R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 MC Test Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #1  
Duffer's Avatar
Duffer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, NC
MC Test Drive

I finally got around to test driving a MC yesterday and was pleasantly surprised that it had adequate acceleration compared to my current car (BMW 328i). I like the fact that the MC has a spare tire, because the ride with the 15" is much better than the 16" w/run flats which exhibited a good deal of chatter even on good pavement. The handling with the 15's was also excellent.

I didn't particularly like the clutch; the release point seemed a little snappy quick for me, and the pedals are very close although I'm sure it would be an easy adjustment. This wouldn't be the best car to teach a newbie how to drive a manual.

I really liked the engine sound which didn't sound buzzy like most 4 cylinder engines. I'm not fond of the huge speedometer, but I was pleased to notice that the speed was included in digital on the tach.

I plan to also drive the Audi A5, Infiniti G37, and Porsche Cayman, but they'll have to be 2x+ better because they cost 2x+ the MC which is a tall order.

If any of you have made similar comparisons, I would be interested to hear your thoughts.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #2  
djam43's Avatar
djam43
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 1
From: South Florida.
I have the MCa, love it. Has all the Zip and Zoomph that I need, Also has a spare tire.. If you dont like the Big speedo you will be pleased with the Navigation system that fits in its place. Good luck with your choices.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #3  
TheBigNewt's Avatar
TheBigNewt
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,602
Likes: 107
From: Arizona
Did you drive the MCS? About 50% more HP.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 02:09 PM
  #4  
dbhouston's Avatar
dbhouston
4th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I bought an MCS, but first tested the Lotus Elise, Audi TT, BMW M4 Coupe, and the Porsche Cayman. They were all great cars in their own right. If I had the money to squander, I would be in the Cayman right now. But the MINI provided tons of fun for a much better price. Also, the MCS gave me a small touch of practicality in that it has a back seat. The Lotus was too tight for my 6'2" frame and had no room for even a bag of groceries. Not gonna cut it for a daily drive. I didn't like the redesign of the Audi. The BMW just didn't feel as in control somehow. But the Cayman was perfect. The weight distribution was evident in the way it handled. Love that car.

All things considered, the MCS is still a hell of a ride. I've had it for months now (Week 3 production) and have yet to get bored.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #5  
at7815's Avatar
at7815
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
It'll be hard to compare an MC or even MCS with the Cayman S. They are in completely distinct categories. Costs about 3 times more, but amazing! While I didn't consider the Cayman when I was shopping for a car b/c of a budget...I did consider a Boxster S and I loved the car, still do but decided to go with the MCS b/c it was fun and more reasonably priced. With that said, I ended up not getting NAV b/c it would move the car into the $30k for me and once it hit that...I was going to start having second thoughts...

Good luck with the search!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #6  
gokartride's Avatar
gokartride
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 38,578
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Duffer
If any of you have made similar comparisons, I would be interested to hear your thoughts.
I'm a bit of a MINI guy so I don't do a lot of comparing, but I too really like Coopers. You're right about adjusting to the car...it happens. The center speedo has always been a Mini-thing so to me a MINI would look incomplete w/o it. Bottom line...the cost of a Cooper compared with the driving quality and fun of the car make it an amazing value and, to me, makes the whole deal that much more attractive!! It's a great little package with amazing driveability with solid heritage...and if you get into that at all it's a very hard deal to pass up.
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #7  
Duffer's Avatar
Duffer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, NC
Thanks for the feedback, in answer to TheBigNewt, I did not drive the MCS. My assumption is that if I want something really fast (for track use, etc.) I would probably go with one of the other cars I mentioned.
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #8  
beatloafer's Avatar
beatloafer
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
I had the same reaction about the MC... I test drove a 2007 MCS with Sport Suspension and I felt like the ride was insanely harsh. I drive an IS300 that I lowered over an inch and that rides softer than that MCS. I was definitely expecting a lot more compliance. I then drove a MC with 15's and it felt perfect. Just as sporty, but much more compliant. My question is, will the MCS feel harsh on 16's w/o the Sport Suspension?
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #9  
kreative's Avatar
kreative
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 420
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by djam43
I have the MCa, love it. Has all the Zip and Zoomph that I need, Also has a spare tire.. If you dont like the Big speedo you will be pleased with the Navigation system that fits in its place. Good luck with your choices.
actually, the speedo is still there, just in the background of the NAV. makes it even harder to see your speed w/ the NAV going. i liked the gen1 chrono pack so that you could have both your speedo & tach above the steering wheel and other gauges such as oil, water, etc where the center speedo was. bring it back MINI!
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #10  
Zman's Avatar
Zman
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Upstate New York
really fast ususally means more weight

the MCS/MC excel in quicker times through turns. they hold their own on small/tight courses against many other cars from what i have read on the net and magazines. for only $3k more, you should at least try the MCS...

that said, the lighter 15 inch standard wheels make the MC pretty fun to drive under most conditions.

Originally Posted by Duffer
Thanks for the feedback, in answer to TheBigNewt, I did not drive the MCS. My assumption is that if I want something really fast (for track use, etc.) I would probably go with one of the other cars I mentioned.
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #11  
srfrman7's Avatar
srfrman7
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
I really want to test drive the new MC 6 speed.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 07:55 AM
  #12  
Duffer's Avatar
Duffer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, NC
Porsche Cayman

I test drove the Cayman yesterday.

Positives
Sounds incredible
Probably the stiffest chassis I've ever driven.
Almost certainly the best handling of any car in my short list (see 1st post)

Negatives
Small, very tight cockpit, footwells are tiny.
Particularly rough ride
Hard to imagine a long trip in this car, good 2nd car if you have the room.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sevin
1st Gear
126
May 2, 2026 06:11 AM
Finhead
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
105
Aug 14, 2023 07:51 AM
Bublik
Stock Problems/Issues
13
Feb 18, 2023 11:09 AM
theblackfalcon
JCW Garage
5
Oct 11, 2015 09:49 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:17 PM.