R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 After three years with an MC, I finally drive an "S"...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #1  
resmini's Avatar
resmini
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
After three years with an MC, I finally drive an "S"...

Local Ford dealer used car lot has a CR/CR 06 MCS. I stopped in today and they tossed me the keys for a drive.

Yes, it has more power than my MC, although, not as much as I expected from reading MC vs MCS post. The ride was a bit stiffer, though not bad. Also, I'm one of the few who prefer the standard seats......the sport seats aren't made for wide rear ends and the flatter standard seats are more comfortable to me.

I like the grab handle for the passenger.

I noticed a little light on the end of the wiper control stalk, what is it for?

Anyway, I concluded that I'm still very happy with my MC. This was fortunate because they were asking over $26,000 for the 06 with premium and sport packages, DSC and Xenon headlights. Isn't that more than MSRP?

Looking forward to driving an 07, both Cooper and MCS.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #2  
Donna/Mike's Avatar
Donna/Mike
Sand Dollar Collector
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,249
Likes: 2
From: Moved from Leesburg, VA to Oceanside, CA Nov. 2003
Originally Posted by resmini

I noticed a little light on the end of the wiper control stalk, what is it for?
It flashes when the wiper fluid is low or out...

Donna
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #3  
clarkdr81's Avatar
clarkdr81
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, VA
Originally Posted by resmini
Yes, it has more power than my MC, although, not as much as I expected from reading MC vs MCS post.
That's the same reaction I had when I drove and MCS.

Originally Posted by resmini
I noticed a little light on the end of the wiper control stalk, what is it for?
My 06 Cooper has that as well.

Originally Posted by resmini
This was fortunate because they were asking over $26,000 for the 06 with premium and sport packages, DSC and Xenon headlights. Isn't that more than MSRP?
I've noticed non-MINI dealers sell used MINIs for outrageous prices. The sad thing is that there are probably a lot of people that pay more for a used MINI than they would if they bought it new.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #4  
Jen's Avatar
Jen
6th Gear
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
From: Sword Mountain
We have an MC (mine) and and MCS (the husbands) in the family. Recently, my MC was in the shop for a week and I drove the MCS daily. While I appreciated the extra pick up power, the more comfortable steering wheel (I have the first generation wheel without the litte bumps for your thumbs), and a few other things ... I was REALLY glad to get back into my MC. I also prefer the standard seats to the sport seats.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #5  
DaCrema's Avatar
DaCrema
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 970
Likes: 1
From: Metro Washington D. C.
Originally Posted by clarkdr81
I've noticed non-MINI dealers sell used MINIs for outrageous prices. The sad thing is that there are probably a lot of people that pay more for a used MINI than they would if they bought it new.
I think it is more a way to get a person in the dealership. "hear drive this MCS.... oh that is too much cash, most likely what you would pay at the MINI Dealership.... Let me show you what we can put you into. Our car gets much better gas milage...."

If gas is the selling point for a customer they will sell the relative price and gas mileage of thier cars, if power is the selling point they will sell the Mustang. An unspecting buyer would not know what the price point on an MCS is. Most people going to a Ford dealer would not be looking for a car that handles well (not true for the Ford GT folks).

Just my guess.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #6  
oldtrojan66's Avatar
oldtrojan66
4th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 386
Likes: 1
From: East Central Indiana
I believe the lighted wiper stalk is the alarm system indicator. HTH
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #7  
gokartride's Avatar
gokartride
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 38,578
Likes: 2
If the light at the end of the stalk was red, it was a MINI alarm, if it was yellow, it was washer fluid.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #8  
resmini's Avatar
resmini
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Jen
We have an MC (mine) and and MCS (the husbands) in the family. Recently, my MC was in the shop for a week and I drove the MCS daily. While I appreciated the extra pick up power, the more comfortable steering wheel (I have the first generation wheel without the litte bumps for your thumbs), and a few other things ... I was REALLY glad to get back into my MC. I also prefer the standard seats to the sport seats.
I noticed your MC is an 03 also. Is it a manual? My "crummy" Midland 5-speed tranny shifts a lot smoother than the Getrag 6-speed, at least the one in the MCS I drove.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #9  
BECOKA's Avatar
BECOKA
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale CA
I purchased an MC and 1 week before delivery I decided to try driving an MCS. The decision was pretty clear, I stayed with my MC. The MCS was a blast but I would be too tempted to get a few speeding tickets and my MC has just enough pep to be fun.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #10  
kenchan's Avatar
kenchan
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31,439
Likes: 4
i think the MC's are quick off the line, just about as fast as MCS
unless the MCS is in race mode and drops the clutch or something.
but you don't do that all the time so they feel about the same.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #11  
Mark C.'s Avatar
Mark C.
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Greater Hartford, CT
The MC is okay off the line, but try a 30-50 or 50-70 MPH run and it is downright anemic compared to the S... As for the tranny, the 5-speed is more rubbery, but not what I'd call "smoother."

