R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 It actually does get 40MPG!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #76  
Btwyx's Avatar
Btwyx
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 3
From: Mountain View, CA
Originally Posted by MoxieMini
Here's something to ponder about this subject...

I watched an episode of Top Gear (last series I believe) where they tried to get better mileage out of a BMW M3 than a Toyota Prius. All they did was drive the M3 more conservatively and a 300+ bhp BMW got better mileage than a hybrid. And it wasn't even THAT conservative. I mean they traveled at highway speeds, they just didn't treat the road like an autocross course.
Wasn't that the M3 was following the Prius around their track. The Prius was getting flogged for all it could give, the M3 wasn't breaking a sweat. Still an interesting comparison.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #77  
Dinlaka's Avatar
Dinlaka
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by kevshootz
I have a 2008, MCS. And while I get more like 38 on the highway, I am the same as you in the city. Average 19.

And 90 percent of my driving is city driving. Only have 7800 miles on my car which i bought in Aug of 07.
Thanks for sharing the info, kev. At least it's good to know that there is nothing wrong with my car. I will try to drive it more on the freeway if possible to keep the MPG happy.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #78  
Flyinace2000's Avatar
Flyinace2000
6th Gear
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,277
Likes: 12
From: Baltimore, MD
I get 33mpg like clock work.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 05:38 AM
  #79  
Skuzzy's Avatar
Skuzzy
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,550
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Skuzzy
Romi will average about 30 to 32 MPG per tank, for my normal driving, which is mostly a 2.5 mile commute to work, at not higher than 40MPH with 8 traffic lights involved. Lots of stop and go. in heavy traffic, for such a short commute.

On the highway, she will get 41 to 43 MPG @ 70MPH, depending on the wind. The worst highway mileage she has gotten was just over 40MPG and that was due to bucking a headwind, uphill at around 75MPH.
Just an update. When I made the above post in August 08, Romi had about 2,100 miles on her.

Now at 16,000 miles, she is averaging 34 to 35 in town and near 43 on the highway at 70MPH, level, in little to no wind conditions.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #80  
gjhsu's Avatar
gjhsu
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Took a trip from Austin to Dallas this weekend. Had a slight tailwind, and managed to touch 40mpg right until I hit South Dallas, where the highway became a parking lot and ruined everything. My car is a Cooper S. Yes, I was pleasantly surprised.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #81  
DangerMan's Avatar
DangerMan
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Like a nerd, I've kept track of every tankful of gas since I bought my 2008 MCSa back in June 2008 (all 35 of them). I average 30.4 +/- 1.1 MPG (calculated) over the 13,000 miles I've had the car. The best I've done on a tank was is 33.7 MPG and the worst was 28.5 MPG. Most of my driving is to/from work which is a mix of highway speeds and stop-and-go. I'm an average aggressive driver (you have to be to survive in SoCal), but not a racer. The 33 MPG tanks are the vacation road trips we've taken in the Mini where I've tried to maximize mileage, so I doubt I'll ever see more than 34 MPG. Oh, and the OBC is typically high by 2 to 4 MPG.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 11:08 AM
  #82  
gjhsu's Avatar
gjhsu
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
^^^

That's odd, my OBC is really very close to my calculated mileage. Off by tenths.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #83  
lacning74's Avatar
lacning74
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 2
From: nyc
i'm jealous of all you open highway commuters. i get 19mpg overall driving in nyc. it's a different kinda city driving here.
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 06:56 AM
  #84  
basil49's Avatar
basil49
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 1
From: west 'burbs of Chicago
Standard answer now when people ask "what kinda mileage do you get?"

I say, "38 when I'm not driving like an *** ... 24 when I AM -- "
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #85  
Agent.COOPER's Avatar
Agent.COOPER
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Right now I'm learning how to drive manual transmission in my MINI... and I'm averaging 31mpg in city/neighborhood traffic. Pretty good in comparison to my Jeep's 11mpg average.
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #86  
VelvetFoot's Avatar
VelvetFoot
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 677
Likes: 20
From: NY, USA
I got 48.4 mpg last tank, but I was trying.
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #87  
KWK's Avatar
KWK
Neutral
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Concord, CA
For Oakland Raiders Mini...

Yes, I am getting about 30mpg (70 - 80mph) when driving in "fun mode" and 32mpg (60 - 65mph) when in "let the world go by mode". I live in Concord and commute to Corte Madera. Using highway 4 I am doing about 80% freeway the whole way.

BTW - 09' MCS
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 12:30 AM
  #88  
Sixspeed-J's Avatar
Sixspeed-J
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Urbana, Ohio
We are getting 32.6 mpg in our JCW according to the onboard computer. 30% city, 30% rural, 40% highway. 93 octane Shell. I have been shifting at around 3500 rpm to 4000 rpm. Occasionally shifting at 4500 rpm. The wife shifts a little bit more conservatively around 3 to 3500 rpm. Also we are still breaking it in so the numbers probably will change. But I'm guessing I will still get around 30 to 31 mpg.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 04:40 AM
  #89  
corcoranwtnet's Avatar
corcoranwtnet
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
The onboard computer makes for interesting reading, but is not accurate. If you calculate miles driven vs. gallons added to fill, you'll get several mpg less than shown on the computer. Around town, mine gets 1-2 mpg less than shown...on the highway, 3-4 (or more) fewer mpg.

