R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 would these rims fit my mini 03

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #1  
minikania's Avatar
minikania
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
would these rims fit my mini 03

i would like to get front 17x7.5 and 17x8.5 in the rear and the offset is 30 also i have kw coilovers, if you know the springs sit really low i would need a spacer, what size i dont know...... aslo i have the willwood braks.... any help would be great.... pm me if its okay thanks alote again
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #2  
bahawton's Avatar
bahawton
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 459
Likes: 6
From: Renton, Washington
That offset would definitely push the wheels & tires past the arches & cause rubbing.

A spacer would just make the problem worse.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 08:24 AM
  #3  
minikania's Avatar
minikania
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bahawton
That offset would definitely push the wheels & tires past the arches & cause rubbing.

A spacer would just make the problem worse.

i understand that it will cause rubbing, but what if i roll the arches just a little to counter that problem? i mean how much could it really stick out?
my main problem is the fronts.... because i do have kw's the springs sit really low and i dont want to have any problems with that
 

Last edited by minikania; Jun 7, 2009 at 08:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 09:16 AM
  #4  
OctaneGuy's Avatar
OctaneGuy
Vendor & Moderator :: MINI Camera and Video & c3 club forum
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,967
Likes: 2
From: Anaheim, CA
Just curious, what's the point of staggering wider wheels in the back on a front wheel drive car?

Originally Posted by minikania
i would like to get front 17x7.5 and 17x8.5 in the rear and the offset is 30 also i have kw coilovers, if you know the springs sit really low i would need a spacer, what size i dont know...... aslo i have the willwood braks.... any help would be great.... pm me if its okay thanks alote again
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 09:56 AM
  #5  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Originally Posted by OctaneGuy
Just curious, what's the point of staggering wider wheels in the back on a front wheel drive car?
For the aesthetic purposes of achieving a proper looking stance. Also, there's more room in the back. You can easily fit nines on the rear to get that wide wheel, deep lip look...but fitting 9's up front can be incredibly difficult so people often run thinner wheels up front...7.5's or 8's.

You'll be able to fit them with some work. You'll need to stretch the tires on the rear...but wider, lower offset wheels have been fit on MINI's before. Your front's shouldn't be a worry...just throw some 205/40's on them.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #6  
OctaneGuy's Avatar
OctaneGuy
Vendor & Moderator :: MINI Camera and Video & c3 club forum
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,967
Likes: 2
From: Anaheim, CA
I understand that..but I thought the purpose of wider rims in the back was for more traction on rear wheel drive cars? So this has nothing to do with making the MINI perform better, just look better?

Originally Posted by Rally@StanceDesign
For the aesthetic purposes of achieving a proper looking stance. Also, there's more room in the back. You can easily fit nines on the rear to get that wide wheel, deep lip look...but fitting 9's up front can be incredibly difficult so people often run thinner wheels up front...7.5's or 8's.

You'll be able to fit them with some work. You'll need to stretch the tires on the rear...but wider, lower offset wheels have been fit on MINI's before. Your front's shouldn't be a worry...just throw some 205/40's on them.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 10:18 AM
  #7  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Originally Posted by OctaneGuy
I understand that..but I thought the purpose of wider rims in the back was for more traction on rear wheel drive cars? So this has nothing to do with making the MINI perform better, just look better?
Yes, entirely for looks. Definitely not for the race cars out there.

For performance oriented cars, you'd stagger the fronts wider.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #8  
OctaneGuy's Avatar
OctaneGuy
Vendor & Moderator :: MINI Camera and Video & c3 club forum
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,967
Likes: 2
From: Anaheim, CA
Aww ok got it. Thanks!

Originally Posted by Rally@StanceDesign
Yes, entirely for looks. Definitely not for the race cars out there.

For performance oriented cars, you'd stagger the fronts wider.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 10:34 AM
  #9  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Some people are interested in good lap times at the track days but aren't worried about their stance looking good. Others are interested in having a stance that looks good but aren't worried that their lap times would be a few seconds slower. Different strokes for different folks

To the OP-

These are 16x8 et33 205/40. About as flush to the arches as you can get. You can use an offset calculator to compare your setup to this one. You'll poke a little more (9mm) so some arch trimming and tire stretch will be required to avoid rubbing at lowered ride heights...but they will fit with proper tire sizing.

