Off-Topic :: Autos Interested in discussing other autos? This is the place!

I keep hearing how people say more than 200whp and a FWD car is undrivable

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #1  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
I keep hearing how people say more than 300whp and a FWD car is undrivable

I keep hearing how people say more than 300whp and a FWD car is undrivable. I was wondering the reasoning behind this. I know there's people who thing you don't need any more than that. That's not the people I want to hear from. I'd like to hear from those who think 200whp+ would not be controllable on the street as a daily driver. I'm not here to argue points, but to try to understand your reasoning.

*Note: please note the HP figures are in WHP not BHP which most cars are advertised at.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #2  
Samurai Will's Avatar
Samurai Will
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Whoops, misunderstood.

The only reason 200+ HP on a FWD car would be undrivable is if the driver can't handle it, or doesn't know how to compensate. 200+ HP on a car that has 5' wide front tires would be difficult, but not undrivable...
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #3  
Eric_Rowland's Avatar
Eric_Rowland
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,382
Likes: 47
From: Santa Cruz, CA
It would be an overstatement to say it's 'undriveable'. The issue with high HP FWD is that you're asking one set of wheels to both channel 200HP to the ground and steer (and brake.) That's a lot to ask.
That said, there are 200HP MINIs out there, and lots of Hondas. You only get the 200HP way up in the rev range, so you get to choose when you harness those horses.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #4  
Uncle_John's Avatar
Uncle_John
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 16,274
Likes: 1
From: right next to a Diet Coke
Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
I keep hearing how people say more than 200whp and a FWD car is undrivable. I was wondering the reasoning behind this. I know there's people who thing you don't need any more than that. That's not the people I want to hear from. I'd like to hear from those who thing 200whp+ would not be controllable on the street as a daily driver. I'm not here to argue points, but to try to understand your reasoning.
Go back with me to 1966 and the Olds Toronado. 425 ci V8 with 370 - 380 hp. The owner of the gas station where I worked had one. I don't remember it being undrivable. I'd not want to put 400+hp through the MINI gear box on a regular basis, but I know of nothing magic about 200 hp and front wheel drive. The pieces have to be stout enough to handle the torque.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #5  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by Uncle_John
I'd not want to put 400+hp through the MINI gear box on a regular basis, The pieces have to be stout enough to handle the torque.
we have put over 400 WHP through the tranny with LSD...with slicks...so far so good...you will loose an axel before you loose the tranny from what we have seen so far...gettrag goooood!
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #6  
Squirlz's Avatar
Squirlz
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 3
From: Okemos, Michigan
Never heard anybody say that...maybe you're hanging out with the wrong crowd
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #7  
Brain1.0's Avatar
Brain1.0
Manufacturer
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by Tuls
gettrag goooood!
YUP YUP !

I have 200whp and its actually starting to feel rather run of the mill, not hardly undrivable in any way, it only goes as fast as you push the long pedal.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #8  
Uncle_John's Avatar
Uncle_John
6th Gear
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 16,274
Likes: 1
From: right next to a Diet Coke
Originally Posted by Tuls
we have put over 400 WHP through the tranny with LSD...with slicks...so far so good...you will loose an axel before you loose the tranny from what we have seen so far...gettrag goooood!
That's good info. As tuners continue to up the power, the weak pieces will make themselves known. Undrivable, no. Stuff break, could happen.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #9  
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 6
From: Lansdale, PA
Since I am running on 175/65-15 snows, I agree. Wheelspin is fun but controllable.

Originally Posted by Samurai Will
200+ HP on a car that has 5' wide front tires would be difficult, but not undrivable...
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 10:35 PM
  #10  
BFG9000's Avatar
BFG9000
5th Gear
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Just go down to the Dodge store and test drive an SRT-4 to see for yourself how "undrivable" it is. 230hp/250 lb-ft and front-drive is perfectly manageable with modern street tires, though not necessarily any faster than with less power. 355hp/365 lb-ft from the top dealer-installed and fully warranted Mopar "Stage 3" kit too: http://www.mopar.com/street/products_srt4_stage3.htm
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #11  
ScuderiaMini's Avatar
ScuderiaMini
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,431
Likes: 0
From: Boerne/SAtown TX
i really wanna do that, just for the heck of it

Originally Posted by BFG9000
Just go down to the Dodge store and test drive an SRT-4 to see for yourself how "undrivable" it is. 230hp/250 lb-ft and front-drive is perfectly manageable with modern street tires, though not necessarily any faster than with less power. 355hp/365 lb-ft from the top dealer-installed and fully warranted Mopar "Stage 3" kit too: http://www.mopar.com/street/products_srt4_stage3.htm
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #12  
kenchan's Avatar
kenchan
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31,439
Likes: 4
if the map was a sudden spool it would be hard to control especially
coming out of a turn or from a standstill.