I'm not trying to hate on the MC. It's a fantastic car, but in terms of straight-line performance and shift feel, there is a reason that the S exists.

Originally Posted by kenchan
i think the MC's are quick off the line, just about as fast as MCS
unless the MCS is in race mode and drops the clutch or something.
but you don't do that all the time so they feel about the same.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #12  
ma78's Avatar
ma78
Coordinator :: Super Secret Orange County MINI Cooper Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by Mark C.
The MC is okay off the line, but try a 30-50 or 50-70 MPH run and it is downright anemic compared to the S... As for the tranny, the 5-speed is more rubbery, but not what I'd call "smoother."

I'm not trying to hate on the MC. It's a fantastic car, but in terms of straight-line performance and shift feel, there is a reason that the S exists.

No argument here. The supercharger may have something to do with that. Just a guess.
I am still impressed with what the Cooper can do on it's high-end; especially when you consider the HP difference. The Cooper is still a lot of fun on the high end.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:05 PM
  #13  
PKAT's Avatar
PKAT
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: South West Fl.
The Ford dealer here in Port Charlotte has one ( there were two) 2005 MCS, 6 speed and Nav panel. They are asking $28000. +
Nothing special about them. The old adage "there a sucker born every day"
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #14  
carrotzilla's Avatar
carrotzilla
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Florida
[FONT=Arial]I’ve owned a wide variety of cars not to mention more than my goodly share of sport bikes so I feel comfortable in saying that the MINI S is the hands down best handling cage I’ve ever piloted. When gassing up my wife’s Beetle convertible, it feels like I’m steering a cloud. The standard MINI is not bad but for a few $’s more why not get the S? The wicked awesome 6 speed is more than worth the expense not to mention the S corners like it’s painted on the road! [/FONT]
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #15  
gokartride's Avatar
gokartride
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 38,578
Likes: 2
I've driven some fantastic MCSs, but I always come back to my Cooper and am perfectly happy...it just feels right to me. That is why I will be getting another.

Mark is right...there is a reason the MCS exists. Those reasons don't align with my driving needs/wants, but I most definitely do respect it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #16  
AlpinaM3's Avatar
AlpinaM3
1st Gear
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
If you can't notice a 50 HP difference then what can I say. IMO the MC and MCS have their differences in interior and all but when you push it past 3500 rpm it is quite evident that the MCS is better. When I am in my 03 MCS just putting around the city in 2000 - 3000 rpm it really would not matter at all.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
wonderboy's Avatar
wonderboy
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by AlpinaM3
If you can't notice a 50 HP difference then what can I say. IMO the MC and MCS have their differences in interior and all but when you push it past 3500 rpm it is quite evident that the MCS is better.
I think you meant to say "faster," not "better."
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 09:18 PM
  #18  
johnnymg's Avatar
johnnymg
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by clarkdr81
That's the same reaction I had when I drove and MCS.



My 06 Cooper has that as well.



I've noticed non-MINI dealers sell used MINIs for outrageous prices. The sad thing is that there are probably a lot of people that pay more for a used MINI than they would if they bought it new.
Why is that?????? I see crazy high prices on the nam for-sale forum too. People must be nuts to pay these prices.

JohnG
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 09:33 PM
  #19  
resmini's Avatar
resmini
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Mark C.
The MC is okay off the line, but try a 30-50 or 50-70 MPH run and it is downright anemic compared to the S... As for the tranny, the 5-speed is more rubbery, but not what I'd call "smoother."

