avatar
Tsar
4th Gear
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Here I did all the hard work for you.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
PatM's Avatar
PatM
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Washington
Originally Posted by Tsar
Here I did all the hard work for you.
That's cool. How did you do that?

I might have to use that in the future.

Pat
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 06:12 AM
  #9  
DrewN's Avatar
DrewN
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by Tsar
Here I did all the hard work for you.
I love doing that.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 06:14 AM
  #10  
DrewN's Avatar
DrewN
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by PatM
That's cool. How did you do that?

I might have to use that in the future.

Pat
http://tinyurl.com/632hcv

 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #11  
SaltNPepa's Avatar
SaltNPepa
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta GA
The owners manual (for 09 at least) says no damage for 87 but performance my suffer. I have tried both in our non s clubman and really found little difference. The milage differences I have found seem to be more related to brand of fuel vs 87 or 93. But like was said above this a talked about a lot and some will say one thing some will say the other. MINI says 87 is ok so no harm in trying. My dealer said top tier fuel it more important than grade.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 07:19 AM
  #12  
PatM's Avatar
PatM
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Washington
Originally Posted by DrewN

Thank you.

I have always used top tier gasolines with the recommended grade from the manufacturer. No worries this way.

Pat
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 10:15 AM
  #13  
lawnboy's Avatar
lawnboy
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Agree, more curious though if there is any difference in MPG when going with one or the other.


Originally Posted by PatM
I think I would only use the recommeded fuel type. The longevity of the engine running trouble free would probably be in jeopardy.

I think premium is recommended.

Pat
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #14  
lawnboy's Avatar
lawnboy
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
OXYBLUECOOP, cool pic, but haven't a clue what it has to do with the thread I posted here.

 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 10:19 AM
  #15  
lawnboy's Avatar
lawnboy
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Thank you SaltNPepa!

Finally a meaningful reply.

Originally Posted by SaltNPepa
The owners manual (for 09 at least) says no damage for 87 but performance my suffer. I have tried both in our non s clubman and really found little difference. The milage differences I have found seem to be more related to brand of fuel vs 87 or 93. But like was said above this a talked about a lot and some will say one thing some will say the other. MINI says 87 is ok so no harm in trying. My dealer said top tier fuel it more important than grade.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #16  
banjoez's Avatar
banjoez
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 191
Likes: 1
From: Northwest PA
I get better MPG's with 89 vs 93. I notice very little (if any) difference in performance. I would not use 87 in a MINI. It will run but will be sluggish.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #17  
33EJB's Avatar
33EJB
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 362
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by lawnboy
OXYBLUECOOP, cool pic, but haven't a clue what it has to do with the thread I posted here.
87 or 91... any difference in MPG?-so-sad.jpg


OXYBLUECOOP is sad.

OXYBLUECOOP has read this same thread 7,832 times.

OYBLUECOOP doesn't want to go on living.


I feel your pain OXYBLUECOOP.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #18  
PatM's Avatar
PatM
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Washington
I read the thread that was previously mentioned and it tells all you need to now. Maybe if everyone read that thread this one would end. I know I fell asleep reading that thing. And really all you need to read is this and then your done.

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...nd-regular-gas

Pat
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #19  
muladesigns1's Avatar
muladesigns1
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
Originally Posted by lawnboy
When running the MCS with automatic on 87 or 91, is there any difference in MPG? Also curious if anyone uses 87 instead of going with the recommended 91?

threads like this are so annoying!
Your recomended octain by the manufacture, (you know, the one that BUILT the car?!!!!) says to use 91 or higher!!!!!!

Why would you "think" you know more then the engineers? no really, why?
you may or may not notice a differance in mpg, but since your engines computer will be "retarding" the timing (such an appropiate word here!) the car will have less then desirable power!
All this to save a whopping $2.00 per fill up?
if you are that concerned about mpg you should have bought a prius!
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #20  
Calmante's Avatar
Calmante
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: SouthCoast, Massachusetts
Please, let this die.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 10:50 AM
  #21  
ellinara's Avatar
ellinara
4th Gear
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
I used either 95 or 100 octanes. I find that my MCS 2008 is more aggressive with the 100 and in my opinion more fuel efficient.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #22  
muladesigns1's Avatar
muladesigns1
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
Originally Posted by ellinara
I used either 95 or 100 octanes. I find that my MCS 2008 is more aggressive with the 100 and in my opinion more fuel efficient.
95-100! i wish we had that out here in AZ. the highest we have is 91...
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:07 AM
  #23  
IzzyG's Avatar
IzzyG
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ellinara
I used either 95 or 100 octanes. I find that my MCS 2008 is more aggressive with the 100 and in my opinion more fuel efficient.

Placebo effect.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 05:34 AM
  #24  
miniguy5's Avatar
miniguy5
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: The dark side of the moon
Being cheap on the gas you put in your tank is like trying to be a body builder and only eating McDonalds, or buying a mansion and putting garage sale furniture in it...etc....etc...
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 05:40 AM
  #25  
GregO's Avatar
GregO
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
87 or 91

2006 MCS with 24,000+ miles and ONLY 87 = 30 mpg overall average.
2008 MC with 10,000+ miles and ONLY 87 = 37 mpg overall average.

Originally Posted by lawnboy
When running the MCS with automatic on 87 or 91, is there any difference in MPG? Also curious if anyone uses 87 instead of going with the recommended 91?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:41 AM.