 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 04:49 PM
  #10  
minikania's Avatar
minikania
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Rally@StanceDesign
Some people are interested in good lap times at the track days but aren't worried about their stance looking good. Others are interested in having a stance that looks good but aren't worried that their lap times would be a few seconds slower. Different strokes for different folks

To the OP-

These are 16x8 et33 205/40. About as flush to the arches as you can get. You can use an offset calculator to compare your setup to this one. You'll poke a little more (9mm) so some arch trimming and tire stretch will be required to avoid rubbing at lowered ride heights...but they will fit with proper tire sizing.


great thanks for the input, my main issue is that i have kw' coilovers and the springs sit really low at the front and when i put my car down low i mite hit the wheel, all im saying is if the offset on the rim 30, is okay or would i need some spacers
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #11  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Originally Posted by minikania
great thanks for the input, my main issue is that i have kw' coilovers and the springs sit really low at the front and when i put my car down low i mite hit the wheel, all im saying is if the offset on the rim 30, is okay or would i need some spacers
That's really gonna depend on exactly where the spring perch is for your current height. My buddy had 17x8 et35 wheels that didn't clear so he put on 5mm spacers which helped them clear just fine. This would suggest that your 7.5 et30 would clear ....but it's impossible to say for sure because the spring location varies between each ride height.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #12  
howsoonisnow1985's Avatar
howsoonisnow1985
6th Gear
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz County Jail
Dude the MINI is a FRONT WHEEL Drive!
And a tendency to understeerat 7/10ths?
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #13  
howsoonisnow1985's Avatar
howsoonisnow1985
6th Gear
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz County Jail
I Do Not Speak Swahili

Originally Posted by OctaneGuy
Just curious, what's the point of staggering wider wheels in the back on a front wheel drive car?
Originally Posted by Rally@StanceDesign
For the aesthetic purposes of achieving a proper looking stance. Also, there's more room in the back. You can easily fit nines on the rear to get that wide wheel, deep lip look...but fitting 9's up front can be incredibly difficult so people often run thinner wheels up front...7.5's or 8's.

You'll be able to fit them with some work. You'll need to stretch the tires on the rear...but wider, lower offset wheels have been fit on MINI's before. Your front's shouldn't be a worry...just throw some 205/40's on them.
I really don't understand either, its Swahili to me too Octane. Rally please talk him out of it, tell'em to go with your buddys fitment of 16x7.5 with 5mm spacers all around, a GAZILLION time better traction, especially with 225/50-16s. But it took me 4 years to buy something I knew was useless, but I always thought it looked good, but looks could not justify the $400 price tag. So, I got more back in taxes than usual, and found a JCW Alcantara Steering Wheel for $351 at Morristown, and bought it. Although completly senseless, I don't regret it, but I am not sure if I would spend on a mod, that common sense dictates a loss of performance and even saftey issues during spited driving.
 

Last edited by howsoonisnow1985; Jun 9, 2009 at 01:44 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #14  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Originally Posted by howsoonisnow1985
I really don't understand either, its Swahili to me too Octane. Rally please talk him out of it
I'm probably the wrong person to ask to talk people out of it. I was the first person to run rear stagger on a MINI and I absolutely love it. My r50 had stagger and my current R55 has stagger...I don't plan on ever changing that.

My car (as well as many MINIs) will never see a track. Running one inch wider in the rear will make VERY VERY little difference in day to day driving. Certainly not something that would ever cause safety issues. There were 3 or 4 staggered setups at the dragon which is about as intense as a public road gets and we had no issues with handling.

225/50/16's might provide a little more traction, but if you're just using your car to drive to work...who cares? A little extra traction making a right turn at a red light isn't something to worry about. My car is a normal daily driver, not a race car, I don't need the extra traction so I opted for a more aesthetically pleasing tire size that doesn't cause rubbing problems. The same is probably true for the original poster.

Like I said....different strokes for different folks. I understand and appreciate both schools of modifying.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #15  
bahawton's Avatar
bahawton
4th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 459
Likes: 6
From: Renton, Washington
I had to really carve up my rear wheel arches/liners/rear bumper to make sure my 16 x 7s W42mm off-set & 225/50R16s didn't rub...

It seems like the proposed set-up would be great to look at- Painful to drive : (
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 06:03 PM
  #16  
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 8
From: oh10
Originally Posted by bahawton
I had to really carve up my rear wheel arches/liners/rear bumper to make sure my 16 x 7s W42mm off-set & 225/50R16s didn't rub...

It seems like the proposed set-up would be great to look at- Painful to drive : (
There's a big difference between the proposed tire sizing and the sizing you ran. It should be entirely possible to avoid any serious rubbing with his proposed setup. 225 is a really big tire, so it's understandable that you'd have to do some trimming.

I ran 15x8.5 et8 with 205's on my r50, and it was a great pleasure to drive. Very little rubbing. Tire sizing is very important when dealing with aggressive stances.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ECSTuning
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 7, 2015 08:02 AM
ECSTuning
Interior/Exterior Products
0
Aug 7, 2015 05:56 AM
ECSTuning
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 7, 2015 05:55 AM
ECSTuning
Interior/Exterior Products
0
Aug 5, 2015 02:11 PM
ECSTuning
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 5, 2015 02:10 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:52 AM.