I'm not trying to hate on the MC. It's a fantastic car, but in terms of straight-line performance and shift feel, there is a reason that the S exists.
Maybe there was something wrong with the shifter on the MCS I drove, but my MC Midland isn't "rubbery" at all, just smoother and less "notchie" than the Getrag 6-speed. I don't know what the Getrag 5-speed is like in the 04 and up MC.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 10:11 PM
  #20  
MINIclo's Avatar
MINIclo
7th Gear Gal
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 36,087
Likes: 3
From: Weeblegabber West (aka WLA)
Originally Posted by resmini
Maybe there was something wrong with the shifter on the MCS I drove, but my MC Midland isn't "rubbery" at all, just smoother and less "notchie" than the Getrag 6-speed. I don't know what the Getrag 5-speed is like in the new MC.
How many miles were on the MCS, res? I had an '02 Cooper with the Midlands tranny and it had a very problematic reverse gear. I really like the Getrag's 6 gears on my 2003 MCS. I'm glad you had the test-drive. It's always fun to compare MINIs.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 10:27 PM
  #21  
wonderboy's Avatar
wonderboy
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
The Midlands box has very good feel, imo. Definitely comparable to the Getrag in this application. It's really about the linkage in these cars, anyway. Once you put a cable between your hand and the gears it's all over. The reason the Midlands has a bad rep is reliability, not feel.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 02:09 AM
  #22  
AKIndiMini's Avatar
AKIndiMini
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,011
Likes: 6
From: Kodiak, AK
I like both the MC and the MCS for different reasons. IMHO, the MC "feels" peppier. Picks up speed in a different way than the MCS. I'd almost say that its a better commuter because the gears aren't spaced as closely together, so you're not shifting as often. The only time I noticed the power difference was in the higher RPMs. The MC started to make noise and lose steam.

The MCS...seems like I shift it very often when commuting. There's times I'll even skip gears just because I can be lazy in traffic. Under acceleration, the MCS doesn't "feel" as peppy, but if you glance at the speedometer, you'll see that it is indeed quicker. It builds speed in such a way that you don't notice it until you look at the speedo and say, "Oh crap! I'm speeding!" The MCS engine really comes alive past 3,000 rpm though, and that's when my grin gets even bigger.

I bought my MCS used, but in all honesty, if instead I found an MC with the same options, I probably wouldn't have thought twice about buying it. They're BOTH loads of fun!
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 04:25 AM
  #23  
jeffc's Avatar
jeffc
7th Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: Orange County NY
When I was shopping for a mini I must have drove 10 different cars about 3 were MC and the rest were MCS. The SC just transforms the car into something special to drive in my opinion.

Both are great cars but if performance is the main driver in your decision the MCS is the way to go.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 06:12 AM
  #24  
resmini's Avatar
resmini
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by MINIclo
How many miles were on the MCS, res? I had an '02 Cooper with the Midlands tranny and it had a very problematic reverse gear. I really like the Getrag's 6 gears on my 2003 MCS. I'm glad you had the test-drive. It's always fun to compare MINIs.
The MCS I drove had 5,700 miles on it. Never had the reverse problem with my Midland....just lucky I guess.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 06:28 AM
  #25  
kenchan's Avatar
kenchan
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31,439
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Mark C.
The MC is okay off the line, but try a 30-50 or 50-70 MPH run and it is downright anemic compared to the S... As for the tranny, the 5-speed is more rubbery, but not what I'd call "smoother."

I'm not trying to hate on the MC. It's a fantastic car, but in terms of straight-line performance and shift feel, there is a reason that the S exists.
imho, it has more to do with the driving habits than anything else.

both MC and MCS are quick cars, but neither one is fast. MCS is
better, but still lacking compared to larger displacement...especially
not on street where low-end torque is wat's needed to be fast.

i like my MCS for its balance, but never really thought about it for
its straight line performance. first thing i told my MA after the test
drive was that this thing's kinda slow... well, you dont tell a
MA you're completely satified with the car until after the deal.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:20 PM.