The computer is most useful for watching instantaneous mpg in order to understand the relationship between driving behavior and fuel economy.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 05:39 AM
  #90  
urameatball's Avatar
urameatball
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
I'm at roughly 30mpg.
considering my driving style, I'm impressed :P

doing a 2500km trip later this month, will try for 40mpg.
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 05:20 AM
  #91  
Red_Fred's Avatar
Red_Fred
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: North Central MD
I'm getting between 42 and 44.5 mpg with a combo of highway and city driving, although mor highway than city. I've got a little over 10,000 on Fred now and he's been 100% trouble free so far.
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #92  
dva1946's Avatar
dva1946
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
Impressive feedback. Anxious to take my 2008 MC Clubman S on a road trip to Wisconsin this weekend (from Colorado). In town, on a very good commuting route, now getting 30.5 MPG (calculated). Freeway 90% of the way, expect to average 70-80 mph, and would love 40 - 45 mpg. Previous Mini was 2007 S, but always wanted the Clubman.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 07:12 AM
  #93  
corcoranwtnet's Avatar
corcoranwtnet
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
When posting your gas mileage, it would be helpful if you specify whether you are just quoting the onboard computer number or if you are calculating it based on mileage driven and gallons of gasoline added at fillup.

(There's a significant difference, so it isn't comparable data ). Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 08:23 AM
  #94  
Red_Fred's Avatar
Red_Fred
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: North Central MD
Mine is not from the OBC. It is what I've calculated based on number of miles driven and gallons to fill the tank. As others have noted, I find that there is a difference between what the OBC says and what I actually get. And usually the OBC overestimates the MPG.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 08:32 AM
  #95  
dhoosee's Avatar
dhoosee
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 2
From: Wheaton, IL USA
Why is the trip computer so far off in it's calculations? Does anyone have any information as to why this is so? Mine varies between 3% to as much as 12%, but mostly in the 3-7% range (it is always on the optomistic side; computer says 37mpg, but I calculate 35). This seems shoddy to me, and should not be acceptable in the eyes of MINI and BMW. My other cars computers are spot on all of the time (Lexus & Volvo).

My refueling methods are as close to each other as possible: I let the pump auto-fill the tank until the first automatic "click-off" occurs. I wait 10 seconds (for the gas to settle down the filler neck and into the tank) then squeeze the trigger, ONE TIME ONLY, until the pump automatically shuts off again. I then make my calculations and compare to the on board computer. I have yet to get a reading within 1 or 2%.

MINI: How about a firmware upgrade to the computer? Or consider switching sources for future models.

I know that this is nit-picking, but hey...aside from a couple of small rattles from time to time, there's nothing else to pick on with this car
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #96  
basil49's Avatar
basil49
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 1
From: west 'burbs of Chicago
who knows? -- it's another mystery to me, too -- like the one about how the gas gauge isn't linear EITHER (but could be if BMW bothered). my only other theory is that the gas we both buy here in the Chicago area is formulated differently than what BMW expects ...
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #97  
mellowmcs's Avatar
mellowmcs
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Danville
Originally Posted by dhoosee
Why is the trip computer so far off in it's calculations? Does anyone have any information as to why this is so? Mine varies between 3% to as much as 12%, but mostly in the 3-7% range (it is always on the optomistic side; computer says 37mpg, but I calculate 35). This seems shoddy to me, and should not be acceptable in the eyes of MINI and BMW. My other cars computers are spot on all of the time (Lexus & Volvo).

My refueling methods are as close to each other as possible: I let the pump auto-fill the tank until the first automatic "click-off" occurs. I wait 10 seconds (for the gas to settle down the filler neck and into the tank) then squeeze the trigger, ONE TIME ONLY, until the pump automatically shuts off again. I then make my calculations and compare to the on board computer. I have yet to get a reading within 1 or 2%.

MINI: How about a firmware upgrade to the computer? Or consider switching sources for future models.

I know that this is nit-picking, but hey...aside from a couple of small rattles from time to time, there's nothing else to pick on with this car
are you resetting the average mpg after each fill up? also on my mini it's pretty consistent and not off by that much from hand calculation.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #98  
corcoranwtnet's Avatar
corcoranwtnet
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
My MCSa does show a significant "optimistic" bias with the OBC, and I do reset everything after each fillup.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #99  
Sixspeed-J's Avatar
Sixspeed-J
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Urbana, Ohio
Originally Posted by Sixspeed-J
We are getting 32.6 mpg in our JCW according to the onboard computer. 30% city, 30% rural, 40% highway. 93 octane Shell. I have been shifting at around 3500 rpm to 4000 rpm. Occasionally shifting at 4500 rpm. The wife shifts a little bit more conservatively around 3 to 3500 rpm. Also we are still breaking it in so the numbers probably will change. But I'm guessing I will still get around 30 to 31 mpg.
Actually calculated was 29.5. So 3mpg difference.
 
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 06:33 AM
  #100  
corcoranwtnet's Avatar
corcoranwtnet
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
32.6/29.5 = 10.5 % high reading on the OBC. That's consistent with my findings.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:39 AM.