Originally Posted by dominicminicoopers
I keep hearing how people say more than 200whp and a FWD car is undrivable. I was wondering the reasoning behind this. I know there's people who thing you don't need any more than that. That's not the people I want to hear from. I'd like to hear from those who thing 200whp+ would not be controllable on the street as a daily driver. I'm not here to argue points, but to try to understand your reasoning.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 01:17 AM
  #13  
mybroscoop's Avatar
mybroscoop
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: ann arbor michigan
if you can modulate the acclerator, you should have zero problems driving a 200 hp fwd car!
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 05:10 AM
  #14  
SpiderX's Avatar
SpiderX
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mybroscoop
if you can modulate the acclerator, you should have zero problems driving a 200 hp fwd car!
I agree with this completely....... I think my Mini is very easy to drive and modulates well.......not peaky and no surprises.......it was wierd the other day putting the pedal to the metal on a Boxster S and feel the rear wheels break.......(I kind of liked it )
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #15  
kenchan's Avatar
kenchan
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31,439
Likes: 4
i had a nitrous kit on my 98 prelude...had to aim then fire. blew away
vettes. bye bye v8. (well, it was an older one with an anus driver).
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 11:19 AM
  #16  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
It's about weight transfer.

If you gas it, the weight transfer it to the rear wheels. that's why rear drivers will do better 1/4 mile times than a front driver. But undrivable, that's just BS. The guy that told you that is speaking out his a$$. He's just quoting stuff that he doesn't understand to sound like a wise person, and comes off as a smart-***!

Matt
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #17  
JCWGurl's Avatar
JCWGurl
Coordinator :: Manitoba MINI Motoring Club
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB
I agree that it's totally driveable. HOWEVER...it does spin on the factory performance run-flats tires and the winter X-ice (haven't tried R compounds yet) from a stand still....you need to get a little roll going. And it will spin the winter tires in 1,2,3rd gear if you push it. The only problem with it is a little torque steer (spelling? ) when changing gears but that is something you can easily learn to accept and expect.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 01:03 PM
  #18  
kenchan's Avatar
kenchan
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31,439
Likes: 4
yah, torque steer is one thing I don't like about FF's. otherwise very fun
to drive. on FR you get a slight wiggle sometimes at full launch with
light tire spin. some people don't like that.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #19  
ScuderiaMini's Avatar
ScuderiaMini
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,431
Likes: 0
From: Boerne/SAtown TX
yeah, i get the same pleasure on daily basis against Hondas, Acuras, and some Bimmers, VWs

Originally Posted by kenchan
i had a nitrous kit on my 98 prelude...had to aim then fire. blew away
vettes. bye bye v8. (well, it was an older one with an anus driver).
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #20  
Tüls's Avatar
Tüls
Turbius Maximus
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Infinity and beyond
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
But undrivable, that's just BS. The guy that told you that is speaking out his a$$. He's just quoting stuff that he doesn't understand to sound like a wise person, and comes off as a smart-***!

Matt
hmmm, hey Dom who was it who said that again?
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 03:45 AM
  #21  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Tuls
hmmm, hey Dom who was it who said that again?
I remember it being said here on NAM (or was it Mini2) in a thread (which I think got deleted due to it's unruly nature) about super high HP MINIs, and then there was one definately posted on motoringfile.com (I think it was in regards to a special version of the JCW kit rumored to have 225+ hp).
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #22  
CooperSigma's Avatar
CooperSigma
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
I would have to say that I don't think that 200HP in a FWD car is "undriveable" considering that most of the Japanese "sporty" cars are making better than that as is.

I think a better statement would be that a 300hp or better FWD car starts to test the limits of useability. I mean, how many twincharged Minis do you know of kicking *** at autocross? With that much power, traction becomes a problem. Hell, ask the SRT-4 crowd what their cars would be like with over 300whp, without an LSD.

It wouldn't be pretty.

Which is why for me, if a car has more than 300whp, it's gotta be AWD or RD. Why waste power?
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 10:12 AM
  #23  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 5
From: Woodside, CA
I still don't buy it...

Originally Posted by CooperSigma
I would have to say that I don't think that 200HP in a FWD car is "undriveable" considering that most of the Japanese "sporty" cars are making better than that as is.

I think a better statement would be that a 300hp or better FWD car starts to test the limits of useability. I mean, how many twincharged Minis do you know of kicking *** at autocross? With that much power, traction becomes a problem. Hell, ask the SRT-4 crowd what their cars would be like with over 300whp, without an LSD.

It wouldn't be pretty.

Which is why for me, if a car has more than 300whp, it's gotta be AWD or RD. Why waste power?
Quoting HP without regard to car weight etc is rather pointless. Look at the reference to the Olds Toranado above. Sure the thing was a tank, but a very powerful front drive one. With that big fat iron V8 sitting on top of the tires, it could use a whole lot more of the torque before things got squirly....

So blanket comments are ususally pretty much useless.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #24  
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by CooperSigma
I think a better statement would be that a 300hp or better FWD car starts to test the limits of useability.
Can you expound on this statement? I'd like to learn how useability is affected by having 300+ hp in a FWD car like the MINI.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #25  
CooperSigma's Avatar
CooperSigma
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
Quoting HP without regard to car weight etc is rather pointless. Look at the reference to the Olds Toranado above. Sure the thing was a tank, but a very powerful front drive one. With that big fat iron V8 sitting on top of the tires, it could use a whole lot more of the torque before things got squirly....

So blanket comments are ususally pretty much useless.

Matt
Since I was speaking more for modern cars than for old cars that weigh more than 4000 lbs, I think my statement was fine as is. I took from the initial statement that we were speaking of modern cars in general, not ALL cars. I daresay a high HP Olds Toronado would be easier to drive than a high HP SRT-4, would you agree?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:10 PM.